<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531</id><updated>2011-11-27T15:29:42.377-08:00</updated><category term='BOOK OF PSALMS 3'/><category term='HOLINESS'/><category term='Intertestamental Period'/><category term='LORD JESU CHRIST'/><category term='JESUS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS'/><category term='BOOK OF PSALMS 1'/><category term='Hities-1'/><category term='BOOK OF PSALMS 5'/><category term='Jeremiah 3'/><category term='BOOK OF PSALMS 9'/><category term='FAITHFULNESS'/><category term='BOOK OF REVELATION'/><category term='Do you really believe the story of Jonah'/><category term='BOOK OF PSALMS 7'/><category term='BIBLE STUDY METHODS'/><category term='Jeremiah 1'/><category term='A chronology of bible events and world events'/><category term='BOOK OF PSALMS 4'/><category term='Songs'/><category term='BOOK OF PSALMS 2'/><category term='BOOK OF PSALMS 8'/><category term='Jeremiah 4'/><category term='Kingdom of God is within you'/><category term='ADAM’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE'/><category term='Jeremiah 2'/><category term='BOOK OF PSALMS 6'/><category term='GOSPEL OF JOHN'/><title type='text'>BIBLE STUDY</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>27</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-16762432780137808</id><published>2008-08-21T23:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-21T23:30:18.260-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GOSPEL OF JOHN'/><title type='text'>GOSPEL OF JOHN</title><content type='html'>1. Palestine: Galilee, Samaria, Judah, and also crossed Jordan River.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Jn.4:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galilee was the beginning ministry of Jesus,&lt;br /&gt;Nazareth caparnahum,Cana, macbella, and Bethesda &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ch.1:45. 45 Philip went to look for Nathanael and told him, “We have found the very person Moses* and the prophets wrote about! His name is Jesus, the son of Joseph from Nazareth.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are many person  named Jesus. So he was called Jesus of Nazareth foe theidentification.&lt;br /&gt;Ch.2: 12. 12 After the wedding he went to Capernaum for a few days with his mother, his brothers, and his disciples.&lt;br /&gt;Ch. 6: 17, 59. Jesus Walks on Water 16 That evening Jesus’ disciples went down to the shore to wait for him. 17 But as darkness fell and Jesus still hadn’t come back, they got into the boat and headed across the lake toward Capernaum. 18 Soon a gale swept down upon them, and the sea grew very rough. 19 They had rowed three or four miles* when suddenly they saw Jesus walking on the water toward the boat. They were terrified, 20 but he called out to them, “Don’t be afraid. I am here!*” 21 Then they were eager to let him in the boat, and immediately they arrived at their destination!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;53 So Jesus said again, “I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you cannot have eternal life within you. 54 But anyone who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise that person at the last day. 55 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. 56 Anyone who eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him. 57 I live because of the living Father who sent me; in the same way, anyone who feeds on me will live because of me. 58 I am the true bread that came down from heaven. Anyone who eats this bread will not die as your ancestors did (even though they ate the manna) but will live forever.” 59 He said these things while he was teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Ch.20: 1. The Resurrection 1 Early on Sunday morning,* while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene came to the tomb and found that the stone had been rolled away from the entrance. 2 She ran and found Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one whom Jesus loved. She said, “They have taken the Lord’s body out of the tomb, and we don’t know where they have put him!”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ch.19:25&lt;br /&gt;25 Standing near the cross were Jesus’ mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary (the wife of Clopas), and Mary Magdalene. 26 When Jesus saw his mother standing there beside the disciple he loved, he said to her, “Dear woman, here is your son.” 27 And he said to this disciple, “Here is your mother.” And from then on this disciple took her into his home.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Synoptic Gospel &lt;br /&gt;SYNOPTIC GOSPELS The phrase “Synoptic Gospels” is a term applied to the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. This is because they describe the ministry of Jesus from generally the same point of view, which is quite different from John’s Gospel. The phrase “Synoptic Gospels” literally means “same view.” There are many similarities among these three Gospels. They all include the use of a common outline, beginning for example with an introduction; ministry of John the Baptist and the baptism and temptation of Jesus. Also, they all include Jesus’ greater Galilean ministry; his journey and ministry through Samaria, Perea, and rural Judea; and the Passion week, death, and resurrection of Jesus in Jerusalem. The books also record the same emphasis in the teaching of Jesus—the presence, nature, and fulfillment of the kingdom of God. Furthermore, these three Gospels relate much of the same material, usually in the same order, and often with similar or identical words. In addition to similarities, there are also striking differences among the three Gospels. These fall into the same general categories as do the similarities—outline, material, organization, and wording. Matthew and Luke also have considerable common material not found in Mark. Except for the healing of the centurion’s slave, Mark is composed exclusively of the words and teachings of Jesus. Each Gospel also contains accounts and teachings that are unique. The result is a rich diversity within the unity of the Gospels. Each provides portrayals of Jesus from a variety of viewpoints. Matthew emphasizes Jesus’ Jewishness and the continuity of his person and work with the message of the Old Testament. Mark’s fast-moving account presents Jesus as a man of action, the Son of Man who was a servant among men. Luke, in Greek literary style, addresses cultured Gentiles and shows Jesus as a friend of underprivileged groups. Attempts to account for both the similarities and differences within these Gospels makes up the “synoptic problem.” Solutions have been sought in many ways. As early as the second century, Tatian combined the four accounts into one. Additional “harmonies” of the Gospel accounts have been continually produced. Since the seventeenth century, scholars have attempted to account for the similarities and differences by examining the stages through which the Gospel material is assumed to have passed before coming into its present form. Form criticism attempts to identify the influences from the period of oral transmission. Source or literary criticism considers the alleged written documents from which the evangelists drew information. Redaction (or editorial) criticism seeks to determine the nature or purposes and personalities of the final editor-authors upon the accounts of the activities and teachings of Jesus. Other suggestions have called attention to the adaptation of material for a specific audience. Another looks at the similarities between the synoptic accounts of Jesus’ teachings and the parallel accounts of the Jewish rabbis in the Talmud. No completely satisfactory solution to the synoptic problem is at hand. The fact remains that the Scriptures present Jesus in various perspectives. The conscientious reader must seek the divine purpose of both the similarities and the differences of these proclamations of “the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God” (Mark 1:1).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bethany 1:28.( Bethesda,*)&lt;br /&gt;28 This encounter took place in Bethany, an area east of the Jordan River, where John was baptizing.&lt;br /&gt;Jesus Heals a Lame Man 1 Afterward Jesus returned to Jerusalem for one of the Jewish holy days. 2 Inside the city, near the Sheep Gate, was the pool of Bethesda,* with five covered porches. 3 Crowds of sick people—blind, lame, or paralyzed—lay on the porches.* 5 One of the men lying there had been sick for thirty-eight years. 6 When Jesus saw him and knew he had been ill for a long time, he asked him, “Would you like to get well?”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ch.4&lt;br /&gt;4 He had to go through Samaria on the way. 5 Eventually he came to the Samaritan village of Sychar, near the field that Jacob gave to his son Joseph. 6 Jacob’s well was there; and Jesus, tired from the long walk, sat wearily beside the well about noontime. 7 Soon a Samaritan woman came to draw water, and Jesus said to her, “Please give me a drink.” 8 He was alone at the time because his disciples had gone into the village to buy some food.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PHARISEES AND SADDUCEES The Pharisees and Sadducees were two Jewish religious groups that were mentioned in the New Testament. They met with Jesus and sometimes tried to trick him by asking him difficult questions. Many people today who study the Bible still do not know everything about the Pharisees and the Sadducees. No one is sure when these groups started. In addition, scholars are not absolutely sure about everything the Pharisees and Sadducees believed. Even though it is impossible to know everything about them, when we look at what the Bible tells us, we can have a better understanding of the two groups and the main differences between them.   PHARISEES The Pharisees were a group of religious leaders who lived in Palestine during the time of Jesus’ life and the beginnings of the Christian church.  SADDUCEES Like the Pharisees, the Sadducees were a Jewish group that is mentioned many times in the New Testament but not in the Old Testament.  JEW A Jew in biblical times was a Judean, a person belonging to Judah which is a kingdom that is based on the descendants of one of the twelve sons of Israel (named Judah). The term “Jew” comes from an underlying Hebrew word that was used first in 2 Kings 16:6 as a national term, meaning citizens of Judah. It came into general use in the period of Jeremiah just before the Judeans or Jews were sent into exile in the late sixth century BC (Jeremiah 32:12). In Jeremiah 34:9, a statement concerning the national principle that an individual citizen had the right to freedom from slavery uses the term “Jew.” In Jeremiah 52:28 it is used in giving the number of deported citizens. Once the people were in exile, the term’s national meaning was expanded with a religious one. The Jews were different from surrounding peoples in that they preserved a living religious tradition of one true God. A Jewish-Gentile polarization developed. Thus in Daniel 3:8-12 certain Jews were accused of deviating from otherwise acceptable Babylonian religious practices. The book of Esther is concerned with the problem of Jewish identity and survival in a hostile environment. Esther 8:17 speaks of Gentiles declaring themselves Jews in the religious sense of becoming proselytes. After the exile, the strongly religious meaning of “Jew” is expressed in the prophecy of Zechariah 8:23 that the Jew would be courted by Gentiles because God was with him. In Ezra 4:12 the term “Jews” is the national designation of the returned exiles, as it is in the book of Nehemiah (see Nehemiah 1:2; Nehemiah 4:2). In Nehemiah 13:24, there is a reference to the social exclusiveness of the Jews: on religious grounds, marriage to foreigners is deplored. In the New Testament, “Jew” continues to have the same national and/or religious meaning. Culturally, Jews have religious and other customs that New Testament documents addressed to Gentiles find it necessary to explain (Mark 7:3; John 5:1). Jews are contrasted with Gentiles (Acts 11:19), Samaritans (John 4:9, 22), and proselytes (Acts 2:10). Jewish Christians can be called “Jews” (Galatians 2:13), but there is an increasing stress on the religious distinctions between Jew and Christian. In Romans 2:17-29, Paul gives an interesting theological analysis of the term “Jew.” He is at pains to emphasize that the true meaning of the word lies not in outward religious profession but in an inward attitude to God. Paul was doubtless thinking of the inadequacy of his own life as a Jew before he was converted to the Christian faith (Philippians 3:3-6). His mention of “praise” in Romans 2:29 is a play on words: in Hebrew, Judah means praise (Genesis 29:35; Genesis 49:8). The apostle Paul is here regarding Christianity as the true heir of the faith of the Old Testament. Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9 express similar sentiments: to be truly a Jew is much more than a matter of birth and synagogue observance. Underlying these passages in both Revelation and Romans is obviously the issue of the messianic claims of Jesus (Romans 10:1-4). The New Testament bears sad testimony to the opposition of Jews to the Christian message. The gospel proved a cause of offense to the Jews (1 Corinthians 1:23). Paul himself, despite his claim of impeccable Jewish credentials (Acts 26:4-7), found himself the object of bitter Jewish attacks (Acts 21:11; Acts 23:12, 27). Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9 describe the Jews’ opposition as satanic: they were carrying out the work of God’s adversary, Satan. These negative overtones are especially attached to the use of the word “Jew” in John’s Gospel. It is found many more times than in any of the other Gospels. In some passages, the word is not associated with hostility, but in most cases the fourth Gospel uses “Jews” for the religious authorities, especially those in Jerusalem, who were hostile to Jesus (John 5:18; John 9:18; John 18:36). In John 9:22, the parents of the blind man, clearly Jews themselves, are said, literally, to fear the investigating Jews. In John 18:14 “Jews” stands for the chief priests and Pharisees of John 18:3. The author, who was obviously a Jew himself, was not expressing an anti-Semitic viewpoint. He condemned not race or people but those who opposed Jesus. He gladly acknowledged that some Jews put their faith in Jesus (John 8:31; John 11:45: John 12:11). Nathanael is featured as a type of the Christian Jew, a true Israelite “in whom is no guile” (John 1:47; see also Genesis 27:35; Genesis 32:28).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DIASPORA OF THE JEWS The Diaspora refers to the spreading out of the Jewish people from Israel to foreign lands. This occurred as the Jews were forced to leave their homeland due to war, captivity, or other persecution. It is also known as the Dispersion. The word means a “sowing” or “scattering.” It can also mean “exile.” The word occurs twice in the New Testament (James 1:1; 1 Peter 1:1). Both times it refers to Christian Jews living outside Palestine as a result of the several dispersions in Israel’s history. Diaspora sometimes refers to the exiled people, sometimes to the place of exile.   MAJOR DIASPORAS From the end of the eighth century BC onward, Jewish history was marked by several major dispersions.   DIASPORA OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM After Solomon’s death, his kingdom broke in two. The northern kingdom of Israel sunk deeper into idolatry and immorality (2 Kings 17:14-18). Jeroboam, the first king of the divided Israel, established a pattern of falling away from the faith. The Old Testament regularly records that succeeding kings “did not turn from the sins of Jeroboam” (10:31; 13:11; 14:24; 15:9, 18, 24, 28, RSV). Assyria conquered the northern kingdom in 722 BC. They took more than 27,000 Israelites into exile, as had been predicted (2 Kings 17:23). They were settled in cities near the Euphrates River and in Media, areas of ancient Asia. Assyrians from cities around Babylon, in turn, colonized Israel (17:6, 24).   DIASPORA OF THE SOUTHERN KINGDOM The southern kingdom of Judah suffered exile to the east in Babylonia and to the south in Egypt. The Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar captured Judeans in several journeys from 605 BC to the fall of Jerusalem in 586 BC. The first expedition to Babylon took Jerusalem’s treasures from the temple and palace. That included “all the princes, and all the mighty men of valor, ten thousand captives, and all the craftsmen and the smiths; none remained, except the poorest people of the land” (2 Kings 24:12-14, RSV; compare 2 Chronicles 36:10; Jeremiah 52:29-30). A year later a second expedition focused on the rebellious Jewish king Zedekiah and his sons (2 Kings 25:1, 6-7; Jeremiah 52:4-11). In the 19th year of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign, Babylonia struck Judah again. This time the temple and the king’s palace were destroyed, and the city’s walls were broken down. All but the very poorest people were carried away captive (2 Kings 25:8-21; Jeremiah 52:12-16). In the 6th century BC, Johanan, a Judean, thought he could escape from Nebuchadnezzar by fleeing to Egypt. Johanan forced Jeremiah and a group of other Jews to go with him. They settled at Migdol, Tahpanhes, and Memphis. Nevertheless, the Babylonians pursued them and took control of Egypt. Many Jews were executed there (Jeremiah 43:5-44:30). Records of property ownership and an altar suggest that the few surviving exiles established permanent colonies in Egypt (Isaiah 19:18-19).   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;OTHER DIASPORAS &lt;br /&gt;The Egyptian king Ptolemy I (323-285 BC) captured many Jews and carried them off to Egypt about 300 BC. Those exiles populated Alexandria. Thereafter, the city was noted as a center of both Greek and Jewish learning. Large colonies of Jews were also sent out from Babylonia to Phrygia and Lydia by Antiochus III (the Great) of Syria (223-187 BC). The Romans sent a sizable group of Jews to Rome. The Roman general Pompey took many there as slaves in the first century BC. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Jews were widely scattered. In the New Testament book of Acts, Luke listed Jerusalem’s visitors: Parthians, Medes, Elamites, people from Mesopotamia, Judea, Cappadocia, Pontus, the province of Asia, Phrygia, Pamphylia, and Egypt. The list also included the areas of Libya toward Cyrene, visitors from Rome (both Jews and converts to Judaism), Cretans, and Arabians (Acts 2:9-11). Those Jews of “the Diaspora” were in Jerusalem to celebrate the Feast of Pentecost. Other Jewish communities were located in the Macedonian cities visited by the apostle Paul. On his missionary journeys he visited Jews in Thessalonica, Berea, and Corinth (Acts 17:1, 10; 18:2-4). Around AD 50, the Roman emperor Claudius commanded all Jews to leave Rome (18:2). The Jewish population in Palestine at the time of Jesus’ birth is estimated from about four to six million. The dispersion population numbered several times that of Palestine. Communities with more than a million each flourished in Asia Minor, Mesopotamia, and Alexandria. Today, even with a national homeland, far more Jews still live outside Israel than inside. In spite of their scatterings, Jews of various diasporas retained a basic unity with Palestinian Jews through several practices.  1. The great national feasts—Passover, Harvest, and Tabernacles (Exodus 23:12-17; Deuteronomy 16:1-17)-continued to be observed abroad. 2. The temple tax used for the temple’s upkeep (Exodus 30:11-16) was collected in foreign Jewish communities even after the temple had been destroyed. 3. All Jews everywhere recognized the authority of the Sanhedrin (the Jewish religious council) over them.   POSITIVE ASPECTS In exile the Jews tended to give up the idol worship that had in part kept them from God. Their exile led them to establish synagogues as places for prayer and education. Jews in Alexandria, Egypt, translated the Old Testament Scriptures into Greek, at that time the international language. From the Christian point of view, the network of dispersed Jewish communities had a special significance. They provided important bases for the spread of Christianity from these communities into the surrounding gentile world. Thus, God used the dispersions to bring the gospel to the Gentiles (Romans 1:11-15; 1 Corinthians 10:11-12). Finally, the arts, sciences, and humanities have been greatly enriched by the Jews scattered throughout Western culture. Few other peoples have endured so much ethnic prejudice as the Jews. Yet, they gave the world cultural gifts and excellence in many areas. The church of Jesus Christ has become a “new Israel” and a “chosen race” (1 Peter 2:9). But the testimony of history and of Scripture indicates that God still has a unique interest in the Jews.&lt;br /&gt;GENTILES Gentiles are people belonging to any of the non-Jewish nations, known as goyim in Hebrew and ethnoi in Greek. According to the Old Testament perspective, there are but two categories of people, the Jews (God’s elect) and the nations. According to the New Testament perspective, salvation is offered to Jew and Gentile alike. Both Peter and Paul took the lead in bringing the gospel to the Gentiles. Paul spent his entire ministry trying to unite Jewish and Gentile Christians into one body, the church.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SAMARIA Samaria was the capital of the northern kingdom of Israel. It is always identified with the hill where the village of Sebastieh is located. The hill was purchased by King Omri from Shemer, the clan who had lived there. King Omri built his new capital there (1 Kings 16:24). This became the center of the northern kingdom and it was prestigious because of King Omri’s family. However, it was also open to attacks. King Ben-hadad of Syria, along with an alliance of 32 kings, attacked Samaria (1 Kings 20), but the Israelites were able to drive them off. During the reign of King Ahab’s son, Joram, Ben-hadad attacked again (2 Kings 6:24-7:20) and almost conquered the city with a siege that lasted a long time. After a series of wars and King Jehu’s efforts to get rid of the priests of Baal in Samaria (2 Kings 10:18-28), the city returned to worshipping the true God while Jehu’s descendents were ruling. Nevertheless, people who worshipped the false god Asherah still lived in parts of Samaria under the leadership of Jehoahaz (2 Kings 13:6). During this time, Syria continued to attack the city and have the upper hand in battle (2 Kings 13:7). During the eighth century BC, the balance of power changed in Israel’s favor (2 Kings 13:14-25), and under King Jeroboam II, Samaria enjoyed great prosperity (2 Kings 14:23-28; Amos 3:10, 15; 4:1, and 6:1, 4-6). However, in the late eighth century BC, internal fighting in Israel allowed the kingdom to be vulnerable to Assyrian attacks (2 Kings 15). Finally, after Galilee, the Transjordan area, and the coastal plain were already conquered, Samaria fell to King Sargon II (2 Kings 18:9-12). During the next few decades, exiles from other countries were ordered by the Assyrians to move to Samaria. During the reign of the Persians in the sixth through fourth centuries B.C., Samaria was the center of an administrative district governed by a dynasty of rulers that included members of the Sanballat family (Nehemiah 2:10). The people who lived in Samaria during this time were called Samaritans. Even though they considered themselves to be part of Israel, they were rejected by the Judeans (Ezra 4:1-3). However, when the Jews of Elephantine wanted to rebuild a temple in Egypt, they asked the Samaritans for help. The ancient historian, Josephus, wrote that when Alexander the Great came to the Levant in 331 BC, the Samaritans gained his favor (Antiquities 11.8.4). Later, however, they rebelled against him and murdered his governor. The Samaritan leaders at this time took refuge in the Wadi Dalieh cave, where they were trapped with their personal documents written on papyrus. These leaders eventually suffocated in the cave. Samaria was taken in 108–107 B.C. (Antiquities 13.10.2 and War 1.2.7) by John Hyrcanus, who destroyed the city. It was rebuilt by Pompey and further restored by Gabinius. King Herod changed the name of the city to Sebaste in honor of Caesar Augustus and he built a large temple for Caesar there. At Sebaste, Herod entertained Agrippa, killed his wife Mariamne, and strangled his sons. During the first Jewish war, the people of Sebaste were conquered and enslaved by the Romans.&lt;br /&gt;SAMARITANS The Samaritans were a sect or group that broke off from the Jews. The group resided north of Judea and south of Galilee. The Samaritans and their Jewish neighbors had a long history of tension and mutual hostility. Jesus’ attitude toward this hated group served as a contrast to the feelings and opinions generally held at that time.   ORIGINS OF THE SECT It is difficult to determine precisely when the Samaritan sect arose and when the final break with Judaism occurred. The Old Testament indicates that the group stemmed from foreign peoples whose worship of God only covered up their underlying idolatry. According to 2 Kings 17, the Samaritan sect arose from the exchange of peoples following Israel’s defeat by Assyria in 722 BC The king of Assyria removed the Israelites from the land, and then brought into the land conquered peoples from Babylon, Cuthah, and various other nations. The Samaritans offer a vastly different interpretation of their origin. They claim they came from the Jewish tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh (John 4:12). They hold that the exile of Israelites in 722 BC by Assyria was neither full-scale nor permanent. The Samaritan version holds that the Jews were guilty of apostasy because they set up heretical sanctuaries during the time of Eli. They should have stayed with the holy place on Mount Gerizim. The Samaritans therefore considered themselves true Israelites in heritage and worship. Assyrian records prove there was an exchange of population in the northern kingdom. Apparently a total expulsion from the land was not carried out (see 2 Chronicles 34:9). This would suggest that there were two groups in the land. First, there were the native Israelite remnant who had not been exiled. Second, there were foreign exiles who were gradually won over to the faith of the native residents.   RELATIONS BETWEEN THE SAMARITANS AND THE JEWS The Samaritans were situated in the north around Mount Gerizim (their holy mountain), Shechem, and Samaria. They had continual tensions with the Jewish populations in Judea and then later in Galilee. The ancient tension between the northern and southern kingdoms was revived with the return of exiles to Jerusalem under the Persian ruler Cyrus’s decree (538 BC). The entire southern area was at the time governed from Samaria in the north by Sanballat. He was a native ruler of Palestine under Persian authority. The return of exiles to Jerusalem, since they intended to rebuild the Jerusalem temple, posed an obvious political threat to his leadership in the north (Ezra 4:7-24; Nehemiah 4:1-9). Opposition was at first politically motivated. But it became religious when sometime later, possibly in the fifth century BC, a rival temple was erected on Mount Gerizim. An example of Jewish hostility toward the Samaritans can be seen about this time. The Samaritans are placed below the Edomites and Philistines in esteem and are called a “foolish people.” Jewish disregard for the Samaritans was increased by the Samaritans’ lack of resistance to Antiochus Epiphanes’s campaign (around 167 BC) to promote Greek worship in the area. Part of the Jewish community resisted the transforming of the Jerusalem temple to a temple for Zeus, and eventually followed the Maccabees in revolt, but sources suggest that the Samaritans were not among them. Poor relations came to a climax during the brief period of Jewish independence under the Hasmoneans. The Jewish ruler, John Hyrcanus, marched against Shechem, conquering and destroying the Samaritan temple on Mount Gerizim (about 128 BC). Under Herod the Great, Samaria’s fortunes improved. But hatred still continued between the Samaritans and Jews in Judea and Galilee. A group of Samaritans believed that the Jerusalem temple was a false cultic center. Because they were excluded from the inner courts by the Jerusalem authorities, they profaned the Jerusalem temple in approximately AD 6 by spreading human bones within the temple porches and sanctuary during Passover. Hostility toward Galilean Jews traveling through Samaria on the way to Jerusalem for various feasts was also not uncommon (Luke 9:51-53). This animosity continued in Jesus’ day. Both groups excluded the other from their respective centers, the Jerusalem temple and the Samaritan temple on Mount Gerizim. The Samaritans, for example, were forbidden access to the inner courts of the temple in Jerusalem. Any offering they might give was considered as if it were from a Gentile. Though technically a sect, it appears Samaritans were in practice treated as Gentiles. All marriage between the groups was therefore forbidden and social relations were greatly restricted (John 4:9). Because of this separation, it is not surprising that any interaction between the two groups was strained. The mere term “Samaritan” was one of scorn on the lips of Jews (8:48). Among some scribes it possibly would not even be uttered. Luke 10:37 may be an example of this. The disciples’ reaction to the Samaritan refusal of lodging (9:51-55) is a good example of the animosity felt by Jews for Samaritans at the time. Although there is less evidence for similar attitudes from the Samaritan side, we can assume they existed. It is probable to suggest, therefore, that the Samaritan shunning of hospitality in Luke 9:51-55 was not uncommon toward other Jews who were heading toward Jerusalem.   SAMARITAN BELIEFS The main beliefs of the Samaritans show how they both relate to and depart from mainstream Judaism. They held in common with Judaism a strong faith in the one God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. In contrast, however, they elevated Mount Gerizim in the north as the only holy place for sacrifice. This was based on several passages in Deuteronomy and Exodus in the Samaritan text. Mount Gerizim came to be identified with the site of Abel’s first altar (Genesis 4:4) and the site of Noah’s sacrifice after the Flood (8:20). It was also the meeting place of Abraham and Melchizedek (14:18) and the site of Isaac’s intended sacrifice (22). The Samaritans felt that only the first five biblical books (Pentateuch) were inspired. They based their beliefs and practice exclusively on these books. Such a narrow view not only determined the direction of Samaritan theology but further separated them from contemporary Jewish thought. Moses, for example, was more highly exalted by the Samaritans than by the Jews. He was considered not only the chief prophet but also, in later thought, was described as the choicest of men. He preexisted from Creation, interceded with God for Israel, and was known as “the light of the world.” A Messiah from the house of David could not be anticipated, as no evidence for such could be found in the Pentateuch. Rather, the Samaritans awaited a prophet like Moses based on Deuteronomy 18:15-18. This anticipated prophet was also designated the “Taheb” (the Restorer). In the last days he would restore proper worship on Mount Gerizim and bring the worship of the heathen to that site. It is clear, therefore, that it was primarily the claim of supremacy for Mount Gerizim that separated this group theologically and culturally from their Jewish neighbors.   JESUS AND THE SAMARITANS The common Jewish perspective on Samaritans as being nearly Gentile was evidently held to some extent by Jesus as well. Jesus refers to the Samaritan leper as “this foreigner” (Luke 17:18). He prohibits his disciples, during their commissioning, from taking the message of the kingdom to either the Samaritans or the Gentiles (Matthew 10:5). Yet the overwhelming evidence in the Gospels is that Jesus’ attitude toward the Samaritans differed radically from the Jews of his day. When his disciples display the usual Jewish animosity in asking to have the “fire from heaven” rain down upon the inhospitable Samaritans, Jesus “rebuked them” (Luke 9:54-55). Moreover, he did not refuse to heal the Samaritan leper. Instead, he honored him as the only one of the ten who remembered to give glory to God (17:11-19). In the parable of the Good Samaritan (10:30-37) Jesus clearly breaks through the traditional prejudices in portraying the despised Samaritan, not the respected Jewish priest or Levite, as the true neighbor to the man in need. Here as elsewhere, Jesus confronts his audience with God’s demand. Again, he breaks through traditional definitions of “righteous” and “outcast.” John 4:4-43 records not only the fascinating exchange between Jesus and the Samaritan woman but also Jesus’ two-day stay in the town of Sychar, a Samaritan city. Here Jesus risks ritual uncleanness by contact with the Samaritan woman at the well (4:7-9). He also offers the gift of salvation to her (4:10) and the entire Samaritan town (4:39-41). Since Jesus knows about her marital life (4:16-18), the woman concludes he must be a “prophet.” The Samaritans were expecting a “prophet like Moses” in the last days. So it is possible that the woman was wondering if Jesus was their long-awaited prophetic Messiah (4:19, 25-26). Jesus breaks through the animosity of Jews toward Samaritans by doing the unthinkable in staying with this despised people. But he goes further by accepting their faith in him as “Messiah” (4:26) and “Savior of the world” (4:42). Here, Jesus redefines righteousness not according to background or religious practice but according to faith in himself. In so doing, he shatters the racial and cultural distinctions of his day and lays the foundation for the gospel’s subsequent spread to the entire Gentile world.   SAMARIA IN THE MISSION OF THE EARLY CHURCH In the great commission given prior to his ascension, Jesus told his disciples to take the gospel to Samaria (Acts 1:8). The missionary activity of the early church did indeed include this region. Following the martyrdom of Stephen, many Christians were forced to leave Jerusalem (8:1). One such Christian, Philip, spread the gospel in the city of Samaria (8:5). The response was so great to the miracles performed that Peter and John (representing the apostles in Jerusalem) were sent to investigate and to confirm the presence of the Holy Spirit among them. Evidence from the second century AD suggests, however, that Christianity did not gain a strong foothold among the Samaritans. For the most part, the Samaritans kept their own religion. A small remnant of the Samaritan sect continues to exist to this day, living near Mount Gerizim (Shechem) and in various cities in Israel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ch.4;7-9&lt;br /&gt;7 Soon a Samaritan woman came to draw water, and Jesus said to her, “Please give me a drink.” 8 He was alone at the time because his disciples had gone into the village to buy some food. 9 The woman was surprised, for Jews refuse to have anything to do with Samaritans.* She said to Jesus, “You are a Jew, and I am a Samaritan woman. Why are you asking me for a drink?”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;JEW A Jew in biblical times was a Judean, a person belonging to Judah which is a kingdom that is based on the descendants of one of the twelve sons of Israel (named Judah). The term “Jew” comes from an underlying Hebrew word that was used first in 2 Kings 16:6 as a national term, meaning citizens of Judah. It came into general use in the period of Jeremiah just before the Judeans or Jews were sent into exile in the late sixth century BC (Jeremiah 32:12). In Jeremiah 34:9, a statement concerning the national principle that an individual citizen had the right to freedom from slavery uses the term “Jew.” In Jeremiah 52:28 it is used in giving the number of deported citizens. Once the people were in exile, the term’s national meaning was expanded with a religious one. The Jews were different from surrounding peoples in that they preserved a living religious tradition of one true God. A Jewish-Gentile polarization developed. Thus in Daniel 3:8-12 certain Jews were accused of deviating from otherwise acceptable Babylonian religious practices. The book of Esther is concerned with the problem of Jewish identity and survival in a hostile environment. Esther 8:17 speaks of Gentiles declaring themselves Jews in the religious sense of becoming proselytes. After the exile, the strongly religious meaning of “Jew” is expressed in the prophecy of Zechariah 8:23 that the Jew would be courted by Gentiles because God was with him. In Ezra 4:12 the term “Jews” is the national designation of the returned exiles, as it is in the book of Nehemiah (see Nehemiah 1:2; Nehemiah 4:2). In Nehemiah 13:24, there is a reference to the social exclusiveness of the Jews: on religious grounds, marriage to foreigners is deplored. In the New Testament, “Jew” continues to have the same national and/or religious meaning. Culturally, Jews have religious and other customs that New Testament documents addressed to Gentiles find it necessary to explain (Mark 7:3; John 5:1). Jews are contrasted with Gentiles (Acts 11:19), Samaritans (John 4:9, 22), and proselytes (Acts 2:10). Jewish Christians can be called “Jews” (Galatians 2:13), but there is an increasing stress on the religious distinctions between Jew and Christian. In Romans 2:17-29, Paul gives an interesting theological analysis of the term “Jew.” He is at pains to emphasize that the true meaning of the word lies not in outward religious profession but in an inward attitude to God. Paul was doubtless thinking of the inadequacy of his own life as a Jew before he was converted to the Christian faith (Philippians 3:3-6). His mention of “praise” in Romans 2:29 is a play on words: in Hebrew, Judah means praise (Genesis 29:35; Genesis 49:8). The apostle Paul is here regarding Christianity as the true heir of the faith of the Old Testament. Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9 express similar sentiments: to be truly a Jew is much more than a matter of birth and synagogue observance. Underlying these passages in both Revelation and Romans is obviously the issue of the messianic claims of Jesus (Romans 10:1-4). The New Testament bears sad testimony to the opposition of Jews to the Christian message. The gospel proved a cause of offense to the Jews (1 Corinthians 1:23). Paul himself, despite his claim of impeccable Jewish credentials (Acts 26:4-7), found himself the object of bitter Jewish attacks (Acts 21:11; Acts 23:12, 27). Revelation 2:9 and Revelation 3:9 describe the Jews’ opposition as satanic: they were carrying out the work of God’s adversary, Satan. These negative overtones are especially attached to the use of the word “Jew” in John’s Gospel. It is found many more times than in any of the other Gospels. In some passages, the word is not associated with hostility, but in most cases the fourth Gospel uses “Jews” for the religious authorities, especially those in Jerusalem, who were hostile to Jesus (John 5:18; John 9:18; John 18:36). In John 9:22, the parents of the blind man, clearly Jews themselves, are said, literally, to fear the investigating Jews. In John 18:14 “Jews” stands for the chief priests and Pharisees of John 18:3. The author, who was obviously a Jew himself, was not expressing an anti-Semitic viewpoint. He condemned not race or people but those who opposed Jesus. He gladly acknowledged that some Jews put their faith in Jesus (John 8:31; John 11:45: John 12:11). Nathanael is featured as a type of the Christian Jew, a true Israelite “in whom is no guile” (John 1:47; see also Genesis 27:35; Genesis 32:28).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-16762432780137808?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/16762432780137808/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=16762432780137808' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/16762432780137808'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/16762432780137808'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/gospel-of-john.html' title='GOSPEL OF JOHN'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-3162059533662151173</id><published>2008-08-20T20:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T20:26:38.243-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='LORD JESU CHRIST'/><title type='text'>LORD JESU CHRIST</title><content type='html'>Prophetical message in the year of 2000 from LORD JESU CHRIST&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2 Chronicles-7&lt;br /&gt;The LORD’s Response to Solomon&lt;br /&gt;. 12 Then one night the LORD appeared to Solomon and said, “I have heard your prayer and have chosen this Temple as the place for making sacrifices. 13 At times I might shut up the heavens so that no rain falls, or I might command locusts to devour your crops, or I might send plagues among you. 14 Then if my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sins and heal their land. 15 I will listen to every prayer made in this place, 16 for I have chosen this Temple and set it apart to be my home forever. My eyes and my heart will always be here.&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;We had a four days fasting prayer at THE APOSTOLIC CHURCH of vavuniya .Lord answered to our prayer and assured that He would bring peace to out country very soon.&lt;br /&gt; 1 Kings -18 &lt;br /&gt;Elijah Prays for Rain&lt;br /&gt;41 Then Elijah said to Ahab, “Go and enjoy a good meal! For I hear a mighty rainstorm coming!”&lt;br /&gt;42 So Ahab prepared a feast. But Elijah climbed to the top of Mount Carmel and fell to the ground and prayed. 43 Then he said to his servant, “Go and look out toward the sea.”&lt;br /&gt;The servant went and looked, but he returned to Elijah and said, “I didn’t see anything.” Seven times Elijah told him to go and look, and seven times he went. 44 Finally the seventh time, his servant told him, “I saw a little cloud about the size of a hand rising from the sea.”&lt;br /&gt;Then Elijah shouted, “Hurry to Ahab and tell him, ‘Climb into your chariot and go back home. If you don’t hurry, the rain will stop you!’ ”&lt;br /&gt;45 And sure enough, the sky was soon black with clouds. A heavy wind brought a terrific rainstorm, and Ahab left quickly for Jezreel. 46 Now the LORD gave special strength to Elijah. He tucked his cloak into his belt and ran ahead of Ahab’s chariot all the way to the entrance of Jezreel.&lt;br /&gt;In the year 2002 February 22nd peace pact singed as results of our prayer. We had a Thanks giving prayer also.              &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Prophetical message in the year of 2005-November,because of unwillingness of leaders of the country to develop the peace process,punishment of living GOD JESUS is pouring upon the country.&lt;br /&gt;The LORD’s Judgment against Nineveh&lt;br /&gt;3 How terrible it will be for Nineveh, the city of murder and lies! She is crammed with wealth to be plundered. 2 Listen! Hear the crack of the whips as the chariots rush forward against her. Wheels rumble, horses’ hooves pound, and chariots clatter as they bump wildly through the streets. 3 See the flashing swords and glittering spears in the upraised arms of the cavalry! The dead are lying in the streets—dead bodies, heaps of bodies, everywhere. People stumble over them, scramble to their feet, and fall again. 4 All this because Nineveh, the beautiful and faithless city, mistress of deadly charms, enticed the nations with her beauty. She taught them all to worship her false gods, enchanting people everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;5 “No wonder I am your enemy!” declares the LORD Almighty. “And now I will lift your skirts so all the earth will see your nakedness and shame. 6 I will cover you with filth and show the world how vile you really are. 7 All who see you will shrink back in horror and say, ‘Nineveh lies in utter ruin.’ Yet no one anywhere will regret your destruction.”&lt;br /&gt;8 Are you any better than Thebes,* surrounded by rivers, protected by water on all sides? 9 Ethiopia* and the land of Egypt were the source of her strength, which seemed without limit. The nations of Put and Libya also helped and supported her. 10 Yet Thebes fell, and her people were led away as captives. Her babies were dashed to death against the stones of the streets. Soldiers cast lots to see who would get the Egyptian officers as servants. All their leaders were bound in chains.&lt;br /&gt;11 And you, Nineveh, will also stagger like a drunkard. You will hide for fear of the attacking enemy. 12 All your fortresses will fall. They will be devoured like the ripe figs that fall into the mouths of those who shake the trees. 13 Your troops will be as weak and helpless as women. The gates of your land will be opened wide to the enemy and set on fire and burned.&lt;br /&gt;14 Get ready for the siege! Store up water! Strengthen the defenses! Make bricks to repair the walls! Go into the pits to trample clay, and pack it into molds! 15 But in the middle of your preparations, the fire will devour you; the sword will cut you down. The enemy will consume you like locusts, devouring everything they see. There will be no escape, even if you multiply like grasshoppers. 16 Merchants, as numerous as the stars, have filled your city with vast wealth. But like a swarm of locusts, they strip the land and then fly away. 17 Your princes and officials are also like locusts, crowding together in the hedges to survive the cold. But like locusts that fly away when the sun comes up to warm the earth, all of them will fly away and disappear.&lt;br /&gt;18 O Assyrian king, your princes lie dead in the dust. Your people are scattered across the mountains. There is no longer a shepherd to gather them together. 19 There is no healing for your wound; your injury is fatal. All who hear of your destruction will clap their hands for joy. Where can anyone be found who has not suffered from your cruelty?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Urging for a spcial prayer for the healing of the nation-2007.This is the time we have to seek our GOG’S face to heal the contry,those who are calling in His name [Christion] should humble themself and ask forgiveness,He eill heal our country.&lt;br /&gt; 1. &lt;br /&gt; Esther  7&lt;br /&gt;The King Executes Haman&lt;br /&gt;So the king and Haman went to Queen Esther’s banquet. 2 And while they were drinking wine that day, the king again asked her, “Tell me what you want, Queen Esther. What is your request? I will give it to you, even if it is half the kingdom!”&lt;br /&gt;3 And so Queen Esther replied, “If Your Majesty is pleased with me and wants to grant my request, my petition is that my life and the lives of my people will be spared. 4 For my people and I have been sold to those who would kill, slaughter, and annihilate us. If we had only been sold as slaves, I could remain quiet, for that would have been a matter too trivial to warrant disturbing the king.”&lt;br /&gt;5 “Who would do such a thing?” King Xerxes demanded. “Who would dare touch you?”&lt;br /&gt;6 Esther replied, “This wicked Haman is our enemy.” Haman grew pale with fright before the king and queen. 7 Then the king jumped to his feet in a rage and went out into the palace garden.&lt;br /&gt;But Haman stayed behind to plead for his life with Queen Esther, for he knew that he was doomed. 8 In despair he fell on the couch where Queen Esther was reclining, just as the king returned from the palace garden. “Will he even assault the queen right here in the palace, before my very eyes?” the king roared. And as soon as the king spoke, his attendants covered Haman’s face, signaling his doom.&lt;br /&gt;9 Then Harbona, one of the king’s eunuchs, said, “Haman has set up a gallows* that stands seventy-five feet* tall in his own courtyard. He intended to use it to hang Mordecai, the man who saved the king from assassination.”&lt;br /&gt;“Then hang Haman on it!” the king ordered. 10 So they hanged Haman on the gallows he had set up for Mordecai, and the king’s anger was pacified&lt;br /&gt;2.&lt;br /&gt;Hezekiah Seeks the LORD’s Help&lt;br /&gt;37 When King Hezekiah heard their report, he tore his clothes and put on sackcloth and went into the Temple of the LORD to pray. 2 And he sent Eliakim the palace administrator, Shebna the court secretary, and the leading priests, all dressed in sackcloth, to the prophet Isaiah son of Amoz. 3 They told him, “This is what King Hezekiah says: This is a day of trouble, insult, and disgrace. It is like when a child is ready to be born, but the mother has no strength to deliver it. 4 But perhaps the LORD your God has heard the Assyrian representative defying the living God and will punish him for his words. Oh, pray for those of us who are left!”&lt;br /&gt;5 After King Hezekiah’s officials delivered the king’s message to Isaiah, 6 the prophet replied, “Say to your master, ‘This is what the LORD says: Do not be disturbed by this blasphemous speech against me from the Assyrian king’s messengers. 7 Listen! I myself will make sure that the king will receive a report from Assyria telling him that he is needed at home. Then I will make him want to return to his land, where I will have him killed with a sword.’ ”8 Meanwhile, the Assyrian representative left Jerusalem and went to consult his king, who had left Lachish and was attacking Libnah. &lt;br /&gt; Soon afterward KingSennacherib received word that King Tirhakah of Ethiopia* was leading an army to fight against him. Before leaving to meet the attack, he sent this message back to Hezekiah in Jerusalem:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;10 “This message is for King Hezekiah of Judah. Don’t let this God you trust deceive you with promises that Jerusalem will not be captured by the king of Assyria. 11 You know perfectly well what the kings of Assyria have done wherever they have gone. They have crushed everyone who stood in their way! Why should you be any different? 12 Have the gods of other nations rescued them such nations as Gozan,Haran, Rezeph, and thepeopleofEdenwhowereinTelassar?The former kingsofAssyria destroyed them all! 13 What happened to the king of Hamath and the king of Arpad? What happened to the kings of Sepharvaim, Hena, and Ivvah?”&lt;br /&gt;14 After Hezekiah received the letter and read it, he went up to the LORD’s Temple and spread it out before the LORD. 15 And Hezekiah prayed this prayer before the LORD: 16 “O LORD Almighty, God of Israel, you are enthroned between the mighty cherubim! You alone are God of all the kingdoms of the earth. You alone created the heavens and the earth. 17 Listen to me, O LORD, and hear! Open your eyes, O LORD, and see! Listen to Sennacherib’s words of defiance against the living God.&lt;br /&gt;18 “It is true, LORD, that the kings of Assyria have destroyed all these nations, just as the message says. 19 And they have thrown the gods of these nations into the fire and burned them. But of course the Assyrians could destroy them! They were not gods at all—only idols of wood and stone shaped by human hands. 20 Now, O LORD our God, rescue us from his power; then all the kingdoms of the earth will know that you alone, O LORD, are God.”&lt;br /&gt;Isaiah Predicts Judah’s Deliverance&lt;br /&gt;21 Then Isaiah son of Amoz sent this message to Hezekiah: “This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: This is my answer to your prayer concerning King Sennacherib of Assyria. 22 This is the message that the LORD has spoken against him:&lt;br /&gt;‘The virgin daughter of Zion&lt;br /&gt;despises you and laughs at you.&lt;br /&gt;The daughter of Jerusalem&lt;br /&gt;scoffs and shakes her head as you flee.&lt;br /&gt;23     ‘Whom do you think you have been insulting and ridiculing?&lt;br /&gt;Against whom did you raise your voice?&lt;br /&gt;At whom did you look in such proud condescension?&lt;br /&gt;It was the Holy One of Israel!&lt;br /&gt;24     By your messengers you have mocked the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;You have said, “With my many chariots&lt;br /&gt;I have conquered the highest mountains—&lt;br /&gt;yes, the remotest peaks of Lebanon.&lt;br /&gt;I have cut down its tallest cedars&lt;br /&gt;and its choicest cypress trees.&lt;br /&gt;I have reached its farthest corners&lt;br /&gt;and explored its deepest forests.&lt;br /&gt;25     I have dug wells in many a foreign land&lt;br /&gt;and refreshed myself with their water.&lt;br /&gt;I even stopped up the rivers of Egypt&lt;br /&gt;so that my armies could go across!”&lt;br /&gt;26     ‘But have you not heard?&lt;br /&gt;It was I, the LORD, who decided this long ago.&lt;br /&gt;Long ago I planned what I am now causing to happen,&lt;br /&gt;that you should crush fortified cities into heaps of rubble.&lt;br /&gt;27     That is why their people have so little power&lt;br /&gt;and are such easy prey for you.&lt;br /&gt;They are as helpless as the grass,&lt;br /&gt;as easily trampled as tender green shoots.&lt;br /&gt;They are like grass sprouting on a housetop,&lt;br /&gt;easily scorched by the sun.&lt;br /&gt;28     ‘But I know you well—&lt;br /&gt;your comings and goings and all you do.&lt;br /&gt;I know the way you have raged against me.&lt;br /&gt;29     And because of your arrogance against me,&lt;br /&gt;which I have heard for myself,&lt;br /&gt;I will put my hook in your nose&lt;br /&gt;and my bridle in your mouth.&lt;br /&gt;I will make you return&lt;br /&gt;by the road on which you came.’ ”&lt;br /&gt;30 Then Isaiah said to Hezekiah, “Here is the proof that the LORD will protect this city from Assyria’s king. This year you will eat only what grows up by itself, and next year you will eat what springs up from that. But in the third year you will plant crops and harvest them; you will tend vineyards and eat their fruit. 31 And you who are left in Judah, who have escaped the ravages of the siege, will take root again in your own soil, and you will flourish and multiply. 32 For a remnant of my people will spread out from Jerusalem, a group of survivors from Mount Zion. The passion of the LORD Almighty will make this happen!&lt;br /&gt;33 “And this is what the LORD says about the king of Assyria: His armies will not enter Jerusalem to shoot their arrows. They will not march outside its gates with their shields and build banks of earth against its walls. 34 The king will return to his own country by the road on which he came. He will not enter this city, says the LORD. 35 For my own honor and for the sake of my servant David, I will defend it.”&lt;br /&gt;36 That night the angel of the LORD went out to the Assyrian camp and killed 185,000 Assyrian troops. When the surviving Assyrians* woke up the next morning, they found corpses everywhere. 37 Then King Sennacherib of Assyria broke camp and returned to his own land. He went home to his capital of Nineveh and stayed there. 38 One day while he was worshiping in the temple of his god Nisroch, his sons Adrammelech and Sharezer killed him with their swords. They then escaped to the land of Ararat, and another son, Esarhaddon, became the next king of Assyria.&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jonah 3&lt;br /&gt;Jonah Goes to Nineveh&lt;br /&gt; Then the LORD spoke to Jonah a second time: 2 “Get up and go to the great city of Nineveh, and deliver the message of judgment I have given you.”&lt;br /&gt;3 This time Jonah obeyed the LORD’s command and went to Nineveh, a city so large that it took three days to see it all. 4 On the day Jonah entered the city, he shouted to the crowds: “Forty days from now Nineveh will be destroyed!” 5 The people of Nineveh believed God’s message, and from the greatest to the least, they decided to go without food and wear sackcloth to show their sorrow.&lt;br /&gt;6 When the king of Nineveh heard what Jonah was saying, he stepped down from his throne and took off his royal robes. He dressed himself in sackcloth and sat on a heap of ashes. 7 Then the king and his nobles sent this decree throughout the city: “No one, not even the animals, may eat or drink anything at all. 8 Everyone is required to wear sackcloth and pray earnestly to God. Everyone must turn from their evil ways and stop all their violence. 9 Who can tell? Perhaps even yet God will have pity on us and hold back his fierce anger from destroying us.”&lt;br /&gt;10 When God saw that they had put a stop to their evil ways, he had mercy on them and didn’t carry out the destruction he had threatened.&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; SO, please hold a fasting and prayer for healing our nation.&lt;br /&gt;                                                                                                                Yours in Christ&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-3162059533662151173?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/3162059533662151173/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=3162059533662151173' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/3162059533662151173'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/3162059533662151173'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/lord-jesu-christ.html' title='LORD JESU CHRIST'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-2725445816175382931</id><published>2008-08-20T05:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T05:02:11.985-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Do you really believe the story of Jonah'/><title type='text'>Do you really believe the story of Jonah</title><content type='html'>Of all the stories in the Bible, the one which people find hardest to swallow is the account of Jonah and the whale. Skeptics have a field day ridiculing the account of a man who was swallowed whole by a whale and lived to tell of it after three days and nights in such surroundings.&lt;br /&gt;In an attempt to avoid the seeming improbabilities of the story, some contend that this story was never meant to be understood literally, but as an allegory. How then does one deal with the story?&lt;br /&gt;The problem of viewing Jonah as an allegory is that the Bible nowhere treats it as such. The story itself is written as a historical narrative, with absolutely no indication that it was intended as myth or allegory.&lt;br /&gt;Second Kings 14:25 refers to Jonah as a historical figure. Jesus Himself treats Jonah as historical, relating that Jonah was a prophet, whose preaching resulted in the people of Nineveh repenting.&lt;br /&gt;He even compared the story to His own death and resurrection: “For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the sea-monster, so shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. The men of Nineveh shall stand up with this generation at the judgment, and shall condemn it because they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and, behold, something greater than Jonah is here” (Matthew 12:40, 41, NASB).&lt;br /&gt;If one denies the facts of the story of Jonah, he (or she) must then assume ignorance or deception on the part of Jesus, who believed its authenticity. This would, in effect, destroy His claim to being God.&lt;br /&gt;Having established that Jonah’s story was intended to be historical, it is now possible to deal with the problems of his being swallowed by a whale and the three days and nights he is said to have survived within the fish.&lt;br /&gt;The first fact to deal with is that the Hebrew and Greek words which are translated “whale” in the King James Version actually mean “large fish.” There are certain species of whales and sharks that are perfectly capable of swallowing a man whole, including the whale shark, white shark, and sperm shark. These giant mammals have been known to swallow whole animals that are larger than man. It could have been a whale that swallowed Jonah, but the Bible was not specific on the species.&lt;br /&gt;The second problem to deal with is Jonah’s sojourn within the “great fish.” A man named James Bartley is known to have survived a day and a half in the belly of a whale before being rescued. The anatomy of these mammals provides sufficient oxygen for the possibility of survival.&lt;br /&gt;There is also the possibility that Jonah died in the belly of the fish, and that God brought him back to life after three days. This would not be inconsistent with the teaching of Scripture, seeing that at least eight other resuscitations are recorded. However, this is not indicative in the narrative and Jonah could have survived.&lt;br /&gt;          ADDITIONAL REFERENCE SOURCES&lt;br /&gt;Henry Morris, The Bible Has the Answer, Baker Book House, 1971&lt;br /&gt;Hobart Freeman, An Introduction to the Old Testament Prophets, Moody Press, 1969&lt;br /&gt;Gleason Archer, A Survey of Old Testament Introduction, rev. ed., Moody Press, 1979&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;                                2.Where did Cain get his wife?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the most frequent questions asked by Christians and non-Christians alike is where did Cain’s wife come from. This question also involves a larger question: what population existed at the time Cain built his city, and what of incest?&lt;br /&gt;According to Genesis, Cain murdered his younger brother Abel (Genesis 4:8) at some point in his life. As punishment for this crime, God banished Cain from his home and the presence of the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;The Bible also records Cain’s fear that others might avenge Abel by killing him (Genesis 4:14), that Cain obtained a wife at some point (Genesis 4:17) and built a city (Genesis 4:17).&lt;br /&gt;One theory that has been put forth to explain the existence of sufficient numbers of people is directly contradictory to Scripture and posits a “pre-Adamic” race dwelling in the neighborhood of the Garden of Eden from which Cain could take a wife.&lt;br /&gt;This is not a tenable solution, however, for the Scriptures clearly teach that Adam was the first man (I Corinthians 15:45) and that his wife, Eve, was “the mother of all the living” (Genesis 3:20, NASB).&lt;br /&gt;Genesis 5:4 tells us that Adam had sons and daughters. At first, sons and daughters of Adam and Eve had to marry each other to populate the earth. Cain probably married a sister or niece or grand niece.&lt;br /&gt;Assuming the accuracy of the Genesis account, and considering the length of lives recorded (around 900 years, on the average), a very sizeable population could have developed very rapidly. Using conservative guesses as to the size of families and average age, there easily could have been several million people living at the time of the death of Cain.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, the Scriptures nowhere indicate at what points in the life of Cain he murdered his brother, married his wife, or built his city. Even a few hundred years might have passed before all of the events took place, allowing for a sizable population with which to build a city.&lt;br /&gt;All this raises the additional question of incest. If incest is scripturally forbidden, according to the Mosaic law, how do we explain all this marrying of siblings? Since Adam and Eve were created directly by God, and perfect, it can be presumed that their genes were perfect.&lt;br /&gt;When sin entered the world at the Fall, bringing with it death, disease, and destruction, the gene pool would gradually become corrupted. At first, no harm would result from marriage of brothers and sisters, and had sin not entered the world, presumably no harm would have ever entered.&lt;br /&gt;As the generations passed, however, disease, environment, and sin took their toll on the genetic pool, which resulted in mutant and defective genes. Incest was prohibited in Moses’ time, from a biological standpoint, because it now was dangerous and resulted in deformed, moronic, or otherwise defective offspring.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, in addition to the biological problem which arises from incest, there is also an ethical one. God forbids incest on moral grounds, and this is more crucial than the biological aspect (Leviticus 20:11ff).&lt;br /&gt;Incest disrupts the family social and moral structure. The family is the only God-ordained institution in the world other than the church. At the initial formation of the family structure in Cain’s day, it is difficult to presume what happened with inter-marriage. Thus we cannot be sure to what extent incest occurred. One thing is certain: after God’s ordained family structure stabilized, incest was sin.&lt;br /&gt;          ADDITIONAL REFERENCE SOURCES&lt;br /&gt;Henry Morris, The Bible Has the Answer, Baker Book House, 1971&lt;br /&gt;H. C. Leupold, Exposition of Genesis, Vol. I, Baker Book House,&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-2725445816175382931?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/2725445816175382931/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=2725445816175382931' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/2725445816175382931'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/2725445816175382931'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/do-you-really-believe-story-of-jonah.html' title='Do you really believe the story of Jonah'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-6564439092934607081</id><published>2008-08-20T04:56:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:56:51.848-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BOOK OF PSALMS 9'/><title type='text'>BOOK OF PSALMS 9</title><content type='html'>of His people. In the history psalms, the poet recounts the history of Israel and asks for a renewed commitment to God—even in the face of a history of rebellion.&lt;br /&gt;Some of the most troubling psalms are those that contain prayers asking God to curse the wicked. These imprecatory psalms are sometimes thought to conflict with the sentiment of the gospel, but in fact they accurately reflect God’s abhorrence of evil.&lt;br /&gt;In contrast to the imprecatory psalms are the joyful and prophetic Passover psalms that became a part of the Passover celebration in Judaism. These psalms are a remarkable celebration of the great acts of the Lord in delivering His people from Egypt, the theme of the Passover celebration. They point forward to the deliverance that would come through the Savior Jesus.&lt;br /&gt;A final group of psalms is clustered at the end of the book. These are the Hallel psalms, named for the principal Hebrew word for praise, hallel. As their name suggests, these psalms praise God for His character and saving works.&lt;br /&gt;Characteristics • In order to fully appreciate the Psalms, a certain number of their characteristics should be kept in mind.&lt;br /&gt;First, the psalms were written for singing. These were songs for public worship in the temple of ancient Israel. They are not merely poems, but lyrics for music from the ancient world. As such they contain musical conventions peculiar to music and worship during that time.&lt;br /&gt;Second, the poems in the Psalms were written over a period of a thousand years, from the time of Moses in the fifteenth century B.C. to the time of Ezra in the fifth century B.C. Although David is the main author associated with the composition of the Psalms, many other authors from various time periods contributed psalms to what would become the Book of Psalms.&lt;br /&gt;Third, the psalms were collected and arranged over a long period of time. This process involved some editorial additions to the poems, some cutting and expanding, and some rearranging and restructuring of various psalms. The Holy Spirit who had inspired these poems in the beginning oversaw this process of restructuring them for temple worship.&lt;br /&gt;Fourth, the psalms were written in the language of the human spirit, the utterances of the soul. The psalms are not cool, reasoned prose, but deeply emotional works that use wrenching language, dramatic exaggeration, and figurative speech.&lt;br /&gt;Fifth, psalms and the writing of psalms were part of ordinary life for the Israelites. The Scriptures record a number of times when the Israelites spontaneously responded to the Lord with a psalm of praise. Moses sang a psalm in praise of God (Ex. 15); Deborah and Hannah did the same (Judg. 5; 1 Sam. 2); and David blessed the Lord with a psalm (1 Chr. 29). Through a psalm the Israelites would express their devotion and thanks to their Lord. This tradition continued into the New Testament period, for Mary in Luke 1 responded to the angel’s message with a psalm (see Rev. 5). This Israelite tradition of psalm writing was confirmed by the discovery of a number of original psalms among the Dead Sea Scrolls discovered in 1947.&lt;br /&gt;Sixth, individual psalms were written for different purposes. Some began as works of private devotion, while others were designed from the beginning to be used in public worship. Ultimately, all the psalms became the treasure of all the people in temple worship, for no matter what subject they addressed, they always led the people to the worship of the living God.&lt;br /&gt;Finally, it must be remembered that the psalms were written in the language of response. Each psalm records in powerful, poetic language one individual’s response to God. From a desperate cry to an ecstatic shout of joy, each psalmist responds to God in the middle of a particular situation. Even though the psalms became a part of the community’s worship life, they remained a vehicle for individual expression as well. Even today, the psalms are used both in public worship and in the devotional moments of individual Christians.&lt;br /&gt;PsalmsOutline&lt;br /&gt;Book I: Ps. 1–41&lt;br /&gt;Book II: Ps. 42–72&lt;br /&gt;Book III: Ps. 73–89&lt;br /&gt;Book IV: Ps. 90–106&lt;br /&gt;Book V: Ps. 107–150&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-6564439092934607081?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/6564439092934607081/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=6564439092934607081' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/6564439092934607081'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/6564439092934607081'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-of-psalms-9.html' title='BOOK OF PSALMS 9'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-6022585073012132922</id><published>2008-08-20T04:55:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:55:29.007-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BOOK OF PSALMS 8'/><title type='text'>BOOK OF PSALMS 8</title><content type='html'>explaining the sufferings of a righteous person and the apparent prosperity of evil people, dealt with in the Wisdom Literature in the book of Job and in the prophets also (e.g., Jeremiah 12:1-4), is taken up in Psalms 37; 49; and 73. The historical psalms should be included in this category, since they underscore the lessons arising from the favored nation’s often bitter experience. It is apparent that Israel delighted in the recital of salvation history. The main psalms, and the periods covered are Psalm 78, from the exodus to the establishment of the Davidic monarchy (note the declared intention to teach in verses 1-4); Psalm 105, from Abraham to the conquest of Canaan; Psalm 106, from Egypt to the judges; and Psalm 136, from the Creation to the Promised Land.   PSALMS OF TRUST While some of these may also be classified as laments, the dominant feature of this group is the serene trust in God revealed, which makes them particularly suitable for devotional use. Many of these psalms begin with an affirmation of gratitude to and affection for God. Psalms 23 and 27 are the outstanding examples of this type, which could also include Psalms 11; 16; 62; 116; 131; and 138.   CONCLUSION The difficulties in any precise categorization of psalms are obvious; many do not neatly fall into one group—hence, the occasional overlap. What is clearly evident is a pulsating, vital devotional life that has found its clearest expression in the book of Psalms. To say that it expresses the worship and devotion of the ordinary person is a simplification; kings and priests, wise men and prophets all contributed to this remarkable collection. Yet there remains the truth that, in God’s sight, all people, regardless of human achievement or privilege, are “ordinary,” for all are sinners in need of God’s grace and goodness. So the worshiping community of ancient Israel, and the saints of every succeeding generation, in the vastness of their diversity, have found the expression of their own hearts’ condition, desires, and devotion in this unique treasury—the Psalms.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PSALM 151 A noncanonical psalm that, prior to the Qumran discoveries, was known only through ancient translations (LXX, Latin, and Syriac). At Qumran the psalm was included in the Hebrew Psalm Scroll (11Q). The Hebrew text indicates two separate poems. The first poem (designated as 151A) is a commentary on 1 Samuel 16:1-13. It relates how David was set over his father’s flocks but was made king over God’s people after God had looked upon his heart. The second poem (151B) is a commentary on 1 Samuel 17 and deals with David and Goliath. It is thought by some to show the bravery of David in contrast to his humility, as is shown in 151A.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Book of&lt;br /&gt;Psalms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nelson study Bible&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As one of the greatest collections of songs, prayers, and poetry, the Book of Psalms expresses the deepest passions of humanity. In these pages we can hear the psalmist’s desperate cry in the midst of despair, but also his ecstatic praise of his Provider and Comforter. We can hear him pouring out his soul in confession, but also bubbling over with joy. The psalms lead us through the valleys and peaks of human experience, but in the end they guide us to the praise of our loving Creator.&lt;br /&gt;Authors • The superscription, the introductory words found before the first verse in most psalms, many times attributes the following psalm to King David, the “sweet psalmist of Israel” (2 Sam. 23:1). These superscriptions were probably not part of the psalms when they were originally composed but were added by editors to aid in the interpretation of the poems. Nevertheless, there is no reason to discount them. The historical books of the Bible speak of David’s considerable accomplishments as a musician, singer, and composer of poems (1 Sam. 16:19–23; 18:10; 2 Sam. 1:17–27; 23:1–7; 1 Chr. 29:10–15). Moreover, one of David’s psalms is recorded in 2 Sam. 22 and reappears with only slight variation as Ps. 18. Parts of the medley that David presented to Asaph in 1 Chr. 16:8–36 are taken from Ps. 105:1–15, Ps. 96, and Ps. 106:1, 47, 48. Thus, the connection between King David and the Psalms is well documented.&lt;br /&gt;Of course, David is not the only composer of the Psalms. Others include contemporaries of David whom he placed in charge of worship in Jerusalem: Ethan, Heman, and Asaph. Solomon followed in his father David’s footsteps by writing psalms as well as proverbs. Some of the earliest psalms were written by Moses, five centuries before the time of David. One priestly family, the sons of Korah, continued to write psalms for centuries. Women, such as Deborah (see Judg. 5) and Hannah (see 1 Sam. 2), wrote psalms as well. However, the composers of many of the psalms remain anonymous. Some of these anonymous psalms may be attributed to David, but certainly not all of them. Psalms were still being written during the time of Ezra. It was in Ezra’s time that the Book of Psalms as we know it was compiled.&lt;br /&gt;Structure • Like the Pentateuch, the five books of Moses, the Book of Psalms is arranged in five sections: &lt;br /&gt;Book I (Ps. 1–41), &lt;br /&gt;Book II (Ps. 42–72),&lt;br /&gt;Book III (Ps. 73–89),&lt;br /&gt; Book IV (Ps. 90–106), and &lt;br /&gt;Book V (Ps. 107–150).&lt;br /&gt; Each book concludes with a doxology, an affirmation of praise to God found in the last verse or two of the concluding psalm. In the case of Book V, the entire last poem, Ps. 150, is the concluding doxology. The reason for this arrangement of the Book of Psalms is not clear. Most likely it had something to do with the use of the Psalms in the praise of God in temple worship. Books I and II are composed primarily of Davidic psalms; Book III includes the psalms of Asaph (Ps. 73–83) and the psalms of the sons of Korah (Ps. 84–88). Books IV and V include anonymous psalms, along with a few by David and others.&lt;br /&gt;Categories of the Psalms • Many of the psalms can be identified as certain types by their theme.&lt;br /&gt;The royal psalms emphasize God as King, often using the words “the Lord reigns.” These psalms speak of His rule as Creator, as Savior of Israel, and as the Coming One. The royal psalms often point forward to the coming rule of the Savior King, the Lord Jesus.&lt;br /&gt;The psalms of Zion focus on Jerusalem, using its endearing name Zion. These psalms rhapsodize on the city as God’s choice for the site of His holy temple, the place for true worship of His name.&lt;br /&gt;The penitential psalms are poems in which the poet confesses sin to the Lord, asks for and receives forgiveness, and then praises God for the renewed relationship that God’s forgiveness provides.&lt;br /&gt;The wisdom psalms focus on some of the same issues that are found in the Book of Proverbs. These psalms present sharp contrasts between the righteous and the wicked, address God’s blessing and cursing, and often focus on righteous living.&lt;br /&gt;One subcategory of the wisdom psalms is the Torah psalms. These are poems that focus on the beauty, truth, and sufficiency of the Law of God. Two other subcategories of the wisdom psalms are the creation psalms and the history psalms. In the creation psalms, the poet calls for the believer to praise God as the Creator of the universe and the Savior&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-6022585073012132922?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/6022585073012132922/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=6022585073012132922' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/6022585073012132922'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/6022585073012132922'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-of-psalms-8.html' title='BOOK OF PSALMS 8'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-8918301264592611976</id><published>2008-08-20T04:54:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:54:41.005-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BOOK OF PSALMS 7'/><title type='text'>BOOK OF PSALMS 7</title><content type='html'>(45:6). But this is best understood in terms of the throne being regarded as the Lord’s, occupied by the king as his representative. Similarly, the wording in Psalm 110:1, “Sit at my right hand,” indicates the privileges and prerogatives that the king enjoys as God’s vice-regent. The balance of the OT evidence concerning the king shows that the monarchy in Israel was qualified by the nature of God’s covenantal relationship with his people; the king did not enjoy the absolutism claimed by most of the rulers of surrounding kingdoms. Most of the royal psalms can also be called messianic psalms. They were interpreted as such in the early Christian church, as witnessed in Jesus Christ’s general statement that the psalmists wrote of him (Luke 24:44) and by particular NT quotations. The main psalms concerned, and the NT references, are the following: 1. Psalm 2 (Acts 13:33; Hebrews 1:5; 5:5), while linked with the Davidic king, nevertheless speaks of a universal vindication and rule, which far transcended even David’s rule. Further, the picture of the Davidic king, anointed to rule on the earth as the representative of God, who is enthroned in heaven, strongly suggests Christ’s mediating, incarnate ministry. 2. Psalm 45 (Hebrews 1:8-9), a marriage psalm for one of the Davidic kings, possibly Solomon, speaks not only of love and marriage but also a permanence and quality of rule. In the most obvious translation of verse 6, the writer addresses God, “Your divine throne endures for ever and ever.” The writer to the Hebrews clearly accepted this interpretation (Hebrews 1:8-9) and used it in contrast to the exalted status of even the angels, reinforcing it with two other quotations from the psalms that originally applied to God (Psalm 97:7; 102:25-27; cf. Hebrews 1:6, 10-12). 3. Psalm 110 is the most frequently quoted messianic psalm (Matthew 22:43-45; Acts 2:34-35; Hebrews 1:13; 5:5-10; 6:20; 7:21). The language, speaking of the privileges, universal victory and continuing priesthood of David and his successors, would be considered hyperbolic and possibly misleading except for its fulfillment in “great David’s greater Son.” In contrast to the angels, who are privileged to stand in God’s presence (Luke 1:19), Christ the Son sits in the place of power and authority (Hebrews 1:13). Other psalms that could also be designated messianic but are not specifically included among the royal psalms are Psalm 8 (1 Corinthians 15:27); Psalm 40 (Hebrews 10:5-10); Psalm 72, with its idealized picture of the nature, consequences, and extent of the rule of God’s representative; Psalm 118:22-23; and Psalm 132 (Acts 2:30).   PASSION PSALMS The four psalms in this group (Psalms 16; 22; 40; 69; some scholars would also include Psalms 102; 109) may also be regarded as messianic. They connect with that line of OT prophecy that interprets the Messiah’s ministry in terms of the Suffering Servant who features prominently in Isaiah (e.g., Isaiah 42:1-9; 52:13–53:12). Of these four, Psalm 22 is the most remarkable. Jesus recited part of it when he was on the cross (Psalm 22:1; cf. Matthew 27:46), and other connections with the crucifixion scene are noteworthy (e.g., Psalm 22:6-8, 14-18). Some further considerations are even more significant: there is no suggestion of any awareness of sin; the suffering of the psalmist appears completely unjustified; there is no imprecatory element, even in the face of bitter persecution. This connects with the sinless Christ (2 Corinthians 5:21), who could even pray for his executioners (Luke 23:34). Psalm 16:10 anticipates the triumph of the incorruptible Christ over the grave (cf. Acts 2:24-31). Psalm 40:6-8 foreshadows the Incarnation and self-giving redemptive work of Christ (Hebrews 10:5-10). Psalm 69 refers to the isolation resulting from a commitment to God’s cause (Psalm 69:8-9) and anticipates the part played by Judas in what was fundamentally God’s work in Christ (Psalm 69:25-26; cf. Psalm 109:8; Isaiah 53:10; Acts 1:20).   PSALMS ABOUT ZION This group could have been classified as a subsection of communal praise, but due to the close historical connection between God’s choice of the house of David and Jerusalem (Psalms 78:68-72; 132:11-13), and their subsequent interrelated fortunes, we consider them at this point. There was a biting satire in the request of the Babylonians to the refugees of a shattered city to “Sing us one of the songs of Zion!” (Psalm 137:3, NIV), but it witnesses to the existence of such a collection. Praise of Zion was, in fact, almost synonymous with the praise of the Lord who dwelt there. Jerusalem’s continued survival, in spite of its difficulties, was ample demonstration of God’s enduring greatness (Psalm 48:11-14) and peculiar affection for the city that housed his temple (Psalm 87:1-3). Psalms 48; 76; 84; 87; and 122 are the main psalms in this category, but the theme itself appears widely throughout the psalms (e.g., 102:16; 125:1; 126:1-3; 133:3; 147:2). The basis of the NT concept of a heavenly Jerusalem, the spiritual home of the regenerate of all nations, finds its origin in this concept, especially in Psalm 87.   LAMENTS These are associated with specific occasions of distress and are of two types: 1. National. The prophetic and historical books give several examples of the kind of occasion, such as drought, locust infestation, or enemy attack, that could prompt national laments, and also the inward and outward attitudes that accompanied them (e.g., Judges 20:23, 26; Jeremiah 14:1-12; 36:9; Joel 1:13-14; 2:12-17; Jonah 3:5). There is a regular structure in the psalms of this class: the distressing situation is first described; God is petitioned to come to the aid of his people, often with the reminder of his past mercies for Israel; finally, there is often an expression of confidence that God would heed their cry. Israel’s adversaries are clearly in mind in Psalms 14; 44; 60; 74; 80; and 83; while Psalms 58; 106; and 125 reflect situations less critical. 2. Individual. There are so many of this type (approximately 50) that it is frequently described as the backbone of the Psalter. Their most obvious features are the sharpness of complaint and the bitterness of attack upon those responsible. As in the national laments, there is often complaint against God, especially for his lack of attention or his tardiness in intervening. The basic components of this type are almost identical to the national laments, except that they often conclude with the avowal to praise God in anticipation of deliverance (e.g., Psalm 13:5-6). Frequently, the lament is accompanied by thanksgiving for the deliverance sought and experienced, as illustrated in the two sections of Psalms 22:1-21 and 28:1-9.   IMPRECATORY PSALMS Approximately 20 psalms contain passionate pleas for the overthrow of the wicked, in language that is often shocking. Any instant condemnation of this attitude must, however, be tempered by certain relevant considerations: The cry for vengeance was not purely personal; it was firmly believed that God’s honor was at stake (e.g., Psalm 109:21). In an age where there was a less developed view of an afterlife, it was axiomatic that rewards and punishments resulting from obedience or disobedience to God, must be observable within this lifetime. Whenever this was not apparent, it would seem that no righteous God existed, and the name of God was dishonored (e.g., Psalm 74:10). This burning desire for the eradication of evil and evil men sprang from a consciousness of a moral God and virtually demanded the triumph of truth. The poetic language is also prone to hyperbole—a feature not confined to the psalms (e.g., Nehemiah 4:4-5; Jeremiah 20:14-18; Amos 7:17). Such language is startling; indeed, part of its function was probably to startle—to express and promote a sense of outrage. In the pre-Christian period, therefore, such outbursts were not completely unjustifiable. But in the light of the fuller revelation in the NT, such an attitude cannot be condoned. The Christian is to love as Christ loved (John 13:34), to pray for his enemies and to forgive them (Matthew 5:38-48; Colossians 3:13). The theme of judgment continues into the NT and is indeed heightened there, since Christ’s coming has left people without excuse to live in sin (John 16:8-11), but there can be no place for purely private vengeance.   PENITENTIAL PSALMS Psalms 32; 38; 51; and 130 are the clearest examples of penitential psalms, although traditionally the church has also included Psalms 6; 102; 143; where there is no explicit confession of sin. In an age when adversity in its various forms was seen as God’s judgment for wrongdoing, the admission of distress was tantamount to a confession of guilt. In the four main examples there is an intensity of feeling and a deep sense of the enormity of sin in God’s sight, although, as elsewhere, there is no indication of specific sin, even in Psalm 51, which is surely to be connected with David’s sin against Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11–12). Significantly, David bypasses the sacrificial system, which was totally inefficacious in his case, casting himself entirely on the mercy of God (Psalm 51:1, 16). The burden of unconfessed sin is clearly revealed in Psalm 32, and sin’s searing and corrupting effect in Psalm 38.   WISDOM PSALMS AND HISTORICAL PSALMS While it is accepted that prophets, priests, and wise men all functioned at the major sanctuaries, some overlap in their modes of expression is to be expected. Proverbial forms are not infrequently found in the psalms (Psalms 37:5, 8, 16, 21-22; 111:10; 127:1-5). Psalm 1, probably an introduction to the whole Psalter, contrasts the diverging paths of the righteous and ungodly (cf. Psalm 112), while Psalms 127 and 128 concentrate on the blessings given to the godly. Psalm 133 is written in praise of unity. The problem of&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-8918301264592611976?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/8918301264592611976/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=8918301264592611976' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/8918301264592611976'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/8918301264592611976'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-of-psalms-7.html' title='BOOK OF PSALMS 7'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-1450230393184188451</id><published>2008-08-20T04:53:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:53:58.434-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BOOK OF PSALMS 6'/><title type='text'>BOOK OF PSALMS 6</title><content type='html'>CONTENT   INTRODUCTION It is more helpful to describe the psalms in categories than to explain them one by one in canonical order. The psalms can be categorized as follows: Psalms of praise Royal, messianic psalms Passion psalms Psalms about Zion Laments Imprecatory psalms Penitential psalms Wisdom psalms and historical psalms Psalms of trust   PSALMS OF PRAISE The Hebrew title, “Praises,” defines accurately a large part of the contents of the book. Each of the first four sections concludes with a doxology, while the fifth section concludes with five psalms, each of which begins and ends with one or two “Hallelujahs.” The last of these, Psalm 150, sounds the call to total praise. God is to be praised for his being, for his great acts in creation, nature, and history on both the individual and the communal level. 1. Individual praise. In comparison with the number of individual laments, there are relatively few psalms in this category. Those normally included are Psalms 9; 18; 32; 34; 116; and 138. This may, in part, be due to the universal tendency to complain rather than to express thanks. But a number of the laments do, in fact, include the note of thanksgiving for the anticipated deliverance, and the normal round of congregational thanksgiving would allow the individual to express his personal praise. However, it was customary in temple worship to give a verbal act of thanksgiving before the whole assembly whenever a vow offering or a thank offering was made. Such public testimony, and the communal meal associated with this type of sacrifice, is indicated in Psalms 22:22-26; 66:13-20; 116:17-19. The inclusion of such opportunities for personal praise and testimony must have added warmth and significance to worship. Each act of deliverance and every experience of God’s mercy became part of salvation history, which was a cumulative, ongoing concept, not simply a recital of God’s deeds in earlier centuries. 2. General communal praise. This is sometimes entitled “hymns” or “descriptive praise,” its main feature being linked to a particular act of deliverance. God is usually referred to in the third person, not directly. Psalm 103 may be taken as representative of this group. It begins and ends with individual references (verses 1-5, 22b), but the central section (esp. verses 6-14) shows that the psalmist was part of a worshiping community. There is first of all the imperative call to praise God for the full range of his mercy to each individual, including physical and spiritual deliverance and his sustaining and satisfying grace. Then the focus changes to his great works in history (verses 6-7). This forms a natural basis for the recital of those gracious qualities revealed so consistently during the course of the national history, especially his tender, fatherly care (verses 8-14). The frailty of humanity contrasts with God’s constancy (verses 15-18), and his rule, being universal and absolute (verse 19), merits the praise of all things, living and inanimate, in heaven and on earth (verses 19-22). There is, however, a great number of possible variations in the way in which God is celebrated, as Psalms 113 and 136, which come within this class, illustrate. 3. Specific communal praise. Occasionally termed “declarative praise,” this type of psalm connects with a particular outstanding evidence of God’s mercy and would most naturally follow soon after the event itself. Deliverance from an enemy provides the occasion for most of the psalms in this category (e.g., Psalms 124; 129). Psalm 66:8-12, now the nucleus of an expanded recital of God’s goodness, was possibly once complete in itself. Psalms 46–48 may form a trilogy connected with the remarkable deliverance of Jerusalem from Sennacherib’s Assyrians in 701 BC (2 Kings 18:17–19:37). Psalm 67 was probably composed in gratitude for a particular harvest. It is easy to see how psalms of this type could, in the process of time, acquire a more general usage. 4. Praise for the God of nature. The first part of Psalm 19 pictures the praise of God sounding from the heavens; Psalm 29 celebrates him as the God of the thunderstorm, which, sweeping in from the Mediterranean near Lebanon, pursues its awe-inspiring path southward into the wilderness of Kadesh, with the result that “in his temple” (the created world?) all are praising, “Glory, glory to the LORD” (verse 9). His sovereignty and self-sufficiency in this world are celebrated in Psalm 50:10-12; he is the God of growth and harvest (Psalm 65:9-13); in Psalm 104, often called the “Hymn of Creation,” he sustains and supplies everything on the earth and in the seas and is the absolute Lord of all life (verses 29-30). There is no confusion between God and his creation; even the seemingly permanent heaven and earth will perish, but “you go on forever” (Psalm 102:25-27). Nature’s role is to proclaim the glory of God (Psalm 19:1) and to praise him (Psalm 148). People see themselves as insignificant when set against those forces of nature, which are themselves dwarfed by God—hence, the awareness of the immeasurable gulf between God and people that God has bridged by his grace (Psalm 8). 5. Praise for God’s kingship. A relatively small group of psalms (Psalms 47; 93; 96–99) celebrate the kingship of God in a way that goes beyond the ascription of praise noted in the foregoing groups. They are marked by acclamation, by both shouting and clapping when God “ascends.” Presumably, the reference is to his throne (Psalm 47:1-5; cf. 99:1-2). “The LORD reigns” (Psalms 93:1; 97:1; 99:1) is the frequent cry, and the nature of his reign is extolled (Psalm 99:4-5).   ROYAL, MESSIANIC PSALMS Psalms 2; 18; 20; 21; 45; 61; 72; 89; 101; 110; 132; and 144 are usually included as the royal psalms. They do not form a literary category, since psalms of various types are included, but they all have some reference to the king, the nature of his rule, and his relationship to God. Since the Davidic monarchy was terminated in 586 BC, these psalms, almost certainly, were composed before that date. The language in these psalms often shows the king as being God’s vice-regent. For example, Psalm 45, a royal marriage psalm, contains the assertion “Your throne, O God, endures for ever and ever”&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-1450230393184188451?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/1450230393184188451/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=1450230393184188451' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/1450230393184188451'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/1450230393184188451'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-of-psalms-6.html' title='BOOK OF PSALMS 6'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-7591810719192938730</id><published>2008-08-20T04:52:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:53:14.676-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BOOK OF PSALMS 5'/><title type='text'>BOOK OF PSALMS 5</title><content type='html'>only cast himself, in total penitence, upon God’s mercy. Man’s moral obligations (Psalms 15; 24:3-5) and loyalty to the law (Psalms 19:7-11; 119) are fully accepted. Throughout, there is the revelation of a strong personal relationship that encourages prayer and praise and invites trust.   THE AFTERLIFE The Psalms maintain the traditional Hebrew view of Sheol as the abode of the departed, without distinction between the good and evil, where all but mere existence has perished. The chief complaint of the devout man was that, in Sheol, all meaningful relationship with God ceased (Psalms 6:5; 88:10-12). However, it was recognized that, since God was almighty, even Sheol was not exempt from his reach (Psalm 139:8). Added to this was the preciousness and strength of fellowship with God, which could not be terminated even by death. Psalms 16:9-11; 49:15; and 73:23-26 well illustrate this insight. The Psalter, therefore, witnesses to an important transitional phase in Israel’s belief.   UNIVERSAL RECOGNITION OF GOD Passages like Psalms 9:11; 47:1-2, 7-9; 66:8; 67; and 117:1 call upon all nations to acknowledge and praise God and show an awareness of his sovereignty over all nations. But this universalism does not appear to involve any desire to convert the heathen nations and, indeed, it is balanced by strong particularistic elements. God’s covenant relationship with his people and his mighty deeds on their behalf are the chief items for which the praise of all nations is summoned (Psalms 47:3-4; 66:8-9; 126:2). As elsewhere in the OT, the role of Israel is passive; her continued existence witnesses to God’s faithfulness and brings glory to him.   LASTING VALUE Whatever the emotion of the psalmists, be it bitter complaint, anguished lament, or joyous exultation, all the psalms reflect one or other of the many aspects of communion with God. The reader may look “into the heart of all the saints” (so said Luther) as they faced life’s experiences in the awareness of a God who was all-seeing, all-knowing, and all-powerful. The strength of that personal relationship with God that typified OT worship at its best is exemplified here, and the many echoes of the psalms elsewhere in Israel’s literature show the powerful influence of these testimonies on the faithful. The fact that, almost invariably, little specific detail is given of the psalmists’ actual conditions has made it easier for the Psalter to become the universal hymnbook and devotional treasury of God’s people, in both public and private worship, until and including the present day. Modern life, materially, is vastly different from that of ancient Israel, but God remains unchanged and so do the basic needs of the human heart. The Holy Spirit, therefore, can still use this spiritual treasury as a means of revelation and communication between God and man. Few books in the Bible have exercised so profound an influence or been so widely used.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-7591810719192938730?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/7591810719192938730/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=7591810719192938730' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/7591810719192938730'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/7591810719192938730'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-of-psalms-5.html' title='BOOK OF PSALMS 5'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-3953785488163211033</id><published>2008-08-20T04:52:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:52:43.279-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BOOK OF PSALMS 4'/><title type='text'>BOOK OF PSALMS 4</title><content type='html'>community, but the sanctuary was the focal point of Israel’s worship for the greater part of the OT period. Prayer was possible elsewhere, but whenever practicable, it was customary for the worshiper to present his petitions at the main sanctuary. And thanksgiving in ancient Israel was almost invariably connected with a thank offering, vow offering, or freewill offering. The psalms could have been composed by individuals, like David, who had the requisite technical ability. And it must be appreciated that poetry, an unfamiliar medium to most Western civilizations, was the natural way for the ancient Easterner to express his emotions. Or the individual could have engaged a member of the Levitical guilds of musicians to frame either his supplication or his thanksgiving. Gradually, a comprehensive collection of psalms would be available for the use of individuals, the congregation, and even the entire nation in any conceivable situation. Once finalized, this collection served not only the subsequent needs of Israel but the devotional requirements of successive generations of Christians as well. Whatever the origin of an individual psalm, each has finally been incorporated in a cultic setting, and it may be assumed that the best of Israel’s psalmody has thus been preserved.   PURPOSE AND THEOLOGY   THE DOCTRINE OF GOD In both adversity and prosperity, the psalmists indicate a strong faith in God and a clear conception of his attributes. Understandably, anthropomorphisms (ascribing human characteristics to nonhuman things) abound, with references to God’s voice, words, ears, eyes, face, or hands and fingers. No exception needs to be taken to this. Anthropomorphisms of this kind are, in fact, widely used by present-day Christians. Their great value is that they make God real to the worshiper. How else could humans describe God, except in terms of their own understanding? The monotheism of the psalms emerges clearly in Psalms 115:3-8; 135:15-18; 139. God is viewed as the Creator (Psalms 8:3; 89:11; 95:3-5), with references to the creation mythology of surrounding nations (e.g., Psalm 89:10) serving merely as illustrations of his almighty creative power. He is proclaimed as the Lord of history (Psalms 44; 78; 80; 81; 105; 106) and as the sovereign controller of nature (Psalms 18:7; 19:1-6; 65:8-13; 105:26-42; 135:5-7). The psalmists never tired of celebrating God’s absolute greatness.   THE HUMAN PERSPECTIVE The Psalter is a God-centered book, but humanity has a worthy place, in spite of the vast gulf between them and their Creator (Psalms 8:3-4; 145:3-4) and the limitations of their earthly life (Psalm 90:9-10). By the will of God, humans occupy a responsible, mediating position between God and all other created beings (Psalm 8:5-8). The relationship with a righteous God is endangered by sin (Psalm 106), but God is gracious and long-suffering (Psalm 103), faithful and forgiving (Psalm 130). While references to the sacrificial system are not lacking (Psalms 20:3; 50:8-9), the emphasis is upon a personal piety that demands obedience and a surrendered heart (Psalm 40:6-8). Psalm 51 indicates a depth of sin with which the sacrificial system was totally inadequate to cope; the psalmist could&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-3953785488163211033?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/3953785488163211033/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=3953785488163211033' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/3953785488163211033'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/3953785488163211033'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-of-psalms-4.html' title='BOOK OF PSALMS 4'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-4590999194594298855</id><published>2008-08-20T04:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:52:12.702-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BOOK OF PSALMS 3'/><title type='text'>BOOK OF PSALMS 3</title><content type='html'>lends support to the probability that the collections were combined chronologically in the sequence in which they are found today. Ezra is traditionally credited with the final grouping and editing of the psalms, a hypothesis that appears reasonable in light of his vital contribution to the systematic reshaping of the national religious life. In any case, the process was completed before the translation of the Psalter into Greek (the Septuagint) at the end of the third century BC, since the traditional order is found there. General, but not complete, support comes also from the evidence of the Dead Sea Scrolls. At some point minor dislocations occurred. Psalms 9 and 10 may have originally formed one psalm (as in the Septuagint), and there is a strong case for combining Psalms 42 and 43.   BACKGROUND As the book of Psalms lies before us, its connection with temple worship is apparent. Fifty-five psalms are addressed to the choirmaster, and as we have noted, 23 or 24 are linked with the two main guilds of Levitical singers, Asaph and Korah. The musical instruments, such as stringed instruments (Psalm 55 title) and flutes (Psalm 5 title) are noted. Probably other terms concern musical directions: Selah, which occurs 71 times, may indicate a pause or crescendo; Higgaion (Psalm 9:16) may recommend a meditative attitude. Seemingly obscure references like “The Hind of the Dawn” (Psalm 22 title), “Lilies” (Psalms 45 title; 80 title) and “The Dove on Far-off Terebinths” (Psalm 56 title) may indicate the tunes to which the psalms were to be sung. The precise meaning of other terms, such as Shiggaion (Psalm 7 title) or Alamoth (conjecturally a choir of ladies, Psalm 46 title), may also be in the realm of musical directions.   STRUCTURE The Psalter, possibly in conscious imitation of the five books of Moses in the Law, is divided into five sections (Psalms 1–41; 42–72; 73–89; 90–106; 107–150), separated by four doxologies (41:13; 72:18-19; 89:52; 106:48). While the editorial comment in Psalm 72:20 notes that the psalms of David were ended, Davidic psalms are found later in the book (Psalms 86; 101; 103), suggesting that at least some of these sections circulated independently until their inclusion in the final collection. Such independence is further indicated by the duplications in the various sections (e.g., Psalms 14 and 53; 40:13-17 and 70) and by the use of different names for God, who is usually referred to as “Lord” in the first collection and as “God” in the second.   CANONICITY In the various recensions of the third section of the Hebrew canon, the Writings or Holy Books, the book of Psalms is almost invariably placed first. It was clearly regarded as the most important book in this section, and in Luke 24:44, “Psalms” is synonymous with “Writings” as its title. While the canonicity of all the contents of the Writings was not finalized until the end of the first century AD, it is likely that the book of Psalms was accepted as inspired long before this, probably by 300 BC. It must not be inferred that all the psalms had their origin in the cultic life of the&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-4590999194594298855?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/4590999194594298855/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=4590999194594298855' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/4590999194594298855'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/4590999194594298855'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-of-psalms-3.html' title='BOOK OF PSALMS 3'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-4364766749285185889</id><published>2008-08-20T04:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:25:28.869-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BOOK OF PSALMS 2'/><title type='text'>BOOK OF PSALMS 2</title><content type='html'>THE CASE FOR DAVIDIC AUTHORSHIP Five points can be offered to support David’s authorship of several psalms: 1. The authenticity of David’s lament over Saul and Jonathan (2 Samuel 1:19-27) is generally accepted. This indicates a deeply poetic spirit and a generous temperament that prepares us to accept those psalms ascribed to David that evidence similar characteristics. “The last words of David” is another Davidic poem in the historical books (2 Samuel 23:1-7). 2. David had a reputation as a skillful musician at Saul’s court (1 Samuel 16:16-18). Amos comments on his inventiveness as a musician (Amos 6:5), while the Chronicler repeatedly stresses his contribution to the musical aspect of temple worship (e.g., 1 Chronicles 6:31; 16:7; Ezra 3:10). The Jewish historian Josephus said that David composed songs and hymns to God in varied meters. The probability is that David, as well as amassing materials and preparing the plans for Solomon’s temple, also gave attention to the temple worship. This is his place in Jewish tradition. 3. The early monarchy, with a freshly secured independence, national prestige, and a new prosperity, would most likely be a time of artistic creativity. David was at the heart of this movement. 4. There is a close correspondence between David’s life as described in the historical books and certain psalms, for example, his sin concerning Bathsheba and Uriah (2 Samuel 11:2–12:25) and Psalm 51, as witnessed in the title. David’s lapses and genuine repentance, as well as the varied aspects of his career— shepherd, fugitive, warrior, and so on—find expression in many of the psalms attributed to him. The correspondence between the David of the psalms and the David of the historical books is close, especially in the display of strong faith in God. 5. Although some scholars believe that when “David” is mentioned in the NT, it is simply a reference to the book of Psalms and not an ascription of authorship, a straightforward interpretation of the NT text strengthens the case for Davidic authorship. David is specifically named as the author of various psalms in Matthew 22:41-45; Acts 1:16; 2:25, 34; Romans 4:6; 11:9. In conclusion, there is strong support for the view that the substantial nucleus of the Psalter is Davidic. Moreover, it is probable that some of the anonymous psalms were the work of the “sweet psalmist of Israel” (2 Samuel 23:1). Hebrews 4:7 refers one of these, Psalm 95, to David (see also Acts 4:25 and Psalm 2).   DATE Once David’s authorship of several psalms is established, then it must follow that these psalms are dated during David’s life. Thus, most of the psalms formed the hymnbook of Israel in the period of the monarchy. Other psalms were written later. For example, Psalm 137 is clearly exilic, and Psalms 107:2-3 and 126:1 allude to the return from captivity. Psalms 44 and 79 are probably, but not conclusively, postexilic. The book of Psalms was probably the product of a considerable period of growth. The incidence of Davidic psalms in the first section indicates that it was completed early, possibly toward the end of David’s reign. The remainder of the process of compilation is difficult to reconstruct, but the fact that the titles, with their allusions to authors, events, and musical directions, become less frequent in the two final collections (Psalms 90–150)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-4364766749285185889?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/4364766749285185889/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=4364766749285185889' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/4364766749285185889'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/4364766749285185889'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-of-psalms-2.html' title='BOOK OF PSALMS 2'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-3975061290770963529</id><published>2008-08-20T04:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:21:58.518-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='BOOK OF PSALMS 1'/><title type='text'>BOOK OF PSALMS 1</title><content type='html'>Poems sung to musical accompaniment, originally the harp. The alternative title, the Psalter, refers to a collection of songs sung to harp accompaniment. The English title, therefore, broadly defines the form employed, whereas the Hebrew title of the book, “Praises,” or “Book of Praises,” suggests the content.   AUTHORS   THE EVIDENCE OF THE TITLES The Hebrew Bible credits David with 73 psalms, compared with 84 in the Septuagint and 85 in the Latin Vulgate. Korah and Asaph, the leaders of the Levitical singing groups, are connected with 11 and 12 psalms, respectively (although Psalm 43 is almost certainly to be attributed to Korah also). Two psalms are ascribed to Solomon (Psalms 72; 127), one to Moses (Psalm 90), and one to Ethan (Psalm 89), while Heman shares the credit for one psalm with the sons of Korah (Psalm 88). The remainder are sometimes called “orphan psalms” because of their anonymity. The preposition “of” found in the titles (for example, “A Psalm of David”) usually indicates authorship. But in the case of groups, such as the sons of Asaph or Korah, it may simply indicate that the psalms were included in their repertoire. Less plausible is the idea that it may also be rendered “for the use of.” For example, some of the “Psalms of David” might be “for the use of” the Davidic king on some occasion.   HISTORICAL ALLUSIONS IN THE TITLES Many of the titles refer to specific events in the life of David (e.g., Psalms 3; 7; 18; 30; 34; 51). There is evidence that the titles were added at an early date. When the psalms were translated into Greek, there appears to have been some difficulty in translating the titles, possibly because of their antiquity. If the historical references were added at a late date, there is no reason why plausible backgrounds could not have been supplied for all the Davidic psalms, instead of only a few. Moreover, the apparent disparity between the title and the actual content of some psalms (e.g., Psalm 30) indicates that the titles were supplied by those who knew about a connection unknown to a later editor. Admittedly, there are minor discrepancies between the titles and the references in the historical books. For example, in Psalm 34 David acts the madman before Abimelech, whereas in 1 Samuel it is before Achish. But probably Abimelech was the general name (like Pharaoh for the kings of Egypt) for all the Philistine kings (e.g., Genesis 21:32; 26:26). Evidence of authorship and historical background in the titles, therefore, may be taken as a reasonably reliable guide. But the internal difficulties, together with the freedom exercised by successive translators into Greek, Syriac, and Latin, indicates that they were not regarded as inspired.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-3975061290770963529?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/3975061290770963529/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=3975061290770963529' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/3975061290770963529'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/3975061290770963529'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/book-of-psalms-1.html' title='BOOK OF PSALMS 1'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-6310518567051754864</id><published>2008-08-20T03:16:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:25:28.867-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Jeremiah 2'/><title type='text'>Jeremiah2</title><content type='html'>NOTES OF BOOK OF JEREMIAH&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1:1-2&lt;br /&gt;After King Solomon’s death, the united kingdom of Israel had split into rival northern and southern kingdoms. The northern kingdom was called Israel; the southern, Judah. Jeremiah was from Anathoth, four miles north of Jerusalem in the southern kingdom. He lived and prophesied during the reigns of the last five kings of Judah. This was a chaotic time politically, morally, and spiritually. As Babylon, Egypt, and Assyria battled for world supremacy, Judah found itself caught in the middle of the triangle. Although Jeremiah prophesied for 40 years, he never saw his people heed his words and turn from their sins. 1:5&lt;br /&gt;God knew you, as he knew Jeremiah, long before you were born or even conceived. He thought about you and planned for you. When you feel discouraged or inadequate, remember that God has always thought of you as valuable and that he has a purpose in mind for you. &lt;br /&gt;1:6-8.&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah was “appointed” by God as “spokesman to the world.” God has a purpose for each Christian, but some people are appointed by God for specific kinds of work. Samson (Judges 13:3-5), David (1 Samuel 16:12-13), John the Baptist (Luke 1:13-17), and Paul (Galatians 1:15-16) were also called to do particular jobs for God. Whatever work you do should be done for the glory of God (Philippians 1:11). If God gives you a specific task, accept it cheerfully and do it with diligence. If God has not given you a specific call or assignment, then seek to fulfill the mission common to all believers—to love, obey, and serve God—until his guidance becomes more clear. Often people struggle with new challenges because they lack self-confidence, feeling that they have inadequate ability, training, or experience. Jeremiah thought he was “too young” and inexperienced to be God’s spokesman to the world. But God promised to be with him. We should not allow feelings of inadequacy to keep us from obeying God. He will always be with us. If God gives you a job to do, he will provide all you need to do it. God promised to be with Jeremiah and take care of him, but not to keep trouble from coming. God did not insulate him from jailings, deportation, or insults. God does not keep us from encountering life’s storms, but he will see us through them. In fact, God walks through these storms with us and rescues us. 1:10&lt;br /&gt;God appointed Jeremiah to bring his word to “nations and kingdoms.” Jeremiah’s work was to warn not only the Jews but all the nations of the world about God’s judgment for sin. Don’t forget in reading the Old Testament that, while God was consistently working through the people of Judah and Israel, his plan was to communicate to every nation and person. We are included in Jeremiah’s message of judgment and hope, and as believers we are to share God’s desire to reach the whole world for him. &lt;br /&gt;1:11-14.&lt;br /&gt;The vision of the branch of an almond tree revealed the beginning of God’s judgment because the almond tree is among the first to blossom in the spring. God saw the sins of Judah and the nations, and he would carry out swift and certain judgment. The boiling pot tipping from the north and spilling over Judah pictured Babylon delivering God’s scalding judgment against Jeremiah’s people.&lt;br /&gt;1:14-19&lt;br /&gt;The problems we face may not seem as ominous as Jeremiah’s, but they are critical to us and may overwhelm us! God’s promise to Jeremiah and to us is that nothing will defeat us completely; he will help us through the most agonizing problems. Face each day with the assurance that God will be with you and see you through. 1:16&lt;br /&gt;The people of Judah sinned greatly by continuing to worship other gods. God had commanded them specifically against this (Exodus 20:3-6) because idolatry places trust in created things rather than the Creator. Although these people belonged to God, they chose to follow false gods. Many “gods” entice us to turn away from God. Material possessions, dreams for the future, approval of others, and vocational goals compete for our total commitment. Striving after these at the expense of our commitment to God puts our heart where Judah’s was—and God severely punished Judah.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2:1-37&lt;br /&gt;In this section, the marriage analogy sharply contrasts God’s love for his people with their love for other gods and reveals Judah’s faithlessness. Jeremiah condemned Judah (he sometimes called Judah “Jerusalem,” the name of its capital city) for seeking security in worthless, changeable things rather than the unchangeable God. We may be tempted to seek security from possessions, people, or our own abilities, but these will fail us. There is no lasting security apart from the eternal God. &lt;br /&gt;2:2&lt;br /&gt;We appreciate a friend who remains true to his or her commitment, and we are disappointed with someone who fails to keep a promise. God was pleased when his people obeyed initially, but he became angry with them when they refused to keep their commitment. Temptations distract us from God. Think about your original commitment to obey God, and ask yourself if you are remaining truly devoted. &lt;br /&gt;2:3&lt;br /&gt;The first fruits, or the first part, of the harvest were set aside for God (Deuteronomy 26:1-11). That’s how Israel was dedicated to him in years gone by. Israel had been as eager to please God as if she were his young bride, a holy, devoted people. This contrasted greatly with the situation in Jeremiah’s time. 2:4-8.&lt;br /&gt;The united nation of Israel included both the “people of Israel” and the “people of Jacob” (Judah). Jeremiah knew Israel‘s history well. The prophets recited history to the people for several reasons: (1) to remind them of God’s faithfulness; (2) to make sure the people wouldn’t forget (they didn’t have Bibles to read); (3) to emphasize God’s love for them; (4) to remind the people that there was a time when they were close to God. We should learn from history so we can build on the successes and avoid repeating the failures of others&lt;br /&gt;Baal was the chief male god of the Canaanite religion. ”Images of Baal” (2:23) refers to the fact that Baal was worshiped in many centers in Canaanite practice. Baal was the god of fertility. Worship of Baal included animal sacrifice and sacred prostitution (male and female) in the high places. Jezebel, the wife of King Ahab, introduced Baal worship into the northern kingdom, and eventually it spread to Judah. The sexual orientation of this worship was a constant temptation to the Israelites, who were called to be holy. &lt;br /&gt;2:10.&lt;br /&gt;God was saying that even pagan nations like Cyprus (in the west) and Kedar (the home of Arab tribes living in the desert east of Palestine) remained loyal to their national gods. But Israel had abandoned the one and only God for a completely worthless object of worship.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2:13.&lt;br /&gt;Who would set aside a fountain of living water for a cracked cistern, a pit that collected rainwater but could not hold it? God told the Israelites they were doing that very thing when they turned from him, the fountain of living water, to the worship of idols. Not only that, but the cisterns they chose were broken and empty. The people had built religious systems in which to store truth, but those systems were worthless. Why should we cling to the broken promises of unstable “cisterns” (money, power, religious systems, or whatever transitory thing we are putting in place of God) when God promises to constantly refresh us with living water (John 4:10)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2;17-17.&lt;br /&gt;Memphis was near modern Cairo’s present location in lower Egypt, and Tahpanhes was in northeastern Egypt. Jeremiah could be speaking of Pharaoh Shishak’s previous invasion of Judah in 926 B.C. (1 Kings 14:25), or he may have been predicting Pharaoh Neco’s invasion in 609 B.C. when King Josiah of Judah would be killed (2 Kings 23:29-30). Jeremiah’s point is that the people brought this on themselves by rebelling against God. &lt;br /&gt;2:22&lt;br /&gt;The stain of sin is more than skin-deep. Israel had stains that could not be washed out, even with the strongest cleansers. Spiritual cleansing must reach deep into the heart—and this is a job that God alone can do. We cannot ignore the effects of sin and hope they will go away. Your sin has caused a deep stain that only God can remove if you are willing to let him cleanse you (Isaiah 1:18; Ezekiel 36:25). 2:23-27.&lt;br /&gt;The people are compared to animals who search for mates in mating season. Unrestrained, they rush for power, money, alliances with foreign powers, and other gods. The idols did not seek the people; the people sought the idols and ran wildly after them. Then they became so comfortable in their sin that they could not think of giving it up. Their only shame was in getting caught. If we desire something so much that we’ll do anything to get it, it is a sign that we are addicted to it and out of tune with God. 2:30.&lt;br /&gt;Being a prophet in Jeremiah’s day was risky business. Prophets had to criticize the policies of evil kings, and this made them appear to be traitors. The kings hated the prophets for standing against their policies, and the people often hated the prophets for preaching against their idolatrous life-styles (see Acts 7:52).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2:31-32.&lt;br /&gt;Forgetting can be dangerous, whether it is intentional or an oversight. Israel forgot God by focusing its affections on the allurements of the world. The more we focus on the pleasures of the world, the easier it becomes to forget God’s care, his love, his dependability, his guidance, and most of all, God himself. What pleases you most? Have you been forgetting God lately? 2:36&lt;br /&gt;God is not against alliances or working partnerships, but he is against people trusting others for the help that should come from him. This was the problem in Jeremiah’s time. After the days of David and Solomon, Israel fell apart because the leaders turned to other nations and gods instead of the true God. They played power politics, thinking that their strong neighbors could protect them. But Judah would soon learn that its alliance with Egypt would be just as disappointing as its former alliance with Assyria (2 Kings 16:8-9; Isaiah 7:13-25). 3:1.&lt;br /&gt;This law, found in Deuteronomy 24:1-4, says that a divorced woman who remarries can never be reunited with her first husband. Judah “divorced” God and “married” other gods. God had every right to permanently disown his wayward people, but in his mercy he was willing to take them back again.&lt;br /&gt;3;2&lt;br /&gt;“Like a nomad in the desert” means that Judah ran to idolatry as an Arab thief might hide and wait to plunder a passing caravan. It was a national preoccupation.  3:4-5.&lt;br /&gt;In spite of their great sin, the people of Israel continued to talk like they were God’s children. The only way they could do this was to minimize their sin. When we know we’ve done something wrong, we want to downplay the error and relieve some of the guilt we feel. As we minimize our sinfulness, we naturally shy away from making changes, and so we keep on sinning. But if we view every wrong attitude and action as a serious offense against God, we will begin to understand what living for God is all about. Is there any sin in your life that you’ve written off as too small to worry about? God says that we must confess and turn away from every sin.  3:6-10&lt;br /&gt;The northern kingdom, Israel, had fallen to Assyria, and its people had been taken into captivity. The tragic lesson of their fall should have caused the southern kingdom, Judah, to return to God, but Judah paid no attention. Jeremiah urged Judah to return to God to avoid certain disaster. This message came between 627 and 621 B.C., during Josiah’s reign. Although Josiah obeyed God’s commands, his example apparently did not penetrate the hearts of the people. If the people refused to repent, God said he would destroy the nation because of the evils of Josiah’s grandfather, King Manasseh (2 Kings 23:25-27).&lt;br /&gt;3:11-13&lt;br /&gt;Israel was not even trying to look as if it were obeying God, but Judah maintained the appearance of faith without a true heart. Believing the right doctrines without heartfelt commitment is like offering sacrifices without true repentance. Judah’s false repentance brought Jeremiah’s words of condemnation. To live without faith is hopeless; to express sorrow without change is hypocritical. Being sorry for sin is not enough. Repentance demands a change of mind and heart that results in changed behavior.&lt;br /&gt;3:12-18&lt;br /&gt;The northern kingdom, Israel, was in captivity, being punished for its sins. The people of Judah undoubtedly looked down on these northern neighbors for their blatant heresy and degraded morals. Even so, Jeremiah promised the remnant of Israel God’s blessings if they would turn to him. Judah, still secure in its own mind, should have turned to God after seeing the destruction of Israel. But the people of Judah refused, so Jeremiah startled them by telling about God’s promise to Israel’s remnant if they would repent. God promised to give his people leaders who would follow him, filled with knowledge (wisdom) and understanding. God saw Israel’s lack of direction, so he promised to provide the right kind of leadership. We look to and trust our leaders for guidance and direction. But if they do not follow God, they will lead us astray. Pray for God-honoring leaders in our nations, communities, and churches—those who will be good examples and bring us God’s wisdom. &lt;br /&gt;In the days of David and Solomon’s reign over a united Israel, the people had a beautiful Temple, where they worshiped God. The Temple housed the Ark of the Covenant, the symbol of God’s presence with the people. The Ark held the tablets of the Ten Commandments (see Exodus 25:10-22). Those days with the Ark wouldn’t be missed in the future Kingdom because God’s presence by the Holy Spirit would be there personally among his people. 3:22-25.&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah predicted a day when the nation would be reunited, true worship would be reinstated, and sin would be seen for what it is. Our world glorifies the thrill that comes from wealth, winning, and sexual pleasure, and it ignores the sin that is so often associated with these thrills. It is sad that so few see sin as it really is—a deception. Most people can’t see this until they are destroyed by the sin they pursue. The advantage of believing God’s Word is that we don’t have to learn by hard experience the destructive results of sin. 4:3&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah told the people to plow up the hardness of their hearts as a plow breaks up unplowed ground—soil that has not been tilled for a season. Good kings like Josiah had tried to turn the people back to God, but the people had continued to worship their idols in secret. Their hearts had become hardened to God’s will. Jeremiah said the people needed to remove the sin that hardened their hearts before the good seed of God’s commands could take root. Likewise we must remove our heart-hardening sin if we expect God’s Word to take root and grow in our life. 4:6-7.&lt;br /&gt;The disaster from the north would come from Babylon when Nabopolassar and Nebuchadnezzar II would attack (see 2 Chronicles 36). 4;10&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah, deeply moved by God’s words, expressed his sorrow and confusion to God. Jeremiah was intercessor for the people. These people had false expectations because of the past promises of blessings, their blindness to their own sin, and the false prophets who kept telling them that all was well.&lt;br /&gt;Disaster was announced first from Dan and then on to the hills of Ephraim because Dan was located at the northern border of Israel. Thus, the Danites would be the first to see the approaching armies as they invaded from the north. No one would be able to stop the armies because they would be coming as punishment for the people’s sin. 4:19-31.&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah was anguished by the sure devastation of the coming judgment. This judgment would continue until the people turned from their sin and listened to God. Although this prophecy refers to the future destruction by Babylon, it could also describe the judgment of all sinners at the end of the world. &lt;br /&gt;Judah was clever at doing evil but did not know how to do what was right. Right living is more than simply avoiding sin. It requires decision and discipline. We must develop skills in right living because our behavior attracts attention to our God. We should pursue excellence in Christian living with as much effort as we pursue excellence at work. 4:22&lt;br /&gt;Judah was clever at doing evil but did not know how to do what was right. Right living is more than simply avoiding sin. It requires decision and discipline. We must develop skills in right living because our behavior attracts attention to our God. We should pursue excellence in Christian living with as much effort as we pursue excellence at work. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4:27&lt;br /&gt;God warned that destruction was certain, but he promised that the faithful remnant would be spared. God is committed to preserving those who are faithful to him. 5:1.&lt;br /&gt;Jerusalem was the capital city and center of worship for Judah. God was willing to spare the city if only one person who was just and honest could be found (he made a similar statement about Sodom; see Genesis 18:32). Think how significant your testimony may be in your city or community. You may represent the only witness for God to many people. Are you faithful to that opportunity? 5:3.&lt;br /&gt;Nothing but truth is acceptable to God. When we pray, sing, speak, or serve, nothing closes the door of God’s acceptance more than hypocrisy, lying, or pretense. God sees through us and refuses to listen. To be close to God, be honest with him. 5:4-5.&lt;br /&gt;Even the leaders who knew God’s laws and understood his words of judgment had rejected him. They were supposed to teach and guide the people, but instead they led them into sin. Jeremiah observed the poor and ignorant—those who were uninformed of God’s ways—and realized they were not learning God’s laws from their leaders. Thus, God’s search in Jerusalem was complete. There were no true followers in any level of society. 5:7.&lt;br /&gt;God held these people responsible for the sins of their children because the children had followed their parents’ example. The sin of leading others, especially our children, astray by our example is one for which God will hold us accountable. 5:15&lt;br /&gt;Babylon was indeed an ancient nation. The old Babylonian Empire had lasted from about 1900 to 1550 B.C., and earlier kingdoms had been on her soil as early as 3000 B.C. Babylon in Jeremiah’s day would shortly rebel against Assyrian domination, form its own army, conquer Assyria, and become the next dominant world power. 5:21.&lt;br /&gt;Have you ever spoken to someone, only to realize that the person didn’t hear a word you were saying? Jeremiah told the people that their eyes and ears did them no good because they refused to see or hear God’s message. The people of Judah and Israel were foolishly deaf when God promised blessings for obedience and destruction for disobedience. When God speaks through his Word or his messengers, we harm ourselves if we fail to listen. God’s message will never change us unless we heed it. 5:22-24.&lt;br /&gt;What is your attitude when you come into God’s presence? We should come with respect and trembling because God sets the boundaries of the roaring seas and sends the rain, assuring us of plentiful harvests. God had to strip away all the benefits that Judah and Israel had grown to respect more than him, with the hope that the people would turn back to God. Don’t wait until God removes your cherished resources before committing yourself to him as you should. 5:28-29.&lt;br /&gt;People and nations who please God treat the fatherless (orphans) justly and care for the poor. Wicked men in Israel treated the defenseless unjustly, which displeased God greatly. Some defenseless people—orphans, the poor, the homeless, and the lonely—are within your reach. What action can you take to help at least one of them? 6:1.&lt;br /&gt;The Lord warned Jeremiah’s own tribe of Benjamin to flee, not to the security of the great walled city of Jerusalem because it would be under siege, but toward Tekoa, a town about 12 miles south of Jerusalem. The warning smoke signal was lit at Beth-hakkerem, halfway between Jerusalem and Bethlehem. 6:3.&lt;br /&gt;The shepherds were the leaders of Babylon’s armies, and their flocks were their troops.&lt;br /&gt;6:9.&lt;br /&gt;The “few who remain in Israel” is not to be confused with the righteous remnant. This remnant refers to those left after the first wave of destruction. Like a grape gatherer, Babylon wouldn’t be satisfied until every person was taken. Babylonians invaded Judah three times until they destroyed the nation and its Temple completely (2 Kings 24–25). 6:10&lt;br /&gt;The people became angry and closed their ears. They wanted no part of God’s commands because living for God did not appear very exciting. As in Jeremiah’s day, people today dislike God’s demand for disciplined living. As unsettling as people’s responses might be, we must continue to share God’s Word. Our responsibility is to present God’s Word; their responsibility is to accept it. We must not let what people want to hear determine what we say. 6:14&lt;br /&gt;Ignore it and maybe it will go away!” Sound familiar? This was Israel’s response to Jeremiah’s warnings. They kept listening to predictions of peace because they did not like Jeremiah’s condemnation of their sin. But denying the truth never changes it; what God says always happens. Sin is never removed by denying its existence. We must confess to God that we have sinned and ask him to forgive us. 6:16&lt;br /&gt;The right path for living is ancient and has been marked out by God. But the people refused to take God’s path, going their own way instead. We face the same decision today—going God’s old but true way, or following a new path of our own choosing. Don’t be misled. The only way to find peace and “rest for your souls” is to walk on God’s path. 6:20&lt;br /&gt;Sheba, located in southwest Arabia, was a center of trade in incense and spices used in pagan religious rituals. 6:29-30.&lt;br /&gt;Metal is purified by fire. As it is heated, impurities are burned away and only the pure metal remains. As God tested the people of Judah, however, he could find no purity in their lives. They continued in their sinful ways. Do you see impurities in your life that should be burned away? Confess these to God and allow him to purify you as he sees fit. Take time right now to reflect on the areas of your life that he has already refined; then thank him for what he is doing. 7:1-15&lt;br /&gt;As this section opens, God sends Jeremiah to the Temple gates to refute the false belief that God would not let harm come to the Temple or to those who lived near it. Jeremiah rebukes the people for their false and worthless religion, their idolatry, and the shameless behavior of the people and their leaders. Judah, he says, is ripe for judgment and exile. This happened during the reign of Jehoiakim, a puppet of Egypt. The nation, in shock over the death of Josiah, was going through a spiritual reversal that removed much of the good Josiah had done. The themes of this section are false religion, idolatry, and hypocrisy. Jeremiah was almost put to death for this sermon, but he was saved by the officials of Judah (see chapter 26). 7:2-3.&lt;br /&gt;The people followed a worship ritual but maintained a sinful life-style. It was religion without personal commitment to God. Attending church, taking communion, teaching church school, singing in the choir—all are empty exercises unless we are truly doing them for God. It is good to do these activities, not because we ought to do them for the church, but because we want to do them for God. 7:9-11.&lt;br /&gt;There are several parallels between how the people of Judah viewed their Temple and how many today view their churches. (1) They didn’t make the Temple part of their daily living. We may go to beautiful churches well-prepared for worship, but often we don’t take the presence of God with us through the week. (2) The image of the Temple became more important than the substance of faith. Going to church and belonging to a group can become more important than a life changed for God. (3) The people used their Temple as a sanctuary. Many use religious affiliation as a hideout, thinking it will protect them from evil and problems. 7:11-12.&lt;br /&gt;Jesus used these words from 7:11 in clearing the Temple (Mark 11:17; Luke 19:46). This passage applied to the evil in the Temple in Jesus’ day as well as in Jeremiah’s. God’s Tabernacle had been at Shiloh, but Shiloh had been abandoned (Psalms78:60; Jeremiah 26:6). If God did not preserve Shiloh because the Tabernacle was there, why would he preserve Jerusalem because of the Temple?&lt;br /&gt;Israel, the northern kingdom, had been taken into captivity by Assyria in 722 B.C. 7:18&lt;br /&gt;The Queen of Heaven was a name for Ishtar, the Mesopotamian goddess of love and fertility. After the fall of Jerusalem, the refugees from Judah who fled to Egypt continued to worship her (44:17). A papyrus dating from the 5th century B.C., found at Hermopolis in Egypt, mentions the Queen of Heaven among the gods honored by the Jewish community living there.&lt;br /&gt;7:19&lt;br /&gt;This verse answers the question, Who gets hurt when we turn away from God? We do! Separating ourselves from God is like keeping a green plant away from sunlight or water. God is our only source of spiritual strength. Cut yourself off from him, and you cut off life itself.&lt;br /&gt;7:21—23.&lt;br /&gt;God had set up a system of sacrifices to encourage the people to joyfully obey him (see the book of Leviticus). He required the people to make these sacrifices, not because the sacrifices themselves pleased him, but because they caused the people to recognize their sin and refocus on living for God. They faithfully made the sacrifices but forgot the reason they were offering them, and thus they disobeyed God. Jeremiah reminded the people that unless they were prepared to obey God in all areas of life, acting out religious rituals was meaningless. 7:25.&lt;br /&gt;From the time of Moses to the end of the Old Testament period, God sent many prophets to Israel and Judah. No matter how bad the circumstances were, God always raised up a prophet to speak against their stubborn spiritual attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;7:31-32&lt;br /&gt;The shrines of Topheth (meaning “fireplace”) were set up in the valley of the son of Hinnom, where debris and rubbish from the city were thrown away. This altar was used to worship Molech—a god who required child sacrifice (2 Kings 23:10). Their valley of sacrifice would become their Valley of Slaughter by the Babylonians. At the place where the people had killed their children in sinful idol worship, they themselves would be slaughtered.&lt;br /&gt;8:1-2&lt;br /&gt;The threat that the graves of Judah’s people would be opened was horrible to a people who highly honored the dead and believed that it was the highest desecration to open graves. This would be an ironic punishment for idol worshipers—their bones would be laid out before the sun, moon, and stars—the gods they thought could save them. 8:4-6&lt;br /&gt;When people fall down or realize that they are headed in the wrong direction, it only makes sense for them to get up or change directions. But as God watched the nation, he saw people living sinful lives by choice, deceiving themselves that there would be no consequences. They had lost perspective concerning God’s will for their lives and were trying to minimize their sin. Are there some indicators that you have fallen down or are heading the wrong way? What are you doing to get back on the right path?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;8;16&lt;br /&gt;Dan was the northernmost tribe in Israel. 8:18&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah was pleading with God to save his people.&lt;br /&gt;8:20-22&lt;br /&gt;These words vividly portray Jeremiah’s emotion as he watched his people reject God. He responded with anguish to a world dying in sin. We watch that same world still dying in sin, still rejecting God. But how often is our heart broken for our lost friends and neighbors, our lost world? Only when we have Jeremiah’s kind of passionate concern will we be moved to help. We must begin by asking God to break our heart for the world he loves.&lt;br /&gt;8:22.&lt;br /&gt;Gilead was famous for its healing medicine. This is a rhetorical question. The obvious answer is, “Yes—God,” but Israel was not applying the “medicine”; they were not obeying the Lord. Although the people’s spiritual sickness was very deep, it could be healed. But the people refused the medicine. God could heal their self-inflicted wounds, but he would not force his healing on them. 9;1-6&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah felt conflicting emotions concerning his people. Lying, deceit, treachery, adultery, and idolatry had become common sins. He was angered by their sin, but he had compassion, too. He was set apart from them by his mission for God, but he was also one of them. Jesus had similar feelings when he stood before Jerusalem, the city that would reject him (Matthew 23:37). 9:22-23.&lt;br /&gt;People tend to admire three things about others: wisdom, power (might), and riches. But God puts a higher priority on knowing him personally and living a life that reflects his justice and righteousness. What do you want people to admire most about you?&lt;br /&gt;9:25-26&lt;br /&gt;Circumcision went back to the time of Abraham. For the people of Israel, it was a symbol of their covenant relationship to God (Genesis 17:9-14). Circumcision was also practiced by pagan nations, but not as the sign of a covenant with God. By Jeremiah’s time, the Israelites had forgotten the spiritual significance of circumcision even though they continued to do the physical ritual. 10:2-3&lt;br /&gt;Most people would like to know the future. Decisions would be easier, failures would be avoided, and successes would be assured. The people of Judah wanted to know the future, too, and they tried to discern it through reading the signs in the sky. God made the earth and the heavens, including stars that people consult and worship (10:12). No one will discover the future in man-made charts of God’s stars. But God, who promises to guide you, knows your future and will be with you all the way. He will not reveal your future to you, but he will walk with you as the future unfolds. Don’t trust the stars; trust the one who made the stars. 10:8&lt;br /&gt;Those who put their trust in a chunk of wood, even though it is carved well and looks beautiful, are foolish. The simplest person who worships God is wiser than the wisest person who worships a worthless substitute, because this person has discerned who God really is. In what or whom do you place your trust? 10:9&lt;br /&gt;Tarshish was located at the westward limit of the ancient world, perhaps in what is now Spain (see Jonah 1:3). It was a source of silver, tin, lead, and iron for Tyre (Ezekiel 27:12). The location of Uphaz is unknown. Instead, it may be a metallurgical term for “refined gold.” No matter how well made or how beautiful idols are, they can never have the power and life of the true and living God.&lt;br /&gt;10:19-21.&lt;br /&gt;In this section, Jeremiah uses the picture of nomads wandering in the wilderness trying to pitch their tents. The shepherds of the nation are the evil leaders responsible for the distress. “Flocks” are the people of Judah. Instead of guiding the people to God, the leaders were leading them astray. 10:23-24.&lt;br /&gt;God’s ability to direct our life is far superior to our ability. Sometimes we are afraid of God’s power andplans because we know his power would easily crush us if he used it against us. Don’t be afraid to let God correct your plans. He will give you wisdom if you are willing. 11:1-17&lt;br /&gt;This section concerns the broken covenant, and a rebuke for those who returned to idols after Josiah’s reform. Jeremiah’s rebuke prompted a threat against his life by his own countrymen. As Jeremiah suffered, he pondered the prosperity of the wicked. As he brought these words to a close, he used a rotten linen belt and filled wineskins as object lessons of God’s coming judgment (see the note on 13:1-11). 11:14.&lt;br /&gt;At first glance this command is shocking: God tells Jeremiah not to pray and says he won’t listen to the people if they pray. A time comes when God must dispense justice. Sin brings its own bitter reward. If the people were unrepentant and continued in their sin, neither their prayers nor Jeremiah’s would prevent God’s judgment. Their only hope was repentance—sorrow for sin, turning from it, and turning to God. How can we keep praying for God’s help if we haven’t committed our life to him? God’s blessings come when we are committed to him, not when we selfishly hang on to our sinful ways. &lt;br /&gt;To Jeremiah’s surprise, the people of Anathoth, his hometown, were plotting to kill him. They wanted to silence Jeremiah’s message for several reasons:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; (1) Economic—his condemnation of idol worship would hurt the business of the idol makers;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; (2) Religious—the message of doom and gloom made the people feel depressed and guilty; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3) Political—he openly rebuked their hypocritical politics; and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(4) Personal—the people hated him for showing them that they were wrong. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah had two options: run and hide, or call on God. Jeremiah called, and God answered. Like Jeremiah, we can both run and hide when we face opposition because of our faithfulness to God, or we can call on God for help. Hiding compromises our message; calling on God lets him reinforce it. &lt;br /&gt;12:1-6&lt;br /&gt;Many people have asked, “Why are the wicked so prosperous?” (See, for example, Job 21:4-21 and Habakkuk 1:1-4.) Jeremiah knew that God’s justice would ultimately come, but he was impatient because he wanted justice to come quickly. God didn’t give a doctrinal answer; instead, he gave a challenge: If Jeremiah couldn’t handle this, how would he handle the injustices ahead? It is natural for us to demand fair play and cry for justice against those who take advantage of others. But when we call for justice, we must realize that we ourselves would be in big trouble if God gave each of us what we truly deserve&lt;br /&gt;12:5-6&lt;br /&gt;Life was extremely difficult for Jeremiah despite his love for and obedience to God. When he called to God for relief, God’s reply in effect was, “If you think this is bad, how are you going to cope when it gets really tough?” God’s answers to prayer are not always nice or easy to handle. Any Christian who has experienced war, bereavement, or a serious illness knows this. We are to be committed to God even when the going gets tough and when our prayers for relief are not immediately answered. .13:1&lt;br /&gt; A linen belt was one of the more intimate pieces of clothing, clinging close to the body. It was like underwear. Jeremiah’s action showed how God would ruin Judah just as Jeremiah had ruined the linen belt. 13;1-11&lt;br /&gt;Actions speak louder than words. Jeremiah often used vivid object lessons to arouse the people’s curiosity and get his point across. This lesson of the linen belt illustrated Judah’s destiny. Although the people had once been close to God, their pride had made them useless. Proud people may look important, but God says their pride makes them good for nothing, completely useless. Pride rots our hearts until we lose our usefulness to God. 13:15&lt;br /&gt;While it is good to respect our country and our church, our loyalties always carry a hidden danger—arrogance. When is pride harmful? When it causes us to (1) look down on others; (2) be selfish with our resources; (3) force our solutions on others’ problems; (4) think God is blessing us because of our own merits; (5) be content with our plans rather than seeking God’s plans. 13:18&lt;br /&gt;The king was Jehoiachin, and the queen mother was Nehushta. The king’s father, Jehoiakim, had surrendered to Nebuchadnezzar but later rebelled. During Jehoiachin’s reign, Nebuchadnezzar’s armies besieged Jerusalem, and both Jehoiachin and Nehushta surrendered. Jehoiachin was sent to Babylon and imprisoned (2 Kings 24:1-15). Jeremiah’s prophecy came true. 13:19&lt;br /&gt;The Negev region is the dry wasteland stretching south from Beersheba. The towns in this area would be closed to any refugees fleeing the invading army.&lt;br /&gt;13:23&lt;br /&gt;Not even the threat of captivity could move the people to repent. The people had become so accustomed to doing evil that they had lost their ability to change. God never rejects those who sincerely turn to him. God was warning them to repent before it became impossible to change. We must never put off until tomorrow those changes God wants us to make. Our attitudes and patterns for living can become so set that we will lose all desire to change and will no longer fear the consequences. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;14:1-22&lt;br /&gt;This section opens with God sending a drought on Judah and refusing to answer their prayers for rain. It continues with Jeremiah’s description of judgment to come. 14;1-12&lt;br /&gt;Drought was a judgment with devastating consequences. As usual, when their backs were to the wall, the people cried out to God. But God rejected their plea because they did not repent; they merely wanted his rescue. Not even Jeremiah’s prayers would help. Their only hope was to turn to God. 14:14&lt;br /&gt;What made the people listen to the false prophets? These “prophets” said what the people wanted to hear. False teachers earn fame and money by telling people what they want to hear, but they lead people away from God. If we encourage false teachers, we are as guilty as they are. 14:19-22&lt;br /&gt;Interceding for the people, Jeremiah asked God if Judah’s repentance would bring his help. But God refused to come to their aid (15:1) because the people were insincere, wicked, and stubborn. They knew he wanted to bless them, and they knew what they needed to do to receive that blessing. They wanted God to do his part, but they did not want to do theirs. It’s easy to express sorrow for wrong actions, especially when we want something, but we must be willing to stop doing what is wrong. God will forgive those who are truly repentant, but hypocrites will be severely punished. 15:1&lt;br /&gt;Moses and Samuel were two of God’s greatest prophets. Like Jeremiah, both interceded for the people before God (Exodus 32:11; Numbers 14:11-20; 1 Samuel 7:9; 12:17; &lt;br /&gt;Psalms99:6). Intercession is often effective. In this case, however, the people were so wicked and stubborn that God knew they would not turn to him. 15:3-4&lt;br /&gt;The goal of these destroyers would be to destroy the living and devour the dead. Because of Manasseh’s evil reign and the people’s sin (2 Kings 21:1-16; 23:26; 24:3), the destruction would be complete. The people may have argued that they should not be held responsible for Manasseh’s sins, but they were continuing what Manasseh began. If we follow corrupt leaders knowingly, we can’t excuse ourselves by blaming their bad example.&lt;br /&gt;15:17-21&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah accused God of not helping him when he really needed it. Jeremiah had taken his eyes off God’s purposes and was feeling sorry for himself. He was angry, hurt, and afraid. In response, God didn’t get angry at Jeremiah; he answered by rearranging Jeremiah’s priorities. As God’s mouthpiece, he was to influence the people, not let them influence him. There are three important lessons in this passage: (1) In prayer we can reveal our deepest thoughts to God; (2) God expects us to trust him, no matter what; (3) we are here to influence others for God. 16:1-21.&lt;br /&gt;This section portrays the coming day of disaster. It begins by showing Jeremiah’s loneliness. He is a social outcast because of his harsh messages and his celibate life-style. He must not marry, have children, or take part in funerals or festivals. The section concludes with another appeal to avoid judgment by turning to God. The people did not heed Jeremiah’s words, however, and the first wave of destruction came almost immediately, in 605 B.C. (2 Kings 24:8-12). The second wave came in 597 B.C., and Judah was completely destroyed in 586 B.C. 16:5-7&lt;br /&gt;In Jeremiah’s culture, it was unthinkable not to show grief publicly. The absence of mourning showed the people how complete their devastation would be. So many people would die that it would be impossible to carry out customary mourning rituals for all of them. 16;8-13.&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah was also told not to participate in parties or other joyful events to show how seriously God took the nation’s sins. In both cases (no public grief or joy), Jeremiah’s life was to be an attention getter and an illustration of God’s truth. Sometimes we think that the only way to communicate is through speaking or teaching, but God can use a wide variety of means to bring his message. Use your creativity. 16:14-16&lt;br /&gt;The book of Exodus records God’s miraculous rescue of his people from Egyptian slavery (Exodus 1–15). The people’s return from exile would be so momentous that it would overshadow even the exodus from Egypt. Even though his people had been so stubborn, God would once again show his great mercy. 16:17&lt;br /&gt;Small children think that if they can’t see you, then you can’t see them. The people of Israel may have wished that hiding from God were as simple as closing their eyes. Although they closed their eyes to their sinful ways, their sins certainly weren’t hidden from God. He who sees everything cannot be deceived. Do you have a sinful attitude or activity that you hope God won’t notice? He knows about it. The first step of repentance is to acknowledge that God knows about your sins. 16;19&lt;br /&gt;In this prayer, Jeremiah approached God with three descriptive names: strength, fortress, and refuge. Each name gives a slightly different glimpse of how Jeremiah experienced God’s presence, and each is a picture of security and protection. Let God be your strength when you feel weak, your fortress when enemies come against you, and your refuge when you need to retreat from life’s pressures. 17:1&lt;br /&gt;God’s people continued to sin even though they had the law, the prophets of God, and history replete with God’s miracles. How could they do that? Why do we continue in sin even though we understand the eternal consequences? Jeremiah says the heart is deceitful (17:9), and “their evil ways are . . . inscribed with a diamond point on their stony hearts.” The Hebrews symbolized the various aspects of a person by locating them in certain physical organs. The heart was the organ of reason, intelligence, and will. So deep is our tendency to sin that only God’s redemption can deliver us. 17:5-8&lt;br /&gt;Two kinds of people are contrasted here: those who trust in human beings and those who trust in the Lord. The people of Judah were trusting in false gods and military alliances instead of God, and thus they were barren and unfruitful. In contrast, those who trust in the Lord flourish like trees planted along a riverbank (see Psalms1). In times of trouble, those who trust in human beings will be impoverished and spiritually weak, so they will have no strength to draw on. But those who trust in the Lord will have abundant strength, not only for their own needs, but even for the needs of others. Are you satisfied with being unfruitful, or do you, like a well-watered tree, have strength for times of crisis and even some to share as you bear fruit for the Lord? 17:9-10&lt;br /&gt;God makes it clear why we sin—it’s a matter of the heart. Our heart is inclined toward sin from the time we are born. It is easy to fall into the routine of forgetting and forsaking God. But we can still choose whether or not to continue in sin. We can yield to a specific temptation, or we can ask God to help us resist temptation when it comes. 17:11&lt;br /&gt;There is a right way and a wrong way to do any task. Jeremiah says that the person who becomes rich by unjust means will end up foolish and poor. Whether at work, school, or play, we should strive to be honest in all our dealings. Getting a promotion, passing an exam, or gaining prestige by dishonest means will never bring God’s blessing or lasting happiness. 17:19-27&lt;br /&gt;The people were working on the Sabbath, their day of rest (Exodus 20:8-11). They considered making money more important than keeping God’s law. If they would repent and put God first in their lives, God promised them honor among the nations. Over a century later, when Nehemiah led the exiles on their return to Jerusalem, one of his most important reforms was to reinstitute Sabbath observance (Nehemiah 13:15-22). The Negev is the southern part of Judah.&lt;br /&gt;18:1-23&lt;br /&gt;The parables in these chapters, probably written during the early years of Jehoiakim’s reign, illustrate God’s sovereignty over the nation. God has power over the clay (Judah), and he continues to work with it to make it a useful vessel. But Judah must soon repent, or the clay will harden the wrong way. Then it will be worth nothing and will be broken and destroyed. 18:6&lt;br /&gt;As the potter molded or shaped a clay pot on the potter’s wheel, defects often appeared. The potter had power over the clay, to permit the defects to remain or to reshape the pot. Likewise, God had power to reshape the nation to conform to his purposes. Our strategy should not be to become mindless and passive—one aspect of clay—but to be willing and receptive to God’s impact on us. As we yield to God, he begins reshaping us into valuable vessels.&lt;br /&gt;18:12&lt;br /&gt;Our society admires assertiveness, independence, and defiance of authority. In a relationship with God these qualities become stubbornness, self-importance, and refusal to listen or change. Left unchecked, stubbornness becomes a way of life hostile to God. 18;18&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah’s words and actions challenged the people’s social and moral behavior. He had openly spoken against the king, the officials, the priests and prophets, the teachers, and the wise (4:9; 8:8-9). He wasn’t afraid to give unpopular criticism. The people could either obey him or silence him. They chose the latter. They did not think they needed Jeremiah; their false prophets told them what they wanted to hear. How do you respond &lt;br /&gt;to criticism? Listen carefully—God may be trying to tell you something. 18;6&lt;br /&gt;The valley of the son of Hinnom was the garbage dump of Jerusalem and the place where children were sacrificed to the god Molech. It is also mentioned in 7:31-32. Topheth was located in the valley and means “fireplace” and was probably where children were burned as sacrifices. 19:7-13&lt;br /&gt;The horrible carnage that Jeremiah predicted happened twice: in 586 B.C. during the Babylonian invasion under Nebuchadnezzar and in A.D. 70 when Titus destroyed Jerusalem. During the Babylonian siege, food became so scarce that people became cannibals, even eating their own children. (See Leviticus 26:29 and Deuteronomy 28:53-57 for prophecies concerning this; and see 2 Kings 6:28-29; Lamentations 2:20; 4:10 for accounts of actual occurrences.) 20:1-2&lt;br /&gt;This event took place during the reign of Jehoiakim of Judah. Jeremiah preached at the valley of the son of Hinnom, the center of idolatry in the city. He also preached in the Temple, which should have been the center of true worship. Both places attracted many people; both were places of false worship. 20:1-3.&lt;br /&gt;Pashhur was the official in charge of maintaining order in the Temple (see 29:26 for a description of the responsibility). He was also a priest and had pretended to be a prophet. After hearing Jeremiah’s words, Pashhur had him whipped and put in the stocks (locked up) instead of taking his message to heart and acting on it. The truth sometimes stings, but our reaction to the truth shows what we are made of. We can deny the charges and destroy evidence of our misdeeds, or we can take the truth humbly to heart and let it change us. Pashhur may have thought he was a strong leader, but he was really a coward. 20:4-6&lt;br /&gt;This prophecy of destruction came true in three waves of invasion by Babylon. The first wave happened within the year (605 B.C.). Pashhur was probably exiled to Babylon during the second wave in 597 B.C. when Jehoiachin was taken captive. The third invasion occurred in 586 B.C. 20:7-18&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah cried out in despair mixed with praise, unburdening his heart to God. He had faithfully proclaimed God’s word and had received nothing in return but persecution and sorrow. Yet when he withheld God’s word for a while, it became fire in his bones until he could hold it back no longer. When God’s living message of forgiveness and love becomes fire in your bones, you also will feel compelled to share it with others, regardless of the results.&lt;br /&gt;21:1&lt;br /&gt;Chapters 21–28 are Jeremiah’s messages concerning Nebuchadnezzar’s attacks on Jerusalem between 588 and 586 B.C. (see also 2 Kings 25). King Zedekiah decided to rebel against Nebuchadnezzar (2 Kings 24:20), and the nobles advised allying with Egypt. Jeremiah pronounced judgment on the kings (21:1–23:8) and false prophets (23:9-40) for leading the people astray. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;21;1-2&lt;br /&gt;King Zedekiah probably was referring to God’s deliverance of Jerusalem from Sennacherib, king of Assyria, in the days of Hezekiah (Isaiah 36–37). But Zedekiah’s hopes were dashed. He was Judah’s last ruler during the time of the Exile of 586 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;21:1-14&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah had foretold Jerusalem’s destruction. The city’s leaders had denied his word and mocked his pronounce- ments. In desperation, King Zedekiah turned to God for help, but without acknowledging God’s warnings or admitting his sin. Too often we expect God to help us in our time of trouble even though we have ignored him in our time of prosperity. But God wants a lasting relationship. Are you trying to build a lasting friendship with God, or are you merely using him occasionally to escape trouble? What would you think of your family or friends if they thought of&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-6310518567051754864?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/6310518567051754864/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=6310518567051754864' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/6310518567051754864'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/6310518567051754864'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/jeremiah2_20.html' title='Jeremiah2'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-867298183470531852</id><published>2008-08-20T03:12:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:25:28.868-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Jeremiah 4'/><title type='text'>Jeremiah 4</title><content type='html'>God has the power to do away with the laws of nature or even to do away with his people. But he will do neither. This is not a prediction; it is a promise. This is God’s way of saying that he will not reject Israel any more than he will do away with nature’s laws.  31:38-40&lt;br /&gt;These points mark the boundaries of restored Jerusalem in the days of Nehemiah. Gareb and Goah are unknown. The graveyard and ash dump are probably the valley of the son of Hinnom, where children were sacrified in pagan worship.&lt;br /&gt;32:1-12&lt;br /&gt;God told Jeremiah to buy a field outside Jerusalem. The city had been under siege for a year, and Jeremiah bought land that the soldiers occupied—certainly a poor investment. In addition, Jeremiah was a prisoner in the palace. But Jeremiah was demonstrating his faith in God’s promises to bring his people back and to rebuild Jerusalem. 32;6-17&lt;br /&gt;Trust doesn’t come easy. It wasn’t easy for Jeremiah to publicly buy land already captured by the enemy. But he trusted God. It wasn’t easy for David to believe that he would become king, even after he was anointed. But he trusted God (1 Samuel 16–31). It wasn’t easy for Moses to believe that he and his people would escape Egypt, even after God spoke to him from a burning bush. But he trusted God (Exodus 3:1–4:20). It isn’t easy for us to believe that God can fulfill his “impossible” promises either, but we must trust him. God, who worked in the lives of biblical heroes, will work in our life, too, if we will let him. &lt;br /&gt;32:17-25&lt;br /&gt;After Jeremiah bought the field, he began to wonder if such a move was wise. He sought relief in prayer from his nagging doubts. In this prayer, Jeremiah affirmed that God is the Creator of heaven and earth (32:17), the wise Judge, who is aware of our conduct (32:19), and our Redeemer, who has great power (32:21). God loves us and sees our situation. Whenever we doubt God’s wisdom or wonder if it is practical to obey him, we can review what we already know about him. Such thoughts and prayers will quiet our doubts and calm our fears.&lt;br /&gt;32:36-42&lt;br /&gt;These pagan shrines were where the most important and grotesque part of Molech worship took place. Children were offered in sacrifice to this pagan god. God uses his power to accomplish his purposes through his people. God doesn’t give you power to be all you want to be, but he gives you power to be all he wants you to be. The people of Israel had to learn that trusting God meant radically realigning their purposes and desires with his. God gave them “one heart” toward him (32:39). We must develop such singleness of heart and action to love God above anything else. 32:44&lt;br /&gt;The hill country is in western Palestine. The Negev is the southern part of Judah. 33:1-26&lt;br /&gt;God would restore Jerusalem, not because the people cried, but because it was part of his ultimate plan. The Babylonian disaster did not change God’s purposes for his people. Although Jerusalem would be destroyed, it would be restored (after the 70-year captivity and in the end times when the Messiah will rule). God’s justice is always tempered by his mercy.&lt;br /&gt;33:3&lt;br /&gt;God assured Jeremiah that he had only to ask God and God would answer (see also Psalms145:18; Isaiah 58:9; Matthew 7:7). God is ready to answer our prayers, but we must ask for his assistance. Surely God could take care of our needs without our asking. But when we ask, we are acknowledging that he alone is God and that we cannot accomplish in our own strength all that is his domain to do. When we ask, we must humble ourselves, lay aside our willfulness and worry, and determine to obey him. 33:15-16&lt;br /&gt;These verses refer to both the first and second comings of Christ. At his first coming he would set up his reign in the hearts of believers; at his second coming he would execute justice and righteousness throughout the whole earth. Christ is the “righteous descendant” sprouting from David, the man after God’s own heart. 33:18 As Christ fulfills the role of King, he also fulfills the role of Priest, maintaining constant fellowship with God and mediating for the people. This verse does not mean that actual priests will perform sacrifices, for sacrifices will no longer be necessary (Hebrews 10:4, 11, 12). Now that Christ is our High Priest, all believers are priests of God, and we can come before him personally. 34:1-22&lt;br /&gt;This chapter describes the fulfillment of many of Jeremiah’s predictions. In the book of Jeremiah, many prophecies were both given and quickly fulfilled. 34:8-9&lt;br /&gt;Babylon had laid siege to Jerusalem, and the city was about to fall. Zedekiah finally decided to listen to Jeremiah and try to appease God—so he freed the slaves. He thought he could win God’s favor with a kind act, but what he needed was a change of heart. The people had been disobeying God’s law from the beginning (Exodus 21:2-11; Leviticus 25:39-55; Deuteronomy 15:12-18). When the siege was temporarily lifted, the people became bold and returned to their sins (34:11-17; 37:5, 11). 34:15-16&lt;br /&gt;The people of Israel had a hard time keeping their promises to God. In the Temple, they would solemnly promise to obey God, but back in their homes and at work they wouldn’t do it. God expressed his great displeasure. If you want to please God, make sure you keep your promises. God wants promises kept, not just piously made. 34;18-20&lt;br /&gt;Cutting a calf in two and walking between the halves was a customary way to ratify a contract (Genesis 15:9-10). This action symbolized the judgment on anyone who broke the contract. God was saying, “You have broken the contract you made with me, so you know the judgment awaiting you!”&lt;br /&gt;35;1-2&lt;br /&gt;The Recabites’ code of conduct resembled that of the Nazirites, who took a special vow of dedication to God (Numbers 6). For 200 years they had obeyed their ancestor’s vow to abstain from wine. While the rest of the nation was breaking its covenant with God, these people were steadfast in their commitment. God wanted the rest of his people to remain as committed to their covenant with him as the Recabites were to their vow. God had Jeremiah tempt the Recabites with wine to demonstrate their commitment and dedication. God knew they wouldn’t break their vow. 35:6&lt;br /&gt;Jehonadab son of Recab had joined Jehu in purging the northern kingdom of Baal worship (2 Kings 10:15-28). There is a vivid contrast between the Recabites and the other Israelites. (1) The 35:13-17&lt;br /&gt;Recabites kept their vows to a fallible human leader; the people of Israel broke their covenant with their infallible divine Leader. (2) Jehonadab told his family one time not to drink, and they obeyed; God commanded Israel constantly to turn from sin, and they refused. (3) The Recabites obeyed laws that dealt with temporal issues; Israel refused to obey God’s laws that dealt with eternal issues. (4) The Recabites had obeyed for hundreds of years; Israel had disobeyed for hundreds of years. (5) The Recabites would be rewarded; Israel would be punished. We often are willing to observe customs merely for the sake of tradition; how much more should we obey God’s Word because it is eternal. 36;1-2&lt;br /&gt;This happened in the summer of 605 B.C., shortly after Nebuchadnezzar’s victory over the Egyptian army at Carchemish, before the events recorded in chapters 34 and 35. &lt;br /&gt;36:2-4&lt;br /&gt;Most people in ancient times could neither read nor write, so those who could were highly esteemed. These men, called scribes or teachers, held positions of great importance and were very respected for their knowledge. Baruch was Jeremiah’s scribe. Writing was often done on vellum or papyrus sheets that were sewn or glued together and stored in long rolls called scrolls. After the Exile, scribes became teachers of the law. In New Testament times, the scribes formed a powerful political party. 36:9&lt;br /&gt;A time of fasting (when people abstained from eating food to show their humility and repentance) was often called during times of national emergency. Babylon was destroying city after city and closing in on Jerusalem. As the people came to the Temple, Baruch told them how to avert the coming tragedy, but they refused to listen. God told Jeremiah to write his words on a scroll. Because he was not allowed to go to the 36;10-32&lt;br /&gt;Temple, Jeremiah asked his scribe, Baruch, to whom he had dictated the scroll to read it to the people gathered there. Baruch then read it to the officials, and finally Jehudi read it to the king himself. Although the king burned the scroll, he could not destroy the word of God. Today many people try to put God’s Word aside or say that it contains errors and therefore cannot be trusted. People may reject God’s Word, but they cannot destroy it. God’s Word will stand forever (Psalms119:89). 36:25&lt;br /&gt;Only three leaders protested this evil act of burning the scroll containing God’s word. This shows how complacent and insensitive to God the people had become. 36:30&lt;br /&gt;Jehoiakim’s son, Jehoiachin, was king for three months before he was taken into captivity, but this did not qualify as sitting “on the throne of David”—an expression that implied permanence. Jehoiakim did not secure a dynasty. Zedekiah, the next ruler, was Jehoiachin’s uncle. Thus, the line of mortal human kings descended from David’s son Solomon was finished, but in less than 600 years the eternal King would come through the descendants of Solomon’s brother Nathan (see also the note on 22:30). 37:1&lt;br /&gt;King Jehoiakim died on the way to Babylon (2 Chronicles 36:6). His son Jehoiachin was appointed king but was taken captive to Babylon three months later. Nebuchadnezzar then appointed Zedekiah as his vassal in Judah. 37;2-3&lt;br /&gt;King Zedekiah and his officials did not want to listen to Jeremiah’s words, but they wanted the blessings of his prayers. They wanted a superficial religion that wouldn’t cost anything. God is not pleased with those who come to him seeking only what they can get rather than seeking to have a relationship with him. We would not accept that kind of relationship with someone else, and we shouldn’t expect God to accept it from us. 37;5&lt;br /&gt;When Nebuchadnezzar besieged Jerusalem in 589 B.C., Pharaoh Hophra marched against him at Zedekiah’s invitation. Jerusalem looked to Egypt for help in spite of Jeremiah’s warnings. But the Egyptians were no help, for as soon as the Babylonians turned on them, they retreated. Jeremiah’s warnings had been correct. 37:17&lt;br /&gt;Zedekiah teetered between surrender and resistance. Too frightened and weak to exercise authority, he asked Jeremiah to come secretly to the palace, perhaps hoping for some better news from God. Zedekiah was desperate. He wanted to hear a word from the Lord, but he feared the political ramifications of being caught talking to Jeremiah. 38:4-5&lt;br /&gt;No wonder Judah was in turmoil: The king agreed with everybody. He listened to Jeremiah (37:21); then he agreed Jeremiah should be killed (38:5); and finally he rescued Jeremiah (38:10). Jeremiah was not popular; his words undermined the morale of the army and the people. Zedekiah couldn’t decide between public opinion and God’s will. What is most influential in your life—what others say and think or what God wants? 38;6&lt;br /&gt;Officials put Jeremiah in a cistern to die. A cistern was a large hole in the ground lined with rocks to collect rainwater. The bottom would have been dark, damp, and, in this case, full of mud. Jeremiah could drown, die of exposure, or starve to death in the cistern. Judah’s leaders persecuted Jeremiah repeatedly for faithfully proclaiming God’s messages. For 40 years of faithful ministry, he received no acclaim, no love, no popular following. He was beaten, jailed, threatened, and even forced to leave his homeland. Only the pagan Babylonians showed him any respect (39:11-12). God does not guarantee that his servants will escape persecution, even when they are faithful. But God does promise that he will be with them and will give them strength to endure (2 Corinthians 1:3-7). As you minister to others, recognize that your service is for God and not just for human approval. God rewards our faithfulness, but not always during our lifetime. 38;7-8&lt;br /&gt;The Benjamin Gate was one of Jerusalem’s city gates where legal matters were handled. A palace official, Ebed- melech, had access to the king. When Ebed-melech heard of Jeremiah’s plight, he went immediately to deal with the injustice. 38:9-13&lt;br /&gt;Ebed-melech feared God more than man. He alone among the palace officials stood up against the murder plot. His obedience could have cost him his life. Because he obeyed, however, he was spared when Jerusalem fell (39:15-18). You can either go along with the crowd or speak up for God. When someone is treated unkindly or unjustly, for example, reach out to that person with God’s love. You may be the only one who does. And, when you are being treated unkindly yourself, be sure to thank God when he sends an “Ebed-melech” your way. 38:27&lt;br /&gt;The officials wanted accurate information, but not God’s truth. They wanted to use this information against God, his prophet, and the king. But Jeremiah told the officials only what the king ordered him to say. We must not withhold God’s truth from others, but we should withhold information that will be used to bring evil to God’s people. 39:1&lt;br /&gt;Zedekiah, son of Josiah and last king of Judah, ruled 11 years, from 597 to 586 B.C. Zedekiah’s two older brothers, Jehoahaz and Jehoiakim, and his nephew Jehoiachin ruled before him. When Jehoiachin was exiled to Babylon, Nebuchadnezzar made 21-year-old Mattaniah the king, changing his name to Zedekiah. Zedekiah rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar, who captured him, killed his sons in front of him, and then blinded him and took him back to Babylon, where he later died (see 2 Kings 24–25; 2 Chronicles 36; and Jeremiah 52). 39:5&lt;br /&gt;Riblah was 200 miles north of Jerusalem. This was the Babylonian headquarters for ruling the region. 39:10&lt;br /&gt;Babylon had a shrewd foreign policy toward conquered lands. They deported the rich and powerful, leaving only the very poor in charge, thus making them grateful to their conquerors. This policy assured that conquered populations would be too loyal and too weak to revolt. 39:11-12&lt;br /&gt;God had promised to rescue Jeremiah from his trouble (1:8). The superstitious Babylonians, who highly respected magicians and fortune-tellers, treated Jeremiah as a seer. Because he had been imprisoned by his own people, they assumed he was a traitor and on their side. They undoubtedly knew he had counseled cooperation with Babylon and predicted a Babylonian victory. So the Babylonians freed Jeremiah and protected him. 39:13-14&lt;br /&gt;What a difference there is between Jeremiah’s fate and Zedekiah’s! Jeremiah was freed; Zedekiah was imprisoned. Jeremiah was saved because of his faith; Zedekiah was destroyed because of his fear. Jeremiah was treated with respect; Zedekiah was treated with contempt. Jeremiah was concerned for the people; Zedekiah was concerned for himself. 39;17-18&lt;br /&gt;Ebed-melech had risked his life to save God’s prophet Jeremiah (38:7-13). When Babylon conquered Jerusalem, God protected Ebed-melech from the Babylonians. God has special rewards for his faithful people, but not everyone will receive them in this life (see the note on 38:6). 40:2-3&lt;br /&gt;The Babylonian commander, who did not know God, acknowledged that God had given the Babylonians victory. It is strange for people to recognize that God exists and does miracles and yet not personally accept him. Knowing God is more than knowing about him. Be sure you know him personally. 40:4&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah was free to go anywhere. In Babylon he would have great comfort and power. In Judah he would continue to face hardship. In Babylon Jeremiah would have been favored by the Babylonians but hated by the Judean exiles. In Judah he would remain poor and unwanted, but the Judean remnant would know he was not a traitor. Jeremiah returned to Judah. 40:6&lt;br /&gt;Mizpah was a few miles north of Jerusalem. Not thoroughly destroyed by the Babylonians, Mizpah served as a refuge after the destruction of Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;40:13-16&lt;br /&gt;Gedaliah, appointed governor of Judah, foolishly ignored the warnings of assassination. Ishmael, in the line of David, may have been angry that he had been passed over for leadership. This is similar to the chaotic political situation that Ezra and Nehemiah faced when they returned to rebuild the Temple and the city. 41:4-9&lt;br /&gt;The 80 men came from three cities of the northern kingdom to worship in Jerusalem. Ishmael probably killed them for the money and food they were carrying. Without a king, with no law and no loyalty to God, Judah was subjected to complete anarchy. 41:16-17&lt;br /&gt;Johanan and his group were already on their way to Egypt, headed south from Gibeon, stopping first at Geruth-kimham, near Bethlehem. Their visit to Jeremiah (42:1-6) was hypocritical, as Jeremiah later told them (42:20). 42:5-6&lt;br /&gt;Johanan and his associates spoke their own curse; Jeremiah merely elaborated on it. It was a tragic mistake to ask for God’s guidance with no intention of following it. Be sure never to ask God for something that you know in your heart you really do not want. It is better not to pray than to pray hypocritically. God cannot be deceived. 43;1-3&lt;br /&gt;Johanan and his tiny band had come to Jeremiah for God’s approval of their plan, not for God’s direction. This is a recurring problem for some of us—seeking God’s approval of our desires rather than asking him for guidance. It is not good to make plans apart from God’s quidance, and it is not good to pray unless we are willing to accept God’s answer. 43:4-7&lt;br /&gt;Afraid to obey the Lord, the people headed for Egypt, even forcing Jeremiah to go with them. (They thought that perhaps God would spare them if Jeremiah was with them.) Jeremiah had served as a prophet for 40 years. Many of his words had already come true, and he had turned down an offer to live comfortably in Babylon, returning instead to his beloved people. But the people still rejected Jeremiah’s advice. The response of our audience is not necessarily a measure of our success. Jeremiah was doing all God asked, but he had been called to minister to a very stubborn group of people. 43:10-13&lt;br /&gt;Nebuchadnezzar invaded Egypt in 568–567 B.C. Like Judah, Egypt rebelled against him and was quickly crushed. So much for the great empire on which Judah had constantly placed its hopes! 44:1&lt;br /&gt;This message, given in 580 B.C. while Jeremiah was in Egypt against his will, reminded the people that their idolatry had brought destruction on their land. Jeremiah told them that they would never return to Judah because the escape to Egypt had been against God’s advice (42:9ff). But the people refused to learn any lessons from all the destruction their sins had caused.&lt;br /&gt;44;10&lt;br /&gt;When we forget a lesson or refuse to learn it, we risk repeating our mistakes. The people of Judah struggled with this; to forget their former sins was to repeat them. To fail to learn from failure is to assure future failure. Your past is your school of experience. Let your past mistakes point you to God’s way. 44;15-18&lt;br /&gt;The farther we drift from God, the more confused our thinking becomes. Whatever spiritual life was left in the Israelites when they went to Egypt was lost as they sank into the depths of idolatry. (For more information on the “Queen of Heaven,” see the note on 7:18.) The escape to Egypt had brought a change in their pagan worship habits, and they blamed their troubles on their neglect of their idols. But idol worship had started all their problems in the first place. The people refused to recognize the true source of their problems—departure from God’s leading. When calamity forces you to examine your life, take a close look at God’s instructions for you. 44;28&lt;br /&gt;After Jeremiah’s forced move to Egypt, there is no word in the Bible about the events in the rest of his life. 44:30&lt;br /&gt;Pharaoh Hophra ruled Egypt from 588 to 569 B.C. and was killed by Ahmose, one of his generals, who was then crowned in his place. 45:1&lt;br /&gt;The event relating to this chapter is recorded in 36:1-8. The chapter was written in 605–604 B.C. Baruch was the scribe who recorded Jeremiah’s words on a scroll. 45;5&lt;br /&gt;Baruch had long been serving this unpopular prophet, writing his book of struggles and judgments, and now he was upset. God told Baruch to take his eyes off himself and whatever rewards he thought he deserved. If Baruch did this, God would protect him. It is easy to lose the joy of serving our God when we take our eyes off him. The more we look away from God’s purposes toward our own sacrifices, the more frustrated we will become. As you serve God, beware of focusing on what you are giving up. When this happens, ask God’s forgiveness; then look at him rather than at yourself. 46:1-27&lt;br /&gt;In this chapter, we gain several insights about God and his plan for this world. &lt;br /&gt;(1) Although God chose Israel for a special purpose, he loves all people and wants all to come to him.&lt;br /&gt; (2) God is holy and will not tolerate sin.&lt;br /&gt; (3) God’s judgments are not based on prejudice and a desire for revenge but on fairness and justice.&lt;br /&gt; (4) God does not delight in judgment but in salvation. &lt;br /&gt;(5) God is impartial—he judges everyone by the same standard. 46:2&lt;br /&gt;At the battle of Carchemish in 605 B.C., Babylon and Egypt, the two major world powers after Assyria’s fall, clashed. The Babylonians entered Carchemish by surprise and defeated Egypt. This battle, which passed world leadership to Babylon, was Nebuchadnezzar’s first victory, establishing him in his new position as king of the Babylonian Empire. With Egypt’s power declining, it was both poor strategy and disobedience to God for Judah to form an alliance with Egypt. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;46:9&lt;br /&gt;The soldiers from Ethiopia and Libya were from eastern and northern Africa. The men of Lydia may have been from Greece. 46:17&lt;br /&gt;In 589 B.C. when Nebuchadnezzar besieged Jerusalem, Pharaoh Hophra marched against him at Zedekiah’s invitation. But when the Babylonians stood up to the Egyptians, Pharaoh Hophra and his troops retreated. Jeremiah had prophesied that Pharaoh Hophra would be killed by his enemies (44:30). This was fulfilled nearly 20 years later when his co-regent Ahmose led a revolt. 46:28&lt;br /&gt;God punished his people in order to bring them back to himself, and he punishes us to correct and purify us. No one welcomes punishment, but we should all welcome its results: correction and purity.&lt;br /&gt;47:1Located on the coastal plain next to Judah, Philistia had always been a thorn in Israel’s side. The two nations battled constantly. Other prophets who spoke against Philistia include Isaiah (14:28-32), Ezekiel (25:15-17), Amos (1:6-8), and Zephaniah (2:4-7). 48;1&lt;br /&gt;The Moabites were descendants of Lot through an incestuous relationship with one of his daughters (Genesis 19:30-37). They led the Israelites into idolatry (Numbers 25:1-3) and joined the bands of raiders Nebuchadnezzar sent into Judah in 602 B.C. They were later conquered by Babylon and disappeared as a nation. 48:7&lt;br /&gt;Chemosh was the main god of the nation of Moab (Numbers 21:29), and child sacrifice was an important part of his worship (2 Kings 3:26-27). 48:11-12&lt;br /&gt;When making wine, the grapes were crushed. After 40 days, the wine was poured off from the dregs in the bottom of the jar. If this was not done, the wine would be inferior. The prophet was saying that because of Moab’s complacency and refusal to do God’s work, Moab would be totally destroyed. 48:13&lt;br /&gt;After Israel divided into northern and southern kingdoms, the northern kingdom set up gold calf idols in Bethel and Dan to keep people from going to worship in Jerusalem, capital of the southern kingdom (1 Kings 12:25-29). 48:29&lt;br /&gt;Moab was condemned for its pride. God cannot tolerate pride because pride is taking personal credit for what God has done or looking down on others. God does not condemn our taking satisfaction in what we do (Ecclesiastes 3:22), but he stands against overestimates of our own importance. Romans 12:3 teaches us to have an honest estimate of ourselves.&lt;br /&gt;48:31&lt;br /&gt;Kir-hareseth was a stronghold city in Moab. God’s compassion reaches to all creation, even to his enemies. 49:1&lt;br /&gt;The Ammonites were descendants of Lot through an incestuous relationship with one of his daughters (as were the Moabites; see Genesis 19:30-38). They were condemned for stealing land from God’s people and for worshiping the idol Molech, to whom they made child sacrifices. 49:7&lt;br /&gt;The Israelites descended from Jacob, and the Edomites descended from his twin brother, Esau; thus, both nations descended from their father, Isaac. There was constant conflict between these nations, and Edom rejoiced at the fall of Jerusalem (see the book of Obadiah). Teman, a town in the northern part of Edom, was known for its wisdom and was the hometown of Eliphaz, one of Job’s friends (Job 2:11). But even the wisdom of Teman could not save Edom from God’s wrath.&lt;br /&gt;49:8&lt;br /&gt;Dedan was a flourishing city that supported caravan travel. God told its inhabitants to flee to the caves or they would also be destroyed. Teman and Dedan were at opposite ends of the country, so this shows the completeness of God’s destruction of Edom. Bozrah (49:13) is a town in northern Edom.  49:16&lt;br /&gt;Edom was located in a rock fortress that today is known as Petra, in southern Jordan. Edom thought it was invincible because of its location. Edom was destroyed because of its pride. Pride destroys nations as well as individuals. It deludes us into thinking that we can take care of ourselves without God’s help. Even serving God and others can lead us into pride. Take inventory of your life and service for God; ask God to point out and remove any pride you may be harboring.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;49:23-26&lt;br /&gt;Damascus was the capital of Aram, north of Israel. This city was defeated by both Assyria and Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar attacked and defeated Damascus in 605 B.C. (Amos 1:4-5). It is difficult to attribute the defeat of the army to a particular event, but God utterly destroyed Aram. 49:28&lt;br /&gt;Kedar and Hazor were nomadic tribes east of Israel and south of Aram, in the desert. In 599 B.C. Nebuchadnezzar destroyed them. 49:34&lt;br /&gt;Elam lay east of Babylon and was attacked by Nebuchadnezzar in 597 B.C. Later Elam became the nucleus of the Persian Empire (Daniel 8:2) and the residence of Darius. 49:38&lt;br /&gt;The throne represents God’s judgment and sovereignty. God would preside over Elam’s destruction. He is the King over all kings, including Elam’s. 50:1-3&lt;br /&gt;At the height of its power, the Babylonian Empire seemed immovable. But when Babylon had finished serving God’s purpose of punishing Judah for her sins, it would be punished and crushed for its own. Babylon was destroyed in 539 B.C. by the Medo- Persians (Daniel 5:30-31). Babylon is also used in Scripture as a symbol of all evil. This message can thus apply to the end times when God will wipe out all evil once and for all. The nation from the north was Medo-Persia, an alliance of Media and Persia that would become the next world power. Cyrus took the city of Babylon by surprise and brought the nation to its knees in 539 B.C. (Daniel 5:30-31). The complete destruction of the city was accomplished by later Persian kings. 5:17-20&lt;br /&gt;God would punish wicked Babylon as he punished Assyria for what it had done to Israel. Assyria was crushed by Babylon, which Assyria had once ruled. Babylon in turn would be crushed by Medo-Persia, formerly under its authority. These verses also look to the time when the Messiah will rule and Israel will be fully restored. No sin will then be found in Israel because God’s people will seek him and be forgiven. Merathaim was located in southern Babylonia; Pekod was in eastern Babylonia.&lt;br /&gt;50:32&lt;br /&gt;Pride was Babylon’s characteristic sin. Pride comes from feeling self-sufficient or believing that we don’t need God. Proud nations or persons, however, will eventually fail because they refuse to recognize God as the ultimate power. Getting rid of pride is not easy, but if we can admit that it often rules us and ask God to forgive us, he will help us overcome it. The best antidote to pride is to focus our attention on the greatness and goodness of God. Babylon remains a wasteland to this day. See also Isaiah 13:19-22. &lt;br /&gt;50:44-46&lt;br /&gt;This invader was Cyrus, who attacked Babylon by surprise and overthrew it. The world was shocked that its greatest empire was overthrown so quickly. No earthly power, no matter how great, can last forever. &lt;br /&gt;51:2&lt;br /&gt;Winnowers worked to separate the wheat from the chaff. When they threw the mixture into the air, the wind blew away the worthless chaff while the wheat settled to the floor. Babylon would be blown away like chaff in the wind. (See also Matthew 3:12 where John the Baptist says Jesus will separate the wheat from the chaff.) &lt;br /&gt;51:11&lt;br /&gt;Cyrus, king of Persia, had allied himself with Babylon to defeat Nineveh (capital of the Assyrian Empire) in 612 B.C. Then the Medes joined Persia to defeat Babylon (539 B.C.). 51:17-19&lt;br /&gt;It is foolish to trust in man-made images rather than in God. It is easy to think that the things we see and touch will bring us more security than God. But things rust, rot, and decay. God is eternal. Why put your trust in something that will disappear within a few years? 51:33&lt;br /&gt;Grain was threshed on a threshing floor, where sheaves were brought from the field. The stalks of grain were distributed on the floor, a large level section of hard ground. There the grain was crushed to separate the kernels from the stalk; then the kernels were beaten with a wooden tool. Sometimes a wooden sledge was pulled over the grain by animals to break the kernels loose. Babylon would soon be “threshed” as God judged it for its sins. 51:36&lt;br /&gt;This verse may refer to an event accomplished by Cyrus, who took Babylon by surprise by diverting the river that ran through the city far upstream and walking beneath the city’s fortifications on the dry riverbed. More likely it is saying that Babylon will be deprived of life-giving water. Unlike Jerusalem, Babylon will not be restored. 51:44&lt;br /&gt;Bel is one of the names of Marduk, the chief god of the city of Babylon.&lt;br /&gt;51:51&lt;br /&gt;The people were paralyzed with guilt over their past. The Babylonian armies had desecrated the Temple, and the people were ashamed to return to Jerusalem. But God told them to return to the city because he would destroy Babylon for its sins. 51:59&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah could not visit Babylon, so he sent the message with Seraiah, the officer who cared for the comforts of the army. Seraiah was probably Baruch’s brother (32:12). 51:60-64&lt;br /&gt;In this last of Jeremiah’s messages, we find again the twin themes of God’s sovereignty and his judgment. Babylon had been allowed to oppress the people of Israel, but Babylon itself would be judged. Although God brings good out of evil, he does not allow evil to remain unpunished. The wicked may succeed for a while, but resist the temptation to follow them or you may share in their judgment. 52:1-30&lt;br /&gt;This chapter provides more detail about the destruction of Jerusalem recorded in chapter 39 (similar material is found in 2 Kings 24:18–25:21). This appendix shows that Jeremiah’s prophecies concerning the destruction of Jerusalem and the Babylonian captivity happened just as he predicted. For more information on Zedekiah, see the note on 39:1ff. 52:8-9&lt;br /&gt;Riblah was 200 miles north of Jerusalem. This was the Babylonian headquarters for ruling the region. Hamath was the district of Aram containing the nation’s capital. 52:31&lt;br /&gt;Babylon’s king showed kindness to Jehoiachin. In 561 B.C. Jehoiachin was released from prison and allowed to eat with the king. God continued to show kindness to the descendants of King David, even in exile. 52:34&lt;br /&gt;In the world’s eyes, Jeremiah looked totally unsuccessful. He had no money, family, or friends. He prophesied the destruction of the nation, the capital city, and the Temple, but the political and religious leaders would not accept or follow his advice. No group of people liked him or listened to him. Yet as we look back, we see that he successfully completed the work God gave him to do. Success must never be measured by popularity, fame, or fortune, for these are temporal measures. King Zedekiah, for example, lost everything by pursuing selfish goals. God measures our success with the yardsticks of obedience, faithfulness, and righteousness. If you are faithfully doing the work God has given you, you are successful in his eyes.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-867298183470531852?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/867298183470531852/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=867298183470531852' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/867298183470531852'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/867298183470531852'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/jeremiah-4.html' title='Jeremiah 4'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-2211465445425663588</id><published>2008-08-20T03:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:25:28.867-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Jeremiah 3'/><title type='text'>Jeremiah3</title><content type='html'>you only as a temporary resource? 21;13&lt;br /&gt;Jerusalem was built on a plateau with valleys on three sides. Because of its strategic location, the inhabitants thought they were safe. 22:1-5&lt;br /&gt;Chapters 22–25 may not be in chronological order. In 21:8-10 God implied that it was too late for repentance. In 22:4, however, God said that there was still time to change. The events to which this chapter refer occurred before those of chapter 21.&lt;br /&gt;22:3&lt;br /&gt;God gave the king the basis for rebuilding the nation—turn from evil and do right. Doing what is right is more than simply believing all the right doctrines about God. It means living in obedience to God. Good deeds do not save us, but they display our faith (James 2:17-26). 22:10-12&lt;br /&gt;Good King Josiah had died at the battle of Megiddo (2 Kings 23:29); his son Jehoahaz reigned for only three months in 609 B.C. before being taken away to Egypt by Pharaoh Neco. He would be the first ruler to die in exile. The people were told not to waste their tears on the death of Josiah but to cry for the king who was taken into exile and would never return.&lt;br /&gt;22:15-16&lt;br /&gt;God passed judgment on King Jehoiakim. His father, Josiah, had been one of Judah’s great kings, but Jehoiakim was evil. Josiah had been faithful to his responsibility to be a model of right living, but Jehoiakim had been unfaithful to his responsibility to imitate his father. God’s judgment was on unfaithful Jehoiakim. He could not claim his father’s blessings when he had not followed his father’s God. We may inherit our parents’ money, but we cannot inherit their faith. A godly heritage, a good education, or a beautiful home doesn’t guarantee moral character. We must have our own relationship with God.  22;21&lt;br /&gt;Jehoiakim had been hardheaded and hard-hearted since childhood. God warned him, but he refused to listen. His prosperity always took a higher priority than his relationship with &lt;br /&gt;God. If you ever find yourself so comfortable that you don’t have time for God, stop and ask which is more important—the comforts of this life or a close relationship with God. &lt;br /&gt;22;24-25&lt;br /&gt;A signet ring was extremely valuable because a king used it to authenticate important documents. Jehoiachin’s sins spoiled his usefulness to God. Even if he were God’s own signet ring, God would depose him because of his sins (see 24:1). 22;30&lt;br /&gt;Zedekiah reigned after Jehoiachin but died before him (52:10-11). Jehoiachin was the last king of David’s line to sit on the throne in Judah (1 Chronicles 3:15-20). He had seven sons, but not one served as king. Jehoiachin’s grandson Zerubbabel ruled after the return from exile (Ezra 2:2). He was only a governor, not a king. 23:1-4&lt;br /&gt;Those responsible to lead Israel in God’s path were the very ones responsible for Israel’s present plight, and so God had decreed harsh judgment against them. Leaders are held responsible for those entrusted to their care. Whom has God placed in your care? Remember that you are accountable to God for those you influence and lead. 23:5-6&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah contrasted the present corrupt leaders with the coming Messiah, the perfect King, who would come from David’s line to reign over Israel. The King is called a righteous Branch because he will sprout up from the stump of David’s fallen dynasty (Isaiah 11:1). This new growth will have God’s own characteristics. Like the Creator, the Branch will be righteous. 23:9-14&lt;br /&gt;How did the nation become so corrupt? A major factor was false prophecy. The false prophets had a large, enthusiastic audience and were very popular because they made the people believe that all was well. By contrast, Jeremiah’s message from God was unpopular because it showed the people how bad they were. There are four warning signs of false prophets—characteristics we need to watch for even today: (1) They may appear to speak God’s message, but they do not live according to God’s Word. (2) They water down God’s message in order to make it more palatable. (3) They encourage their listeners, often subtly, to disobey God. (4) They tend to be arrogant and self-serving, appealing to the desires of their audience instead of being true to God’s Word.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;23;14&lt;br /&gt;Sodom and Gomorrah were sinful cities destroyed by God (Genesis 19:23-24). In the Bible they typify the ultimate in depraved, sinful behavior and rebellion against God. 23:20&lt;br /&gt;In the days to come, you will understand all this very clearly” means that the people would see the truth of this prophecy when Jerusalem fell.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;23:28&lt;br /&gt;True prophets and false prophets are as different as chaff and wheat. Chaff is useless for food and cannot compare to nourishing wheat. To share the gospel is a great responsibility because the way we present it and live it will encourage people either to accept it or reject it. Whether we speak from a pulpit, teach in a class, or share with friends, we must accurately communicate and live out God’s Word. As you share God’s Word with friends and neighbors, they will look for its effectiveness in your life. Unless it has changed you, why should they let it change them? If you preach it, make sure you live it! &lt;br /&gt;23;33-40&lt;br /&gt;People mocked Jeremiah by saying sarcastically, “What prophecy has the LORD burdened you with now?” It seemed that Jeremiah brought nothing but God’s sad news of condemnation. But this sad news was the truth. If they had accepted it, they would have had to repent and turn to God. Because they did not want to do this, they rejected Jeremiah’s message. Have you ever rejected a message or made fun of it because it would require you to change your ways? Before dismissing someone who brings sad news, look carefully at your motives.&lt;br /&gt;24:1&lt;br /&gt;In 597 B.C. Jehoiachin was taken to Babylon, and Zedekiah became king. Often royal officials were exiled to keep them from exerting power and starting a rebellion. Skilled craftsmen were taken because they were valuable for Babylon’s building program. Jeremiah foretold this event in 22:24-28. 24;2-10&lt;br /&gt;The fresh, ripe figs represented the exiles to Babylon, not because they themselves were good, but because their hearts would respond to God. He would preserve them and bring them back to the land. The spoiled figs represented those who remained in Judah or ran away to Egypt. Those people may have arrogantly believed they would be blessed if they remained in the land or escaped to Egypt, but the opposite was true because God would use the captivity to refine the exiles. We may assume we are blessed when life goes well and cursed when it does not. But trouble is a blessing when it makes us stronger, and prosperity is a curse if it entices us away from God. If you are facing trouble, ask God to help you grow stronger for him. If things are going your way, ask God to help you use your prosperity for him.&lt;br /&gt;24:6&lt;br /&gt;The exiles in Babylon were cared for by the Lord. Although they were moved to a foreign land, their captivity was not enslavement. The people could function in business and own homes. Some, like Daniel, even held high positions in the government (see Daniel 2:48). 25;1-3&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah gave this message in 605 B.C., the year Nebuchadnezzar came to power. From verse 3 we learn that the beginning of Jeremiah’s ministry was in 627 B.C. He predicted the 70 years of captivity a full 20 years before they began.  25:2-6&lt;br /&gt;Imagine preaching the same message for 23 years and continually being rejected!&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah faced this; but because he had committed his life to God, he continued to proclaim the message “Turn from the evil road you are traveling and from the evil things you are doing.” Regardless of the people’s response, Jeremiah did not give up. God never stops loving us, even when we reject him. We can thank God that he won’t give up on us, and, like Jeremiah, we can commit ourselves to never forsaking him. No matter how people respond when you tell them about God, remain faithful to God’s high call and continue to witness for him. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;25:12&lt;br /&gt;This event is further described in Daniel 5. The troops of Cyrus the Great entered Babylon in 539 B.C. and killed Belshazzar, the last Babylonian ruler. 25;15-38&lt;br /&gt;Judah would not be the only nation to drink the cup of God’s anger. Here Jeremiah listed other wicked nations that would experience God’s wrath at the hands of Babylon. Finally, Babylon itself would be destroyed because of its sin. 26:1-24&lt;br /&gt;The events described in this chapter took place in 609–608 B.C., before the events described in chapter 25. Jehoiakim was a materialistic and self-centered king who persecuted and murdered innocent people (36:22-32; 2 Kings 23:36–24:6). Chapter 26 describes how and why Jeremiah was on trial for his life. 26:2&lt;br /&gt;God reminded Jeremiah that he wanted his entire message given—”Include every word.” Jeremiah may have been tempted to leave out the parts that would turn his audience against him, sound too harsh, or make him sound like a traitor. But by God’s command, he was not to delete parts of God’s message to suit himself, his audience, or the circumstances in which he found himself. Like Jeremiah, we must never ignore or exclude important parts of God’s Word to please someone. 26:2-9&lt;br /&gt;Shiloh was where the Tabernacle had been set up after the conquest of Canaan (Joshua 18:1). It was destroyed in 1050 B.C. by the Philistines. God said he would destroy the Temple as Shiloh had been destroyed. When Jeremiah said that Jerusalem, the city of God, would become an object of cursing and the Temple would be destroyed (26:6), the priests and false prophets were infuriated. The Temple was important to them because the people’s reverence for it brought them power. By saying that the Temple would be destroyed, Jeremiah undermined their authority. Jesus also infuriated the religious leaders of his time by foretelling the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple (Matthew 24:2). 26;11&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah was branded a traitor because he prophesied the destruction of the city and the Temple. But the “courageous” people advocated a foreign alliance to fight Babylon and retain their independence. 26;17-19&lt;br /&gt;The wise old men remembered the words of the prophet Micah (Micah 3:12), which were similar to the words Jeremiah spoke. When Micah called the people to repent, they turned from their wickedness. Although these people did not kill Jeremiah, they missed the main point—that the application of the story was for them. They spared Jeremiah, but they did not spare themselves by repenting of their sins. As you recall a great story of the Bible, ask how it can be applied to your life. 26:20-23&lt;br /&gt;Uriah is an otherwise unknown prophet who was executed for faithfully proclaiming God’s words. This shows us that God has had other prophets whose words are not included in the Bible. :27:1-8&lt;br /&gt;The year was 593 B.C., and Nebuchadnezzar had already invaded Judah once and had taken many captives. Jeremiah wore a yoke (a wooden frame used to fasten a team of animals to a plow) as a symbol of bondage. This was an object lesson, telling the people they must put themselves under Babylon’s yoke or be destroyed. 27:5-6&lt;br /&gt;God punished the people of Judah in an unusual way, by appointing a foreign ruler to be his “servant.” Nebuchadnezzar was not appointed to proclaim God’s message, but to fulfill God’s promise of judgment on sin. Because God is in control of all events, he uses whomever he wants. God may use unlikely people or circumstances to correct you. Be ready to accept God’s guidance, even if it comes from unexpected sources. 27:12-18&lt;br /&gt;Zedekiah was in a tough spot. Jeremiah called on him to surrender to Nebuchadnezzar at a time when many of the other leaders wanted him to form an alliance and fight. It would be disgraceful for a king to surrender, and he would look like a coward. This was a great opportunity for the false prophets, who kept saying that the Babylonians would not defeat the great city of Jerusalem and that God would never allow the magnificent, holy Temple to be destroyed. 27:19-22&lt;br /&gt;When Nebuchadnezzar invaded Judah, first in 605 and then in 597 B.C., he took away many important people living in Jerusalem—including Daniel and Ezekiel. Although these men were captives, they had a profound impact on the exiles and leaders in Babylon. Jeremiah predicted that more people, and even the precious objects in the Temple, would be taken. This happened in 586 B.C. during Babylon’s third and last invasion. &lt;br /&gt;28:8-17&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah spoke the truth, but it was unpopular; Hananiah spoke lies, but his deceitful words brought false hope and comfort to the people. God had already outlined the marks of a true prophet (Deuteronomy 13; 18:20-22): A true prophet’s predictions always come true, and his words never contradict previous revelation. Jeremiah’s predictions were already coming true, from Hananiah’s death to the Babylonian invasions. But the people still preferred to listen to comforting lies rather than painful truth. 29:4-7&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah wrote to the captives in Babylon (29:4-23) instructing them to move ahead with their lives and to pray for the pagan nation that enslaved them. Life cannot grind to a halt during troubled times. In an unpleasant or distressing situation, we must adjust and keep moving. You may find it difficult to pray for those in authority if they are evil, but that is when your prayers are most needed (1 Timothy 2:1-2). When you enter times of trouble or sudden change, pray diligently and move ahead, doing whatever you can rather than giving up because of fear and uncertainty. 29;10&lt;br /&gt;Scholars differ on the exact dates of this 70-year period in Babylon. Some say it refers to the years 605–538 B.C., from the first deportation to Babylon to the arrival of the first exiles back in Jerusalem after Cyrus’s freedom decree. Others point to the years 586–515 B.C., from the last deportation to Babylon and the destruction of the Temple until its rebuilding. A third possibility is that 70 years is an approximate number meaning a lifetime. All agree that God sent his people to Babylon for a long time, not the short captivity predicted by the false prophets. 29:11&lt;br /&gt;We’re all encouraged by a leader who stirs us to move ahead, someone who believes we can do the task he has given and who will be with us all the way. God is that kind of leader. He knows the future, and his plans for us are good and full of hope. As long as God, who knows the future, provides our agenda and goes with us as we fulfill his mission, we can have boundless hope. This does not mean that we will be spared pain, suffering, or hardship, but that God will see us through to a glorious conclusion.&lt;br /&gt;29:12-14&lt;br /&gt;God did not forget his people, even though they were captives in Babylon. He planned to give them a new beginning with a new purpose—to turn them into new people. In times of dire circumstances, it may appear as though God has forgotten you. But God may be preparing you, as he did the people of Judah, for a new beginning with him at the center. 29:13&lt;br /&gt;According to God’s wise plan, his people were to have a future and a hope; consequently, they could call upon him in confidence. Although the exiles were in a difficult place and time, they need not despair because they had God’s presence, the privilege of prayer, and God’s grace. If we seek him wholeheartedly, he will be found. Neither a strange land, sorrow, persecution, nor physical problems can break our fellowship with God. 29:21&lt;br /&gt;These false prophets, Ahab and Zedekiah, should not be confused with the kings who had the same names. Their family connections clearly identify them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;29:24-28&lt;br /&gt;These verses describe the reaction of Shemaiah, a false prophet exiled in 597 B.C. who had protested about Jeremiah’s letter. To discredit Jeremiah, Shemaiah accused him of false prophecy. Although Jeremiah’s message was true and his words were from God, the people hated him because he told them to make the most of the Exile. Jeremiah’s truth from God offered temporary correction and long-range benefit, while the false teachers’ lies offered only temporary comfort and long-range punishment. 30;1-22&lt;br /&gt;Chapters 30 and 31 show that Jeremiah spoke of hope and consolation as well as trouble and gloom. The people would one day be restored to their land, and God would make a new covenant with them to replace the one they broke. Whereas once they sinned and disobeyed, eventually they would repent and obey. 30:8-9&lt;br /&gt;Like Isaiah, Jeremiah associated events of the near future and those of the distant future. Reading these prophecies is like looking at several mountain peaks in a range. From a distance they look as though they are next to each other, when actually they are miles apart. Jeremiah presents near and distant events as if they will all happen soon. He sees the Exile, but he sees also the future day when Christ will reign forever. The reference to David is not to King David, but to his famous descendant, the Messiah (Luke 1:69). 30:12-13&lt;br /&gt;The medical language here conveys the idea that sin is terminal. Sinful people cannot be cured by being good or being religious. Beware of putting your confidence in useless cures while your sin spreads and causes you pain. God alone can cure the disease of sin, but you must be willing to let him do it. 30:15&lt;br /&gt;Judah protested its punishment, even though the sin that caused the pain was scandalous. But punishment is an opportunity for growth because it makes us aware of sin’s consequences. The people should have asked how they could profit from their mistakes. Remember this the next time you are corrected. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;30:18&lt;br /&gt;This prophecy that Jerusalem would be rebuilt was not completely fulfilled by the work of Ezra, Nehemiah, and Zerubbabel. The city was indeed rebuilt after the captivity, but the final restoration will occur when all believers are gathered in Christ’s Kingdom. This restoration will include buildings (30:18), people (30:19), and rulers (30:21). 30:21&lt;br /&gt;This verse refers to the restoration after the Babylonian captivity as well as to the final restoration under Christ.&lt;br /&gt;31:1&lt;br /&gt;This promise is to all the families (tribes) of Israel, not only to the tribe of Judah. The restoration will include all people who trust God. 31;3&lt;br /&gt;God reaches toward his people with kindness motivated by deep and everlasting love. He is eager to do the best for them if they will only let him. After many words of warning about sin, this reminder of God’s magnificent love is a breath of fresh air. Rather than thinking of God with dread, look carefully and see him lovingly drawing us toward himself. 31;14&lt;br /&gt;This means that many sacrifices will be made at the Temple so that the priests will have a feast with their portion. It is also a symbol of life and prosperity (Psalms36:8; 63:5; Isaiah 55:2).&lt;br /&gt;31:15&lt;br /&gt;Rachel, Jacob’s favorite wife, was the symbolic mother of the northern tribes, which were taken into captivity by the Assyrians. Rachel is pictured crying for the exiles at Ramah, a staging point of deportation. This verse is quoted in Matthew 2:18 to describe the sadness of the mothers of Bethlehem as the male children were killed. The weeping was great in both cases. &lt;br /&gt;31:18-20&lt;br /&gt;These words picture grief and mourning. Although Israel, the northern kingdom, had sunk into the most degrading sins, God still loved the people. A remnant would turn to God by repenting of their sins, and God would forgive. God still loves you despite anything you may have done. He will forgive you if you turn back to him. 31:29-31&lt;br /&gt;The people tried to blame God’s judgment on the sins of their fathers. One person’s sin does indeed affect other people, but all people are still held personally accountable for the sin in their own life (Deuteronomy 24:16; Ezekiel 18:2). What excuses do you use for your sins?&lt;br /&gt;31;33&lt;br /&gt;God would write his law on their hearts rather than on tablets of stone, as he did the Ten Commandments. In 17:1 their sin was engraved on their hearts so that they wanted above all to disobey. This change seems to describe an experience very much like the new birth, with God taking the initiative. When we turn our life over to God, he, by his Holy Spirit, builds into us the desire to obey him. The old covenant, broken by the people, would be replaced by a new covenant. The foundation of this new covenant is Christ (Hebrews 8:6). It is revolutionary, involving not only Israel and Judah but even the Gentiles. It offers a unique personal relationship with God himself, with his laws written on individuals’ hearts instead of on stone. Jeremiah looked forward to the day when Jesus would come to establish this covenant. But for us today, this covenant is here. We have the wonderful opportunity to make a fresh start and establish a permanent, personal relationship with God (see 29:11; 32:38-40). &lt;br /&gt;31:35-37&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-2211465445425663588?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/2211465445425663588/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=2211465445425663588' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/2211465445425663588'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/2211465445425663588'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/jeremiah2.html' title='Jeremiah3'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-1606266148986594480</id><published>2008-08-20T02:49:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:25:28.865-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Jeremiah 1'/><title type='text'>Jeremiah1</title><content type='html'>Jeremiah&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;JEREMIAH God called an ordinary person like Jeremiah to an extraordinary task. Jeremiah is best known for his role as a prophet. He warned Israel’s southern kingdom of Judah of its pending doom. He loved God’s people and hated to see them refuse God’s mercy. However, the people of Judah shunned Jeremiah and mistreated God’s messenger. They did not like him getting on their case. They continued to ignore his warnings until Babylon finally destroyed them and took them captive. We remember Jeremiah as the “weeping prophet”—someone who hurt whenever God’s people broke God’s commands. Instead of resenting Judah for the way they treated him, he mourned Judah’s fate. Jeremiah wrote the Old Testament books of Jeremiah and Lamentations.   JEREMIAH’S BACKGROUND He was the prophet to Judah before its fall in 586 BC; his name is also spelled “Jeremias” (Matthew 16:14) and “Jeremy” (Matthew 2:17; 27:9, KJV). Jeremiah was born in the village of Anathoth, about three miles northeast of Jerusalem. His father’s name was Hilkiah, and he belonged to the tribe of Benjamin. His call came in the thirteenth year of King Josiah (640-609 BC). He refers to himself as “a child” when called (Jeremiah 1:6), but the Hebrew word is not the same as used in 30:6 and cannot be limited to preadolescence. He was probably referring to his inexperience rather than to his age. Jeremiah was born about 657 BC during the reign of the wicked king Manasseh, while the great Ashurbanipal, who had shaken the world by sacking the ancient Egyptian city of Thebes in 663 BC, ruled a world empire from Assyria. God informed Jeremiah that he had consecrated and appointed him before birth (Jeremiah 1:4-5). Jeremiah first shrank with a sense of inadequacy and fear: “O Sovereign LORD,...I can’t speak for you! I’m too young!” (1:6). God would not allow Jeremiah to excuse himself. He was assured that words would be given him to speak, and guidance given for the way (1:7). He was promised protection (1:18) and deliverance (1:8) despite opposition (1:19). God touched his mouth, signifying divine inspiration of his words, and gave the sign of a branch from an almond tree, explaining that the Lord is watching (see the margin or footnote in the New Living Translation). The third sign was the boiling pot (1:13) facing from the north, picturing the source and fury of impending disaster. Thus the tone of Jeremiah’s life ministry was set: judgment, disaster, danger, defeat, and impending death for the nation. What a job! We may not win popularity contests with others for enlightening them to God’s truth. However, we must remain faithful nonetheless. Although God’s overall message to the world is one of love and salvation, not condemnation, he takes sin seriously—especially among his own people. As we communicate God’s truth, we must be careful not to gloss over sin. Sometimes we must play Jeremiah’s role-despite an unwelcome reception.   &lt;br /&gt;EARLY MINISTRY The messages Jeremiah gave during his first five years of ministry may have been instrumental in the great revival of 622 BC. Those cooperating with King Josiah in the reformation and friendly with Jeremiah included Ahikam and his father, Shaphan (Jeremiah 26:24); Gedaliah, Ahikam’s son (39:14), who later became governor; Acbor, son of Micaiah, also called Abdon, whose son Elnathan joined the opposition (26:22) but later repented (36:25); and Asaiah (2 Chronicles 34:20). The prophets Nahum and Zephaniah also influenced the reform movement, which must have climaxed under the preaching of Habakkuk and Jeremiah, the priestly ministry of Hilkiah, and the prophecies of Huldah the prophetess. During the reign of King Josiah, Jeremiah spoke without the fear of persecution that plagued his later ministry. Though the content of the book of Jeremiah sometimes appears to be fragmentary, most of chapters 1-19 date to the time of Josiah. When they found the lost Book of the Covenant in the temple debris, Jeremiah may have been inspired to write these words in Jeremiah 15:16: “Your words are what sustain me. They bring me great joy and are my heart’s delight.” The words “So be it, LORD” (11:5) in a context recalling the words of Moses in the Torah may be Jeremiah’s response after hearing King Josiah read the newly found book. Small towns and rural areas, including his hometown, heard Jeremiah shame the high places and idolatry. They sought to kill the young prophet, or at least to intimidate him (Jeremiah 11:21). Instead of being silent, Jeremiah asserted that his motivation was for their good and condemned their resistance to the truth as their greatest danger. Shortly after Jeremiah began his ministry, a number of world-changing events took place. Ashurbanipal died, and the Assyrian Empire rapidly declined. Nabopolassar began a twenty-one-year reign in Babylon, leading an expansion that ended when his son Nebuchadnezzar conquered the known world. As the world news filtered in, Jeremiah turned more toward Jerusalem. He may have shared his first temple speeches (Jeremiah 7:1-10) at this time. Nabopolassar felt his strength sufficient to launch an attack against Assyrian territory in 616 BC, but he advanced cautiously because Psamtik I (Psammeti-chus) of Egypt appeared ready to aid Assyria. Cyaxares of Media (Medes) pounced on Assyria when Babylon hesitated and took its most sacred city, Asshur, in 614 BC. Babylon joined Media, along with Scythia, and waged an assault against Nineveh, which fell late in the summer of 612 BC. The Assyrian Empire had shriveled to two small areas: Haran and Carchemish. Nabopolassar took Haran in 610, and Ashuruballit, having escaped, appealed to Egypt for help at Carchemish. Neco, who had become pharaoh within the year, responded immediately. He marched through Judah without giving Josiah prior notice and asked that the Jews not bother him in view of his haste to go northward (2 Chronicles 35:21). Ignoring the request, Josiah pursued them to Megiddo and was wounded in the ensuing battle; he died in Jerusalem.   DURING THE REIGN OF JEHOIAKIM In place of Jehoahaz, Josiah’s fourth son, who reigned only three months, Pharaoh Neco enthroned Jehoiakim (Eliakim). Neco demanded heavy payments from Judah for providing protection. He also took Jehoahaz prisoner as collateral to assure payment (2 Kings 23:31-33). Early in the reign of Jehoiakim, Jeremiah, moved by God’s Spirit, delivered his third temple speech (Jeremiah 26) on the occasion of one of the annual Jewish feasts. He called for the people to repent and to act on the basis of the revelation they had heard repeatedly from the Book of the Law. The barb of the sermon came in the warning: “This is what the LORD says: If you will not listen to me and obey the law I have given you, and if you will not listen to my servants, the prophets-for I sent them again and again to warn you, but you would not listen to them—then I will destroy this Temple as I destroyed Shiloh, the place where the Tabernacle was located. And I will make Jerusalem an object of cursing in every nation on earth” (26:4-6). Shiloh had been the heart of Jewish worship from Joshua to Samuel, but after being destroyed by the Philistines, it never revived. It served as an example of complete desolation following God’s judgment in the days of Eli. In response, the crowds gathered rapidly and reacted angrily against Jeremiah. Priests and princes hurried to the New Gate, where a court was established to bring order and to control violence. Jehoiakim would be no help to Jeremiah, for he had refused to listen to God’s messages (Jeremiah 22:21). The priests and false prophets spoke against Jeremiah, calling him a traitor. Then some of the elders spoke to the people about Uriah, who had prophesied the same message. Rather than risk disaster, Ahikam persuaded the court to spare Jeremiah. Egypt controlled Palestine and Syria after the decay of the Assyrian Empire. In 606 BC Egypt succeeded in annihilating a garrison city of Babylonian soldiers south of Carchemish and then reoccupied Carchemish to await the return blow from Babylon. This Egyptian victory meant persecution for Jeremiah, who was often accused of false prophecy (compare to Jeremiah 20). Jeremiah never had confidence in Egypt. Each time a Jewish leader would call for a new alliance with Egypt, Jeremiah repeated God’s message against it. Whenever a Jewish group fled to Egypt for security, Jeremiah warned of worse things in that land of false refuge (see Jeremiah 44:26-27). We, too, often see God’s own people trusting in almost anything other than God. They trust in the money they can touch. And they rely on relationships they can feel. However, we must share God’s truth with these disillusioned believers. At their best, material possessions and earthly relationships will one day disappoint us. Only God can be fully trusted. This was Jeremiah’s message, and it is ours today. Jeremiah’s ode and prophecy in 46 poetically describe Egypt’s defeat at Carchemish, when Nabopolassar sent his son Nebuchadnezzar to destroy them (605 BC). After smashing the Egyptian army at Carchemish, Nebuchadnezzar pursued the enemy through Judah. “Not a single man escaped to his own country,” reads the exaggerated Babylonian record. His father’s death, however, prevented him from invading Egypt, and he returned to Babylon to assume the throne. The following year Nebuchadnezzar, now king of Babylonia, returned to accept the homage of the rulers of Judah, Syria, and Phoenicia. On this occasion God gave Jeremiah his great 70-year prophecy (25:11-12), the basis of Daniel 9:2, 24-27. A year after the decisive battle at Carchemish, Baruch, Jeremiah’s scribe, finished recording all the dictated words of Jeremiah and was reading from this scroll at the temple. A report reached the king, who sent Jehudi, a servant, to fetch the scroll and read it to him. When this was done, Jehoiakim burned the scroll in spite of his counselors, who pleaded with the king to stop (Jeremiah 36:23-25). God’s message, soon rewritten, added a promise of fearful judgment on Jehoiakim (36:27-31). Ambitious young Nebuchadnezzar determined to add Egypt to his dominion. In 601 BC he led his forces through Judah again, but Neco had advance warning and was prepared for the onslaught. In the desert of Shur, Nebuchadnezzar suffered defeat. Encouraged by this display of Egyptian defensive strength, the pro-Egyptian parties in Judah asserted themselves, persuading Jehoiakim to lead them to freedom from Babylon by making an alliance with Egypt (2 Kings 24:1). But help from Egypt did not come (24:7). In 599 BC, Nebuchadnezzar armed those surrounding the rebel Jewish kingdom to harass the Jews, which they willingly did (2 Kings 24:2). Evidently, Jehoiakim lost his life in one of these raids. Since the people despised him, his body was thrown out without honorable burial, as Jeremiah had predicted (Jeremiah 22:19).   DURING THE REIGN OF ZEDEKIAH Nebuchadnezzar’s siege of Jerusalem in 598 BC lasted only a short time because the new king, Jehoiachin, crowned at age eighteen, knew resistance was useless. He gave himself up, with all his family and court, in March of 597 BC, after serving as king about three months. The Babylonian Chronicle reads: “He [Nebuchadnezzar] seized the city and captured the king.” Jehoiachin was carried to Babylon along with eight thousand officers, artisans, and executives (Ezekiel among them) and many treasures (2 Kings 24:16; compare to 24:14). In his place Nebuchadnezzar appointed Zedekiah, Jehoiachin’s uncle, to rule. Zedekiah proceeded to organize his government with the less capable and inexperienced help left after the deportation. Jeremiah took up his thankless ministry, calling on the Jews to believe God, obey the laws of Babylon, and reject false hopes in Egypt. Zedekiah turned a deaf ear to these appeals, listening rather to the unwise advice of his counselors (Jeremiah 37:1-2). During the first year of Zedekiah’s rule, Jeremiah received the vision of the two baskets of figs. The Jews carried to Babylon were like good figs, while Zedekiah and those who trusted in Egypt were like rotten figs (24:1-8). The reason for this reproachful description was that the Jews began plotting rebellion against Babylon along with Edom, Moab, Ammon, Tyre, and Sidon. This rebellion started from the beginning of the reign of Zedekiah (27:1-3) and marked a breach in their oath of loyalty to Nebuchadnezzar. Of course, it also meant they once again refused God’s message through Jeremiah. In Egypt the Pharaoh began to renew plans to organize dissidents within the Babylonian Empire to revolt. He hired Jewish soldiers to aid him in protecting his southern border. The Jewish soldiers settled on a Nile island called Elephantine, or Yeb (593-410 BC). Jeremiah addressed an oracle to these Jews (Jeremiah 44). The treaty for Jews to help in Egypt evidently also assumed that Egyptians would aid Israel. When the Babylonians besieged Jerusalem in 589, Pharaoh Hophra came to the aid of Zedekiah. Nebuchadnezzar, ruling from Riblah, commanded that the siege against Jerusalem be lifted in order to make a surprise attack on Hophra (37:5). The release gave Jeremiah an opportunity to journey to Anathoth to secure some family property (37:12). However, Irijah, captain of the guard, arrested Jeremiah in the Gate of Benjamin for defecting to the enemy, and he was beaten and flung into a dungeon. King Zedekiah brought him out after many days. With characteristic boldness, Jeremiah told the king he would shortly become a captive himself. At the same time, Jeremiah requested that the king act justly and release him. He gained part of his request and was treated more fairly. However, he continued as prisoner in the court of the guard. The Babylonian army chased Pharaoh Hophra back to Egypt and returned to crush Jerusalem without further mercy. The siege, which began in 589 BC, was restored with rigor in January of 588, Zedekiah’s ninth year (Jeremiah 39:1). During this time, the Lord gave Jeremiah foreknowledge of a visit from a cousin who wished to sell a field near Anathoth (32:7-9; compare to 37:12). Jeremiah bought the field as an object lesson to verify the message of restoration after their captivity—an experience that would last seventy years (29:10). The armies of Babylon cut off all supplies from Jerusalem and were able to destroy the last two outlying Jewish fortresses of Lachish and Azekah (Jeremiah 34:7). Food became scarce. Disease spread. Sewage and impure cistern water caused pestilence. With increased distress came Jeremiah’s increased appeal for the city to surrender. However, we see human nature at work in Judah’s stubborn refusal to follow along God’s plans. Like Judah, instead of surrendering to his plans for us, we fear them. We feel God must have made a mistake if his plans include suffering. So, we look for a shortcut, or a detour or some other way to hold back the inevitable. Instead, we should listen to the voice of Jeremiah and entrust the consequences of our lives to God. Jeremiah remained in the prison court until the Babylonians breached the city wall in July of 586 BC. The king escaped by night and succeeded in reaching the plains of Jericho but was captured there and taken to Riblah. Zedekiah’s family and counselors were killed; he himself was blinded and taken in chains to Babylon, where he died soon after (Jeremiah 39:6-7). Back in Jerusalem, Nebuzaradan, the Babylonian general, sent most of the Jews into captivity. Jeremiah, however, was granted special consideration; after being released from prison, he was placed under the care of Gedaliah, son of Ahikam.   AFTER THE FALL OF JERUSALEM A month after the fall of Jerusalem, the city was burned and the walls broken down. Gedaliah was appointed governor of the remaining agricultural community, with headquarters at Mizpah. Jeremiah returned to Jerusalem where, according to tradition, he took up his abode in a grotto near what is now known as Gordon’s Calvary. There he wrote the book of Lamentations. The Ammonite king Baalis, plotting rebellion against Babylon, instigated the murder of Gedaliah (Jeremiah 40:13). In the reaction that followed, the remaining people followed the leader Johanan ben Kareah to a camp near Bethlehem, intending to go to Egypt. They asked Jeremiah, at Jerusalem, to give guidance from the Lord, promising obedience. Jeremiah’s message required that they remain in Israel and not go to Egypt. Disobedience was complete and immediate. Fearing Babylon, they departed from Judah, taking Jeremiah with them, and entered Egypt (41:16-43:7). Jeremiah did not stop his ministry in Egypt. His message at Tahpanhes (Jeremiah 43:8-12) assured a victorious conquest of the land by Nebuchadnezzar, which took place in 568-567 BC. Jews from all parts of Egypt gathered to discuss their future in exile. Jeremiah took the opportunity to denounce their idolatry. Jewish women as well as men argued that they had enjoyed prosperity while serving idols but had suffered since stopping. Jeremiah condemned their obdurate blindness to reality and gave God’s indictment. For a verifying sign, Jeremiah predicted that Pharaoh Hophra of Egypt would be assassinated (44:30), which happened in 466 BC. No later record of Jeremiah’s acts exists in the Bible. Tradition says that some Jews from the exile stoned Jeremiah in a settlement in Tahpanhes. Though Jeremiah suffered continued rejection during his life, numerous writers of the apocrypha as well as more traditional writings honor his history. Jesus could well have had Jeremiah in mind when he said, “You build tombs for the prophets your ancestors killed and decorate the graves of the godly people your ancestors destroyed... [You are] the descendants of those who murdered the prophets” (Matthew 23:29-31, NLT).   OTHER JEREMIAHS 2. Jeremiah was also a family head in the Transjordan portion of Manasseh whom Tiglath-pileser took captive (1 Chronicles 5:23-26; compare to 2 Kings 15:29). 3. Jeremiah was also the father of Hamutal, a wife of King Josiah (2 Kings 23:31; 24:18). 4. Jeremiah was also an ambidextrous (right- and left-handed) Benjamite bowman and slinger who joined David at Ziklag (1 Chronicles 12:4). 5, 6. Two Gadite soldiers who joined David’s army were named Jeremiah (1 Chronicles 12:10, 13). 7. Jeremiah was also the postexilic priest who with Nehemiah set his seal to the covenant, renewing the people’s promise to obey God’s laws (Nehemiah 10:2). He is mentioned again (12:34) as part of the procession for the dedication of the new wall of Jerusalem. 8. Jeremiah was also the priest who returned from exile with Zerubbabel (Nehemiah 12:1) and became head of a family of priests (12:12). 9. Jeremiah was also the father of Jaazaniah, a Recabite who refused to drink wine (Jeremiah 35:3).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;                                 BOOK OF JEREMIAH&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;OT prophetic book, second in the canonical order of the Prophets.   AUTHOR Few doubt that the prophet from Anathoth wrote the book of Jeremiah, yet questions persist concerning some parts, particularly chapter 52. The use of the third person cannot be used to discredit Jeremiah’s authorship, for Jeremiah used the first and third person, and even the second person, in the same context. For example, 32:6-7 reads: “Jeremiah said [third person], ‘The word of the LORD came to me: [first person] . . . your uncle will come to you [second person]’ ” (RSV). The problem of the passage of time provides the strongest argument against the Jeremian authorship of chapter 52. Jeremiah was born about 657 BC. Evil-merodoch released Jehoiachin (52:31) about 95 years later. Jeremiah 52:33 summarizes the continuation of events beyond this time. The problem of location also argues against Jeremian authorship, for Jeremiah took up residence in Egypt (43:6-7) while Jehoiachin dwelt in Babylon. Note also that Jeremiah concludes his writing with chapter 51, making chapter 52 a true editorial appendix. Since chapter 52 parallels 2 Kings 24:18–25:30, it may be that other portions of Jeremiah that parallel sections of 2 Kings may have been written by someone other than Jeremiah. The following table shows such portions and includes harmonic passages in 2 Chronicles. The first column shows historical (chronological) sequence. The last column provides a brief condensation of content. Baruch served as the secretary for Jeremiah. The relationship between the two men apparently lasted many years; the prophet gave a word of encouragement as he blessed his helper (45:5). According to the custom of the people, it would have been legitimate for the scribe to write some of the prophet’s messages in his own words. This would not deny inspiration.   AUTHENTICITY That Jeremiah lived and actually wrote the major part of the book bearing his name is authenticated by numerous references in both biblical and nonbiblical sources (e.g., Daniel 9; Ecclesiasticus 49; Josephus’s Antiquities 10; Talmud: Baba Bathra). The veracity of the historical sections of Jeremiah have abundant confirmation in contemporary biblical books and in the secular histories preserved in Babylon, Egypt, and Persia. Higher critics sought to discredit the portions of Jeremiah that were omitted by the Septuagint, or to credit passages to a later writer because of style differences (e.g., chapters 30–33) or spelling differences (as found in chapters 27–29) or linguistic problems (as in 10:11, written in Aramaic, but this may be a gloss). Another reason for discrediting Jeremiah’s authorship is that critics dated some prophecies later than indicated in the context. This results from their requiring that predictive writing follow the record of its fulfillment. None of these reasons is sufficient cause for doubting authenticity. The Hebrew text deserves priority over the Septuagint. Aramaic contact with the Jews became commonplace during this period (cf. Ezra 4–7; Daniel 2–7) and therefore explains the presence of Aramaic. Different styles may be expected from the same writer due to differing circumstances and differing purposes. Baruch may have been inspired to write parts of this book and/or edited what Jeremiah wrote. Prediction preceding fulfillment presents no problem for believers.   THE BOOK OF JEREMIAH AND THE SEPTUAGINT The special problems of the Septuagint translation of Jeremiah demand attention. The Septuagint translators evidently made an inaccurate translation. About 2,300 Hebrew words are omitted from the Septuagint. After chapter 23, the mistranslation, omissions, and mixed chronological order indicate confusion. However, the Dead Sea Scrolls display texts with both the Hebrew and the Septuagint order, indicating the antiquity of both editions. Both have suffered corruption at the hands of scribes and the ravages of the ages. The Septuagint evidently veers much further from the original, yet it has invaluable clues to help suggest answers to some textual problems. The most evident major shift in the Septuagint consists of the removal of chapters 46–51 of the Hebrew order, and the placement of them in the spot from which 25:13b-14 was removed. These chapters are renumbered 26–31 but are mixed and changed considerably from the order of the Hebrew Masoretic Text.   BACKGROUND This is fully discussed in the previous entry.    DATE The chronological sequence of the messages of Jeremiah constitutes a major problem that cannot be wholly solved. Nonetheless, the book was written during Jeremiah’s ministry (c. 627–586 BC).   ORIGIN AND DESTINATION After beginning his ministry in Anathoth, Jeremiah moved to Jerusalem, where he remained until he was forced to join the disobedient refugees who arrived in Egypt about 584 BC. Until the deportation of Jehoiachin (597 BC), Jeremiah addressed his messages to the king and the people residing in Judah. Later messages addressed the same group, plus the captives in Babylon (e.g., chapter 29). After the departure to Egypt, he addressed Jews in that land.   PURPOSE Part of God’s commission to Jeremiah stated the purpose of Jeremiah’s ministry: “Today I appoint you to stand up against nations and kingdoms. You are to uproot some and tear them down, to destroy and overthrow them. You are to build others up and plant them” (1:10, NLT). The first four parts of the commission required that Jeremiah, appointed as a “chief governor” over nations, should wreck the existing religious and social structures by his preaching against moral and spiritual sin. Doubtless, the physical destruction caused by the Egyptians, Assyrians, and Babylonians was the accoutrement for the truth uttered by the prophet. Jeremiah is consistent in his blasts at moral and religious wickedness, his call to submit to the punishment that God gives through Babylon, and his assurance that such submission will lead to blessing. When Zedekiah asks advice (38:14), we know what Jeremiah will say. When the captains of the refugees ask if they should go to Egypt, we already know the answer (42:3). We may also anticipate the obdurate rejection of God’s message on the part of the inquiring people, who apparently want to know God’s will but have no desire to obey it. Nevertheless, part of Jeremiah’s purpose focuses on the most distant future when the new covenant will supplant the old (31:31-37), and a transformed people bent on obedience rather than sin will receive God’s promised kingdom.   TEACHING National sin brings national punishment. No truth blazes so clearly as this. Gentiles as well as Jews stand under the same judgment, for God is not the God of Israel only. Individuals are not overlooked in divine judgments on nations. God sets before each the way of life and the way of death (21:8) and appeals to each to choose life (27:13). Jeremiah illustrates human depravity by questioning if people can change their skin color or leopards their spots (13:23). The depths of depravity reach beyond man’s ability to measure (17:9-10). People even love falsehood (5:30-31). Yet God promises to transform willing subjects who call on him (33:3) by giving them a “new heart” (24:7; 32:38-41) as the climatic provision of the new covenant (31:33-35). The Messiah, who accomplishes the saving work, is called the Lord our Righteousness, the King, the righteous Branch, the Branch of David (23:5-6; 33:15-16). A future nation will be made up of individuals who accept this salvation. Passing through the night of tribulation as of travail (30:6-7), the Jews will understand the true identity of their Messiah, will believe and receive him with repentant sorrow, will be cleansed (33:8), and will be regathered from all countries (32:37) by the omnipotent God (verse 27).   OUTLINE AND CONTENT Though many see no logical order, a careful reading of Jeremiah will reveal a grouping on the basis of content, as suggested by the following outline: VII. Introduction (1) VII. Oracles against the Jews (2–25) III. History—Signs and Sufferings of Jeremiah before the Siege (26–29) IIV. The Book of Hope written during the Siege (30–33) IIV. History—Signs and Sufferings of Jeremiah after the Siege (34–45) IVI. Oracles against the Nations (46–51) VII. Conclusion (52) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The prophet opens his ministry with a series of utterances against the sins of Jerusalem (2:1–3:5), followed by similar messages (through chapter 4), concluding with words of judgment (chapters 5–6). The message in the temple gate (chapters 7–10) leads into the proclamation against covenant breakers (chapters 11–13). The lamentation over the drought (chapter 14) and subsequent miseries (chapter 15) compares with many similar expressions of grief. Jeremiah did not differ from other prophets in his use of object lessons. The rotted linen waistband (chapter 13), the broken jug (chapter 19), figs (chapter 24), and ox yoke (chapters 27–28) may be supplemented by human object lessons (chapter 35), and even the prophet himself, whose celibacy (16:1-4), resistance to sympathetic consolation (16:5-7), and withdrawal from feasts (16:8-9) all served to illustrate and confirm his message. Places where Jeremiah proclaimed his messages helped bear home his point. He stood in the public gate, where kings came and went, to proclaim that judgment (fire) would come through the gate (17:19, 27; 39:3). Then he went to the potter’s house (chapter 18), and then to Hinnom or Topath, which would be called the Valley of Slaughter (chapter 19). The persecution suffered by Jeremiah first hinted at (1:8), then predicted (verse 19), expresses its venom privately from his home village (11:19-23). The prophet’s kindred join the opposition (12:6). Public opposition brings beatings and the stocks (20:2-3). Jeremiah prefers to keep silent rather than to speak and suffer (verse 9), but he cannot withhold the word that is as fire in his bones. The result: all his familiars reproached, derided, terrorized, and denounced him, then sought his death (verses 7-18). Jeremiah escaped death at the hands of priests, prophets, and people only because he had a few faithful friends (26:8-24). When his prophecies began to materialize, hatred mounted. He was beaten and put into a dungeon for many days (37:14-17) on a false charge. Temporary relief at the guardhouse (verse 21) lasted only a few days. Officials clamored again for his death (38:4) and put him into a cistern, where he sank in the mire (verse 6). His rescue (verse 10) preserved his life, but his imprisonment at the guardhouse continued (verse 28). His writings were cut up and burned (36:23); his words were denied and rejected (43:1-7; 44:16). The “Book of Hope“ (chapters 30–33) does contain some words of judgment (32:28-35), and other sections of the prophecy have a few bright spots (3:11-18; 16:14-16; 23:2-8; 29:10-14), but in a volume otherwise dark, these four chapters bring pleasant relief. The climax of hope, as indicated also in the longest NT quotation from Jeremiah (see Hebrews 8:8-12), predicts a new covenant (31:31-40). Other prophecies also describe the end of the Mosaic law and sacrament (e.g., 3:16), and the new covenant (32:40; 33:19-26). Little is known of Jeremiah’s activity or messages from c. 594–589 BC. Zedekiah’s counselors made clandestine plans for throwing off Babylon’s yoke by alliances with neighbor nations. A traitor may have reported the conspiracy to Babylon (perhaps Edom). After Babylon attacked, Zedekiah sought a hopeful report from Jeremiah but did not get it. The Recabite faithfulness to the Nazarite vow (chapter 35) dates to the days of Jehoiakim but as an object lesson fits the siege context. Recabites received a human command that they obeyed; Jews received a divine command that they rejected. Recabites will be blessed (35:18-19); Judah, judged (verses 15-17). The reading of the scroll to Jehoiakim and his scornful rejection of it (chapter 36) illustrates the prophetic assertion (35:15) that destruction follows the rejection of God’s message given through the prophets. The siege comes into focus in chapter 37 with another inquiry from Zedekiah (the nonchronological chapters 35–36 serve as an illustrative parenthesis). Jeremiah 37:11 moves forward to the time of the lifting of the siege of 589 BC when Nebuchadnezzar drove Pharaoh Hophra’s army back to Egypt. During the reprieve, Jeremiah sought to attend a meeting of relatives to settle family matters at or near Anathoth. Perhaps the trip involved initiating the purchase that would be made two years later (32:6-15). However, as he was leaving the city, he was arrested for desertion to the Babylonians and jailed in a dungeon cell until Zedekiah granted him privileged prisoner status. The king’s officers had ample cause for the accusation of sedition: Jeremiah had encouraged desertion (21:9; 38:2). Traitors deserved death, and this was their verdict against Jeremiah (38:4-5). The violence of the time encouraged the officers to select a cruel method of execution: let Jeremiah starve and bury himself in the mire at the bottom of an abandoned cistern. A sympathetic Ethiopian, Ebed-melech, made the rescue. Immediately, the unadulterated prophecies of judgment came forth again from Jeremiah’s lips, including a message to the king that reflected Jeremiah’s own recent experience: “[Your friends] have betrayed and misled you. When your feet sank in the mud, they left you to your fate” (38:22, NLT). Jeremiah 39:1–43:7 records history from the fall of Jerusalem in 586 BC to the flight into Egypt, including the liberation of Jeremiah (chapter 39), appointment and assassination of Gedaliah (chapters 40–41), a warning from God against going to Egypt (chapter 42), and the obdurate disobedience of the people (43:1-7). The latest writings of Jeremiah are found in chapter 44. The audience consisted of idolatrous Jews (44:4-6) gathered from various parts of Egypt as far as Aswan (Pathros). Jeremiah repeated the appeal of former prophets to reject false gods in favor of Jehovah, but to no avail (44:15-16). The message to Baruch (chapter 45), written about 605 BC, is placed here to round out the main part of the book, which begins with the commission to “break down” and “pluck up” (1:10) and concludes with the same Hebrew words (45:4). If Baruch had ambition to obtain status in the Judean court like his brother Seraiah (51:59), he was advised that it would be useless because disaster would come, as the preceding chapters indicate. The oracles against the nations (46–51), introduced by a title superscription (46:1), constitute a distinct stylistic division similar to Isaiah 13–23, Ezekiel 25–32, and Amos 1:3–2:16. Some of the prophecies against foreign nations in Jeremiah carry dates that show that they were written at different points during his ministry but were collected together for the book. The prophecy against Egypt opens with a colorful description of Egypt’s expulsion from Carchemish (605 BC) after a short occupancy (Jeremiah 46:1-12). The second message (verses 13-26) may picture the attack on Egypt in 601 BC when Neco stopped Nebuchadnezzar at the border; the attack in 589 BC when Hophra lost in his attempt to aid Zedekiah; or (most probably) the invasion of Egypt by Nebuchadnezzar in 568 BC, when Babylon took advantage of the weakness of Egypt to occupy it. At that time Nebuchadnezzar set up his judgment throne as predicted (43:10) and meted out death sentences to all rebels, including those Jews who might have been implicated in anti-Babylonian conspiracies. The conclusion of the Egypt oracle repeats part of the Book of Hope (46:27-28, cf. 30:10-11). Messages against Edom, Arabia, Phoenician cities, and Ammon generally condemn pride, cruelty, and idolatry. The oracle against Elam is unique. No other prophet speaks judgment against this people, whose dwelling east of Babylon meant rare contact with Judah. Jeremiah predicted that Elam would be doomed, then restored. Ezekiel counts Elamites among the inhabitants of Sheol (Ezekiel 32:24). The final judgment indicates the unbiased attitude of the prophet. His messages placed him in an advantageous position with the Babylonians, who treated him with respect and kindness, in contrast to their cruelty to other Jews. But when God spoke against Babylon, Jeremiah uttered God’s words without respect to his own comfort, just as he had spoken against Egypt when silence would have been logical for self-preservation. Chapter 51 concludes “the words of Jeremiah.” Chapter 52 repeats historical facts previously stated prophetically by Jeremiah, and partially recorded also as history in chapter 39 (cf. 2 Kings 25 and 2 Chronicles 36). The editor of Jeremiah evidently desired to climax the book with a historical confirmation of Jeremiah’s prophecy, but he included facts beyond those contained elsewhere.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6726185993263976531-1606266148986594480?l=christianmessage4u.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/feeds/1606266148986594480/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=6726185993263976531&amp;postID=1606266148986594480' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/1606266148986594480'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6726185993263976531/posts/default/1606266148986594480'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://christianmessage4u.blogspot.com/2008/08/jeremiah.html' title='Jeremiah1'/><author><name>ROGER</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11677101082004085544</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6726185993263976531.post-2857997972705719725</id><published>2008-08-20T01:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T04:25:28.866-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ADAM’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE'/><title type='text'>ADAM’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE</title><content type='html'>ADAM’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;The Hebrew word ‘adam is used over 500 times in the Old Testament in the sense of “human being” or “humanity.” Only in early Genesis and 1 Chronicles 1:1 is ‘adam the proper name of Adam, the first man. Early Genesis defines Adam’s role in history. Any insight we’re given into Adam as an individual is found there. &lt;br /&gt;The significance of Adam’s creation by God (Gen. 1:26, 27; 2:7–25.) Some argue that Genesis 1 and 2 are two contradictory creation accounts, spliced together by ancient editors. In fact, what we have in these two chapters are “establishing” and “close up” views of creation. &lt;br /&gt;We see this same technique used daily on television. The camera gives us a look at the outside of an apartment building—and then shifts inside to focus on the featured individuals. The view of the building is the establishing shot; it tells us where the action takes place. The view focuses our attention on the hero and heroine of the writer’s tale. &lt;br /&gt;Genesis 1 is God’s “establishing shot.” Genesis 1 overviews the universe in which the action will take place. That brief overview establishes the fact that the material universe is the work of a Person. All that exists was consciously designed and brought into being by One whose power and wisdom are utterly awesome. That brief overview also establishes that all living creatures owe their existence to Him, yet draws our attention to “man.” Only man will God fashion “in Our image, according to our likeness.” And only to man will God give “dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth” (Gen. 1:26–27).&lt;br /&gt;Genesis 1 provides the framework in which we understand the universe and man’s place in it. No one who ignores Genesis 1, God’s “establishing shot,” can hope to understand human nature or the meaning of human life.&lt;br /&gt;Then, with the framework fixed, Genesis 2 takes us “inside.” We’re led to one spot on the surface of the earth, a place called Eden, and introduced to the pair who became the parents of our race. &lt;br /&gt;Grasping the teaching of these two chapters is essential if we are rightly to understand the men we meet in the Bible—as well as any human being. What, then, do these chapters teach us?&lt;br /&gt;Man was created in God’s image and likeness (Gen. 1:26–27). In this text, two Hebrew words, image and likeness, are linked to convey a single powerful truth. Human beings, and human beings alone, have been given the “likeness-image” of God. The Expository Dictionary of Bible Words (1985) notes:&lt;br /&gt;The creation story makes it clear that the likeness-image is not of physical form: material for man’s creation was taken from the earth. It is the inner nature of human beings that reflects something vital in the nature of God. Thus theologians generally agree that the likeness is rooted in all that is required to make a human being a person: in our intellectual, emotional, and moral resemblance to God, who has revealed Himself to us a personal being.&lt;br /&gt;It is this likeness-image that sets human beings apart from [the rest of] the animal creation, and it is transmitted through the process of reproduction to succeeding generations (Gen. 5:1–3). It is this likeness-image of God that makes each human life so precious that nothing of however great value can possibly be offered in compensation for the taking of another’s life (Gen. 9:5–6)(p. 351).&lt;br /&gt;According to Genesis then, human life is unique, and each human being is special.&lt;br /&gt;Man was given dominion (Gen. 1:26). Three Hebrew words convey the idea of rule or dominion. Masal, found over 80 times in the Old Testament, is a general word denoting authority. Sapat and mispat are translated either “rule” or “judge,” and are linked with various functions of human government. But the Hebrew word in Genesis 1 is radah. Its twenty-five uses in the Old Testament refer to human’s governance of nature, and particularly animal creation, as God’s surrogate. In stating His intention to give man dominion over animal creation, God charged human beings to care for what He has made. The gift of God’s likeness-image carries with it the responsibility to guard God’s handiwork rather than to exploit it. &lt;br /&gt;Adam’s creation was intimate and personal (Gen. 2:7). In Scripture’s close up of Adam’s creation, we note a striking departure. In describing the creation of the universe and the shaping of earth, Genesis 1 repeatedly records, “Then God said … and it was so.” In describing Adam’s creation, Genesis 2:7 says “the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.” &lt;br /&gt;What a difference! “Then God said … and it was so” suggests emotional distance. The picture of God stooping to form Adam’s body from the dust of the earth and then breathing life into his still form is warm and personal. God was emotionally involved. He stepped into His creation; He fashioned Adam’s body and held it in His arms; He gently breathed His own breath into Adam’s nostrils that Adam might become a living soul. God watched as Adam stirred. When Adam sat up, we can imagine God stepping back, deeply satisfied with this being who is the crown of His creation. &lt;br /&gt;Adam was something totally new. His body is from earth, and in his possession of biological life Adam shared his earthly nature with the animals. But his life is from God. As a “living soul” Adam shared something of the nature of his Creator. In time, Adam’s body would grow old and die. But Adam himself, a self-aware and unique individual in whose essence God’s breath had planted eternity, would exist for evermore. Adam would forever be an object of God’s love.&lt;br /&gt;In Genesis 1 and 2, we are taught foundational truths about man’s essential nature, and we catch a glimpse of man’s relationship with God.&lt;br /&gt;•     Man [both male and female] was created by the God who brought the universe into being.&lt;br /&gt;•     Man [both male and female] was given God’s likeness-image, and in this gift was set apart from the animals. &lt;br /&gt;•     Man [both male and female] has been granted dominion over God’s creation. We are God’s caretakers.&lt;br /&gt;•     Man [both male and female] is a living soul, possessing biological life but also destined for eternity. &lt;br /&gt;The men we meet in Scripture have been called to live their earthly lives in relationship with the God who created them. No human being’s achievements or character can be rightly evaluated without considering how well his life reveals a whole and healthy relationship with the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;  ABRAHAM&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;Genesis 12–24; Romans 4; &lt;br /&gt;Galatians 3&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: 2100 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Abram [AY-bruhm; “exalted father”]&lt;br /&gt;Abraham [AY-bruh-ham; “father of a multitude”] &lt;br /&gt;Main&lt;br /&gt;contribution: Abraham stands in Scripture as the prime example of saving faith, and the covenant promises given him reveal God’s plans and purposes.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;ABRAHAM’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Abraham is a towering figure in history. God chose Abraham to receive a unique revelation of Himself and gave him a series of stunning covenant promises. And Abraham responded to God with faith. These two themes–covenant and faith—sum up Abraham’s unique role in Scripture’s story of people’s relationship with God. &lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;BIBLE BACKGROUND:&lt;br /&gt;THE COVENANT PROMISES FULFILLED&lt;br /&gt;In a companion volume in this series, Every Covenant and Promise in the Bible, the significance of the Genesis 12 promises and their fulfillment is traced through the entire Bible (pp. 23–27). This chart summarizes how God has or will fulfill His ancient promises. &lt;br /&gt;The Promise Stated: I will The Promise Fulfilled &lt;br /&gt;… make you a great nation Millions (both Arabs and Jews) have descended from Abraham. &lt;br /&gt;… bless you Throughout Abraham’s long life God protected and cared for him. &lt;br /&gt;… make your name great Millions in three world religions—Islam, Judaism, and Christianity—revere Abraham as founder of their faith. &lt;br /&gt;… you shall be a blessing Abraham’s faith-response to God revealed the key to personal relationship with God (Gen. 15:6). &lt;br /&gt;… bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you Ancient and modern history shows that nations that have persecuted the Jewish people have paid a terrible price. &lt;br /&gt;… in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed. Both the Scriptures and the Savior have been given to humanity through Abraham’s descendants. &lt;br /&gt;… and to your descendants I will give this land. The promise was partially fulfilled in Israel’s history, and according to Bible prophecy will be entirely fulfilled at history’s end.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;God’s Covenant promises to Abraham (Gen. 12:1–3, 7). God spoke to a man named Abram, a citizen of Ur in what is now Iraq. Genesis 12 records what God said to him, revealing in a series of “I will” statements what God intended to accomplish in and through this wealthy but otherwise ordinary man. &lt;br /&gt;The covenant promises stated (Gen. 12:1–3, 7). Here are God’s statements, understood as promises and later confirmed by the making of a formal covenant [a legally binding agreement]:&lt;br /&gt;Get out of your country,&lt;br /&gt;From your family&lt;br /&gt;And from your father’s house,&lt;br /&gt;To a land that I will show you.&lt;br /&gt;I will make you a great nation;&lt;br /&gt;I will bless you&lt;br /&gt;And make your name great;&lt;br /&gt;And you shall be a blessing.&lt;br /&gt;I will bless those who bless you,&lt;br /&gt;And I will curse him who curses you;&lt;br /&gt;And in you all the families of the earth &lt;br /&gt;shall be blessed. (Gen. 12:1–3)&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s first great act of faith was to leave the city of Ur for an unknown land at God’s command.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Later, when Abraham had obeyed God and arrived in the land God showed him, God added this promise: “To your descendants I will give this land” (Gen. 12:7).&lt;br /&gt;Starting in chapter 12, the Book of Genesis tells the story of Abraham and the story of his sons, grandsons, and great-grandsons. While their stories are rich in spiritual lessons, Isaac, Jacob, and Jacob’s twelve sons are significant primarily because the covenant-promises God gave Abraham were passed on to them, and through them to the Hebrew people. In a real sense, the rest of the Bible is a demonstration of God’s faithfulness to the covenant promises He gave to Abraham long ago. As the Bible’s story unfolds, we understand more and more of God’s plan for the redemption of humankind, a plan stated first in the promises He made to Abraham.&lt;br /&gt;The covenant promises expanded and explained. As the Bible unfolds, the covenant promises made to Abraham are both expanded and explained. Later, God promised David that a ruler would emerge from his descendants, who would establish an everlasting kingdom. Still later, God announced that one day he would make a new covenant with Israel that would make Old Testament law obsolete. In that covenant, signed and sealed by Jesus’ death on the cross, God promised complete forgiveness of sins and inner transformation. Each of these historic events—giving of covenant promises to David, and the formal entry at Calvary into what Scripture calls the “New Covenant”—reveals more of how God intended to keep His original covenant with Abraham. &lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;BIBLE BACKGROUND: &lt;br /&gt;THE NEW COVENANT&lt;br /&gt;God revealed to Jeremiah that one day He would make a new covenant with His people (Jer. 31). That covenant, instituted by Jesus’ death and resurrection, tells us God’s plan for reversing the impact of the Fall by the transformation of those who have a personal relationship with God. The writer of Hebrews quotes Jeremiah, showing us this plan for the blessing of all the families of earth in Abraham’s greatest descendant, Jesus Christ:&lt;br /&gt;For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the LORD: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. None of them shall teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying ‘Know the LORD,’ for all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them. For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more (Heb. 8:10–12)&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Nearly a hundred times Scripture refers to God as “the God of Abraham” or to Abraham as the father of the Hebrew people. Each reference looks back to Abraham as the man to whom God made covenant promises. Each reference reminds us that what we know of God has been channeled to us through Abraham and his descendants.&lt;br /&gt;The covenant promises: a foundation for our hope (Heb. 6:13–18). The writer of Hebrews reminds us that the significance of the promises to Abraham is not merely historical or theological. In looking back to Abraham and the promises made to him, we discover a firm basis for our own faith in God. In the promises given to Abraham and in their working out in history, we see a God who is utterly faithful to His word. The writer of Hebrews said: &lt;br /&gt;For when God made a promise to Abraham, because He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself, saying, “Surely blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply you.” And so, after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise. For men indeed swear by the greater, and an oath for confirmation is for them an end of all dispute. Thus God, determining to show more abundantly to the heirs of promise the immutability of His counsel, confirmed it with an oath, that by two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold on the hope set before us. This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the Presence behind the veil, where the forerunner has entered for us, even Jesus (Heb. 6:13–29). &lt;br /&gt;In looking back to Abraham and God’s promises to him, the writer of Hebrews reminds us that God made an absolute and immutable commitment. All that we know of God, we know through events that unfolded through millennia, and these events have demonstrated that God keeps His promises. It is unthinkable that the God who kept His promises to Abraham would go back on the promises He made to us in Jesus Christ. &lt;br /&gt;Summing up, Abraham’s significance in Scripture is rooted first in the fact that he was the recipient of covenant promises made to him by God. Those promises give shape to salvation history, and indeed the rest of Scripture is the story of how God has kept commitments first made to Abraham. That God is still keeping those ancient covenant promises serves as a revelation of God’s character. God is ever faithful to His Word. And because God is faithful to His commitments, we who look to Jesus for salvation can be utterly confident that we are secure in Him.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s faith in God (Gen. 15:6; Rom. 4). Abraham is also significant in Scripture for his modeling of saving faith. Abraham followed God’s instructions and traveled from Ur to Canaan. Some ten years after he arrived, God spoke to Abraham again, repeating and expanding the promise of many descendants (Gen. 15:5). Although Abraham was old, and his wife Sarah had gone through menopause and was no longer fertile, Scripture says that Abraham “believed in the LORD, and He accounted it to him for righteousness” (Gen. 15:6).&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s need for righteousness (Gen. 15:6). Unlike hagiographies, the Bible never glosses over the sins and failures of its heroes. In saying God counted Abraham’s faith “for [or as] righteousness,” the Bible makes it clear that Abraham had no righteousness of his own.&lt;br /&gt;This is clear to anyone who reads the Bible’s account of Abraham’s life. Originally Abraham was a pagan who, with his family, “served other [pagan] gods” (Josh. 24:2–3). In Canaan, Abraham twice was so terrified of what strangers might do to him that he had Sarah lie about being his wife. While some have attempted to explain away Abraham’s moral failures, it is important to see that Abraham was as flawed by sin as any human being. &lt;br /&gt;Why is this important? In three places the New Testament portrays Jesus refusing to permit His opponents to take comfort in the notion that they have Abraham as their father (Matt. 3:9; Luke 3:8; John 8:33, 39). While the claim by Jesus’ opponents that Abraham is their father rests on acknowledged physical descent from Abraham, far more is implied. First-century rabbinic Judaism, like Judaism today, tended to glorify Abraham. One modern Jewish commentary on Genesis stated:&lt;br /&gt;God Himself was indebted to Abraham because, until he proclaimed Him as Master, the purpose of Creation had been frustrated.… What was more, he would be father to a nation that would carry on his mission of standing up to skeptics and enemies until the day when all would acknowledge its [creation’s] message and accept its teaching. Of course, Abraham could be called master of mankind because, whether they realized it or not, they owed their existence to him. But that was not all. God called him My master, because he had presented God with a gift that even He, in His infinite power, could not fashion for Himself. For even God cannot guarantee that man’s mind and heart would choose truth over evil, light over darkness, spirit over flesh, love of God over love of pleasure, recognition that the Master is God and not whatever inexorable force happens to find favor in the eyes of any current generation of non-believers (Bereishis, Vol. 1, p. 376 [1988]) &lt;br /&gt;The glorification of Abraham led to the doctrine that personal salvation was possible through keeping Moses’ Law and participation in the merits of Abraham. That is, God owed such a great debt to Abraham that Abraham’s merits were endlessly available to make up for any personal failures on the part of his descendants!&lt;br /&gt;Christ decisively rejected any such claim, for Genesis clearly teaches that Abraham was saved by faith rather than by works. God accepted the sinner Abraham’s faith in place of a righteousness he did not have, and his faith was credited to him as if it were righteousness.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham as the prototype man of faith (Rom. 4). In arguing for a salvation won for us by Jesus Christ and appropriated by faith, the apostle Paul pointed back to Abraham.&lt;br /&gt;What shall we say that Abraham our father has found according to the flesh? For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt. But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness.&lt;br /&gt;And not being weak in faith, he did not consider his own body, already dead (since he was about a hundred years old), and the deadness of Sarah’s womb. He did not waver at the promise of God through unbelief, but was strengthened in faith, giving glory to God, and being fully convinced that what He had promised He was also able to perform. And therefore “it was accounted to him for righteousness.” Now it was not written for his sake alone that it was imputed to him, but also for us. It shall be imputed to us who believe in Him who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead, who was delivered up because of our offenses, and was raised because of our justification (Rom. 5:1–5, 19–25).&lt;br /&gt;Paul’s point is that faith in God’s promises has always been the key to a personal relationship with God (see also Gal. 3:6–14). This truth, lost in first-century Judaism, is clearly established in Abraham’s experience with God. Abraham’s true offspring are not his biological descendants but rather those who have an Abraham-like faith in the God who makes wonderful promises to humankind. &lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s role as one of Scripture’s greatest—in the sense of significant—men is firmly established. Abraham received covenant promises that revealed God’s fixed purposes and plans. In responding to God’s promises with faith, Abraham showed us the way to a personal relationship with God.&lt;br /&gt;A “contradiction” (James 2)? One passage in Scripture seems to contradict Paul’s emphasis on salvation by faith. The apostle James also looked back to Abraham, but he emphasized Abraham’s works! In chapter 2 of his New Testament book, James wrote,&lt;br /&gt;Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on the altar? Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect? And the Scripture was fulfilled which says, “Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” And he was called the friend of God. You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only (James 2:21–24).&lt;br /&gt;The apparent conflict is resolved when we realize that James was contrasting two kinds of “faith,” one of which exists as mere intellectual assent. James pointed out that the demons also believe in God—and tremble (2:19). No, the kind of faith the Bible calls for is trust, a true commitment of oneself to God.&lt;br /&gt;The question James asked is how can one justify a claim to have this kind of faith? Indeed, how can God Himself show that Abraham had a “trust” kind of faith so that He was right in counting it for righteousness? The answer James gave is simple: true faith works. A true trust in God will be expressed in the believer’s daily life. &lt;br /&gt;Here James pointed to one incident in Abraham’s life—his willingness to sacrifice his son Isaac in response to God’s command—as evidence that Abraham’s faith was real. A claim that any man has faith, whether the claim is made by God or by the individual, is justified [vindicated, shown to be true] by his actions. For faith produces works.&lt;br /&gt;In this brief paragraph, James gave us a key to use in studying Abraham’s life. Abraham, the prototype man of faith, had to learn faith’s walk step by step. He had no Scriptures to refer to, no believing parent to serve as a model. And so day by day, event by event, Abraham had to learn how to live out his faith. This is exciting for us, because you and I as men today do have a model—in Abraham! We can walk with him and learn from him how to build a faith lifestyle of our own.&lt;br /&gt;ABRAHAM’S LIFE OF FAITH&lt;br /&gt;First steps of faith (Gen. 12–15). Faith usually isn’t something that springs into existence full-blown. This was certainly true in Abraham’s case. Abraham’s first steps of faith were faltering.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham left Ur (Gen. 12:1–5). Genesis 12:1–3 harks back to a time when Abram lived in Ur, then a major and cosmopolitan city. There God had given Abram His wonderful covenant promises, and there God had commanded: &lt;br /&gt;Get out of your country,&lt;br /&gt;From your family&lt;br /&gt;And from your father’s house&lt;br /&gt;To a land that I will show you. &lt;br /&gt;(Gen. 12:1)&lt;br /&gt;Abram did leave Ur. But Genesis 11 tells us that rather than go “from your family,” Abram brought his family along (11:31)! And rather than go directly to the land God would show him, Abram settled in Haran until his father Terah died. Even then when Abram set out for Canaan, he brought his nephew Lot along.&lt;br /&gt;Abram’s first steps of faith were faltering ones, and his obedience to God was incomplete. Abram simply could not find the courage to set out alone in complete dependence on God. Abram tried so hard to hold on to the dear and the familiar. &lt;br /&gt;Letting go is hard for us, too. What do we struggle to hold on to despite God’s call? What are we afraid to release—that we might learn to rely on God alone? Whatever it is, the day will come when we, like Abram, do set out to complete our journey of faith. How good to see that despite Abram’s failure, God’s commitment to him remained firm. However long you and I may delay, God will remain committed to us, too.&lt;br /&gt;God added promise to promise (Gen. 12:6–8). It is significant that the promise “to your descendants I will give this land” was not added to the covenant until Abram actually arrived in Canaan. God has more for us than we can imagine. Yet, we’ll not discover the full riches of His provision until we act in faith and respond to God’s call.&lt;br /&gt;Abram responded to circumstances rather than wait on God’s Word (Gen. 12:10). God had sent Abram to Canaan. But when the rains ceased to fall and a famine developed, Abram hurried off to Egypt in search of food. Abram reacted to circumstances rather than inquire concerning God’s will.&lt;br /&gt;God may guide us through circumstances. However, God expects us to use common sense in making decisions. God had specifically led Abram to Canaan, and God had not told Abram to leave. &lt;br /&gt;We’re naturally tempted to wonder, should things go wrong, if God has really led us into a difficult situation. But such situations are often intended to increase our faith, and it is important for those learning to walk by faith to discover that God has a solution already planned. &lt;br /&gt;In this case, Abram relied on himself rather than God. And this led him into potential disaster.&lt;br /&gt;Abram was gripped by fear (12:11–20). When Abram entered Egypt he became afraid. His wife Sarai was still beautiful, and he feared that some powerful Egyptian would kill him in order to possess her. Abram’s solution was to beg Sarai to lie about their relationship, and claim that she was merely his sister. &lt;br /&gt;Unrealistic fears are one sign that we have strayed away from God’s will. Another is a strong temptation to do wrong—whatever our motive may be. &lt;br /&gt;In this case, God protected Sarai and Abram from the possible consequences of his lie. God may well protect us as well. But how much better to remain in our Canaan rather than hurry to some Egypt when troubles come. &lt;br /&gt;Abram risked being gracious to others (Gen. 13). When Abram was still in Ur, he built up the herds and flocks that were the wealth of nomads. As Abram and Lot now wandered through Canaan, it became clear that their herds were simply too large for them to remain together. As the eldest, Abram had the right to take his pick of the land when they separated. Instead, Abram gave Lot first choice. Lot selfishly (and foolishly) chose the verdant Jordan River valley where the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah lay. &lt;br /&gt;Abram had risked offering Lot first choice, and his nephew had taken advantage of him. But shortly afterward God appeared to Abram and promised, “All the land which you see I give to you and your descendants forever” (13:15). Abram learned that making himself vulnerable was no risk at all, for God was for him. Whatever he lost, God would repay many fold. &lt;br /&gt;This is an important lesson to learn early in our Christian life. We, too, can trust God. Rather than act in a self-protective way, we can risk showing concern for others. Even should others take advantage of us, God will bless.&lt;br /&gt;Abram rescued Lot (Gen. 14). Archaeology has documented the route taken by the raiding kings described in this chapter, and documented the natural resources they sought to obtain. In this case, the kings also stripped Sodom and Gomorrah of their wealth and their populations, taking Abram’s nephew Lot captive as well. &lt;br /&gt;Abram immediately set out to rescue Lot, and succeed in retrieving all the goods and people of the fallen cities. When the king of Sodom offered to turn the recovered wealth of his city over to Abram, Abram refused. “I have raised my hand to the LORD, God Most High, the Possessor of heaven and earth, that I will take nothing … lest you should say, ‘I have made Abram rich’ ” (Gen. 14:22–23). &lt;br /&gt;Abram showed himself not only ready to depend on God completely, but he was also concerned for God’s reputation. Abram wanted the world to see that any blessing he experienced came from God, not from favor shown by others.&lt;br /&gt;The promise formalized (Gen. 15). God’s response to Abram’s fresh affirmation of faith was to appear to Abram again, telling Abram not to be afraid and saying, “I am your shield, and your exceeding great reward” (15:1). In turning his back on Sodom’s wealth, Abram had lost nothing. God would guard him. No reward on earth could compare with what God had planned for him.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Abraham failed as a husband when he begged Sarah to pretend that they were not married and then let her be taken into the king’s household.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Abram’s response was a complaint. What could possibly have any value to Abram, seeing he still had no son? God made an utterly amazing promise to this aged, childless man. “Look now toward heaven, and count the stars if you are able to number them.… So shall your descendants be” (Gen. 15:5). And Abram responded with total and complete trust in God. He believed God. &lt;br /&gt;In this we see how much Abram has grown in his walk of faith. From a man hesitant and uncertain about relying fully on God, Abram has been freed by his trust in God to be vulnerable to his nephew, bold in confronting danger, and more concerned with God’s glory than with earthly wealth. Abram has come to have complete faith that God can and will do the impossible for him! &lt;br /&gt;The message for us is a wonderful one. Our young faith may falter as Abram’s did. But as the years pass and we experience more and more of God’s goodness, our faith, like Abram’s, will grow. The doubts that trouble us will dissipate, to be replaced by an unshakable confidence in the Lord. &lt;br /&gt;Challenges to a mature faith (Gen. 16–24). One of the things that we learn from Abraham’s life is that faith is no guarantee of a stress-free existence. In fact, men of faith experience just as many if not more trials than others. This was certainly true for Abram.&lt;br /&gt;The challenge of awaiting God’s timing (Gen. 16). When Abram and Sarah had been in Canaan for ten years, Sarah began to urge her husband to seek a child through a surrogate. It was common in Mesopotamia two thousand years before Christ for marriage contracts to include a provision that should a wife not produce an heir within as little as two years, she should procure a servant girl who would serve as a surrogate to be impregnated by her husband. Sarai had waited ten years, and she had ceased menstruating. So Abram gave in to her urgings, and had sex with Sarai’s maid Hagar, who almost immediately became pregnant.&lt;br /&gt;The child Hagar bore Abram was named Ishmael, and although Abram loved him, he was not destined to inherit the covenant. Once again Abram had run ahead of God, and the consequences were disastrous. For the Islamic peoples trace their roots back to Ishmael, and the conflict between Arab and Jew has been bitter indeed.&lt;br /&gt;Even those whose faith is great need to learn to wait on God. Sensing His timing, and resisting the temptation to run ahead of Him, is a challenge indeed.&lt;br /&gt;The challenge of testifying to the impossible (Gen. 17:1–9). Thirteen years passed before God spoke to Abram again. This time He promised specifically that Sarah would bear Abram a son. At that time God also told Abram, “your name shall be called Abraham” (17:5).&lt;br /&gt;It must have been difficult enough for the childless Abram to bear a name that meant “exalted father.” But to have his name changed to Abraham, “father of a multitude,” must have seemed a burden. In a culture where a man’s name was expected to reflect something of his essence, for a childless man nearly a hundred years old to be called Abraham was an object of ridicule. Yet from this point on, Abram is Abraham. We can imagine him returning to his tents and announcing the change to all. Abraham believed God. And He was willing to bear the ridicule in the firm confidence that God would vindicate him in due time. &lt;br /&gt;Today, we live in a world that laughs at the most basic truths taught in Scripture and at Christians’ moral commitments. Like Abraham we are called to testify boldly to what seems impossible to most, in the sure and settled belief that God will vindicate us too, in His own time.&lt;br /&gt;The challenge of maintaining unity (Gen. 17:9–27). On this occasion, the last statement of His covenant promises, God instituted the rite of circumcision. Throughout the Old Testament era, circumcision remained a vital symbol of membership in the covenant community.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s challenge and that of his offspring was to see himself as a member in a community of faith. Relationship with God, while personal, is not merely individual. The faith that bonds us to God bonds us to all others who profess the same allegiance. If we are to grow to maturity we need to commit ourselves to develop nurturing relationships with other believers, for worship, fellowship, and ministry.&lt;br /&gt;The challenge of appropriate prayer (Gen. 18). When God next visited Abraham, this time as the Angel of the Lord and accompanied by two angels, it was to inform him that within the year Sarah would bear the promised son. God also informed Abraham that Sodom and Gomorrah were about to be judged. For fascinating insights into the role of investigator angels and the place of angels in carrying out divine judgment, see the companion volume, Every Angel and Demon in the Bible (1998).&lt;br /&gt;The announcement troubled Abraham. His concern was expressed in a series of prayers. Abraham did not object to God judging sin, but Abraham was worried that some who were innocent might die with the guilty. This would tarnish God’s reputation. Abraham won a promise from God that if even ten good men could be found in Sodom and Gomorrah, God would withhold judgment. In fact, only one good man could be found in the cities: Lot. God saw to it that Lot and his family were brought out before He destroyed the cities.&lt;br /&gt;We’re reminded of several things about prayer in this incident. We’re reminded that our prayers are to be driven by a desire to see God glorified. And we’re reminded that our prayers for others are welcome. God has a far deeper love for them than we do.&lt;br /&gt;The challenge of continuing temptation to sin (Gen. 20). Abraham’s faith had matured. But Abraham remained a sinner, subject to the pull of his old nature. This is revealed in another incident. Again, fearing that he might be killed for the sake of his wife, Abraham asked Sarah to lie about their relationship. Again, God protected Abraham. But Scripture records Abraham’s confession—and his weakness. “I thought, surely the fear of God is not in this place” (20:11). &lt;br /&gt;How easy it is for us to look away from God for a moment and be overwhelmed by circumstances. Had Abraham taken a moment to consider, he would have realized that whether or not the people he feared respected God, God was present there. We are not to be confident because others believe in God but because we know God is ever present with us. &lt;br /&gt;The challenge of personal heartbreak (Gen. 21:1–14). Isaac, the child of Abraham and Sarah, had now been born and, at age three or four, was being weaned. At the celebration marking this transition from infant to child, Isaac’s half-brother Ishmael teased Isaac. Sarah exploded and insisted that Abraham send Ishmael and his mother away. &lt;br /&gt;Abraham refused, not only because such an act was morally wrong and legally wrong in that culture, but also because Abraham loved his son Ishmael (Gen. 21:11). Only when God confirmed that this was His will as well as Sarah’s did Abraham consent to send Ishmael away.&lt;br /&gt;The separation from his son broke Abraham’s heart. All too many today, in our age of broken families, share Abraham’s pain. Yet, God’s words to Abraham can comfort us. God promised, “I will also make a nation of the son of the bondwoman, because he is your seed” (Gen. 21:13). Abraham could no longer care for his son, but God would take care of Ishmael. When events beyond our control shatter a precious relationship, we need to remember those words. We may not be able to be with our loved one, but God is with him or her. If for no other reason than that the loved one is ours, God will care for him or her.&lt;br /&gt;The challenge of surrendering all (Gen. 22). All Abraham had left was his son Isaac. But when Isaac was a young teenager, God claimed Isaac too. He commanded Abraham to take his son to Mount Moriah [later to be known as Mount Zion], and to sacrifice Isaac there. &lt;br /&gt;The text tells us that Abraham “rose early in the morning” (22:3) and set out with his son. How stunning! Despite the awful import of the command, Abraham did not wait to obey. What a difference from the man whose reluctant journey to Canaan had taken so many years!&lt;br /&gt;Years later, the writer of Hebrews recalled Abraham’s words to two servants who accompanied father and son on their journey: “The lad and I will go yonder and worship, and we will come back to you” (Gen. 22:5). The New Testament interprets this in a fascinating way. Abraham’s faith in God’s promise that “in Isaac your seed shall be called” was so firm that he concluded “God was able to raise him up, even from the dead” (Heb. 11:18).&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Abraham was willing to offer his son Isaac because he was convinced that God could raise Isaac from the dead if that were necessary to keep His promises.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;At times, we too are called to surrender what is nearest and dearest to us. Faith reminds us that, no matter how great the loss may seem, God will never take away more than He gives. &lt;br /&gt;The challenge of the death of loved ones (Gen. 23). Sarah, who had shared Abraham’s life for well over half a century, now died. Abraham went about the sad task of arranging for the burial of this one he had loved so long. Of all the ills human beings are subject to, the loss of loved ones may be the most painful. Yet faith looks beyond the loss to a grand reunion in God’s future, dawning day.&lt;br /&gt;The challenge of relying on others (Gen. 24). It was now time for Isaac to wed. Abraham, unwilling for his son to marry one of the women of Canaan, sent the most responsible servant in his household on a mission to find a bride for Isaac. Quieting the servant’s doubts, Abraham quietly said, “The LORD God of heaven, who took me from my father’s house and from the land of my family … He will send His angel before you” (24:7).&lt;br /&gt;It’s hard for most men to delegate responsibility. We feel confident in what we do ourselves but less sure of others. Abraham’s example helps us understand how to approach situations in which we must rely on others. First, choose the right person. Abraham selected “the oldest servant of his house, who ruled over all that he had” (Gen. 24:2). Second, instruct him carefully. Abraham made his expectations clear (Gen. 24:3–4). And third, Abraham trusted God to work in and through the man he had chosen (Gen. 24:7). &lt;br /&gt;We need to be wise in who we select to take on responsibilities for us, and careful to prepare them. But then we need to trust God to work through them.&lt;br /&gt;The challenge of aging and death (Gen. 25:1–11). Abraham’s last challenge was to face his own mortality. As Abraham drew near the end of his life, he was forced to realize that his day was past. His descendants would play their part in fulfilling God’s purposes, but Abraham’s moment on history’s stage was drawing to an end. &lt;br /&gt;It’s hard for men of action to come to grips with inactivity. It’s hard for those who have done great things to realize that nothing remains for them to do. As life draws near its end, each of us must focus anew on our relationship with God, and realize afresh that knowing Him is the most significant thing of all.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;CHALLENGES TO A MAN’S MATURE FAITH&lt;br /&gt;•     Awaiting God’s timing&lt;br /&gt;•     Testifying to the impossible&lt;br /&gt;•     Maintaining unity with others&lt;br /&gt;•     Praying appropriately&lt;br /&gt;•     Resisting continuing temptations&lt;br /&gt;•     Trusting despite heartbreak&lt;br /&gt;•     Being willing to surrender all&lt;br /&gt;•     Loss of loved ones&lt;br /&gt;•     Relying on others&lt;br /&gt;•     Facing personal mortality&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;EXPLORING ABRAHAM’S RELATIONSHIPS&lt;br /&gt;As we read the chapters in Genesis devoted to Abraham, we can clearly see that he had several significant relationships.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s relationship with Lot (Gen. 12–14; 18; 19). Lot was Abraham’s nephew, the son of Abraham’s brother Haran. Haran had died years before in Ur (Gen. 11:27–28); it’s likely that Abraham looked on his nephew almost as a son. It’s no wonder that despite God’s command to leave family behind, Abraham took Lot with him when he came to Canaan.&lt;br /&gt;Competition develops (Gen. 13). In letting his emotions rather than God guide him, Abraham did his nephew no favor. Lot had inherited his herds and flocks along with servants to care for them. The trouble was that when Abraham and Lot traveled together, “the land was not able to support them” (Gen. 13:6). The conflict began with the herdsmen as they competed for grass and water, but soon the hard feelings infected Lot’s and Abraham’s relationship too (Gen. 13:8). &lt;br /&gt;Lot’s selfish choice (Gen. 13). Abraham took the initiative to restore peace. In doing so, he surrendered his rights as eldest and offered Lot first choice of the whole land. Lot looked over the land and selfishly chose the best for himself: “all the plain of Jordan … well watered everywhere” (Gen. 13:10). This left the less desirable highlands for Abraham, but Abraham neither complained nor resented Lot’s choice. What neither grasped then was that the men of the cities of the plain “were exceedingly wicked and sinful against the LORD” (13:13). In disobeying God and bringing Lot with him to Canaan, Abraham had inadvertently placed his nephew in a danger neither could imagine.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s loyal love (Gen. 14). The first hint of danger came when raiding kings overwhelmed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah and took their populations captive. When Abraham heard that Lot was among the captives, he quickly organized a nighttime raid that startled the enemy into flight. Lot was rescued from the most obvious danger, and then he returned to Sodom! &lt;br /&gt;Lot’s compromise (Gen. 18; 19). The real danger, however, was moral. Lot had settled among a wicked and immoral people. He was wealthy and comfortable, but the society he lived in was corrupt. Yet Lot, knowing the character of the men of the land, chose to remain among them, not imagining that God was about to destroy the wicked cities. &lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s intercessory prayer (Gen. 18). When God told Abraham of His intent to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, Abraham must have thought immediately of Lot. Although not stated in Scripture, Abraham’s concern for Lot must have been in Abraham’s mind as he pleaded with God on behalf of any “righteous” among the wicked men God was determined to destroy. God too was concerned for Lot, and the angels sent to investigate Sodom’s sins carried Lot and his family to safety. Yet in the process, Lot lost his wife and all his wealth. The riches Lot had compromised his convictions to enjoy were burned to ashes, and he was reduced to poverty, living with his two daughters in a cave.&lt;br /&gt;Genesis makes it clear that Abraham was intensely loyal to Lot and remained loyal to the end. Even when Lot behaved selfishly, Abraham was committed to his nephew. Loyalty is an admirable trait in any man, but in this case, Abraham’s loyalty to Lot had moved him to disobey God’s command. In the end, Abraham’s loyalty did Lot far more harm than good.&lt;br /&gt;You and I may be so loyal to our sons or daughters that we act protectively even when we know deep down that we should release them to mature on their own. Should God lead us to release our loved ones to find His path for them without us, we need to let them go.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s relationship with Sarah (Gen. 13–21). Sarah was Abraham’s companion for many decades. Yet only four incidents involving her directly are recorded in the text.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s shocking requests (Gen. 13; 20). We’re told of two incidents in which Abraham asked Sarah to lie about their relationship. In each case, the lie resulted in Sarah’s being taken from Abraham’s tents and installed in a pagan ruler’s harem. In each case, God protected Sarah’s virtue despite Abraham’s betrayal of their relationship.&lt;br /&gt;It is hard to view Abraham’s actions, motivated as they were by fear, as anything but betrayal. Husbands are supposed to love their wives, to protect and sacrifice for them. Abraham asked his wife to sacrifice for him. Surely Abraham’s actions damaged their relationship, robbing Sarah of trust in her husband, and burdening Abraham with a load of shame. &lt;br /&gt;Sarah’s suggestion of a surrogate (Gen. 16:1–6). After years of childlessness, Sarah urged Abraham to give her a child through a surrogate, her maid Hagar. This was common practice in the ancient East, and any child Hagar bore would legally be considered Sarah’s (see 16:2). &lt;br /&gt;Strikingly, this incident is reported immediately after the account in Genesis 15 in which God reaffirmed His promise of descendants to Abraham. Did Abraham share what God had told him with Sarah? If he had, wouldn’t the two have found grace to wait for God to act, rather than taking matters into their own hands? We cannot know, but the juxtaposition of these two stories is suggestive indeed. Sarah, without the reassurance God had given Abraham, panicked. But rather than relate his experience to his wife to give her perspective, Abraham “heeded [her] voice” (16:2).&lt;br /&gt;Nothing turned out as expected. When Hagar became pregnant, she showed contempt for Sarah, as the couple’s childlessness was clearly not due to Abraham’s impotence. The hostility between Sarah and Hagar poisoned any possibility that Sarah might love and accept Hagar’s child as her own. And Sarah blamed Abraham, saying, “My wrong be upon you!” (16:5). &lt;br /&gt;Sarah’s angry demand (Gen. 21). When Ishmael, the son Hagar bore Abraham, was a teenager, Sarah had her own son, Isaac. When Ishmael teased [NKJV “scoffing”] Isaac, Sarah demanded that Ishmael and Hagar be sent away. This time Abraham refused. Abraham truly cared for his son Ishmael. Only when God intervened and told Abraham to do as Sarah had said did Abraham agree.&lt;br /&gt;In this case, despite Sarah’s selfish motives, she was in harmony with God’s purposes. Isaac and Ishmael represented two contrasting principles: promise, which depends entirely on God’s work in and for us; and works, which rely on what human beings can do for themselves. Only the miracle-child Isaac could truly symbolize the outcome of Abraham’s faith in God.&lt;br /&gt;Ultimately Abraham’s relationship with Sarah can only be described as flawed but fruitful. We cannot doubt that a true love existed between these two saints, or that their love enabled each to overlook flaws in the other. However, we cannot explain away Abraham’s cowardly sacrifice of Sarah to his fears. Yet, Sarah out of love was willing to risk herself to protect her husband. Concern for his childless wife as well as his own desire for offspring led Abraham to have sex with Hagar. Sarah had desperately wanted a son; Abraham was willing to take this means to give her one. Yet Abraham was wrong not to share more openly with Sarah about his meetings with God. &lt;br /&gt;As in most marriages, each spouse hurt the other, not intentionally, but nevertheless painfully. And as in most marriages, each forgave, and Abraham and Sarah continued to build a life together. Perhaps this is the most basic message for us from Abraham’s relationship with Sarah. Their marriage wasn’t perfect, but they remained committed to each other. The life they shared was a fruitful one indeed.&lt;br /&gt;Whatever our spouse’s flaws, we need to remember that we, too, are imperfect, and trust that through mutual forgiveness and commitment our marriages will be fruitful too.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s relationship with Ishmael (Gen. 21; 25:7–8). Our insight into Abraham’s relationship with Ishmael comes first from chapter 21. Abraham was eighty-six when Ishmael was born (Gen. 16:16) and had fourteen years to bond with his boy before Isaac’s birth. And bond Abraham did! When Sarah demanded that he send the then nineteen-year-old Ishmael away, Abraham was distressed “because of his son” (Gen. 21:11). When God confirmed Sarah’s demand and told Abraham to send Ishmael away, Abraham must have been heartbroken. Yet, he did as God said. And God promised that He Himself would watch over Ishmael and make him a great people for Abraham’s sake.&lt;br /&gt;In this day of easy divorce and broken homes, many fathers share Abraham’s pain. They are separated from their children, for whatever reason. And not only do many of them hurt; many must wonder whether their children will ever understand or forgive. In such cases one can only follow Abraham’s course and trust the children into God’s loving hands. And this is good. Yet Scripture adds a word of additional comfort.&lt;br /&gt;Years later, when Abraham died, the Bible tells us that “his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Machpelah” (Gen. 25:9). Ishmael had understood after all! In the years after Sarah’s death, father and son must have been reconciled. What a relief to know that if we continue to love our children, in time they will understand.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Abraham paid in pain for the lack of faith shown when he fathered a son by Hagar, Sarah’s maid. Later his heart was broken when he had to send this son, Ishmael, away.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s relationship with Isaac (Gen. 22). Genesis tells us that God tested Abraham telling him to “take now … your only son Isaac, whom you love” (Gen. 22:2). Abraham was to take Isaac to Mount Moriah (Zion) and sacrifice him there.&lt;br /&gt;The description of the incident records touching words exchanged by the two. After reaching the foot of the mountain, Abraham and his son set out together, bringing wood for the burnt offering and a knife. Isaac looked up at his father trustingly and asked, “Where is the lamb for a burnt offering?” Abraham could only reply: “God will provide for Himself the lamb.”&lt;br /&gt;Reaching the top of the mountain, Abraham built an altar and then bound his son Isaac, and laid him on the altar. Isaac trustingly let his father tie him, and then looked up as Abraham picked up the knife. Only then did a voice from heaven call Abraham and point out a ram caught in a nearby thicket. God had provided the sacrifice. Abraham had demonstrated his trust in God—and Isaac had demonstrated trust in his father.&lt;br /&gt;We can find many lessons in this brief story. Abraham had shown himself willing to surrender what he loved most should God require it. Only as complete a trust in God as Abraham’s will enable us freely to give up to God what we love, confident that He has something better in mind for us. &lt;br /&gt;Isaac also demonstrated a remarkable trust in Abraham. Isaac knew his father loved him. A healthy father-son relationship marked by love and trust makes the son’s transition to trust in God a natural and easy one. &lt;br /&gt;But the story of these two tells us even more about God. In the end, God could not ask Abraham to sacrifice his only and dearly loved son. Yet, one day God would lead His own beloved Son to Calvary’s cross, and Jesus Christ would die there for us. For Christ there would be no reprieve. God the Father would fully experience the pain that for a few brief days Abraham had looked forward to but from which he had been spared. &lt;br /&gt;ABRAHAM: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Abraham is truly one of Scripture’s towering figures. Yet he lived his life as a nomad far from any ancient seat of power. What made Abraham so significant was not, as some have suggested, his “invention” of monotheism, but the fact that the God of the universe spoke to Abraham—and Abraham responded with faith.&lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s long life was marked by challenges that required him to exercise faith. At times, Abraham’s faith failed. Yet, we can see the growth in his faith as Abraham experienced more and more of God. &lt;br /&gt;Abraham’s relationships involved long-term commitments to the others in his life. While Abraham may not have been wise in his relationships with either Lot or Sarah, he most surely was loyal. Perhaps considering our many failings, loyalty and commitment are the most important gifts we can give to those we love.&lt;br /&gt;All in all, Abraham was a man to be respected and admired. We can hardly describe him more appropriately than did the writer of the Book of Hebrews, who said in chapter 11: &lt;br /&gt;By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called to go out to the place which he would receive as an inheritance. And he went out, not knowing where he was going. By faith he dwelt in the land of promise as in a foreign country, dwelling in tents with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise; for he waited for the city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God (Heb 11:8–10).&lt;br /&gt;What lessons can a man take away from a study of Abraham’s life? Certainly the following:&lt;br /&gt;•     Trust in God and His promises is the only sure foundation on which a man can build his life.&lt;br /&gt;•     As we meet each new challenge, we need consciously to rely on God for guidance and for strength.&lt;br /&gt;•     We need to remain aware of our fallibility, and live humbly in the sight of others and of God.&lt;br /&gt;•     Like Abraham, we need to invest in our long-term relationships with spouse, family, and friends. We must set aside time and energy to nurture our relationships with those who are important in our lives. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;MOSES&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;Exodus-Deuteronomy;&lt;br /&gt;The Gospels, Hebrews 2; 11&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: About 1520–1400 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Moses [MOH-zuhs; “drawn-out”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;accomplishment: Moses was God’s agent in delivering the Israelites from slavery in Egypt and in giving them His Law.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;MOSES’ ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;We cannot praise Moses’ significance too highly. Moses’ name is mentioned some 850 times in the Old Testament in 787 verses. His name is found 80 times in the New Testament, in 79 verses. He is the traditional author of the first five books of the Bible and the dominant figure in four of them. His ministry during a definitive period of Old Testament history is absolutely unique.&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ role in Scripture can be summed up under four headings. Moses was a miracle worker, a channel through whom God’s power was revealed to Israel, to Egypt, and to us today. Moses was the prototype prophet, a spokesman for God through whom God revealed Himself and His will. Moses was the lawgiver, who at Sinai recorded God’s commandments and the precepts that were to shape the lives of the Israelites. And Moses was a leader, whose struggles with the Israelites and whose prayers to God for them both have encouraged and guided those in spiritual leadership ever since.&lt;br /&gt;Without question, Moses is one of the dominant figures of the Old Testament and remains the central figure in Judaism to this day.&lt;br /&gt;MOSES IN JUDAISM&lt;br /&gt;In The Book of Jewish Knowledge, Nathan Ausubel writes of Moses: &lt;br /&gt;To the persecuted Jewish people—rootless human beings feeling the need for emotional as well as physical security—Moses appeared as a powerful father-image. He was the indomitable, the wise, the righteous, the comforting father who had been protectingly, in times of crisis, like a shield and a buckler for their ancestors, the children of Israel, and had led them into freedom when they were slaves in Egypt. And whenever God had lost patience with them on account of their backsliding, Moses had stood between them and His wrath and had pleaded their wretched cause for them—his straying sheep.…&lt;br /&gt;To this day, after thirty-two centuries, Moses remains an exemplar of social morality, law, and justice not only to the adherents of three world religions—Christianity, Islam, and Judaism—but also to countless millions of the religiously uncommitted or even downright skeptics and unbelievers. His greatness transcends the sectarian limits of theological dogma or institutional separation. By his intellectual power and moral will, and with his organizational genius to serve both, he was able to hammer a self-respecting people out of a brutalized conglomeration of former slaves. He taught them to abide by a system of morality and law—not a philosophical or utopian system like that described in Plato’s theorizing blueprint for an ideal Republic of superiors, but one realistic and practical enough to enable a people who lived by it to cope with the daily problems of living; working, suffering and striving to create under it a happier and more just society of equals. Therein lies his achievement in the history of human progress (p. 306).&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Boats made of bundles of papyrus reeds carried cargo on the Nile River from before the time of Moses well into New Testament times.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;MOSES’ LIFE AND TIMES&lt;br /&gt;Moses was born into a family of Hebrew slaves. Some twenty years earlier, about1540 B.C., West Semitic peoples known as the Hyksos had finally been driven from Egypt by Ahmose I. Before that, the Hyksos had supplanted the Egyptian rulers and had governed as pharaohs some one hundred years. Perhaps partly because the Hebrews were also a Semitic people, Pharaoh intended to take no chances that the Israelites would support his enemy (see Ex. 1:10). Pharaoh enslaved the Israelites and set them to forced labor. He also determined to limit severely the Hebrew population, and ordered the midwives of Egypt to kill any male children born to the Israelites. When this attempt at population control failed, Pharaoh commanded “all his people” to see that every male Hebrew infant should be thrown in the River Nile.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Was this the princess who rescued Moses? The Nelson Illustrated Bible Handbook comments on the possibility:&lt;br /&gt;It is possible that the daughter of Pharaoh who finds him is Hatshepsut, only living child of Thutmose I…&lt;br /&gt;As a woman, Hatshepsut could not take the throne in her own right. So she married a brother, born to one of her father’s lesser wives. On his death, the throne passed to one of his younger brothers, who was then about 10. Hatshepsut seized the throne and ruled for another 22 years. After her death the long suppressed and bitter king, Thutmose II, ordered every mention of Hatshepsut obliterated. Throughout all Egypt her statues were defaced and her name chiseled from stone inscriptions. Undoubtedly Thutmose, who went on to become the greatest ruler in Egyptian history, would have hated Moses, and welcomed any excuse to kill him (p. 73).&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ childhood (Ex. 2:1–10). When Moses was born about 1520 B.C. his parents obeyed Pharaoh’s command. Only they first placed their boy child in a basket-boat, woven of papyrus reeds! Every Sunday school child has heard the story of baby Moses found floating in his basket boat by Pharaoh’s daughter. Moses was adopted by the princess, who hired Moses’ own mother as his wet nurse. As children in biblical times frequently were not weaned until age four, Moses would have heard the stories of his people from his mother during his most impressionable years. Later when Moses was an adult, he identified himself with the Israelites rather than the Egyptians and dreamed of freeing them from slavery.&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ education. As the adoptive child of an Egyptian princess, Moses would have received the best education Egypt had to offer. Interestingly, attendance records from the royal schools of the era list the names of other Semitic boys being trained for roles in Egypt’s bureaucracy. &lt;br /&gt;Moses’ formal education would have lasted for about twelve years. Afterward, he would probably have received additional training in diplomacy and the military. Some have suggested that Moses was probably fluent in some four or five languages of the time.&lt;br /&gt;A reference in Hebrews 11:24 speaks of Moses as “the son of Pharaoh’s daughter.” Some have speculated that this is in fact a title, reflecting the fact that in Egypt the royal line was passed through the daughter, rather than directly to the son. If Moses was considered the “son of Pharaoh’s daughter” and was in line for the throne, we can understand why Moses would have received the best education Egypt had to offer!&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ rash act (Ex. 2:11–22). When Moses was forty, he noticed an Egyptian taskmaster brutalizing a Hebrew slave. Looking around to see that he was unobserved, Moses killed the Egyptian and hid his body.&lt;br /&gt;Later when Moses tried to intervene in a dispute between two Hebrews, he discovered that the killing was known! Before long, word of what Moses had done came to Pharaoh, and the text says that Pharaoh “sought to kill Moses” (Ex. 2:15). It may well be that Moses’ rash act had given the Pharaoh an excuse to rid himself of someone he already hated! At any rate, Moses realized his only hope was to flee. And he did.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Moses wandered in the Sinai desert as a shepherd, and later he led Israel to Mount Sinai, modern Jebel Musa.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Moses in the Sinai (Ex. 2:15–25). In the time of Moses, the Sinai Peninsula was largely uninhabited, although the Egyptians had long mined it for semi-precious stones. In that desolate wilderness, Moses found a small group of Midianite shepherds whom he joined. In time, he married the daughter of Jethro, the Midianite clan and religious leader. Moses himself became a shepherd, and the text tells us that for the next forty years Moses “was content to live” there (Ex. 2:21). &lt;br /&gt;For forty years, Moses lived the quiet life of a wilderness shepherd, so different from his life in the court of Egypt. During that forty years, Moses’ dream of delivering his people died. His grand vision of himself gradually shrank until, finally humbled, Moses was fitted for the task God had in mind all along.&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ call by God (Ex. 3–4). When Moses was eighty years old, God appeared to him in a burning bush and commissioned Moses as His people’s deliverer.&lt;br /&gt;Reading the text, it’s clear that Moses didn’t want to go. “Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh, and that I should bring the children of Israel out of Egypt?” (3:11) was Moses’ immediate response to the Lord. Rather than being unwilling, Moses was uncertain. He had at last become fully aware of his own inadequacies, and seeing his limitations more clearly, Moses was understandably hesitant. Even though God promised to go with Moses, Moses still made excuses. Moses wouldn’t know what to say (Ex. 3:13). He didn’t know enough about God to represent Him (Ex. 3:13). Moses was sure that even the Israelites wouldn’t believe him (Ex. 4:1). He was “slow of speech and slow of tongue” (Ex. 4:10). Despite the fact that God had an answer for every excuse, Moses begged, “O my LORD, please send by the hand of whomsoever else You may send” (4:13).&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Pharaoh’s response to Moses’ demand for freedom was to increase the workload of the Hebrew slaves.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;In this, Moses was very much like many of us today. We hesitate when called by God to act for Him; we fix our eyes on our inadequacies rather than on His sufficiency. The later accomplishments of Moses, who finally did obey the Lord, are a healthy reminder to you and me. We may be utterly correct in our assessment of our weaknesses, but to those whom God lends His strength, weaknesses are irrelevant. We are not to plead, “Send someone else.” We are to respond, and set out in faith to obey.&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ confrontation of Pharaoh (Ex. 5–15). Moses finally responded to God’s commission and did confront Pharaoh. The biblical text tells us that those who had sought Moses’ life were now dead (Ex 4:19). The arrogant Pharaoh with whom Moses had to deal was likely a young man, filled with himself and with the foolish confidence of youth. &lt;br /&gt;The familiar story of the miracle plagues that finally drove Pharaoh to his knees is told in chapters 7–13. In the end, Pharaoh changed his mind once again about his slaves, and set out with his army to recapture the Israelites. This choice doomed the Egyptian forces, for they followed the Israelites into a sea whose waters God had parted, only to have the same waters close on the pursuing Egyptians.&lt;br /&gt;For a detailed study of the plagues and associated miracles, see the companion book in this series, Every Miracle and Wonder in the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;Moses as Lawgiver (Ex. 18—Deut.). Moses had succeeded in bringing some two and a half million Israelites out of Egypt (see Num. 1:46, which numbers only males of military age). God Himself provided a cloudy-fiery pillar that led the Israelites deep into the Sinai peninsula to Mount Sinai. It was there that Moses was given not only the Ten Commandments but also the various regulations that would govern the daily lives of the Israelites from that time forward. It is a mistake to think of “the Law” only as the Ten Commandments, for it also details worship regulations, criminal law, and civil law, defines acceptable sexual relationships and diet, and much more. Moses’ role in the giving of the Law is so central that both Testaments frequently refer to the Sinai revelation as the “Law of Moses.” &lt;br /&gt;In this context, Moses is not only called a prophet, but He serves as the model prophet. Simply put, a prophet serves as God’s spokesman, delivering a message from God to human beings. Deuteronomy 18 forbade Israel to consult with any occult source. There Moses promised that God would “raise up for [Israel] a Prophet like [Moses] from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth” (Deut. 18:18). The Prophet like Moses to whom this verse refers is Jesus Christ. Yet the verse also relates to the many prophets who, throughout Israel’s history, appeared at critical times to serve as God’s spokespersons.&lt;br /&gt;In what way, however, were the prophetic ministries of Moses and Christ parallel? The revelation given through these two set sacred history on a new and unexpected course. The revelation given through Moses served as the basis for the founding of a people and a nation; a basis that established the identity of Old Testament Israel as God’s own people. The revelation given through Jesus Christ, which supplanted the Mosaic revelation, served as the basis for the founding of another people of God; not a nation, but the very body of Christ in which we Christians find our identity as God’s Own. &lt;br /&gt;Moses as leader (Ex. 16—Deut.). In the Pentateuch, we discover a Moses who was a leader as well as a miracle worker, lawgiver, and prophet. In these aspects, Moses proved very human indeed. The people whom Moses led were troublesome and rebellious, and Moses felt all the frustration, anger, and pain that can accompany the struggle to lead an unresponsive people. Yet, Moses remained faithful to his task, and frequently interceded with God on the Israelites’ behalf. Moses’ prayers on Israel’s behalf merit intense study on their own, as a challenge and an encouragement for pastors and for parents. &lt;br /&gt;For forty years, Moses led two generations of Israelites. Those who failed to respond to God and rebelled against Moses’ leadership died in the wilderness outside the promised land. Moses then led their sons and daughters, a purified and responsive people, to the borders of the land God had promised to Abraham’s offspring. There, finally, Moses died, but only after seeing from a distance the land he had dreamed of from childhood. Moses’ dream had come true in the most unexpected way.&lt;br /&gt;For forty years, Moses was a privileged prince of Egypt, picturing himself as his people’s deliverer. For the next forty years, Moses was a humble shepherd isolated in an empty wilderness, finally aware of his own inadequacies. And for his last forty years, Moses was an agent of God on earth, accomplishing far more in his old age than he could ever have imagined. By God’s grace and sovereign choice, Moses had become the miracle worker, lawgiver, prophet, and leader who towers over every other Old Testament character, the greatest of the Old Testament’s great men. &lt;br /&gt;EXPLORING MOSES’ RELATIONSHIPS&lt;br /&gt;The biblical account describes several sustained relationships maintained by Moses. Moses’ mother had a significant impact in shaping Moses’ sense of personal identity. He grew up seeing himself as a Hebrew rather than as a member of Egyptian royalty. Yet, we have no description of the interaction between mother and son. It is also clear that Moses’ sister Miriam played a significant role in his life, not only during Moses’ infancy but also in his later ministry as a leader. [Miriam is discussed in depth in the companion volume in this series, Every Woman in the Bible.] We have much more information on Moses’ relationship with his older brother, Aaron. That relationship is explored in the chapter on notable priests of the Old Testament (see page 140). Similarly, Moses’ relationship to the young Egyptian Pharaoh of the Exodus will be explored in the article on that Pharaoh, on page 134. The two most important relationships, each of which receives extensive attention in the biblical text, must be examined here. These are Moses’ relationship with God, and Moses’ relationship with the Israelites.&lt;br /&gt;MOSES’ RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD&lt;br /&gt;The relationship begins: the burning bush (Ex. 3:1–4:17). We might argue that Moses knew God before the incident at the burning bush. The stories of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and of their God that Moses had heard from his mother had such an impact on Moses that he identified with the Hebrew people despite his privileged position in the Egyptian royal family. Yet Moses’ personal relationship with God clearly began when he was some 80 years old and was caring for sheep in the Sinai wilderness. There God spoke to him from a bush that burned yet was not consumed. And there three significant things occurred.&lt;br /&gt;God commissioned Moses for his mission (Ex. 3:6–10). When God had identified Himself to Moses as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the Lord told Moses He had seen the oppression of His people and heard their cries. God revealed Himself to Moses at this time because He intended to deliver the Israelites and bring them home to the Promised Land. Moses must have been utterly nonplused when God told him, “Come now, therefore, and I will send you to Pharaoh that you may bring My people, the children of Israel, out of Egypt” (3:10).&lt;br /&gt;God revealed His personal name to Moses (3:11–22). The forty years Moses had spent in the wilderness had taken away his native arrogance and pride as well as his early dream of being Israel’s deliverer. Now when God appeared to commission Moses for the task he had once yearned to accomplish, Moses resisted. His self-effacing “Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh” (3:11) revealed a man who had come to face his inadequacies and to know himself all too well. The depth of his humbling is further revealed in the series of objections he raised during this conversation with God:&lt;br /&gt;•     “What shall I say to them” (3:13).&lt;br /&gt;•     “But suppose they will not believe me” (4:1).&lt;br /&gt;•     “O my Lord, I am not eloquent … I am slow of speech and slow of tongue” (4:10).&lt;br /&gt;•     “O my Lord, please send … whomever else You may send” (4:13).&lt;br /&gt;God’s initial response to the hesitant Moses was to promise to be with him, and then to reveal His personal name, Yahweh, which is represented in our English versions by “LORD.” That most significant of God’s biblical names, rendered “I AM” in our English text, may be better translated as “The One Who Is Always Present.” Moses and all Israel were about to come to know God as the Ever-Present One whose closeness guaranteed their release. The events about to take place in Egypt and at the Red Sea would forever shape Israel’s and the world’s image of God. No wonder God told Moses, “This is My name forever” (3:15). [For a thorough exposition of the significance of the name Yahweh, see the companion volume in this series, Every Name and Title of God in the Bible.]&lt;br /&gt;Moses would succeed, not because of his personal gifts or endowments, but because God was with Him. The humility Moses had learned during the forty years he had been in the desert would enable him to remain completely dependent on God. That dependence on the Lord was the key to Moses’ greatness.&lt;br /&gt;What a wonderful lesson here for each of us. Spiritual significance is not a matter of our abilities, our talents, or even our gifts. God can and will use those who have learned humility and who as a consequence remain totally, trustingly dependent on Him.&lt;br /&gt;God equipped Moses for his ministry (Ex. 4:1–17). The essential equipment for any successful ministry is a dependence on God, expressed as a ready response to His leading. Moses however was given two unusual gifts.&lt;br /&gt;The first was knowledge of what God intended to do. The Lord plainly told Moses that Egypt’s Pharaoh would resist releasing his slaves and that the Lord would then “stretch out My hand and strike Egypt with all My wonders” (Ex. 3:19–20). It is fascinating that with both Abraham and Moses God announced His intentions beforehand. Just as fascinating is that through Abraham and Moses God announced His intentions to us. The great “I will” statements to Abraham set the course of redemption history, and God’s promise of a Prophet like Moses set the stage for the coming of Christ and His totally unexpected revelation of the cross and Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;But God also equipped Moses with two simple “signs.” This word for miracles emphasizes that such interventions by God authenticate both His presence and His prophet. The word reminds us that when God so chooses, He can intervene in our world in ways that simply cannot be explained by reference to either trickery or to natural law’s reliance on cause and effect. The two simple signs God gave Moses—the ability to turn his staff into a snake and back to staff again, and the ability to turn his arm leprous and restore it to health—were enough to convince both Moses and the Israelites of God’s presence. It would take far greater and more devastating signs to convince Pharaoh, but these signs, too, would be present when the occasion required.&lt;br /&gt;This is worth meditating on. God goes with His own. He equips us with whatever we need to accomplish His purpose in our lives.&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ relationship with God is tested (Ex. 5:1–7:7). Moses’ first approach to Pharaoh on behalf of Israel proved to be a disaster. The young Pharaoh was understandably contemptuous of Moses and of his God. In the ancient world, one measure of the power of a people’s deities was assumed to be that people’s relationship with other nations. At the time Egypt was not only wealthy but also the dominant power in the region. The Hebrews were an oppressed population of slaves. Weighed in Pharaoh’s balance, the God of slaves seemed weak and feeble indeed. &lt;br /&gt;In utter contempt, Pharaoh increased the burden placed on the Hebrews, causing the Israelites to accuse Moses of putting “a sword” (5:21) in Pharaoh’s hand to kill them. Moses, stunned by this turn of events, turned to God with a complaint of his own. “Lord, why have You brought trouble on this people? Why is it You have sent me? For since I came to Pharaoh to speak in Your name, he has done evil to this people; neither have You delivered Your people at all” (Ex. 5:22, 23). The pattern seen here would be followed throughout Moses’ last forty years. When things seemed to go wrong, the Israelites would murmur and complain to Moses. Moses would take his own frustrations and uncertainties to God (see Ex. 17:1).&lt;br /&gt;In this, the Israelites sinned, while Moses showed respect for God. The Israelites failed to look beyond circumstances and realize that a sovereign God had His hand on every event. Moses understood that however he might feel about an event and however in the dark he might be about God’s purposes, God was at work in the situation. The Israelites’ failure to look to God as Moses consistently did is a stunning revelation of their spiritual insensitivity, while Moses’ immediate acknowledgment of God’s responsibility for what was happening demonstrated a true faith in the Lord. &lt;br /&gt;Here, too, is a vital lesson for Christians today. Events will often test the quality of our relationship with God. It will be so easy to complain about others or about our circumstances. All too often we complain to others. This is an ungodly response. The godly follow Moses’ example, recognize God’s hand in events, and bring their complaints to Him. &lt;br /&gt;God responded to Moses’ complaint by giving him the perspective he needed. Pharaoh would resist, but God would “multiply My signs and wonders in the land of Egypt” (Ex. 7:3) and so convince Israel, Egypt, and future generations that He, the Lord, surely is God.&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ relationship with God is revealed (Ex. 7:8–15). Moses had been called by God and given a mission. He was to win the release of the Israelite slaves. In a most significant interchange the Lord told Moses, “See, I have made you as God to Pharaoh, and Aaron your brother shall be your prophet. You shall speak all that I command you” (7:1–2). &lt;br /&gt;This statement was made in response to yet another of Moses’ expressions of inadequacy: “Behold, I am of uncircumcised lips, and how shall Pharaoh heed me” (6:30). God’s answer was that Moses would represent Him to Pharaoh. Through Moses’ words and actions, God would be revealed to the disbelieving Egyptians.&lt;br /&gt;Moses did represent God before Pharaoh, and when Pharaoh ridiculed the God Moses represented, devastating plagues struck Egypt at Moses’ word. Those same plagues departed at Moses’ word. The reality of Moses’ relationship with God was displayed in the works God performed through Him. The reality of Moses’ relationship with God was revealed. Through His relationship with Moses, God revealed Himself.&lt;br /&gt;This remains true today. God will communicate His reality through the walk and the words of believers who love Him and live close to Him. Spiritual power and effectiveness are as dependent today on maintaining a close relationship with the Lord as they were in Moses’ time. When we maintain this relationship, God will be able to use us as He did Moses. He will use us, not to carry out Moses’ mission, but rather to fulfill His purpose in our lives. The reality of our relationship with God will be revealed in the works God does in us; works that in truth will reveal Him.&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ relationship with God transforms (Ex. 32:1–14). Moses led the Israelites away from Egypt into the Sinai peninsula. When they reached Mount Sinai, God gave Israel the law through Moses. Exodus 32 tells one of the darker stories of the period. While Moses was on Mount Sinai receiving the Ten Commandments, the Israelites camped on the plains below Sinai. They came to Aaron, Moses’ brother, and demanded: “Make us gods that shall go before us; for as for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him” (Ex. 32:1). Aaron gave in to them and fashioned a golden calf. The Israelites imagined an invisible deity sat astride this calf. God informed Moses of what was happening below, and said, “I have seen this people, and indeed it is a stiff-necked people! Now therefore, let Me alone that My wrath may burn hot against them and I may consume them. And I will make of you a great nation” (Ex. 32:9–10). &lt;br /&gt;What is significant for us here is not any theological questions the verse raises, but rather Moses’ response. For Moses pleaded with God, saying:&lt;br /&gt;“LORD, why does Your wrath burn hot against Your people whom You have brought out of the land of Egypt with great power and with a mighty hand? Why should the Egyptians speak, and say, ‘He brought them out to harm them, to kill them in the mountains, and to consume them from the face of the earth’? Turn from Your fierce wrath, and relent from this harm to Your people. Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, Your servants, to whom You swore by your own self, and said to them, ‘I will multiply your descendants as the stars of heaven; and all this land that I have spoken of I give to your descendants, and they shall inherit it forever’ ” (Ex. 32:11–13).&lt;br /&gt;There are several things to note about this prayer. First, Moses expressed a concern for God’s glory. To turn against the Israelites at that point would have exposed God as a failure, unable to accomplish His stated purpose (32:12). Second, Moses reminded God of His Word. Surely the Lord would not go back on the covenant commitments He had made to the patriarchs. &lt;br /&gt;In this prayer, we see into Moses’ heart. Whatever His motives were as a youth when he dreamed of freeing the Israelites, His motives at this point were pure. Moses sought not fame for himself; rather, he sought glory for his God. &lt;br /&gt;This same motivation was expressed in a similar prayer uttered just after the Israelites rebelled at Kadesh Barnea and refused to enter the promised land (Num. 14). There, too, Moses prayed for a rebellious people, and there, too, Moses’ intent was to glorify God. &lt;br /&gt;The text adds a fascinating insight. After Moses’ prayer was granted on Mount Sinai, he went down the mountain. But when he saw the golden calf idol and the “dancing” [orgy] taking place around it, “Moses’ anger became hot, and he cast the tablets [stones, on which the Ten Commandments had been recorded] out of his hands and broke them” (32:19). &lt;br /&gt;God had preserved Moses’ perspective by reporting what was happening while Moses was still on the mountain. Isolated from the awful offenses, Moses retained his perspective, and was able to plead with God. If Moses had first seen the people sinning, in His anger He might well have responded as God had, and determined on extermination.&lt;br /&gt;It’s hard for us, being human, to be balanced in our responses to sin. On the one hand, the godly feel revulsion and anger at humanity’s inhumanities. On the other hand, we are to be concerned for the honor of God who is glorified as much in His displays of grace as in His righteous judgments. All we can do is keep our desire focused on glorifying God, and our thoughts purified by a knowledge of His Word.&lt;br /&gt;Scripture’s own evaluation of Moses makes it clear how completely his relationship with God transformed Moses. The Bible tells us that “the LORD spoke to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend” (Ex. 33:11). Hebrews 3:5 praises Moses as a man who was “faithful in all His [God’s] house as a servant.” Moses, at times referred to as “the man of God” (Deut 33:1; Josh. 14:6), had been transformed indeed by his personal relationship with God. &lt;br /&gt;Moses yearns to know God better (Ex. 33:13–23). Despite Moses’ godly response to the Israelites’ sin with the golden calf, the incident shook Moses to his core. Yet, Moses prayed that the people’s sin might be forgiven. God did announce that He would punish the individuals who had engaged in the idolatry. He forgave the rest and promised that despite the Israelites’ sins He would bring them into the Promised Land. Moses warned the Israelites that God could easily destroy them, and Moses himself continued to meet with the Lord. This intimate relationship with God sustained Moses during the difficult years ahead—years during which the Israelites again and again revealed a hostile and angry spirit and caused Moses, as well as God, intense pain.&lt;br /&gt;God sustained His prophet with a promise: “My Presence will go with you, and I will give you rest” (Ex. 33:14). To Moses it was increasingly clear that God’s Presence was Israel’s only hope—and his own only support.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Israel worshiped at the portable tabernacle for some 400 years after the Exodus.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Eager to know God even better, Moses begged the Lord, “Please, show me Your glory” (Ex. 33:18). Here “glory” refers to the divine essence. Moses yearned to see God as He truly is, fully revealed. God refused, for “no man shall see Me, and live.” But God did promise to “make all My goodness pass before you” (33:19). The Lord then placed Moses in a fissure in the rock wall of Mount Sinai until His glory had passed by. And then God allowed Moses to see His back, not His face. &lt;br /&gt;The imagery here is metaphoric, not anthropomorphic. God’s “face” stands for His essential being; His “back” for that which He reveals of Himself to human beings. With this, Moses had to be—and surely was—content. For God showed Moses more of Himself than he had revealed to any human being up to that time. This revelation by God of Himself sustained Moses through the difficult and painful years that lay ahead. Moses could not imagine the stress he would experience in trying to lead God’s obstinate people. But through it all, God’s Presence would go with Moses. And through it all, Moses would learn more about the grace and goodness of God. &lt;br /&gt;This thought is important to you and me today. We need God’s presence in our lives if we handle the pressures that stress all people. For us, as for Moses, the ultimate revelation of God’s essence awaits. In the meantime, we can learn more of God, both through Scripture and by responding to His revealed will. As we follow Him closely, we will experience His presence. And this will enable us, as it did Moses, to overcome. &lt;br /&gt;Flaws in Moses’ relationship with God (Ex. 34:29–34; Num. 20:1–12). Whether or not the first incident constitutes a flaw is debatable. But the second kept Moses from entering the promised land. &lt;br /&gt;The veil on Moses’ face (Ex. 34:29–34). God spoke to Moses in the Israelite camp as well as on Sinai. When this happened, the cloudy-fiery pillar that accompanied the Israelites in the wilderness came down and hovered over the tabernacle, which the text also calls the “tent of meeting.” Moses entered the tabernacle to converse with the Lord, and when Moses left the divine presence, his face literally shone. &lt;br /&gt;Exodus tells us that after exiting the tabernacle following his meetings with the Lord, Moses would come out and speak to the Israelites, who were clearly impressed with the radiance that shone from his face. Moses would then put a veil over his face until the next time he met with the Lord. Again Moses would exit the tent unmasked, but soon once again slip on his veil.&lt;br /&gt;Nahum M. Sarna, in the Jewish Publication Society’s commentary on Exodus, rightly notes that the shining face “functions to reaffirm and legitimate the prophet’s role as the peerless intimate of God, the sole and single mediator between God and His people”(p. 221). And certainly, in view of the Israelites’ intransigence, such a symbol must have been comforting to Moses. But why did Moses put on a veil? Why not simply leave it off? The answer is provided by the apostle Paul, who told us that Moses “put a veil over his face so that the Israelites might not see the end of the fading splendor” (2 Cor. 3:13, R.S.V.). &lt;br /&gt;While each meeting with God seemed to recharge the supernatural effulgence, Moses truly was merely a man. He did not wish the Israelites to see the splendor fade and be reminded of his humanity. Strikingly, the apostle urged Christians to abandon similar efforts to mask our mortality, and thus our flaws. He urged us in 2 Corinthians 3 to be bold, “not like Moses,” and to remove the masks. Yes, people will see our flaws. But as we live open and honest lives, people will also see Jesus’ face, for “we are being transformed” (2 Cor. 13:18) by God’s Spirit. Witnessing the process of our transformation—not a pretense of perfection—convinces others that God is in our lives and that He is real!&lt;br /&gt;Was Moses wrong to veil his face so that the Israelites would not realize that the radiance faded away? Certainly given the characteristics of the people whom Moses led, his actions were understandable. Yet, it would seem that Moses might have better glorified God and better set us an example if he had chosen simply to be himself, without any pretense or deceit.&lt;br /&gt;Striking the rock (Num. 20:1–13). The Israelites had rebelled against God, and God had condemned them to wander in the wilderness until the entire unbelieving generation died out. In their wanderings, they came again to the region of Zin [called “Sin” in Ex. 17:1]. The land was parched and waterless, and as at the earlier time, the people were desperate for water. As usual, they complained bitterly against Moses and Aaron and against [but not to] God. And as usual, Moses went immediately to God.&lt;br /&gt;This time God told Moses to “speak to the rock” before the eyes of the Israelites and the rock would produce water for humans and animals. “The rock” is undoubtedly the same rock which, at an earlier time, Moses had been told to strike with his staff and had at that time produced water (Ex. 17:5–7). But this time Moses, upset and angry with the Israelites and undoubtedly worn down by their unresponsiveness, failed to heed God’s words. Rather than speak to the rock, he struck it twice, angrily complaining to the rebels and asking, “Must we bring water for you out of this rock?”&lt;br /&gt;The rock did produce abundant water. But God was displeased.&lt;br /&gt;Then the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron, “Because you did not believe Me, to hallow Me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore you shall not bring this assembly into the land which I have given them” (Num. 20:12).&lt;br /&gt;God had told Moses to speak to the rock. Moses failed to heed God’s word, and struck the rock instead. &lt;br /&gt;Some have felt that the punishment God decreed hardly fit Moses’ crime. But there are two possible reasons why such critics are wrong. The first reason is theological; the second is practical.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Because Moses disobeyed God by striking rather than speaking to the rock to produce water, he was not allowed to lead Israel into the promised land.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;The theological reason is based on Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 10:4 that the Rock represented Christ. When Moses struck the rock, the first time on the way to Mount Sinai, the rock provided life-saving water, even as when Christ died on Calvary He provided a life-giving salvation for all who believe in Him. Jesus died once for all for sins: His sacrifice was complete and fully efficacious. Hebrews says that by His one sacrifice He perfected forever those who are sanctified (cf. Heb. 10:10). In striking the rock on this second occasion, Moses distorted the typology, for Christ was smitten once for all. It was not necessary for Jesus to be stricken twice or three times. &lt;br /&gt;The practical reason is expressed in the Numbers text. Moses had failed to believe God. This statement rests on the principle that trust in God leads to obedience, a theme developed in Hebrews 3 and 4. Israel had disobeyed God through unbelief and rebelled at Kadesh Barnea; in a similar way Moses disobeyed God through unbelief and failed to follow His instructions. We might argue that Moses’ failure can hardly be compared to that of the Israelites in degree, but we must admit that Moses’ failure was the same in kind. The consequences to Moses and to the Israelites were the same. Like the Israelites, Moses died outside the promised land, unable to set foot on territory God had promised to Abraham’s seed.&lt;br /&gt;Before we assume that God was overly hard on Moses, let’s consider. Moses was an intimate of God’s. Moses knew far more of the Lord than did the Israelites he led. With Moses’ privileges, there came weighty responsibility. As James reminds us, “Let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment” (James 3:1). &lt;br /&gt;Unlike the Israelites of the Exodus generation, however, God did permit Moses to stand on heights across the Jordan and see the promised land. There Moses died, and God Himself buried His faithful prophet and His friend.&lt;br /&gt;MOSES’ RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ISRAELITES&lt;br /&gt;One might almost say that Moses had a love-hate relationship with Israel. His early dream of delivering God’s people was shattered when an Israelite rejected Moses’ intervention in a quarrel and revealed that people knew about Moses’ earlier murder of an Egyptian slave-master (Ex. 2:11–15). Forty years later when Moses returned to Egypt he was first welcomed by the Israelite community, but with the very first setback the Israelites turned on Moses and blamed him for their misfortunes (Ex. 5:1–22). This pattern was repeated for most of the forty years that Moses led Israel, with almost all hostility in the relationship expressed by the Israelites.&lt;br /&gt;Yet through the years, Moses not only remained faithful to his mission; he also remained committed to care for and to pray for the Israelites. What an example he set for parents of strong-willed children and for shepherds of God’s sometimes-contentious flock.&lt;br /&gt;The pattern of the relationship foreshadowed (Ex. 5). When Moses first appeared in Egypt, he went to the Hebrew community’s leaders with the good news that God intended to win their release from slavery. When Moses performed the signs God had given him, the Israelites expressed thanks to God for the prospect of freedom (Ex. 4:31). However, when Moses delivered God’s demand to Pharaoh, the Egyptian ruler’s response was to increase his slaves’ workload. Understandably, the Israelites blamed Moses (Ex. 5:21). Puzzled, Moses turned to God for an explanation. When Moses understood that God would use Pharaoh’s hostility as an occasion to display His power, and would win Israel’s freedom in time, Moses believed God. But when Moses reported God’s intentions to the Israelites, “they did not heed Moses, because of anguish of spirit and cruel bondage” (Ex. 6:9). &lt;br /&gt;In this initial story, we can see elements that would mark this generation of Israelites’ relationship with God and with Moses for the next forty years. Moses obeyed God. Difficulties arose. The Israelites criticized Moses. Moses prayed. God acted.&lt;br /&gt;While the nature of the difficulties, the intensity of the criticisms, the content of the prayers, and the nature of God’s responses varied, these elements remained constant.&lt;br /&gt;The character of the relationship displayed (Ex. 16–17). It was one thing for the Israelites to react with unbelief after the setback described in Exodus 5. Their reactions as they left Egypt and traveled toward Mount Sinai were much more difficult to explain. &lt;br /&gt;Before that journey had begun, the land of their servitude had been devastated by a wondrous series of judgments through which God had unmistakably demonstrated His power. On that journey a massive cloudy-fiery pillar that hung in the heavens above them led the Israelites. Even more, the Israelites had seen God part the waters of a sea so they might pass safely through and then had seen the waters close to wipe out their pursuers. God was obviously, unmistakably with them, and Moses was marked as God’s appointed spokesman and leader.&lt;br /&gt;Yet, just three days after being led safely through the sea, when confronted with undrinkable water, “the people complained against Moses” (15:24). Moses prayed, and God responded by showing Moses how to purify the waters so the people could drink. &lt;br /&gt;Some days later, food ran out and again, rather than look to God to provide, the Israelites “complained against Moses and Aaron” (Ex. 16:2). Again the Lord provided. Yet when the water ran out once again, “the people contended with Moses” and demanded water, continuing to “complain” against him.&lt;br /&gt;What the English text does not reveal is that in the original languages the intensity of the complaints increases incident by incident. We can sense Moses’ increasing frustration as we read Exodus 17:4: “Moses cried out to the LORD, saying, ‘What shall I do with this people? They are almost ready to stone me!’” Once again God provided water. &lt;br /&gt;The sequence of events in these chapters is striking and significant. With each difficulty the hostility of the Israelites toward Moses and their insensitivity to God increased—despite the fact that God continued to meet their every need immediately. In this we see both the pattern and the consequences of “permissive parenting.” In permissive parenting, wrong behavior is not corrected nor are the children disciplined. Rather, they are given whatever they demand. The product is not a mature, self-disciplined and responsible adult, but an individual or a people ever more selfish and insensitive. &lt;br /&gt;All this however was about to change. For the Israelites were journeying toward Mount Sinai. Soon they would become subject to a law that not only set standards but also called for sin to be disciplined. &lt;br /&gt;The rebelliousness of the Israelites unveiled (Num. 11). It is striking to compare the events of Numbers 11 with those recorded in Exodus 16–17. The circumstances are parallel, the responses of the Israelites are the same, but God’s actions are totally different. We see it in the very first verse of Numbers 11:&lt;br /&gt;Now when the people complained, it displeased the LORD; for the LORD heard it, and His anger was aroused. So the fire of the LORD burned among them, and consumed some in the outskirts of the camp (Num. 11:1). &lt;br /&gt;This incident introduced Moses’ role as an intercessor, for “when Moses prayed to the LORD, the fire was quenched” (Num. 11:2).&lt;br /&gt;But the Israelites did not learn from discipline any more than they had learned from unmixed grace. They craved a change in diet, and soon the spirit of dissatisfaction and complaint swept through the camp. Again the Lord was angry, and Moses began to feel the weight of leading an unspiritual and selfish people. We can sense Moses’ frustration in his prayer:&lt;br /&gt;So Moses said to the LORD, “Why have You afflicted Your servant? And why have I not found favor in Your sight, that You have laid the burden of all these people on me? Did I conceive all these people? Did I beget them, and You should say to me, ‘Carry them in your bosom, as a guardian caries a nursing child,’ to the land which You swore to their fathers? … I am not able to bear all these people alone, because the burden is too great for me” (Num. 11:11, 12, 14).&lt;br /&gt;Despite the tone of Moses’ prayer, and Moses’ failure to remember that God was with him so he did not “bear all these people alone,” Moses was right to bring his complaint directly to the Lord. In this, Moses showed a great respect for God and acted quite differently than the Israelites, who directed their complaints against Moses.&lt;br /&gt;God’s response was to provide the meat the Israelites craved, but with it He sent a “very great” plague that must have killed thousands of Israelites. The psalmist commented on this event:&lt;br /&gt;So they ate and were well filled,&lt;br /&gt;For He gave them their own desire.&lt;br /&gt;They were not deprived of their craving;&lt;br /&gt;But while the food was still in their mouths,&lt;br /&gt;The wrath of God came against them,&lt;br /&gt;And slew the stoutest of them,&lt;br /&gt;And struck down the choice men of Israel.&lt;br /&gt;In spite of this they still sinned,&lt;br /&gt;And did not believe in His wondrous works.&lt;br /&gt;Therefore their days He consumed in futility,&lt;br /&gt;And their years in fear. (Ps. 78:29–33)&lt;br /&gt;Here too we find an important lesson. God had provided in manna all that the Israelites needed to sustain life and health. Yet, they craved what God had not seen fit to provide. Rather than be thankful and satisfied with God’s gracious provision, they were dissatisfied and focused on what they did not have. Finally, God gave them what they craved—and it destroyed them. How foolish not to find satisfaction in the gracious gifts God has given us, and how foolish to crave more. Should God give us what we crave rather than what He chooses for us, we too might be destroyed.&lt;br /&gt;The ultimate act of rebellion (Num. 14). When the Israelites reached Canaan, a representative of each tribe was sent to explore the land and bring back reports. Ten of the explorers emphasized the military strength of the Canaanites. This terrified the people. Despite the miracles of deliverance and the terror of the divine judgments they had experienced, they still refused to take account of God’s power or to trust Him. Numbers 14:2, 3 tells us:&lt;br /&gt;All the children of Israel complained against Moses and Aaron, and the whole congregation said to them, “If only we had died in the land of Egypt! Or if only we had died in this wilderness! Why has the Lord brought us to this land to fall by the sword, that our wives and children should become victims? Would it not be better for us to return to Egypt?&lt;br /&gt;Despite the urgings of Moses, Aaron, and the two faithful explorers Caleb and Joshua, the Israelites rebelliously refused to obey God’s command to go up and take Canaan. The Israelites’ response is described in verse 10: “All the congregation said to stone them with stones.”&lt;br /&gt;At this point God again threatened totally to destroy the Israelites and begin anew with Moses. Moses again interceded for the Israelites, pleading God’s glory and reminding the Lord of His covenant commitment to the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. [See the discussion of this similar prayer, page 35.]&lt;br /&gt;Moses’ prayer for pardon was granted (Num. 14:20), yet the disobedient and unbelieving Israelites would have to face some consequences. The Israelites had proclaimed that they would rather die in the wilderness than face the Canaanites. God would give them what they had chosen. God announced through Moses:&lt;br /&gt;“Just as you have spoken in My hearing, so will I do to you: the carcasses of you who have complained against Me shall fall in this wilderness, all of you who were numbered, according to your entire number, from twenty years old and above” (Num. 14:29).&lt;br /&gt;And so it was.&lt;br /&gt;We can learn several lessons from this incident. First, leaders, like Moses, are both to represent their people before God and represent God before their people. On the one hand, faithfulness in ministry calls for earnest prayer on behalf of others even when they sin. On the other hand, faithfulness calls for announcing God’s judgments even when we know they will be unpopular. In each of these aspects of spiritual leadership, Moses provides us with an exceptional example.&lt;br /&gt;The second lesson is that our choices have consequences. When we refuse to follow God’s Word, we can be sure that disaster will follow—whatever our motives for disobedience may have been. Whether it is a fleshly craving or fear that moves us to disobey, abandoning God’s will provides neither satisfaction nor security.&lt;br /&gt;The Israelites’ unbelieving hearts further revealed (Num. 16). The Israelites’ rebellion at Kadesh Barnea destined the Exodus generation to decades of wandering in the wilderness until God’s sentence had been carried out. Yet, clearly the Israelites still failed to understand or to trust the Lord. This is made abundantly clear in the story of Korah’s rebellion.&lt;br /&gt;Korah and his followers argued that in a faith community where each individual had been redeemed and set apart to God, it was inappropriate for Moses and Aaron to exalt themselves “above the assembly of the Lord” (Num. 16:3). They felt that this was especially true for them, for they were Levites, set apart to serve God at the tabernacle. So Korah and his followers argued that where all are holy [in the sense of being set apart to God], no individual should be responsible to a mere human leader. &lt;br /&gt;In this, of course, Korah and his followers totally ignored the fact that God Himself had commissioned Moses to lead His people and that while Moses had consistently been faithful to the Lord, Korah and all the rest had proven rebellious and unbelieving. So Moses proposed a test: let Korah and his followers appear before the Lord ready to lead in worship, and let the Lord decide.&lt;br /&gt;But Korah’s coleaders in this rebellion, Dathan and Abiram, refused to listen to Moses. They accused Moses of being responsible for the failure to take Canaan, and they blamed him for the wilderness death they now faced. Whatever Moses suggested, they would refuse to do! Angry then, Moses prayed against these rebels, asking God not to respect their offering. How could they treat Moses in this way; Moses who had never done one thing to exploit his position as a leader or to harm a single individual (Num. 16:15)? &lt;br /&gt;When the day of the test came, Korah with Dathan and Abiram and their followers, some 250 men in all, marched up to the tabernacle bearing censers filled with incense to offer to the Lord. They were followed by the entire congregation of Israelites, who supported them in their stand against Moses! &lt;br /&gt;Again, God threatened to destroy the Israelites. Again, Moses prayed for the people. This time, however, Moses made a distinction in his prayer between the congregation and the leaders of the rebellion. God then told Moses to warn the Israelites to get away from the tents of the rebel leaders. Moses then established the parameters of the test: The people would know that God had chosen Moses as their leader if the ground opened and swallowed the tents and families of the rebels. A great chasm opened and swallowed the households and possessions of Korah’s clan, and fire blazed from the tabernacle and consumed the 250 men who had arrogantly violated God’s Word and taken on themselves the priestly role reserved for Aaron’s descendants.&lt;br /&gt;The terrible fate of Korah and his family and followers was unmistakably the result of an act of God. Yet “on the next day” all the Israelites complained against Moses and Aaron and accused them of killing “the people of the Lord!” (Num. 16:41). Again, God threatened to wipe out His rebellious people, and a plague struck. This time Moses sent the true priest, Aaron, to make atonement for the Israelites, and the plague was stopped.&lt;br /&gt;The incidents reported in this chapter fully demonstrate why the Lord had no choice but to replace the Exodus generation with their children. The adults who left Egypt simply refused to respond to the Lord, no matter what God did. This generation could not enter the promised land, for only people who trusted God enough to obey Him would win the victories that would establish the Hebrew’s dominance of the Holy Land.&lt;br /&gt;Moses leads the new and responsive generation (Num. 26–36). Taking the census described in Numbers 26 marks the passing of the Exodus generation. The census revealed that just as some 600,000 men of military age had left Egypt four decades earlier, there were now some 600,000 men of the new generation, ready to succeed where their fathers had failed.&lt;br /&gt;These last chapters of Numbers tell of Moses’ travels with the new generation, travels marked by military victories and preparations for entering the promised land. What a relief and joy it must have been for Moses, now well over a hundred years old, at last to be able to guide a people who were respectful, responsive, and willing to trust the Lord. It is so much easier for leaders when those they lead willingly follow! The Lord had given Moses a wonderful gift near the end of his life.&lt;br /&gt;At the same time, we must appreciate that Moses’ travails are more instructive for us. Moses’ experience with the Israelites remind us that leadership is burdensome, a ministry not to be sought lightly or for self-aggrandizement. A person who accepts the mantle of leadership must accept with it the care of persons who will often misunderstand, criticize, and complain. A person who accepts the mantle of leadership must faithfully pray for the hostile, and just as faithfully honor and communicate God’s Word, regardless of whether others accept that Word. Yet, a person who accepts the mantle of leadership will find in that ministry great and wonderful rewards. Leadership’s challenges will drive the leader closer to God. When at last the leader sees God’s people respond and grow, it will all seem worthwhile.&lt;br /&gt;MOSES: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;We rightly hesitate to compare ourselves to the greatest or even great men of faith. Yet, we can learn much from their lives. Perhaps the most significant quality Moses modeled was humility. No person full of himself would have been so totally dependent on God or so patient with the Israelites. Both these aspects of humility are required in anyone who aspires to spiritual leadership. Only the person who acknowledges and who acts in total dependence on the Lord will experience God’s full working in and through his life. And only the truly humble person will remain loving despite the unmerited complaints and hostility that seem so typically associated with leading God’s people. &lt;br /&gt;It is striking that in a world where people assume that the self-confident, assertive individual is the leader type, that in God’s economy it is the humble and self-effacing who achieve great things. It took Moses forty years in the wilderness to learn humility. May we learn humility from him, in far less time, and far less painfully.&lt;br /&gt;There are also other lessons a person can take away from a study of Moses’ life.&lt;br /&gt;•     Moses was eighty years old before he was ready to be used by God. Never despise the time it takes to prepare yourself for ministry. And never assume that it’s too late to serve. The church and the world are well able to wait until God has fully equipped you.&lt;br /&gt;•     Moses performed miracles—and even so those God called him to lead abused him. Few of us will ever perform miracles, so we should not be surprised when we are treated unfairly.&lt;br /&gt;•     Moses brought his complaints to God, not to the neighbors. We will often be tempted to tell friends and fellow believers when we feel we have been mistreated. This will only make matters worse. We need to recognize God’s hand in all that happens and honor Him by bringing our complaints as well as our praises to Him.&lt;br /&gt;•     Moses continued to pray for his congregation, despite their lack of spirituality and the personal abuse he suffered. We are not called to treat others as they treat us, but rather to treat others as God for Christ’s sake has treated us.&lt;br /&gt;•     Moses remained obedient to the Lord, even when obedience seemed to lead to disaster. The “success” of what we do does not indicate God’s pleasure. What pleases the Lord is our obedience, whatever may come. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;DAVID&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;1 Samuel 16-2 Samuel;&lt;br /&gt;1 Chronicles; 1 Kings 1; &lt;br /&gt;Numerous psalms&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: Reigned 1010–970 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: David [DAY-vid; “beloved”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;accomplishment: David built a powerful Hebrew kingdom, greatly expanded Israel’s territory, and instituted major religious and political reforms.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;DAVID’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Moses is Scripture’s prototype prophet; David is Scripture’s prototype king. Christ fulfilled the promise of a Prophet like Moses in His first coming when He introduced the new covenant era. In Christ’s Second Coming, He will fulfill the promise of a King like David, of David’s line, destined to rule over all. The Old Testament prophets spoke of the coming of a promised Ruler to spring from David’s line who would fulfill the promise implicit in the historic reign of Israel’s greatest king.&lt;br /&gt;In his own day, David had a powerful impact on the political life of the Hebrew people. Prior to David, the Israelites had remained loosely associated tribes governed for centuries by charismatic judges, and then for a time by a flawed king, Saul. During these centuries, the Israelites were an oppressed minority in Canaan, squeezed into a narrow strip of the broad land God had promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. When David finally won the allegiance of the twelve Hebrew tribes, he was able to weld them into the most powerful Middle Eastern kingdom of his era. The Nelson Illustrated Bible Handbook summarizes David’s accomplishments as Israel’s ruler: &lt;br /&gt;The years of David complete Israel’s transition from a loose tribal structure, under which God’s people lived in the days of the judges, to a monarchy. A number of important aspects of the transition are accomplished under David’s leadership: &lt;br /&gt;•     Transition from government by judges to an established monarchy.&lt;br /&gt;•     Transition from a loose confederation of tribes to a united nation.&lt;br /&gt;•     Transition from anarchy to a strong central government.&lt;br /&gt;•     Transition from bronze-age poverty to iron-age economy and wealth.&lt;br /&gt;•     Transition from a subject people to conquerors. David expanded Israel’s territory some ten times!&lt;br /&gt;•     Transition from decentralized worship to centralized worship, with one city as both political and religious capital.&lt;br /&gt;While David proved to be a military and political genius whose accomplishments in Israel are unmatched, David’s contributions to Israel’s spiritual life are just as impressive. David himself was deeply committed to God and spiritually sensitive. The passion and intensity of David’s personal relationship with God are revealed in the seventy-three poems in the Book of Psalms attributed to him. In these psalms, David fully exposed his inner spiritual life, freely expressing his hopes and fears, his failures and his abiding confidence in the goodness of the Lord. David’s psalms, along with the others in this book of 150 religious poems, have served believers ever since as a pattern for praise and worship. They have led untold millions of people into a deeper relationship with the Lord. &lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;DAVID’S SHEPHERD PSALM&lt;br /&gt;The Lord is my shepherd;&lt;br /&gt;I shall not want.&lt;br /&gt;He makes me to lie down in green &lt;br /&gt;pastures;&lt;br /&gt;He leads me beside the still waters.&lt;br /&gt;He restores my soul;&lt;br /&gt;He leads me in the paths of righteousness&lt;br /&gt;For His name’s sake.&lt;br /&gt;Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,&lt;br /&gt;I will fear no evil;&lt;br /&gt;For You are with me;&lt;br /&gt;Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me.&lt;br /&gt;You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies;&lt;br /&gt;You anoint my head with oil;&lt;br /&gt;My cup runs over.&lt;br /&gt;Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me&lt;br /&gt;All the days of my life;&lt;br /&gt;And I will dwell in the house of the LORD&lt;br /&gt;Forever. &lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;David also expressed commitment to worship by desiring to construct a temple in Jerusalem. While God did not permit David to fulfill this dream, David spent his declining years laying out plans for its design and developing detailed organizational plans for the duties of the priests and Levites who would lead worship there. David also committed his personal wealth and much of the kingdom’s income to stockpiling the materials his son Solomon would use to build the temple of which David had dreamed.&lt;br /&gt;David fell short in many ways, particularly in his family life. Yet, David’s military, political, and spiritual accomplishments cannot be overstated. David founded a dynasty that ruled in Judah, the southern Hebrew kingdom, from 1010 B.C. to its fall to the Babylonians in 586 B.C. And, as the prophets announced, Israel’s Deliverer and future Ruler of all was to emerge from David’s family line.&lt;br /&gt;And so He did, when the babe destined to be both Savior and King was born to Mary in Bethlehem, the hometown of David, nearly a thousand years after David died.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;SAMPLING “DAVID” IN PROPHECY&lt;br /&gt;“Of the increase of His government and peace &lt;br /&gt;There will be no end, &lt;br /&gt;Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom, &lt;br /&gt;To order it and establish it with judgment and justice &lt;br /&gt;From that time forward, even forever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will accomplish this.” (Isa. 9:7)&lt;br /&gt;“In mercy the throne will be established; &lt;br /&gt;And One will sit on it in truth, in the tabernacle of David, &lt;br /&gt;Judging and seeking justice and hastening righteousness.” (Isa. 16:5) &lt;br /&gt;“Behold, the days are coming,” says the LORD, &lt;br /&gt;“That I will raise to David a Branch of righteousness; &lt;br /&gt;A King shall reign and prosper, &lt;br /&gt;And execute judgment and righteousness in the earth.” (Jer. 23:5)&lt;br /&gt;“But they shall serve the LORD their God, &lt;br /&gt;And David their king, &lt;br /&gt;Whom I will raise up for them.” (Jer. 30:9)&lt;br /&gt;“David My servant shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd; they shall also walk in My judgments and observe My statutes, and do them.” (Ezek. 37:24)&lt;br /&gt;“Afterward the children of Israel shall return and seek the LORD their God and David their king.” (Hos. 3:5)&lt;br /&gt;“The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the Son of David … ” (Matt. 1:1)&lt;br /&gt;All the multitudes were amazed and said, “Could this be the Son of David?” (Matt. 12:23)&lt;br /&gt;“I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, the Bright and Morning Star.” (Rev. 22:16)&lt;br /&gt;See the companion book in this series, Every Covenant and Promise of the Bible, for a complete explanation of this theme. &lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;DAVID’S LIFE AND TIMES&lt;br /&gt;David was born at a time when his people’s fate hung in the balance. Israel’s primary enemies at the time were the Philistines, who dominated their weaker neighbors. The Philistines had mastered the secrets of smelting iron, and they carefully guarded this new technology. When David was a youth, only King Saul and his son Jonathan carried iron weapons; the other members of Israel’s citizen militia were forced to use bronze knives and farm implements when they fought. During David’s lifetime, and largely due to his own efforts, this situation was transformed, and all of Israel’s neighboring enemies were subdued.&lt;br /&gt;We can trace the transformation by looking at the differing period of David’s life.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;The stone in slings used by Israelites in David’s time were about the size of tennis balls, plenty large enough to fell even a giant like Goliath.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;David’s early life as a shepherd (1 Sam. 16:11). David was the youngest son of a man named Jesse, who lived in Bethlehem, a small town about six miles from the future site of David’s capital, Jerusalem. As the youngest, David was assigned the task of guarding his father’s sheep. Alone in nature, David experienced a growing awe of God as Creator. David’s sense of wonder is frequently expressed in the psalms. As David would one day write, &lt;br /&gt;The heavens declare the glory of God; &lt;br /&gt;And the firmament shows His handiwork. &lt;br /&gt;Day unto day utters speech, &lt;br /&gt;And night unto night reveals knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;There is no speech nor language&lt;br /&gt;Where their voice is not heard. &lt;br /&gt;(Ps. 19:1–3)&lt;br /&gt;As David cared for his sheep, he listened to nature’s testimony. During those quiet years, David developed a sense of God’s greatness that never left him. David’s later confidence in God’s power rested in large part on the lessons David learned as a shepherd.&lt;br /&gt;David also learned to act on his confidence in God. Later, when asked how he dared challenge a giant Philistine warrior, David replied simply: &lt;br /&gt;Your servant used to keep his father’s sheep, and when a lion or a bear came and took a lamb out of the flock, I went out after it and struck it, and delivered the lamb from its mouth; and when it arose against me, I caught it by its beard, and struck and killed it. Your servant has killed both lion and bear; and this uncircumcised Philistine will be like one of them, seeing he has defied the armies of the living God (1 Sam. 17:34–36).&lt;br /&gt;When Saul, Israel’s first king, proved weak and untrusting, God sent the prophet Samuel to Bethlehem to anoint David as his successor. At first, Samuel assumed that one of David’s older brothers, impressively tall, was God’s choice. But God pointed out David, who was handsome but rather small of stature, as His choice. In one of the Bible’s most telling verses, the Lord reminded Samuel that “the Lord does not see as man sees; for man looks at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart” (1 Sam. 16:7). It was David’s heart for the Lord, nurtured during his shepherd years, that more than anything else equipped David for greatness.&lt;br /&gt;David’s emergence as a military hero (1 Sam. 17–19). An invasion of Israelite territory by the Philistines created the opportunity for David’s emergence from obscurity. As the two armies lay camped on hillsides opposite each other, a Philistine warrior some nine feet tall strode out each morning to challenge the Israelites to send out a champion to fight him. Saul, the tallest and most powerful man in Israel’s army as well as king, cowered in his tent, promising to reward anyone who would venture out to do battle.&lt;br /&gt;When David, then a teenager, came to camp to bring provisions to his brothers, David was shocked that no one was willing to fight the giant. In David’s eyes, the Philistine’s challenge demeaned the living God who would surely give victory to anyone who stepped out to represent Him and His people. So David volunteered, and the cowardly king permitted a stripling to attempt what no soldier in Saul’s army was willing to try.&lt;br /&gt;As every Sunday school student knows, David killed the giant, Goliath. He was quickly accepted into Saul’s army as a junior officer, and immediately began to display the courage and brilliance that marked his entire military career. David was so successful, and so honored by the Israelites, that Saul grew jealous. Saul undoubtedly recognized in David that true faith and courage that he himself lacked. In the end, when several plots to rid himself of David failed, Saul attempted to kill David whom he now saw as a rival to the throne. David, although at the time the king’s son-in-law as well as a military officer, fled for his life.&lt;br /&gt;David’s outlaw years (1 Sam. 20–31). David was alone when he fled from Saul; however, others soon joined him. Before long, David had assembled a band of some 600 fighting men and their families; fierce warriors, many of whom became the core of his army after David became king.&lt;br /&gt;During these outlaw years, Saul often pursued David. Saul was determined to see David dead. Many close calls and last-minute escapes are described in these chapters. Particularly notable however is David’s refusal to assassinate Saul on two occasions when he had the opportunity. Saul had been anointed king by the prophet Samuel and thus appointed by God. God, not David, must remove him. &lt;br /&gt;Only once during these years did David become discouraged. Convinced that sooner or later Saul would massacre his little band, David moved into Philistine territory and offered himself and his men as mercenaries to the king of Gath. God overruled however, and David was preserved from fighting against his own people when Philistia and Israel went to war again. Despite this one lapse, David generally maintained his confidence in God and realized that in time he would fulfill his destiny as Israel’s king.&lt;br /&gt;David’s rule over Judah (2 Sam. 1–4). When at last Saul was killed in a battle with the Philistines, the tribes of Judah and Benjamin invited David to become their king. A son of Saul, Ishbosheth, was propped up as king of the other ten tribes by Abner, who had been Saul’s commanding general. For seven years the north [the ten tribes] and the south [David’s two tribes] skirmished. In the end, a perceived insult moved Abner to make peace with David and unify the nation under his rule. Even though David’s general, Joab, assassinated Abner, the transfer of power took place. David was king of a united Israel, and at last was in a position to fulfill his destiny.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;David ruled Judah and Dan for seven years before the other Hebrew tribes acknowledeged him as king.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;David builds a nation (2 Sam. 5–10; 1 Chron. 11–16). David’s first act as king was to establish a new capital. He chose Jerusalem, a city that lay between north and south and had been occupied by neither. David drove out the Canaanites who held the heights. David also set out to break the power of the enemy nations that surrounded the Israelites. In a series of wars, many of which were started by the enemy, David defeated all of Israel’s foes. In the process, David expanded Israelite-held territory ten times. During David’s reign, God’s people occupied nearly all the lands promised to Abraham long before.&lt;br /&gt;With his borders secure, David organized his government, setting up an efficient administrative system. David also instituted religious reforms. Since the conquest of Canaan, some four hundred years earlier, the Israelites had offered their sacrifices and worshiped at the tabernacle, the portable worship center constructed under Moses’ supervision. Now David brought the ark of the covenant, the most holy object in Israel’s religion, to Jerusalem, and laid plans for the construction of a magnificent temple in which to house it. In this, David provided a third unifying symbol for his nation. Israel now had a common capital, a common king, and a common faith. The Israelites were at last a unified nation, no longer merely a loose confederation of tribes who shared a common heritage.&lt;br /&gt;David’s declining years (2 Sam. 11–24; 1 Chron. 20–29). David’s faith and energy had enabled him to build a powerful and stable kingdom. But with this accomplished, a strange lethargy seems to have gripped David. All of life’s challenges seemed to have been met successfully; David had arrived at the top. Now David would face a different kind of challenge, a moral and interpersonal challenge. &lt;br /&gt;David’s moral challenge (1 Sam. 11–20). One spring when David’s armies went out to do battle, David stayed in Jerusalem. There he chanced to see a beautiful woman bathing. Inflamed with desire, he sent for the woman and took her, and then tried to hide what was essentially a rape. David’s detour into sin caused him real anguish; likewise, it harmed others and outraged the Lord. David’s anguish is clearly expressed in Psalm 32, as well as being reflected in his great prayer of confession recorded in Psalm 51. When the prophet Nathan finally confronted David, he confessed his sin and was forgiven. But David’s moral failure had a terrible impact on his family. When his son Amnon followed his father’s example and raped his half-sister, Tamar, David did nothing. Robbed of moral authority by his own sins, David seemed strangely silent over the crimes committed by his children. Later Absalom, the brother of Tamar, murdered Amnon and fled the country. Again David said and did nothing. Still later Absalom returned to Jerusalem. Again David said and did nothing, despite the fact that Absalom sought to alienate the northern tribes from David. Absalom succeed in fomenting a rebellion, but he was killed in the battle between north and south.&lt;br /&gt;David, so brilliant in building the nation, was strangely helpless to guide or govern his own family. How tragic when our sins impact our children so. We need to learn from David’s mistakes and guard our hearts against the attractions of sin.&lt;br /&gt;David’s enthusiasm restored (1 Chron. 17–28). The challenges of kingdom building had all been met successfully. David had learned by painful experience that however attractive sin might appear, its consequences could be devastating.&lt;br /&gt;In his declining years, David found a better way to invest his energies, and his enthusiasm for life was restored. Essentially David turned his thoughts and his efforts to preparing for the construction of God’s temple and to working out the details of how temple worship would be conducted. David also dedicated his own personal wealth to temple building and urged the wealthy in his kingdom to follow his example. First Chronicles describes in detail David’s plans; and, here again, we see David’s organizational genius displayed. &lt;br /&gt;It is striking that the emphases in Second Samuel and 1 Chronicles, which cover the same periods of David’s life, differ so significantly. But there is a good explanation. The Books of Samuel and the Kings are historical reports of events in the kingdoms of Israel and Judah. The books of Chronicles are divine commentary on those events. Second Samuel emphasizes David’s failure and its impact on David’s family, faithfully reporting conditions in the kingdom. But 1 Chronicles skips over David’s sin and its consequences to focus on evidence of his interior life with God. His sins like ours had been forgiven; his service remembered and celebrated. &lt;br /&gt;Whatever else can be said of David, he was a human being who truly had a heart for God. Yes, David was flawed, as we all are. Nevertheless David loved and trusted God, and those qualities enabled him to use his many gifts to the fullest and mark him as one of the Old Testament’s greatest men.&lt;br /&gt;EXPLORING DAVID’S RELATIONSHIPS&lt;br /&gt;DAVID’S RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD&lt;br /&gt;Scripture testifies that God chose David to succeed Saul because David was a man after God’s “own heart” (1 Sam. 13:14). This does not mean that David was perfect. Far from it. It does mean that with all his flaws, David loved the Lord and was responsive to him.&lt;br /&gt;David was responsive to God’s revelation of Himself in nature. David was deeply moved by the evidence of God’s greatness in nature and profoundly awed that God could care about human beings. His pondering is reflected in Psalm 8:&lt;br /&gt;When I consider Your heavens, the work of Your fingers,&lt;br /&gt;The moon and stars, which You have ordained,&lt;br /&gt;What is man that You are mindful of him,&lt;br /&gt;And the son of man that You visit him? (Ps. 8:3–4)&lt;br /&gt;In praise and wonder David exclaimed,&lt;br /&gt;O LORD, our LORD,&lt;br /&gt;How excellent is Your name in all the earth.” (Ps. 8:9)&lt;br /&gt;David displayed confidence in God’s promises (1 Sam. 17). While all in Saul’s army quaked before the Philistine champion, Goliath, young David was merely surprised. Why hadn’t anyone been willing to fight Goliath? The Philistine wasn’t simply challenging men; he was challenging the forces of the living God. David was utterly convinced that the God of the covenant, the God of Israel’s deliverance from Egypt, would fight for His people. Only David counted on God’s commitment to His people and looked beyond the giant foe to Israel’s far greater and more powerful God. All David’s life he displayed confidence in the Lord and counted on Him to keep His promises. As a result, He won great victories for his people. &lt;br /&gt;David looked to God for guidance (1 Sam. 23:2). The historical books that tell the story of David’s life report some eleven times that David “inquired of the Lord” when facing difficult decisions. In David’s day this typically involved an appeal to the Urim and Thummim held by the high priest, as described in Exodus 28:30. It is significant that although a brilliant strategist and a decisive leader of men, David was also a humble believer, deeply aware of his need for divine guidance. David’s dependence on God is reflected in Psalm 31:3–5:&lt;br /&gt;For You are my rock and my fortress;&lt;br /&gt;Therefore for Your name’s sake&lt;br /&gt;Lead me and guide me.&lt;br /&gt;Pull me out of the net which they have secretly laid for me,&lt;br /&gt;For You are my strength.&lt;br /&gt;Into Your hand I commit my spirit;&lt;br /&gt;You have redeemed me, O LORD, God of truth.&lt;br /&gt;David encouraged others to honor and worship God. We see this ministry of David’s reflected in several ways.&lt;br /&gt;David set a personal example (1 Sam. 26:1–12). On one occasion when King Saul pursued David and his band, David had an opportunity to assassinate Saul. Abishai, one of David’s men, urged him to kill Saul, arguing that God had delivered Saul into David’s hand. David refused: “The LORD forbid that I should stretch out my hand against the LORD’s anointed.” God would remove Saul in His own time. David had too great a respect for God to kill a man the Lord had appointed to royal office.&lt;br /&gt;David emphasized the importance of worship (2 Sam. 6). As soon as David had established himself as king and made Jerusalem the capital of a united Israel, he brought the ark of the covenant to Jerusalem. David himself led the celebration honoring God, again setting an example for his people and demonstrating his own passionate desire to honor and worship the Lord. &lt;br /&gt;David devoted himself to producing a worship liturgy for his people. David’s psalms expressed his personal relationship with God. They also were intended to serve as guides to personal and corporate worship for David’s people. David knew it was vitally important for the Israelites to become a worshiping people. Many of the psalms David wrote have in their superscription the phrase “to the chief musician.” The “chief musician” was responsible for leading worship. David intended these psalms to become part of Israel’s worship liturgy.&lt;br /&gt;David committed his later years to prepare for constructing the temple (1 Chron. 21–27). David’s deepest desire was to encourage worship of God. In his later years, he committed all his energies to raising the money and assembling the materials needed to construct a temple to the Lord in Jerusalem. While Solomon actually built the temple, David drew up the temple plans, organized the tasks of the priests and Levites who would ministered there, and energized the nation to undertake the project. &lt;br /&gt;DAVID’S RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD REFLECTED IN HIS PSALMS&lt;br /&gt;Psalm The relationship expressed &lt;br /&gt;3, 4 David finds inner peace during Absalom’s rebellion. &lt;br /&gt;5 David begins his day with prayer. &lt;br /&gt;6 David entreats God for mercy. &lt;br /&gt;7 David examines his own heart before the Lord. &lt;br /&gt;8 David expresses awe at God’s concern for people. &lt;br /&gt;9 David rejoices in the Lord and sings His praises. &lt;br /&gt;11 David expresses trust in God. &lt;br /&gt;12 David calls on God to judge the wicked. &lt;br /&gt;13 David expresses trust despite unanswered prayer. &lt;br /&gt;14 David ponders the foolishness of the wicked. &lt;br /&gt;15 David describes the ways of those who fear God. &lt;br /&gt;16 David rejoices in the blessings of knowing God. &lt;br /&gt;17 David begs God to intervene. &lt;br /&gt;18 David praises God as his rock and salvation. &lt;br /&gt;19 David rejoices in God’s revelation in nature and Scripture. &lt;br /&gt;20 David prays for others and encourages trust. &lt;br /&gt;21 David expresses trust in God’s sovereign control. &lt;br /&gt;22 David laments over God’s seeming silence. &lt;br /&gt;23 David rests in God as his shepherd. &lt;br /&gt;24 David looks forward to the coming of the King of glory. &lt;br /&gt;25 David trusts God to guide and to deliver. &lt;br /&gt;26 David begs God to vindicate him. &lt;br /&gt;27 David praises God as an antidote to fear. &lt;br /&gt;28 David urgently seeks God’s aid against enemies. &lt;br /&gt;29 David worships. &lt;br /&gt;31 David expresses trust in God as rock and fortress. &lt;br /&gt;32 David contemplates sin, forgiveness, and guidance. &lt;br /&gt;33 David calls on the righteous to praise God. &lt;br /&gt;34 David praises God and urges all to trust Him. &lt;br /&gt;35 David calls on God to defend him against enemies. &lt;br /&gt;36 David praises God’s loving kindness and mercy. &lt;br /&gt;37 David encourages delight in the Lord. &lt;br /&gt;38 David shares his pain when God disciplined him. &lt;br /&gt;39 David expresses frustration and begs for relief. &lt;br /&gt;40 David praises God for His loving kindness. &lt;br /&gt;41 David honors God for his mercy and goodness. &lt;br /&gt;51 David confesses his sin with Bathsheba. &lt;br /&gt;52 David warns the wicked. &lt;br /&gt;53 David ponders the foolishness of the wicked. &lt;br /&gt;54 David affirms God as his helper in a time of great stress. &lt;br /&gt;55 David turns to God when fearful and pained. &lt;br /&gt;56 David begs for mercy when captured by the Philistines. &lt;br /&gt;57 David cries out to God when pursued by Saul. &lt;br /&gt;58 David calls on God to judge the wicked. &lt;br /&gt;59 David calls on God to scatter his enemies. &lt;br /&gt;60 David cries out for help. &lt;br /&gt;61 David expresses trust in God when overwhelmed. &lt;br /&gt;62 David commits himself to wait for God. &lt;br /&gt;63 David longs to know God better. &lt;br /&gt;64 David expresses confidence that God will preserve him. &lt;br /&gt;65 David praises God’s awesome deeds. &lt;br /&gt;68 David reviews history in praise of God. &lt;br /&gt;69 David begs God’s help against those who hate him. &lt;br /&gt;70 David appeals to God to deliver him. &lt;br /&gt;86 David cries out to God “all day long” for help. &lt;br /&gt;101 David praises God for His mercy and justice. &lt;br /&gt;103 David blesses God for his mercy and love. &lt;br /&gt;108 David reaffirms his commitment to the Lord. &lt;br /&gt;109 David seeks God’s help against enemies. &lt;br /&gt;110 David foresees the work of God’s Messiah. &lt;br /&gt;122 David rejoices in the privilege of worship. &lt;br /&gt;124 David praises God for past deliverance. &lt;br /&gt;131 David bows as a child before the Lord. &lt;br /&gt;133 David affirms the blessings of unity. &lt;br /&gt;138 David praises God with his whole heart. &lt;br /&gt;139 David sees his life totally exposed to God’s scrutiny. &lt;br /&gt;140 David begs God to keep him from the hand of the wicked. &lt;br /&gt;141 David expresses commitment to God in evening prayers. &lt;br /&gt;142 David contemplates answered prayers. &lt;br /&gt;143 David expresses reliance on the Lord as he prays for deliverance. &lt;br /&gt;144 David sings God’s praises. &lt;br /&gt;145 David meditates on God’s splendor and works.&lt;br /&gt;David repented when he sinned (2 Sam. 12). The Old Testament records more than one sin committed by David. Although David’s love for God was real, he was a fallible human being whose sins seem as great as his accomplishments. While Scripture records David’s sin in numbering Israel (2 Sam. 24), the sin all remember is his sexual assault on Bathsheba and his subsequent murder of her husband, Uriah. Even remembering that these actions were out of character, there is no excuse for David’s actions. &lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;David refused to strike when King Saul was in his power, for God had made Saul king and David believed only God should remove him.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;However, David’s deep sense of guilt, revealed in Psalm 32, and his public repentance, expressed in Psalm 51, remind us that David truly responded to God. In repentance, David relied on God’s grace to create in him a clean heart and restore the joy of his salvation. God restored David, encouraging each of us to turn quickly to the Lord when we sin. Even in David’s great failure God used David to teach transgressors God’s ways and to convert sinners to Him.&lt;br /&gt;David was a man after God’s own heart not because he was sinless but because David trusted how God responded to Him. For most of his life, David sought to honor and obey God. His psalms remind us that David freely shared his inner life and emotions with the Lord and was as eager to commune with the Lord as to depend on Him. Even when David sinned, he relied on God’s grace and forgiveness to restore him to a right relationship with the Lord. In all this, David is an example of true godliness.&lt;br /&gt;DAVID’S RELATIONSHIP WITH SAUL&lt;br /&gt;In many ways, Saul was the opposite of David. Saul had been anointed king of Israel, but the pressures of leadership revealed that Saul was unwilling to trust God. As Saul became more and more alienated from the Lord, he grew erratic, fearful, and paranoid. All of Saul’s weaknesses are displayed in David’s relationship with the unworthy king.&lt;br /&gt;David as a musician in Saul’s court (1 Sam. 16:14–23). After Saul had been rejected by the Lord and condemned by Samuel, he was frequently depressed. David was called to court to play the harp for Saul and cheer him. Saul liked the young man and made him his armor bearer, an official court position. &lt;br /&gt;David as victor over Goliath and as an army officer (1 Sam. 17:1–18:16). David, a teenager, was at home from court when the Philistines invaded. His father sent him to carry supplies to his brothers, who were with the Israelite forces. There David volunteered to meet Goliath in single combat, and Saul reluctantly agreed. Saul’s question to his general, Abner, “Whose son is this youth,” (17:55), has been taken to contradict the story that David was already known to Saul. However, Saul’s question related to David’s lineage. Saul had promised his daughter in marriage to whoever killed Goliath, and understandably, he wondered about David’s family.&lt;br /&gt;After David killed Goliath, Saul failed to give David his daughter, but he made David an officer in his army. David proved himself a gifted and successful military man, and rapidly became a hero to the people of Israel. David’s popularity aroused Saul’s resentment. Saul was both jealous and fearful, for Saul sensed that God, who had deserted him, was with David.&lt;br /&gt;David as the king’s son-in-law (1 Sam. 18:17–19:24). When Saul’s daughter Michal fell in love with David, Saul saw a way to rid himself of the young army officer. He set David to earn Michal’s hand by killing Philistines, hoping that David would be the one killed. When David succeeded, Saul permitted the wedding, but soon was asking his servants and even his son Jonathan, David’s friend, to murder David. &lt;br /&gt;During this time, David simply could not credit the reports that Saul was out to kill him. David had proven himself loyal to Saul, and he was the king’s son-in-law! Finally Saul moved openly against David, and David was forced to flee. &lt;br /&gt;David as a fugitive (1 Sam. 20–30). For a number of years, Saul, who was still intent on seeing David dead, harried David and those who joined him. Twice while David and his men were being pursued, David had opportunities to kill Saul. Each time, David refused, but took tokens from Saul that revealed how close to death the king had come. Each time, Saul was forced to acknowledge that David was more righteous than he was, and each time Saul promised David a pardon. David, however, was too wise to trust Saul, and he continued to live as a fugitive. During those years Saul served as a grindstone, whose pressure strengthened David’s faith and honed his trust in the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;Even so, it is not surprising that after years of narrow escapes even a person with as much trust in God as David displayed should become discouraged. Convinced that sooner or later Saul would take him, David left Israelite territory and enrolled his men as mercenaries with the king of Philistine Gath. David pretended to the Philistine ruler to lead raiding parties into Israelite territory, but instead David raided Israel’s enemies. This lapse of David’s faith created a serious situation. When the Philistines went to war with Israel, David, now a subject of the king of Gath, was expected to battle his own people! God extricated David from this situation, and in the battle that followed, Saul and his son Jonathan were both killed.&lt;br /&gt;Saul had been God’s instrument to test David’s faith and his loyalty. David had passed the test; now it was time for a maturer David to lead God’s people.&lt;br /&gt;How often God uses those who make themselves our enemies to strengthen and mature us. We need to be sure, however, that we follow the course David took, refusing to strike back, and treating our enemies with consideration and respect (see Matt. 5:44).&lt;br /&gt;DAVID’S RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS WIVES&lt;br /&gt;While David maintained an exemplary relationship with Saul, the same cannot be said for his relationship with his wives. We shall explore his relationship with three of the women David married.&lt;br /&gt;David’s relationship with Michal, Saul’s daughter (1 Sam. 18–19; 2 Sam. 3, 6). Saul’s younger daughter, Michal, fell in love with the young and handsome army officer who had killed Goliath. Her father saw her love as an opportunity to strike at David. Saul established a dowry of one hundred Philistine foreskins, hoping his enemies would kill David. When David brought Saul the required dowry, Saul permitted the marriage. Later when Saul’s hostility became open and the threat to David’s life became clear, Michal helped David escape. After David fled, Saul married Michal to another man. In this manner, Saul callously used his daughter, showing no concern at all for her feelings.&lt;br /&gt;There is no evidence that David tried to contact Michal during his fugitive years. But much later, when David was offered the throne of Israel, he demanded that Michal be returned to him. The Israelite general who was negotiating turning the northern tribes over to David went to Michal’s home and simply took her away from her husband and brought her to David.&lt;br /&gt;To suppose that David was eager to have his first love restored to him would be romantic. However, the text suggests that David’s insistence on the return of Michal was a political rather than a loving act. Marriage to Saul’s daughter would help to legitimize David’s rule over the northern tribes that had remained loyal to Saul’s family. Michal’s expression of hostility toward David seen in 2 Samuel 6:16–23 reveals no affection between them.&lt;br /&gt;David’s relationship with Michal reveals him to be as much an exploiter of women as Saul had been. The text tells us that Michal loved David; it never suggests that David loved Michal. Many years later when David demanded her return without consulting her, David showed a callous disregard for her feelings. &lt;br /&gt;While some might excuse David’s actions by noting that women in the royal houses of the ancient world were universally regarded as pawns of public policy, such a heartless disregard of the feelings of a woman who had shown David such love and loyalty was inexcusable. &lt;br /&gt;David’s relationship with Abigail (1 Sam. 25). Once when he was a fugitive, David’s men camped near the land of a wealthy rancher named Nabal. David’s men never stole a sheep to eat, but rather helped the shepherds guard the flock. Yet, at harvest time when David sent a delegation to ask Nabal for a gift, Nabal insulted David and sent the delegation away.&lt;br /&gt;David’s anger flared, and he set out with his men to kill Nabal and his herdsmen. Warned by the herdsmen, who were appalled at what Nabal had done, Nabal’s wife Abigail quickly assembled some supplies and set out to intercept David.&lt;br /&gt;Not only did Abigail intercept David, but she spoke so wisely that David realized his intent to take revenge was both wrong and politically unwise. He accepted Abigail’s gifts, and returned to his camp. When Nabal suffered a stroke and died a few days later, David sent for Abigail and married her. David recognized and appreciated Abigail’s strength of character and her wisdom.&lt;br /&gt;Too many men today are threatened by strong women. David, a strong man himself, realized that a woman of strength and character is of great worth, and he took the opportunity to join her life to his. In this relationship, at least we can admire David’s choice and seek to emulate him.&lt;br /&gt;David’s relationship with Bathsheba (2 Sam. 11–12; 1 Kings 1). David’s initial attraction to Bathsheba was purely sensual. She was beautiful; David wanted her; David took her. The fact that Bathsheba was another man’s wife was something that David, driven by passion and power, simply ignored.&lt;br /&gt;The text of 2 Samuel makes it clear that Bathsheba was a victim here; she was not the temptress some in their efforts to excuse David have tried to cast her (see 2 Sam. 11:1–6). It was night when Bathsheba was bathing in the privacy of the inner court of her own home, when David looked down from the palace roof and saw her. He “sent messengers and took her” and when she arrived at the palace, “he lay with her.” And then David simply sent Bathsheba home. Weeks later when she let him know she was pregnant, David called her husband home from the war, hoping to mask his responsibility for her condition. In the end, David arranged to have Bathsheba’s husband killed in battle, and then he married her himself, perhaps to further hide his rape of a young woman who was helpless in the hands of Israel’s king.&lt;br /&gt;David and Bathsheba’s marriage was likely not a loving one at first. David’s lust, so shocking in a king who had a reputation for godliness, must have shaken Bathsheba. When she discovered she was pregnant by David, she clearly had lost control of her own life and was utterly powerless.&lt;br /&gt;Yet we learn in the Chronicles that she later bore David four sons, and that one of those sons, Solomon, was David’s successor. Even more fascinating, as David lay dying and one of his sons acted to usurp the throne, the prophet Nathan enlisted the aid of Bathsheba to appeal to the king. Bathsheba reminded David of his promise to see Solomon crowned, but it was her reminder that after David died the lives of both herself and Solomon would be in danger (1 Kings 1:21) that moved David to act.&lt;br /&gt;Something had happened to transform a relationship initiated in lust into a loving commitment of these two to each other. &lt;br /&gt;In Psalm 51, we learn what happened. After David was confronted by the prophet Nathan and acknowledged his sin to the Lord, David took another significant step. David penned a confession and delivered it to the chief musician to be used in public worship. That confession, Psalm 51, is headed by a superscription that bluntly describes the occasion of its writing: “A psalm of David when Nathan the prophet went to him, after he had gone in to Bathsheba.” &lt;br /&gt;In this public confession David took full responsibility for what happened, and wrote: “I acknowledge my transgressions” (51:3). &lt;br /&gt;The public confession not only restored David’s relationship with the Lord, but also laid a foundation on which to build a loving relationship with Bathsheba. &lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;David showed himself a truly strong man when he listened to the advice of Abigail and changed his mind despite publicly stating he would take revenge.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;All too many women today are in abusive relationships. The first reaction of most victims is to hide the abuse out of a sense of guilt and shame, while the first reaction of the abuser is to his victim. Typically these relationships are marked by repeated expressions of contrition and promises never to do it again—all too soon followed by repeated abuse. Such relationships can be healed in only one way: David’s way. The abuser must take full responsibility for his actions and publicly exonerate the abused—just as David did in writing Psalm 51.&lt;br /&gt;When we examine David’s relationships with his wives, what we find is not pretty. David showed a disregard for women that we rightly find repugnant. And yet, David also showed appreciation for the strong woman who repels rather than attracts so many men today. And in his relationship with Bathsheba, David did display a willingness to accept responsibility for the wrong he committed. In this, David pointed the way to the healing of many relationships today.&lt;br /&gt;We can never study David without realizing how complex human beings are. And how greatly we need the grace, forgiveness, and guidance that can be ours through a personal relationship with David’s God.&lt;br /&gt;DAVID’S RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS CHILDREN&lt;br /&gt;It was not unusual in the ancient Middle East for kings to have a number of children. Nor was it common for kings to be close to their children while they were young. We know that David had a number of sons and daughters (cf. 1 Chron. 3:1–9). We also know that several of David’s children featured in Scripture came to a tragic end.&lt;br /&gt;David’s relationship with Amnon and Tamar (2 Sam. 13). David’s son Amnon developed a consuming lust for his half-sister, David’s daughter Tamar. Amnon feigned illness and asked for Tamar. When Amnon got Tamar alone, he raped her. As soon as he had sex with her, his lust changed to hatred, and he sent her away, weeping bitterly. The text tells us that “when King David heard of all these things, he was very angry” (13:21). But David did nothing.&lt;br /&gt;According to Old Testament law, Amnon should have married Tamar, a marriage she herself suggested before the rape. Surely David, whose relationship with Bathsheba had begun the same way and yet had been healed, could at least have advised his son. Yet rather than deal with the situation, David remained silent. Tamar hid herself in her brother Absalom’s home, and the pain and the anger the rape created festered. David’s failure to act made a tragic situation worse and made resolution impossible. &lt;br /&gt;David’s relationship with Absalom (2 Sam. 13–15). Tamar was the full sister of Absalom, and her rape by Amnon kindled Absalom’s hatred. Absalom waited for two years, pretending to remain Amnon’s friend, and then arranged for Amnon to be assassinated. Absalom then fled to a friendly nation, where he remained in exile for some time. Finally, David was prevailed on to recall Absalom, but even then the king refused to see him. In this, David neither judged Absalom for his fratricide, nor confronted him as Nathan had confronted David, nor forgave him as God had forgiven David.&lt;br /&gt;Nor did David act when Absalom set out on a carefully crafted campaign to win the allegiance of the northern Hebrew tribes. Soon it was too late: Absalom and a group of David’s old advisors led rebel forces into Jerusalem, forcing David to flee. &lt;br /&gt;In the civil war that followed, Absalom was killed, and David wept inconsolably over his son. David had loved Absalom. But David’s failure to deal with the sin contributed to the tragedy and deaths that followed.&lt;br /&gt;David’s relationship with Solomon (1 Chron. 29). Like many a dad whose children go into the family business, David had his doubts about Solomon’s readiness. Near the end of his life David commented in public, “My son Solomon, whom alone God has chosen, is young and inexperienced” (29:1). This may explain in part why David held on to the throne long after he was physically and mentally unable to rule. Even on his death bed David failed to confirm Solomon as his successor until another of his sons, Adonijah, took a chance and attempted to have himself crowned Israel’s ruler. Only then did David act and fulfill his pledge to see Solomon, God’s choice, crowned. &lt;br /&gt;How easy it is to see our children as “young and inexperienced,” never realizing that until we let them step out on their own they will never gain the experience they need. &lt;br /&gt;Yet David’s relationship with Solomon clearly mirrors his relationship with his other children. David was at best a passive parent. David cared deeply but he was never willing to step forward. David neither disciplined nor counseled. He neither confronted nor forgave. David’s inaction seems to have been perceived by David’s children as indifference; an indifference that left them free to cross the boundary between right and wrong.&lt;br /&gt;David’s failures as a father warn us all. More than anything else our children need us to be involved in their lives. They may rebel as they grow up; they may seem to reject our values. But loving involvement gives a father an influential role in shaping a child that detachment never can.&lt;br /&gt;Why did David detach himself from these intimate family matters? Some assume it was the press of great affairs—for David had a kingdom to manage. But I suspect that the underlying reason was David’s earlier failure with Bathsheba, which despite God’s forgiveness and her forgiveness too, robbed him of that moral authority that every parent needs. Seeing his own flaws repeated in his children, David seems to have drawn back, feeling helpless. &lt;br /&gt;DAVID: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;The more closely we examine David’s life, the more we realize how complex an individual David was. On the one hand, David was a mystic, deeply in awe of and in love with God. On the other hand, David was a military genius, a gifted leader. &lt;br /&gt;On the one hand, David was deeply committed to the Lord, so concerned with doing right that he remained loyal to King Saul even when Saul betrayed David again and again. On the other hand, David was a man who casually exploited a woman who loved him, and who surrendered to lust for another man’s wife. &lt;br /&gt;On the one hand, David was consumed with a desire to honor God and to lead his people to worship the Lord. On the other hand, David was a failure as a father; he proved unable to control, guide, or discipline his children. &lt;br /&gt;Perhaps the best we can say of David was that he was a human being, writ large. Both David’s sins and his sanctity come across boldly, so much greater than either our sins or our meager efforts to nurture our relationship with the Lord. And so from David the lessons we can learn are great ones, too.&lt;br /&gt;•     David came to know and love God early in life. The earlier we can introduce our children to God, the more significant their lives will be.&lt;br /&gt;•     David was responsive to God’s self-revelation. David not only wished to honor God; David was eager to know God better and to glorify Him. A passion for the Lord will not keep us from sin by itself, but it will bring us back to Him should we fall.&lt;br /&gt;•     David gave significant attention to worship. If we would know God better, we too will spend time in personal and corporate worship.&lt;br /&gt;•     David’s flaws stand as warnings, signposts erected by God for our benefit. We are not to succumb to lust, nor are we to demean or exploit women. And we are not to withdraw from involvement with our children.&lt;br /&gt;•     Yet David’s sterling qualities also point us toward significant lives. We are to be loyal to God and to others, faithful under persecution, trusting when things go wrong, captivated by the vision of serving God in whatever way He chooses. We are to be ready to confess our sins and quick to turn to the Lord when in need. In these things David can be our example. And for these things we rightly honor him today.&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;ISAAC&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;Genesis 17:19–21; 21:3–12; &lt;br /&gt;22; 24–28; 31; 35&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: 2066 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Isaac [I-zik; “laughing”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;accomplishment: Isaac inherited God’s covenant promises from Abraham and passed them to his son Jacob.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;ISAAC’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Isaac is significant primarily as a transitional figure. He inherited the covenant promises God gave to Abraham, and he passed those promises on to his son Jacob. He is frequently named where the Bible speaks of patriarchs, and for generations the Israelites knew God simply as “the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.”&lt;br /&gt;ISAAC’S LIFE AND TIMES&lt;br /&gt;Isaac lived his life as a nomad in the Promised Land, living in tents, leading his flocks and herds to pasture as the seasons changed, and now and then pausing to plant and harvest grain. By the standards of the time, Isaac was a wealthy person.&lt;br /&gt;Most references to Isaac portray him in a passive role, being acted upon rather than acting. God predicted his birth and gave him his name (Gen. 17:19–21). When Isaac was weaned, his mother insisted that his older half-brother Ishmael be sent away to protect Isaac’s inheritance rights (Gen. 21:3–12). Perhaps as a teenager, his father took Isaac to Mount Horeb where Abraham prepared to offer him as a sacrifice at God’s command (see pages 19–20). When Isaac was forty years of age, his father sent a servant to find a bride for him (Gen. 24). Later when a dispute with local peoples over water rights erupted, Isaac’s response was to move again and again rather than engage in conflict (Gen. 26). And, like his father Abraham, Isaac got his wife Rebekah to pretend they were not married out of fear that he might be killed by a king of the Philistines who desired her (Gen. 26). &lt;br /&gt;Isaac is not known for bold actions or great achievements. Yet, Isaac played a vital role in God’s plan and His calling into being a people through whom He intended to reveal Himself and through whom Christ would come.&lt;br /&gt;EXPLORING ISAAC’S RELATIONSHIPS&lt;br /&gt;The relationships developed in the text are Isaac’s relationships with his family members.&lt;br /&gt;Isaac’s relationship with his wife. The text tells us that Isaac loved Rachel (Gen. 24:67). Certainly she was a strong woman as well as a beautiful one, as displayed in her willingness to leave her homeland for an unknown future with a man she had just met. Yet, the relationship between Rachel and Isaac apparently was not especially close. Each of the two had a favorite son, and Rachel plotted to trick Isaac into giving his blessing to her favorite rather than his. Perhaps Isaac was rigid and unwilling to dialog with his wife, but whatever the reason for Rachel’s actions they suggest that husband and wife were not as close as they might have been.&lt;br /&gt;It is tragic when spouses feel they cannot discuss significant family issues with each other but must go behind one another’s backs to gain a personal “win.”&lt;br /&gt;Isaac’s relationship with his sons. Isaac and Rachel both fell into the trap of having favorites—and favoring them. It may not be humanly possible for a parent not to feel more affection for one child than for others. However it is possible, and right, to refrain from showing favoritism. Isaac liked the outdoorsman Esau, even though he was a materialistic individual with no spiritual sensitivity. Rachel liked the quiet and contemplative Jacob, who felt more comfortable staying near the family tents. How much better it is for parents to praise the strengths of each child rather than to favor the child whose strengths we appreciate most.&lt;br /&gt;Isaac’s relationship with God. Surprisingly, little is said of Isaac’s personal relationship with God. We know that Isaac was a believer who worshiped the Lord (Gen. 26:23–25). Jacob once referred to “the LORD your God” when addressing his father (Gen. 27:20). At the same time nothing in the text suggests that Isaac’s relationship with the Lord was as close as that of his father Abraham.&lt;br /&gt;However, one action indicates that Isaac chose to submit to God’s will despite his own desires. Jacob had come to his blind and aged father, and, pretending to be Esau, tricked Isaac into blessing him. In Old Testament times, this final parental blessing had legal as well as prophetic force. When Esau himself appeared before his father, Isaac realized that Jacob had tricked him. Jacob, whom God had indicated before his birth would be preferred over his older twin Esau, now had the old man’s blessing even though it was stolen. Realizing what had happened, Isaac said, “and indeed he shall be blessed” (Gen. 27:33). This simple statement, seemingly an afterthought, is significant. Isaac accepted that God had chosen Jacob and that his favorite, Esau, had been set aside. At last Isaac was willing to submit to God’s will.&lt;br /&gt;ISAAC: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Isaac reminds us that it’s not necessary for a son to be as great as his father to have a significant role in God’s plan. Nor is it necessary for a father to be as great as his son. In a real way, both his father Abraham and his son Jacob overshadowed Isaac. Even so, we have much to learn from him.&lt;br /&gt;•     Isaac is a model for the quiet among us who neither want nor need the limelight. He reminds us that it is less important to be great than to be faithful and that the apparently insignificant people play a greater role in God’s plan than we imagine.&lt;br /&gt;•     Isaac encourages us to love our wives—but also to share with them. Neither children nor any other thing should be permitted to divide us in our willingness to do God’s will together.&lt;br /&gt;•     Isaac reminds us that it is better to submit to God’s will later than never. Isaac truly favored Esau and loved him much better than he loved Jacob. But Jacob was God’s choice as the one to whom the covenant should pass. In the end, Isaac submitted to God’s will and so decreed, “Indeed, he shall be blessed.”&lt;br /&gt;JACOB&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;Genesis 25–35; 48–49&lt;br /&gt;Romans 9:6–13&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: About 2006–1859 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Jacob [JAY-kuhb; “supplanter”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;accomplishment: Jacob, renamed Israel, fathered the twelve men from whom the Jewish people sprang.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;JACOB’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;It’s tempting to skip over Jacob in our discussion of great men of the Old Testament. Jacob is hardly a savory character. Yet, in God’s economy Jacob fathered twelve sons who are the source of the twelve tribes of Israel, and thus of God’s Old Testament people. Jacob’s significance is reflected in the fact that his names (Jacob, and later Israel) are found 2,549 times in our Bible! &lt;br /&gt;Yet, it simply is because Jacob gave his second name, “Israel,” to a people that his name is mentioned so often. Both Isaac and Jacob are significant primarily because their histories permit us to trace the passage of the covenant God made with Abraham from Abraham to the Jewish people as a whole. The covenant passed from Abraham, to his son Isaac, and then to his son Jacob, whose name was changed to Israel.&lt;br /&gt;In Romans 9, Paul made an important point concerning the passage of the covenant to these sons. Isaac had an older half-brother, Ishmael. Yet the covenant promises were passed to Isaac. Jacob had an older twin brother, Esau. Yet the covenant promises were passed to Jacob, and God decisively rejected Esau. According to the apostle Paul, this demonstrates an important truth. God is Sovereign, and is free to act as He chooses without reference to human conventions. While in ancient culture the older son was to inherit the tangible and intangible property of the father, God saw fit to do things His way. That Jacob was in many ways an unsavory character simply reminds us that the bestowing of God’s gifts do not depend on our righteousness but rather on the grace and unmerited favor of our God.&lt;br /&gt;JACOB’S LIFE AND TIMES&lt;br /&gt;Jacob spent his youth living a nomadic life with his parents and twin brother Esau. A rivalry developed between the two brothers, fostered by the fact that their father favored the outdoorsman, Esau, while their mother favored Jacob. The rivalry and the parents’ favoritism introduced discord and hostility into the family.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob supplanted his brother (Gen. 25:27–34; 27:1–41). In biblical times, the oldest son inherited twice the amount of younger sons, as well as family headship. Despite the fact that Esau was minutes older than Jacob, and thus the eldest, God intended Jacob to inherit the covenant promises He had given to Abraham, which were the family’s true legacy. Rather than be patient and wait for God to work this out in His own way, Jacob took matters into his own hands.&lt;br /&gt;One day when Esau came in from hunting and was hungry, he asked Jacob for some stew Jacob was cooking. Jacob proposed a trade: the stew for Esau’s birthright. Esau’s easy acquiescence showed how little concern he had for spiritual things; Jacob’s proposal showed how little Jacob cared for integrity. &lt;br /&gt;Years later, when Isaac felt that his death was near, he determined to bless his boys. In that era, the “blessing” of a father had the force of a will and was also thought to fix the future of the sons he blessed. When his wife Rebekah learned that Isaac intended to give his blessing to Esau, Rebekah urged Jacob to pretend to be his brother. Jacob deceived the now blind Isaac, who gave Jacob the blessing he had intended for Esau. When Isaac learned what had happened, he bowed to God’s will and confirmed passage of the covenant promise and other blessings to Jacob. &lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Jacob’s offer to trade his stew for Esau’s birthright provides significant insight into the character of each.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Rebekah and Jacob’s deceit gained their objective but at a terrible cost. Esau now hated his brother and planned to kill Jacob when their father died. When Rebekah learned what Esau intended to do, she sent Jacob away, ostensibly to obtain a bride from her own family back in Haran. Little did Rebekah realize when she plotted with Jacob that once her best loved son left home, she would never see him again. Jacob was gone from Canaan for twenty years, during which time his mother died.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob in Haran (Gen. 28–31). In Haran Jacob located his uncle Laban’s family. There he fell deeply in love with Laban’s younger daughter, Rachel. However in Laban, Jacob found his match as a trickster. Lacking a dowry, Jacob promised to work for Laban for seven years for Rachel. Documents from the period show that an exchange of service in place of the payment of money as a bride price was not unusual. But at the wedding Laban substituted Rachel’s older sister Leah. When dawn came, Jacob discovered the trick, and stormed out to confront his uncle. The slippery Laban made excuses, and Jacob was forced to work an additional seven years for Rachel. &lt;br /&gt;With this obligation met, Laban, realizing that God had blessed him because of Jacob, worked out other agreements to keep Jacob in his employ. To Jacob’s frustration Laban kept changing the terms of the agreement. Jacob learned by experience the frustration his brother Esau must have felt when Jacob tricked Esau! Finally, after twenty years, God directed Jacob to return to the promised land.&lt;br /&gt;The journey home (Gen. 32–35). During his years in Haran, Jacob had sired eleven boys and one girl, and through God’s intervention had gained large flocks and herds. On his way home, Jacob was terrified of the possible reaction of his brother, Esau. Jacob sent gifts of sheep and cattle on ahead to pacify his brother. When Esau met Jacob, however, he greeted him gladly. During the years Jacob was away, Esau had become rich. To Esau, the original “material man,” all he had ever cared about were material possessions. Since he was now wealthy, Esau cared nothing about Jacob’s possession of God’s covenant promises.&lt;br /&gt;The Genesis text tells us of several adventures of Jacob’s family in Canaan, but the essence of the story is that Jacob was again in the land that God had promised to Abraham and his offspring. There Jacob was content to live a nomadic lifestyle as his father and grandfather before him.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob’s great tragedy (Gen. 37). For many years Jacob’s great love, Rachel, had remained childless. Finally she had a son, Joseph, who became his father’s favorite. Just as favoritism had ruined the harmony of Jacob’s childhood family, so the favoritism he now showed toward Joseph destroyed his happiness. Jacob’s other sons grew to resent Joseph. They plotted to kill him, but instead sold him as a slave to traders bound for Egypt. They then took Joseph’s distinctive coat, sprinkled it with goat’s blood, and let Jacob conclude that wild animals had killed his son.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob’s resettlement to Egypt (Gen. 39–50). Jacob mourned for years for his lost son, never dreaming that Joseph was alive and had risen to head the government of Egypt. When a famine struck Canaan, and Joseph’s brothers went to Egypt to buy grain, the family was reunited. Jacob and the seventy-five members of his clan were welcomed in Egypt, where their offspring remained for several hundred years, multiplying to a population of some two million persons.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob ended his life in Egypt, content to be reunited with Joseph and Joseph’s two sons. But when Jacob died his body was returned to Canaan, and he was buried there beside Abraham and Sarah, with his parents Isaac and Rebekah, and his wife Leah.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;ESAU: THE MATERIALISTIC MAN&lt;br /&gt;Jacob and Esau were twins, but they were quite different individuals. We rightly criticize Jacob for defrauding and cheating Esau of his birthright; yet we need to be aware of Esau’s total indifference to spiritual realities. &lt;br /&gt;The “birthright” in ancient times was the right of the eldest son to leadership of the family, to the bulk of the tangible and to all of the intangible family assets. Isaac’s intangible asset was the covenant of promise God had given to Abraham and his descendants. When the hungry Esau readily traded this birthright for a bowl of Jacob’s stew, he showed his contempt for spiritual realities and for God. Esau was a truly material man; for him this world of sight and touch and taste and feel was all that counted.&lt;br /&gt;Later, after Jacob stole Esau’s blessing by tricking their father Isaac, Esau planned to murder his brother. Esau was angry with his brother for defrauding him, but what moved Esau to consider murder was the fear that Jacob would now take possession of the bulk of the family’s wealth.&lt;br /&gt;Years later, when Jacob returned to Canaan from the land to which he had fled from Esau’s wrath, Esau met his brother graciously. The threat to Esau’s wealth had not materialized; Esau had in fact taken possession of their father’s entire estate! Esau’s remark, “I have enough, my brother” (Gen. 33:9) explains his lack of rancor. All Esau had ever wanted was to be wealthy in this world’s goods. And Esau, the material man, was wealthy indeed. Jacob could keep God’s covenant promises, and even keep the little flocks and herds he had offered as a gift to win his brother’s favor. Since Jacob did not ask the one-third of the family estate to which he was entitled, Esau could afford to be generous! &lt;br /&gt;How tragic is the fate of the materialistic man. Like Esau, he may gain wealth beyond his dreams. But like Esau, he will never grasp the significance of the spiritual and will enter eternity as a truly poor man. &lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;EXPLORING JACOB’S RELATIONSHIPS&lt;br /&gt;Jacob’s relationship with God. The biblical text traces the development of Jacob’s personal relationship with God.&lt;br /&gt;God’s choice of Jacob (Gen. 25:19–26). The apostle Paul made it clear that Jacob was God’s choice to inherit the covenant promises. This choice was announced to his mother, Rebekah, before Jacob’s birth. The apostle drew an important lesson from this fact. He wrote in Romans 9:10 that “when Rebecca also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac (for the children not yet being born, nor having done anything good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls).” Paul’s point is simply that God’s choice of Jacob did not depend on what Jacob had done or would do, or on Jacob’s character. God was and is free to choose. And, when He chooses, God intends to do us good, no matter how flawed our nature might be. &lt;br /&gt;God was involved in Jacob’s life before Jacob was born as He is in ours.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob’s desire for Esau’s birthright (Gen. 25:29–34). It would be wrong to suppose at this point that Jacob had a conscious personal relationship with God. What Jacob did have was enough faith to see the value of the spiritual. In this he contrasts with Esau, to whom the notion of a spiritual realm beyond what he could see and taste and feel seemed nonsense. Today, too, some seem more aware of and open to the spiritual, while others are utter materialists who are blind to every spiritual reality. How important it is to cultivate spiritual sensitivity, for such may prove to be the door though which God enters our life.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob’s initial meeting with God (Gen. 28:10–22). When Jacob was forced to flee from his home he had an experience with God at a site he named Bethel [“house of God”]. In a dream, Jacob saw angels passing back and forth between heaven and earth. The vision stunned Jacob, and before he left the next morning he made a pledge:&lt;br /&gt;If God will be with me, and keep me in this way that I am going, and give me bread to eat and clothing to put on, so that I come back to my father’s house in peace, then the Lord shall be my God (Gen. 28:20).&lt;br /&gt;For Jacob, this was a first step in welcoming God into his life. Like our own first steps, this one seems to have been taken for selfish reasons. Jacob was willing to commit himself to the Lord in exchange for protection, food, clothing, and a safe return home. One day, Jacob would learn that the greatest benefit of any relationship with the Lord is His presence and that the greatest reason to seek Him is to praise and enjoy Him forever. But for now, this was as far as Jacob could see. &lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Jacob’s vision of angels at Bethel convinced him to trust himself and his future to the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;This first step was acceptable to the Lord, even as our first faltering steps of faith are acceptable to Him.&lt;br /&gt;God’s intervention on Jacob’s behalf (Gen. 30:25–43). During the years that Jacob worked for Laban, God blessed Jacob’s every effort. Laban was becoming rich! &lt;br /&gt;When Laban schemed to defraud Jacob, God taught Jacob how to transfer much of Laban’s wealth in herds to himself, while always dealing honestly with his uncle. In time, Laban and his sons saw their wealth dwindle and Jacob’s wealth increase. At that point, God told Jacob it was time to return to the Promised Land.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob prayed to God (Gen. 32:1–12). Despite his fear of Esau, Jacob set out for home. When he reached the borders of Canaan, Jacob saw an encampment of angels waiting to accompany him home. Despite this vision, Jacob was afraid. He took all the precautions humanly possible to secure his family should Esau attack, and then turned to prayer. Jacob’s prayer showed a maturity and spiritual depth lacking in his early years.&lt;br /&gt;I am not worthy of the least of all the mercies and the truth which You have shown Your servant; for I crossed over this Jordan with my staff, and now I have become two companies. Deliver me, I pray, from the hand of my brother, from the hand of Esau; for I fear him, lest he come and attack me and the mother with the children. For You said, “I will surely treat you well, and make your descendants as the sand of the sea, which cannot be numbered for multitude” (Gen. 32:10–12).&lt;br /&gt;This prayer demonstrated an appreciation for the Lord and a reliance on His promises of which Jacob was not capable earlier in his life.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob wrestled with God (Gen. 32:22–32). That night, Jacob sent his herds and family across the river while he remained behind. There he wrestled with a “Man” whom Jacob identified as a theophany— a pre-incarnation appearance of God in human form. Jacob refused to release his hold on his supernatural opponent, and the Lord blessed Jacob and changed his name to Israel. The nature of this encounter remains a mystery, but the new name God gave Jacob echoed throughout Old Testament history.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob/Israel’s mature faith (Gen. 48:15–16). The last incident in which we gain a sense of Jacob’s relationship with God occurred in Egypt. Jacob was near death, and he called for his sons and grandchildren. He blessed Joseph’s two sons, and said:&lt;br /&gt;God, before whom my fathers Abraham and Isaac walked,&lt;br /&gt;The God who has fed me all my life long to this day,&lt;br /&gt;The Angel who has redeemed me from all evil,&lt;br /&gt;Bless the lads. (Gen. 48:15, 16)&lt;br /&gt;To Joseph he said, “Behold, I am dying, but God will be with you and bring you back to the land of your fathers” (Gen. 48:21).&lt;br /&gt;Jacob, who began life relying on tricks and on his wits to gain spiritual ends, had finally come to the place where he acknowledged God’s hand in all, and where he encouraged his son to wait, trustingly, on the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;It took a long journey to bring Jacob/Israel to this point. May you and I accomplish that journey from self-reliance to complete reliance on God more quickly.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob’s relationship with his wives (Gen. 29, 30). Jacob had children by four women. Two were wives, Rachel and Leah. The other two, Bildad and Zilpah, were surrogates forced on Jacob by the two wives in a competition to give their husband sons. Little is said of the impact of this arrangement on Jacob, but the text reveals much about its impact on the women. [For a study of that impact, see the companion book in this series, Every Woman in the Bible.] &lt;br /&gt;Clearly, Jacob had a deep and abiding love for Rachel, and just as clearly, Jacob put up with, but did not love, Leah. We sense Leah’s pain in the names she gave her sons, names that reflect her dwindling hope to win her husband’s affection.&lt;br /&gt;Reuben: “now therefore, my husband will love me” (29:32)&lt;br /&gt;Simeon: “because the Lord has heard I am unloved” (29:33)&lt;br /&gt;Levi: “now this time my husband will become attached to me” (29:34).&lt;br /&gt;At last, Leah realized that whatever she did, her husband would never truly care for her, so she named her next son Judah: “Now I will praise the Lord.”&lt;br /&gt;We can sense something of the pressure on Jacob that his wives’ competition for sons caused. But the real tragedy is that in this polygamous family one wife was loved and the other unloved, and the two slave girls the wives forced on Jacob were treated as objects, with no say in what happened to them.&lt;br /&gt;For those who imagine that God’s intent that marriage involve one man and one woman somehow limits human beings, a study of Jacob and his wives is revealing indeed. How tragic for the man who seeks relationships with many women, to be deprived of the blessings of growing toward oneness with his wife. And how tragic for the women, to be in a relationship which at best depersonalizes and devalues them as human beings.&lt;br /&gt;Jacob’s relationship with Esau. See the sketch of Esau on pages 70–71.&lt;br /&gt;JACOB: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Jacob is honored as one of the patriarchs through whom God’s covenant promises were transmitted to His Old Testament people, the Jews. In a sense Jacob is most significant as a conduit of both revelation and grace. &lt;br /&gt;At the same time, Jacob’s experiences can teach us much about ourselves and our relationship with God. How clearly we see in Jacob our own tendency to take matters into our own hands, even when God has promised to act in His own time. How clearly we see our own willingness to cut corners when we think it will bring us closer to some goal. Yet Jacob also reminds us of our potential for spiritual growth and transformation. If we are spiritually sensitive and value a relationship with God, as Jacob did, God will speak to our open hearts. God will graciously and gradually work within us, until like Jacob we reach a point in which we have learned to value grace.&lt;br /&gt;What specific lessons can we learn from Jacob?&lt;br /&gt;•     Jacob teaches us to look past material gain and value the spiritual. We must never lose sight of the fact that God is there and that the reality He inhabits is far more important than the shadow world we know through our senses.&lt;br /&gt;•     Jacob reminds us that God intends to correct our character flaws. Often, He does this by making us victims of the same kind of hurt we inflict on others. God is not willing to leave His chosen ones unchanged. We can correct ourselves. Or He will correct us.&lt;br /&gt;•     Jacob reminds us that the purpose we serve is greater than we are. Jacob was the conduit through which God intended to bless the world. That God uses us to bless others is far more important than that we live happy and prosperous lives.&lt;br /&gt;•     Jacob’s life journey reminds us that God never deserts His own. God was with Jacob before Jacob knew him. He ventured with Jacob on all his travels. He stayed close to Jacob as his life drew to an end. There is no place we can go, no time we can inhabit, where God is absent. His presence is, and will ever remain, our hope.&lt;br /&gt;JOSEPH&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;Genesis 37–50; Acts 7:9–18; &lt;br /&gt;Hebrews 11:22&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: About 1880 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Joseph [JOH-suhf; “may God add”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;achievement: Joseph rose to become vizier of Egypt and preserved the Israelites by settling his family there.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;JOSEPH’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Joseph played a vital role in the preservation of the Hebrew people. His little family lived in Canaan, the land bridge and buffer between the great powers of the north and Egypt in the south, and Canaan frequently became a battleground. There was no way the Israelites could have built the population needed to inhabit the Promised Land had God’s people remained in Canaan. But resettled by Joseph in one of the richest of Egypt’s agricultural areas, the Hebrew people multiplied greatly. Despite being later enslaved by the Egyptians, the sojourn in Egypt was an essential part of God’s plan for fulfilling his promise to Abraham, “I will make you a great nation” (Gen. 12:2).&lt;br /&gt;Joseph is also one of the most attractive of Old Testament characters. He maintained a steadfast trust in God, and despite suffering unjustly, he consistently made choices that honored the Lord. Some have suggested that Joseph is the single most Christlike figure in the Old Testament, a man whose life mirrors that of our Lord in significant ways.&lt;br /&gt;JOSEPH’S LIFE AND TIMES&lt;br /&gt;Joseph’s early years (Gen. 37). Joseph was the son of Jacob and of Rachel, Jacob’s best-loved wife. Unfortunately, his father showed him such obvious favoritism that Joseph’s brothers resented him deeply. Joseph seems to have been naively unaware of their jealousy. When Joseph related two dreams that suggested that one day his parents and his brothers would bow down to him, he only deepened their animosity. While Joseph was still a teenager, his brothers sold him to merchants traveling to Egypt. &lt;br /&gt;Joseph’s suffering in Egypt (Gen. 39–40). In Egypt, Joseph was sold to a high official named Potiphar. Joseph soon became Potiphar’s most trusted agent and was put in charge of his estate. When Potiphar’s wife falsely accused Joseph of attempting to rape her, Potiphar imprisoned Joseph. In prison, Joseph’s organizational gifts and trustworthiness again led to advancement. Soon he became the warden’s agent, and ran the prison. This prison housed the king’s prison, and when two high officials of the royal court were housed there, Joseph correctly interpreted their dreams. As Joseph had predicted, one official was hanged, while the other was restored to his office. Two years later when Pharaoh had disquieting dreams no one could interpret, the official whose dream Joseph had explained told Pharaoh about him. &lt;br /&gt;Several things are significant about the decade or more during which Joseph lived first as a slave and later as a convict. First, Joseph made the most of his opportunities. Rather than become despondent, Joseph went to work. There is no better way to prepare for great things than to be faithful in small things.&lt;br /&gt;Second, Joseph remained committed to God and godliness. We see this in Joseph’s response to Potiphar’s wife’s attempts to seduce him: “How then can I do this great wickedness, and sin against God” (39:9). It’s all too tempting, when life treats us unfairly, to take detours into sin. Joseph maintained his integrity through it all.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;The symbols of office with which Pharaoh invested Joseph were those traditionally worn by the vizier of Egypt, as shown on ancient reliefs.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Joseph’s exaltation as second ruler of Egypt (Gen. 41). God showed Joseph the meaning of Pharaoh’s disquieting dreams. Joseph explained that Egypt would experience seven years of abundant crops, followed by seven years of famine. Joseph advised Pharaoh to prepare for the famine by storing grain during the seven good years. Pharaoh, impressed by the dream interpretation and the advice, made Joseph “second ruler” in Egypt. The symbols of Joseph’s office described in Genesis 41:42 can be seen in wall paintings from the era. They suggest that Joseph was made vizier of Egypt, the highest administrative position in the kingdom. Applying the organizational skills he had developed in Potiphar’s house and in the king’s prison, Joseph set out energetically to prepare Egypt for the coming famine.&lt;br /&gt;Joseph’s reunion with his family (Gen. 42–46). When the famine struck, the entire Middle East was affected. Jacob sent his sons to Egypt to purchase grain so the family might survive. On each of their two trips they met with Joseph, but did not recognize him. Finally Joseph revealed himself, and wept with happiness. He forgave his brothers and invited the whole family to settle in Egypt. &lt;br /&gt;The review in Acts 7 of Joseph’s life reminds us that while Joseph is a fascinating individual, what is truly significant is the role Joseph played in God’s plan. Joseph clearly understood this plan. Joseph explained his gracious attitude toward the brothers who had sold him into slavery by saying, “As for you, you meant evil against me; but God meant it for good, in order to bring it about as it is this day, to save many people alive” (Gen. 50:20). &lt;br /&gt;EXPLORING JOSEPH’S RELATIONSHIPS&lt;br /&gt;The most significant relationship in the Joseph story is that which he had with his brothers. Joseph’s relationships with his brothers was complex, even though he was with them only during his youth and later as ruler of Egypt.&lt;br /&gt;Joseph’s early relationship with his brothers (Gen. 37). As a child and young teen, Joseph basked in his father’s affection. He was dad’s favorite and accepted the love lavished on him as his due. Not surprisingly, Joseph was naively unaware of the effect this obvious affection had on his older brothers. Joseph hardly understood how his brothers would feel when he related dreams that suggested he would be exalted above his parents as well as them. &lt;br /&gt;But the dreams made his brothers even more hostile toward him. The hostility was so great that one day when Joseph was sent to find his brothers and their flocks, the brothers decided to kill Joseph. Instead of such drastic action, Joseph’s brother Judah suggested that he be sold to a caravan of Ishmaelite merchants. Later, they led their father to believe wild beasts had killed Joseph. &lt;br /&gt;When the brothers saw how utterly devastated their father Jacob was, they were sorry. By then, it was too late. In the coming years, witnessing their father’s unresolved grief deeply troubled their consciences. But their sorrow—or ours over the wrong choices we make—could never repair the damage caused by their sin.&lt;br /&gt;Joseph’s later relationship with his brothers (Gen. 42–50). Joseph immediately recognized his brothers years later when ten of them came to Egypt to buy grain. &lt;br /&gt;The first trip to Egypt (Gen. 42). When Joseph’s brothers arrived in Egypt they failed to recognize him. Joseph at first accused them of being spies, and questioned them closely. Joseph had a younger full brother, Benjamin, who had remained in Canaan. He demanded that they bring Benjamin to him.&lt;br /&gt;The brothers, deeply disturbed and unaware that Joseph could understand their language, exclaimed that the present disaster was a just consequence of their wickedness in selling Joseph into slavery. Joseph kept Simeon in Egypt, but gave the others grain and sent them home. First, however Joseph had the silver they had paid him slipped into their grain sacks. When the money was later discovered, the brothers were terrified, saying, “What is this that God has done to us?” (Gen. 42:28).&lt;br /&gt;The second trip to Egypt (Gen. 43). When the purchased grain was gone the brothers simply had to return to Egypt, the only source of food in the region. Joseph welcomed his brothers, told them not to worry about the money they had found in their sacks, fed them, and sent them away. But this time Joseph had his staff hide a valuable cup in the sacks carried by Benjamin’s donkey. Joseph’s men then pursued the brothers, found the sack, and brought them back to Joseph. When Joseph threatened to keep Benjamin as a slave, Judah begged Joseph to enslave him in place of Benjamin, pleading that their father could not survive the loss. “He alone is left of his mother’s children,” Judah pled, “and his father loves him” (Gen. 44:20; see v. 31). This selfless act by Judah, who was willing to give up his own freedom and family, is in striking contrast to the earlier actions of the brothers. (Judah was also the one who had suggested selling Joseph into slavery instead of killing him.) &lt;br /&gt;At this, Joseph could no longer restrain himself. He revealed himself to his brothers, weeping and hugging them, and urging them to bring their father to Egypt where Joseph would provide for them all.&lt;br /&gt;Many have wondered about Joseph’s motives in testing his brothers as he did. Was he simply taking revenge? Or did he have another reason? Knowing Joseph, we must assume that his motive was honorable. Joseph wanted to know his brothers’ hearts before making himself known. Their actions revealed their hearts. On their first visit, Joseph learned that they still felt guilt for what they had done to him. On the second visit Joseph saw in his brother Judah’s actions an inner transformation that was wonderful indeed. By the time Joseph revealed himself to his brothers, he knew that he could trust them at last!&lt;br /&gt;Forgiveness is a wonderful thing. But often it is not enough to heal a relationship. The person who is offered forgiveness must be repentant, willing to acknowledge his fault and ready to accept the gift offered to him. Joseph’s “tests” revealed that his brothers truly were ready to receive what Joseph had always been willing to extend—a full and complete forgiveness which put the past behind and restored trust and confidence for the future.&lt;br /&gt;Perhaps it is this grace of forgiveness that most reminds us of Christ and makes Joseph a Christlike figure. Both Joseph and Jesus were treated unjustly by their own people. Both suffered great loss. Both were later exalted to a position of power. Both, through their suffering, were enabled to deliver their loved ones from certain death. And both chose to forgive.&lt;br /&gt;JOSEPH: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Joseph is one of the few—and perhaps the only—biblical character who seems to have had no flaw. His actions as a young teen that so provoked his brothers reflect a certain naïveté, not arrogance. His behavior in the house of Potiphar, his industriousness and integrity, are beyond rebuke. As the second most powerful man in Egypt, Joseph selflessly dedicated himself to the well being of that land. And, as an abused brother, Joseph showed such grace in forgiving those who had injured him that we cannot help comparing him with Jesus Christ. No wonder we have much to learn from Joseph, one of the truly godly men of the Old Testament.&lt;br /&gt;•     Joseph teaches us to seek excellence in whatever situation we may find ourselves. What we achieve in life’s small things will train and equip us for the greater challenges ahead.&lt;br /&gt;•     Joseph teaches us to live morally pure lives. We, too, live in a world filled with temptations. Keeping ourselves pure honors God and shows respect for others.&lt;br /&gt;•     Joseph teaches us to maintain a positive attitude when treated unfairly. Others often abused Joseph, but he never gave in to despair. He continued to do his best in every circumstance, and in so doing, he prepared himself for the future God had in mind.&lt;br /&gt;•     Joseph reminds us that while it is divine to forgive, we must also be wise in our relationship with those who have harmed us. We are always to be willing to forgive, but this does not mean we must foolishly trust ourselves to others who have proven untrust-worthy before. Joseph’s test of his brothers’ character was not undertaken to help him decide whether they were worthy of forgiveness, but rather to determine whether they were worthy of trust.&lt;br /&gt;•     Joseph reminds us that fulfilling God’s purpose in our lives is more significant than our experiences along the way. Many Christians have suffered for God’s greater good, and found joy in doing so. We need to look beyond ourselves—beyond our own wants and desires–and take satisfaction in serving Him.&lt;br /&gt;•     Joseph reminds us of the wonder of forgiveness and its healing power. As God has forgiven us, so we are to forgive others, freely and completely. To the extent that others will receive the forgiveness we offer, the hurts of both culprit and victim can be heale&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;NATHAN&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;2 Samuel 7, 12; 1 Kings 1; &lt;br /&gt;1 Chronicles 17, 29&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: About 1000 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Nathan [NAY-thuhn; “gift”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;accomplishment: Nathan served as court prophet to King David.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;NATHAN’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;We know little about Nathan’s origins or background. When we first meet him, Nathan is already serving in the royal court, delivering God’s messages to King David. Nathan announced the Davidic covenant in which God promised to confirm David’s family line as the royal line in Israel and which would ultimately produce a King who would rule Israel forever. Nathan also confronted David after he sinned with Bathsheba and brought about David’s repentance. And, when David was near death, Nathan rallied Solomon’s supporters and made sure that Solomon succeeded David as king. On each of these occasions, Nathan’s ministry helped shape Old Testament history.&lt;br /&gt;Nathan clearly portrays the challenging role of the Old Testament prophet. Old Testament prophets most often delivered God’s message to kings. While some prophets like Ezekiel ministered primarily to the people, most were sent by God to guide or to confront the rulers of His people. While a few kings, like David, heeded the prophets sent to them, most rulers rejected the message and persecuted the prophet. &lt;br /&gt;The relationship between David and Nathan shows us the ideal: prophet and king function together to carry out God’s will.&lt;br /&gt;EXPLORING NATHAN’S RELATIONSHIPS&lt;br /&gt;Nathan was court prophet, and his primary relationship was with King David. Each of three major incidents involving the two men reveal much about their characters.&lt;br /&gt;Nathan reported God’s promise (2 Sam. 7; 1 Chron. 17). When David had defeated all the surrounding nations and Israel was at peace, David told Nathan his dream of building a temple for the Lord. At first, Nathan encouraged the king. But that night “the word of the Lord came to Nathan” (2 Sam. 7:4). The prophet had to return and tell David that he was not allowed to build a temple, but that God would build David a “house”—a permanent dynasty.&lt;br /&gt;Any disappointment David felt at being denied the privilege of constructing a temple was swallowed up in his joy and wonder at God’s promise. David accepted Nathan’s message as the very word of God Himself. David had such confidence in Nathan that he trusted his words completely.&lt;br /&gt;Nathan confronted David (2 Sam. 12). David had sinned with Bathsheba and had arranged for the death of her husband. He had then married Bathsheba. For some time afterward David lived with these sins, although Psalm 32 suggests that he suffered intense guilt. God sent Nathan to confront David. Nathan told David a story of a wealthy man who had taken a poor man’s only lamb to feed a guest. David was furious over the injustice. (Like us, David found it far easier to be angry over another’s sins than his own!) Nathan than denounced David, saying, “You are the man!” and delivering the Lord’s blunt and harsh condemnation (12:7–12).&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Nathan fulfilled a major role of Old Testament prophets when he confronted David concerning David’s sin.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;David immediately confessed to Nathan: “I have sinned against the LORD.”&lt;br /&gt;The incident tells us much about the courage it took to serve as a prophet in any royal court. Court prophets were charged not only with delivering good news but also with confronting men who had the power to punish or even kill them. In this case, we are amazed by Nathan’s boldness, for his message was harsh indeed. But we are also impressed by David’s reaction. David immediately humbled himself and confessed his sin. God’s Word through the prophet had its intended effect.&lt;br /&gt;All too often, as we read the Old Testament we meet rulers who ignored the words of God’s prophets or who tried to kill the prophets. While Nathan models the ministry of prophets in the royal court, David models the appropriate response of kings to the messages delivered by God’s spokespersons.&lt;br /&gt;Nathan acted to preserve Solomon’s rights (1 Kings 1). When David was near death one of his sons attempted to usurp the throne. Nathan, aware of God’s intent that Solomon succeed David, acted. He enlisted the help of Bathsheba and others and appealed to the king to crown Solomon immediately. &lt;br /&gt;In this Nathan was not acting as a prophet but rather as an ordinary man who had been a trusted associate of the king. Through his years with David, Nathan had become a trusted advisor as well as a respected spokesman for God.&lt;br /&gt;The respect that Nathan showed David, as revealed in the dialog in this chapter, makes it clear that Nathan did not confuse the roles of prophet and adviser. Too many of us would have presumed on our calling by God and, puffed up by our own importance, would have expected the king to give the same weight to our words as to God’s. But not Nathan; he was aware that while he was a prophet he was also an ordinary man.&lt;br /&gt;NATHAN: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Nathan was able to live near the center of power and remain uncorrupted. His close relationship with David was not only displayed in the incidents noted above, but Nathan also helped David reorganize Israel’s worship (1 Chron. 29:25). Nathan also wrote a book, now lost, that may have been used to compile the record of David’s life found in 2 Samuel and 1 Chronicles. Throughout his years in David’s court, Nathan was utterly faithful to God, while at the same time being a loyal supporter and friend of David the king. &lt;br /&gt;•     Nathan reminds us that to be a true friend we need to be as willing to confront as to encourage.&lt;br /&gt;•     Nathan reminds us that we need to be willing to speak out for God even when that course might involve risk.&lt;br /&gt;•     Nathan reminds us to remain humble, especially when we have been given spiritual gifts that others recognize and honor. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;ELIJAH&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;1 Kings 17–19; 2 Kings 1–2; &lt;br /&gt;Malachi 4; Matthew 11, 17; &lt;br /&gt;Mark 9; Luke 1, 4, 9; &lt;br /&gt;John 1; James 5:17&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: About 875 b.c. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Elijah [ee-LI-juh; “Yahweh is my God”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;accomplishment: Elijah checked the efforts of evil King Ahab and his wife Jezebel to replace the worship of Yahweh with worship of Baal in the northern Hebrew kingdom.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;ELIJAH’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Elijah lived at a critical time in the history of the northern kingdom, Israel. From its origin in 930 B.C., Israel had been ruled by kings who refused to submit to God’s will. The first ruler of the north, Jeroboam I, had designed a counterfeit worship system to keep his citizens from going to Jerusalem, the capital of the southern kingdom, Judah, to worship. In the 850s, King Ahab, encouraged by his wife Jezebel, initiated an active campaign to wipe out the worship of Yahweh in Israel and replace it with worship of Baal. Jezebel had imported some 850 pagan prophets from her homeland and at the same time had set out to exterminate any prophets of the Lord who remained in Israel. It was then that Elijah appeared, and demonstrated the power of the Lord first by bringing a three-and-a-half-year drought that devastated Israel, and then by defeating 450 prophets of Baal in a contest on Mount Carmel. The outcome was that the people of Israel, who had been wavering, affirmed that “the LORD, He is God!” (1 Kings 18:39). The efforts of Ahab and Jezebel were stymied, and while the counterfeit religious system existing in Israel was not changed, the Israelites were turned back to the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;This confrontational ministry of Elijah and its great national impact serve in Scripture as a model for the ministry of a prophet predicted in Malachi 4:5–6. &lt;br /&gt;Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet &lt;br /&gt;Before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;And he will turn &lt;br /&gt;The hearts of the fathers to the children,&lt;br /&gt;And the hearts of the children to their fathers,&lt;br /&gt;Lest I come and strike the earth with a curse.&lt;br /&gt;Elijah and the Malachi prophecy are referred to frequently in the Gospels. A prophet with an Elijah-like ministry (or, some say, Elijah himself!) will appear before the Messiah sets up His kingdom. John the Baptist had this kind of ministry, but Israel did not respond, and so the Elijah prophecy was not fulfilled in John. &lt;br /&gt;James 5 also contains a significant reference to Elijah. James encouraged his readers to pray and declared that “Elijah was a man with a nature like ours, and he prayed earnestly that it would not rain; and it did not rain on the land for three years and six months. And he prayed again, and the heaven gave rain, and the earth produced its fruit” (James 5:17–18). The inspired author focused on two matters: Elijah’s humanity and his prayer. &lt;br /&gt;EXPLORING ELIJAH’S RELATIONSHIPS&lt;br /&gt;Elijah’s relationship with Israel’s rulers (1 Kings 17–19; 2 Kings 1). Elijah dealt with rulers who were utterly hostile to God and thus to him. Four incidents illustrate the antagonism that existed between the rulers and God’s prophet.&lt;br /&gt;Elijah announced a drought (1 Kings 17). God sent Elijah to Ahab to announce that for three years there would be neither rain nor dew in Israel. For those three years the prophet was hidden from the king, who searched for him as the land withered under the drought. Ahab had the largest chariot army in the region, and he was unable to find provisions for his horses.&lt;br /&gt;Elijah proposed a test (1 Kings 18). After three and a half years, God sent Elijah to confront Ahab again. Elijah proposed a test of God’s power versus Baal’s power. Ahab, who seems actually to have had some confidence in Baal’s powers, agreed. For hours, the prophets of Baal called on their deity with no response. But as soon as Elijah prayed, fire fell from heaven and consumed the offering Elijah had laid out. The people, who had been wavering, were convinced. At Elijah’s words, the people killed the prophets of Baal. Elijah then prayed for rain, and the drought was broken.&lt;br /&gt;Elijah pronounced Ahab’s doom (1 Kings 21). Ahab’s wife Jezebel arranged the judicial murder of Naboth, a man whose vineyard Ahab coveted. Although Ahab had not conspired to commit the murder, he gladly went down to inspect the property when Jezebel told him what she had done. Elijah confronted Ahab there, and announced God’s judgment on the wicked pair. Ahab put on sackcloth, fasted, and wept to demonstrate his repentance. God put off the punishment He decreed on Ahab’s dynasty. Later the king ignored the warning of another prophet and was killed in battle.&lt;br /&gt;Elijah announced the death of Ahaziah, Ahab’s son and successor (2 Kings 1). When King Ahaziah was injured, he sent messengers to inquire of a foreign deity whether he would survive. Elijah intercepted the messengers and announced that since Ahaziah had not seen fit to inquire of the Lord, he would surely die. The king sent several troops of soldiers to bring Elijah to him. Elijah called down fire from heaven on two of the companies, but when the captain of the third squad showed respect for the Lord and His power, God told Elijah to accompany them to the king. &lt;br /&gt;In each of these situations Elijah was called to a ministry of judgment. Each placed Elijah in potential danger at the hands of a hostile king. Yet, Elijah faithfully carried out each mission and was protected by the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;Elijah’s relationship with Elisha (1 Kings 19:19–21; 2 Kings 2). Near the end of his ministry Elijah became despondent and discouraged. It seemed to him that everyone had abandoned the Lord. At this point, God selected Elisha as a companion and an apprentice for Elijah. &lt;br /&gt;When God took Elijah into heaven, Elisha became the premier prophet in Israel. While Elijah’s ministry had been one of confrontation and judgment—as demonstrated in the miracles attributed to him—Elisha benefited from his predecessor’s impact on the average Israelite. Elisha’s ministry was marked by miracles that aided both the nation and godly individuals.&lt;br /&gt;Elijah’s relationship with the Lord (1 Kings 19). When we read of Elijah’s accomplishments, he comes across as a fierce and fearless individual. Whatever God called Elijah to do, he did boldly. Yet, James reminded us that Elijah was a “man with a nature like ours” (James 5:17). &lt;br /&gt;God provided for Elijah (1 Kings 17). During the years of drought when Elijah was hiding from Ahab, God provided for him in supernatural ways. Ravens provided his food by the brook Cherith, and later God miraculously extended the supply of food of a widow with whom Elijah stayed. &lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Elijah’s victory on Mount Carmel convinced the wavering Israelites that the Lord truly was God.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;God ministered to a despondent Elijah (1 Kings 19). Elijah’s humanity came through most clearly after his victory on Mount Carmel. When Jezebel heard that Elijah had ordered the prophets of Baal killed, the queen sent a death threat to the prophet. Elijah was terrified, and ran for his life.&lt;br /&gt;While terror gripped Elijah, the Lord supplied him with the strength he needed to flee. Finally exhausted after a forty-day journey, Elijah stopped running at Mount Sinai [called Horeb here]. God spoke to him there, and Elijah shared his despair:&lt;br /&gt;“I have been very zealous for the LORD God of hosts; for the children of Israel have forsaken Your covenant, torn down Your altars, and killed Your prophets with the sword. I alone am left; and they seek to take my life” (1 Kings 19:10).&lt;br /&gt;Often emotional highs are followed by emotional lows. This was surely Elijah’s experience. In the grip of depression, Elijah could not see matters clearly.&lt;br /&gt;Rather than rebuke Elijah, God ministered to His prophet in specific and gracious ways.&lt;br /&gt;•     God spoke to Elijah in a “still small voice” (1 Kings 19:12). Elijah needed to know God cared and the gentle response of the Lord communicated this reality powerfully.&lt;br /&gt;•     God gave Elijah a task to complete (1 Kings 19:15–17). Elijah was sent to anoint two future kings who would bring an end to Ahab and his line. A depressed person often feels overwhelmed. Elijah needed to have a clear and obtainable goal set for him. &lt;br /&gt;•     God gave Elijah a companion, Elisha (1 Kings 19:16). A depressed person typically feels isolated and alone. This certainly describes Elijah, who had complained, “I alone am left.” Elisha would become Elijah’s friend and companion as well as his successor.&lt;br /&gt;•     God gave Elijah perspective (1 Kings 19:18). Elijah was wrong in his belief that all except him had abandoned the Lord. God told him, “I have reserved seven thousand in Israel, all whose knees have not bowed to Baal.”&lt;br /&gt;Truly Elijah was “a man with a nature like ours” (James 5:17), and just as surely God graciously ministered to Elijah. Elijah had given his life to serve God, but God also was dedicated to serve Elijah.&lt;br /&gt;ELIJAH: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Elijah provides us a picture of the prophet as a lonely man—a man dedicated to God in a hostile society. Elijah was bold and brave, but Elijah was merely human. His dedication to God placed strains on him that led to the recorded bout of fear and depression. Elijah’s experience reminds us that while commitment to the Lord may increase the stress in our life, the Lord is committed to us and will meet us in our need. From Elijah we discover much about the cost and the rewards of commitment.&lt;br /&gt;•     Elijah reminds us that we may find ourselves in situations where we feel that we alone have remained faithful to the Lord. Should this happen, we are to be bold and speak up for Him as Elijah did.&lt;br /&gt;•     Elijah reminds us that when we feel weakest God may be the closest to us, ready to whisper to us in a still, small voice.&lt;br /&gt;•     Elijah reminds us that God is never critical of our human limitations. God understands us, and cares. He knows how to provide what we need to go on with life.&lt;br /&gt;•     Elijah reminds us that we need God’s perspective always. However alone we may feel, many others love God equally and share our experiences. &lt;br /&gt;•     Elijah reminds us that we, too, need the companionship of like-minded believers. Today, you and I can find this companionship with others in the church, the body of Christ. Let’s seek fellowship there, that we might offer and receive support.&lt;br /&gt;ELISHA &lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;1 Kings 19; 2 Kings 2–13; &lt;br /&gt;Luke 4:27&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: About 850 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Elisha [ee-LI-shuh; “God is salvation”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;accomplishment: Elisha was the successor of Elijah whose ministry confirmed God’s active presence in Israel.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;ELISHA’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Elisha had a very different ministry from that of Elijah. Elijah’s role as a prophet of judgment was to display God’s power in a time of apostasy. Elisha, his successor, seems to have focused his ministry on a display of God’s grace toward those who would trust Him.&lt;br /&gt;The Old Testament records fourteen miracles of Elisha compared with seven miracles performed by Elijah. These miracles help us sense the healing nature of Elisha’s ministry and their promise of overflowing grace should the Israelites simply turn to Him completely. Here is a list of Elisha’s miracles as reported in 2 Kings:&lt;br /&gt;1.     Elisha separated the waters of the Jordan (2:14)&lt;br /&gt;2.     Elisha healed bitter spring waters (2:21)&lt;br /&gt;3.     Elisha cursed young men who ridiculed God (2:24)&lt;br /&gt;4.     Elisha won a battle for Israel (3:15–26)&lt;br /&gt;5.     Elisha multiplied a poor widow’s oil (4:1–7)&lt;br /&gt;6.     Elisha promised a good woman a child (4:14–17)&lt;br /&gt;7.     Elisha raised the good woman’s child from the dead (4:32–37)&lt;br /&gt;8.     Elisha made poison stew edible (4:38–41)&lt;br /&gt;9.     Elisha multiplied loaves to feed many (4:42–44)&lt;br /&gt;10.     Elisha healed a Syrian general’s leprosy (5:1–19)&lt;br /&gt;11.     Elisha made a borrowed ax head float (6:1–6)&lt;br /&gt;12.     Elisha trapped an Aramean army (6:8–23)&lt;br /&gt;13.     Elisha showed his servant an angel army (6:15–17)&lt;br /&gt;14.     Elisha predicted an excess of food for starving Samaria (6:24–7:20)&lt;br /&gt;These miracles were certainly less spectacular than those performed by Elijah; they were also different in nature. Yet, each prophet’s miracles displayed different aspects of God’s character. God reveals himself in judgment; He also reveals Himself in gracious acts to nations, individuals, and even to enemy generals.&lt;br /&gt;ELISHA: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Elisha replaced Elijah as God’s premier prophet in Israel. When we compare Elisha with his mentor, we come to appreciate the lessons he has to teach us.&lt;br /&gt;•     Elisha had a less spectacular ministry than that of Elijah, but one that was as significant in its revelation of God’s character to His people. He reminds us that we each have our calling and are not to measure ourselves or our mission against that of the great people of our time. The role we play in God’s plan is the role He has designed for us, and this makes us significant indeed.&lt;br /&gt;•     Elisha had a ministry to common people as well as to kings. In every context, Elisha displayed God’s grace and showed that the Lord cares about every detail of our lives. This is important to remember as we serve others. We should bring our ordinary needs to the Lord as well as the big things.&lt;br /&gt;JONAH&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references: &lt;br /&gt;2 Kings 14:25; Jonah;&lt;br /&gt;Matthew 12:39–41; 16:4; &lt;br /&gt;Luke 11:29–32. &lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: About 775 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Jonah [JOH-nuh; “dove”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;accomplishment: Jonah predicted the resurgence of Israel and warned Assyria of impending judgment.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;When told to go north to Nineveh, Jonah boarded a ship going west! It took a storm and a great fish to set Jonah back on God’s path.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;JONAH’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Jonah lived in Israel and predicted the triumphs of Jeroboam II that led to a resurgence of the northern kingdom in the eighth century B.C. His little book relates the story of his reluctance to carry a warning of divine judgment to Nineveh, the capital of Assyria, and what happened when he did deliver the message. Jonah’s famous three-day stay in the belly of a great fish is referred to in the Gospels as a symbol of Christ’s stay in the tomb after His crucifixion.&lt;br /&gt;JONAH’S LIFE AND TIMES&lt;br /&gt;Jonah was a patriot who predicted the victories won by Jeroboam II (2 Kings 14:25). This king of Israel, who is given little space in the Old Testament, was one of the most successful rulers of the northern Hebrew kingdom. During his forty-year rule, Assyria was weak and Israel became the dominant power in the Middle East. Jeroboam II expanded his borders almost to the extent reached in Solomon’s days, and, like Solomon, dominated the trade routes that ran through Damascus.&lt;br /&gt;When God called Jonah to go to Nineveh and announce the destruction of the capital of Israel’s most powerful enemy, he chose to run away instead. Jonah explained his motivation in the little four-chapter book that bears his name. &lt;br /&gt;Ah, LORD, was this not what I said when I was still in my country? Therefore I fled previously to Tarshish; for I know that You are a gracious and merciful God, slow to anger and abundant in loving kindness, One who relents from doing harm (Jon. 4:2).&lt;br /&gt;Jonah’s attempted flight was thwarted, however. God sent two unusual elements: a storm that nearly destroyed the ship on which Jonah had taken passage and a great fish to return the fleeing prophet to land. The next time God spoke, Jonah obeyed. He went to Nineveh, and announced the coming judgment. As Jonah had feared, the people of Nineveh did repent! Jonah sat on a hill outside Nineveh waiting to see what would happen until it became clear that God had chosen to delay the judgment Jonah had announced. Angry and miserable, Jonah begged God to end his life. &lt;br /&gt;Instead, Jonah rebuked his prophet, reminding him that the Lord had pity on “Nineveh, that great city, in which are more than one hundred twenty thousand persons who cannot discern between their right hand and their left—and much livestock” (Jon. 4:11).&lt;br /&gt;Jonah missed the significance of God’s warning and subsequent relenting. Amos, a prophet from Judah, would soon come to Israel and issue God’s indictment of Israel’s sins and call on His own people to repent. Nineveh’s repentance and God’s gracious failure to punish that city was an object lesson for Israel. Surely, if God would be gracious to an enemy of His people, God would be gracious to His own people if only they would repent! However, Israel did not repent. They persisted in their sins. The judgment of which Amos spoke came when Israel fell to Assyria and its people were carried away as captives and were swallowed up in that mighty empire.&lt;br /&gt;JONAH: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Jonah is a prime example of a patriot who knew God well but whose first loyalty was to his nation. He was unwilling to do God’s will when he feared that what God had in mind might conflict with his own hopes for his nation’s future. We have much to learn from Jonah today.&lt;br /&gt;•     Jonah warns us against confusing God’s purposes with our own political or national agendas. We are to be loyal to God and responsive to Him. We must avoid any temptation to “use” God to advance our own purposes.&lt;br /&gt;•     Jonah reminds us that we are to view others as God views them, being as gracious and merciful toward them as He Himself is. Compassion is a quality God values and which we are to nurture as well as express in our relationships with others.&lt;br /&gt;•     Jonah encourages us, in that God overlooked His prophet’s rebellion and gave him a second chance to do His will. God is gracious to us as well as to others. When we rebel, we need to remember that we too can safely return. &lt;br /&gt;WRITING PROPHETS&lt;br /&gt;The ministry of the speaking prophets is described in narrative passages of Scripture. The ministry of the writing prophets, although several are mentioned in Old Testament narrative, is known primarily through the books of the Bible that bear their names. In most cases, we know little about the lives or personalities of the writing prophets other than what their books reveal. This may be little, indeed. For instance, we know that Amos was a rancher of Judah who was sent to Israel with a call for social justice and for Israel to return to the Lord. Aside from what we can sense from the concerns expressed in his little book, we know little about Amos as a person. We know more about other writing prophets, notably Daniel and Jeremiah.&lt;br /&gt;ISAIAH&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;2 Kings 19–20; 2 Chronicles 26:22; &lt;br /&gt;32:30–32; Isaiah 20:2–3; 38:21&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: Isaiah prophesied about 739–681 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Isaiah [I-ZAY-yuh; “Yahweh is salvation”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;achievement: Isaiah penned the great Old Testament book bearing his name, filled with messianic prophecies.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;ISAIAH’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Isaiah was a prophet of Judah, who ministered to the people of the southern kingdom. During his time Assyria’s expansionist policies seriously threatened Judah. This threat, combined with the preaching of Isaiah and Micah and the leadership of godly king Hezekiah, led to a religious revival in Judah. God intervened to turn back the Assyrian forces after Judah was invaded and severely battered. Many of Isaiah’s messages recorded in his book focus on Judah’s sin and injustice and show how greatly the spiritual renewal was needed in Isaiah’s time.&lt;br /&gt;Isaiah’s messages however looked beyond the immediate situation, and portrayed a future in which God, after punishing His people’s sins, would restore and bless the redeemed. Because so many of Isaiah’s images of the future feature the coming Messiah, Isaiah has rightly been called the evangelist of the Old Testament. His significance can be seen in the fact that Isaiah’s words are quoted or referred to some 13 times in the Gospels, three times in Acts, and five times by the apostle Paul in Romans.&lt;br /&gt;ISAIAH’S LIFE AND TIMES&lt;br /&gt;Nelson’s Illustrated Bible Handbook comments on how little we know of Isaiah the man. &lt;br /&gt;He is often mentioned in Kings and Chronicles, and his name occurs several times in his own book. But his family background and social status remains a mystery. The fact that his great personal vision of God took place in the temple (Isa. 6) suggests he may have been a priest, as only priests were to enter the holy place. Isaiah was an intimate of King Hezekiah—probably a sort of court preacher. His mastery of Hebrew is as rich and great as Shakespeare’s grasp of English, and shows he was a highly educated man (p. 282).&lt;br /&gt;While Isaiah at times writes of events in which he played a significant part, Isaiah, unlike Jeremiah, does not go into detail about his emotions. For instance, Isaiah describes the following experience, but makes no comment on his emotions:&lt;br /&gt;“Go, and remove the sackcloth from your body, and take your sandals off your feet.” And he did so, walking naked and barefoot. Then the Lord said, “… My servant Isaiah has walked naked and barefoot three years for a sign and wonder against Egypt and Ethiopia.” (Isa. 20:2, 3)&lt;br /&gt;As Isaiah remained silent about his own feelings, he revealed little about his personal life. We know that Isaiah was married to an unnamed prophetess and that he had children (Isa. 7; 8), but we know nothing about them. Isaiah is the proverbial silent man, who although a very public figure, is at the same time a very private man.&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;Today Bedouins still live in tents much like those that housed Jacob and his family 4,000 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;ISAIAH: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Isaiah’s prominence in his own time and in Scripture contrasts sharply with his reticence. He was a great man but one who felt no need to put himself forward. He had no need for public accolades or to be the center of attention. To serve God faithfully and selflessly was enough for him. We have much to learn from Isaiah.&lt;br /&gt;•     Isaiah reminds us that modesty is a virtue. Serving God is reward enough, without seeking or demanding public acclaim.&lt;br /&gt;•     Isaiah reminds us that while some freely share emotions, others are private individuals. Each personality style is valid and acceptable, and we are not to force others into a way of relating that may be uncomfortable for them.&lt;br /&gt;•     Isaiah encourages us to keep Christ in focus. We should seek to impress others with Him—not with ourselves.&lt;br /&gt;EZEKIEL&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;Ezekiel&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: Prophesied between 593–571 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Ezekiel [ee-ZEE-kee-uhl; “God strengthens”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;accomplishment: Ezekiel ministered to Jews in Babylon before the fall of Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;EZEKIEL’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Ezekiel was taken to Babylon with many other Jews in 597 B.C. He was God’s spokesman to the captive community before the final fall of Jerusalem in 586 B.C., and he warned the captives that Jerusalem and the temple would be destroyed. After the fall of Jerusalem, God gave Ezekiel a message of hope and described a great new temple to be constructed in Jerusalem in the days of the Messiah (Ezek. 40–48).&lt;br /&gt;————————&lt;br /&gt;At their greatest extent the Assyrian and the Babylonian empires dominated the ancient Near East.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;One of the most striking aspects of Ezekiel’s experience is the stunning visions of Himself that God granted to this prophet. These visions of a transcendent God, glorious and all-powerful, strengthened Ezekiel for the many personal trials that lay ahead. &lt;br /&gt;EZEKIEL’S LIFE AND TIMES&lt;br /&gt;Only two verses in the Old Testament identify Ezekiel by name. Each is in the prophet’s own book (1:3; 24:24). At the same time many passages in Ezekiel’s book describe his experiences. Ezekiel was not only given towering visions of God; he also was called to act out God’s messages to the Jewish captives. While some in Babylon held out hope that Judah might be preserved and that they might return home, God’s words through Ezekiel emphasized the depths of Judah’s sins (see Ezek. 8–11), and the certainty of divine judgment. While God would restore His people to the Promised Land in the future, there was no hope for the present generation.&lt;br /&gt;Two incidents reflect ways in which Ezekiel’s experiences were to mirror the fate God had in store for the people of Judah. &lt;br /&gt;Ezekiel acted out the siege of Jerusalem (Ezek. 4; 5). God told Ezekiel to build a model city and lay siege works against it. Ezekiel then was to lie on his side for a fixed number of days and for over a year was to live on a daily ration of some eight ounces of food and a pint of water. Ezekiel’s diet represented the starvation diet of those trapped in Jerusalem by the Babylonian forces.&lt;br /&gt;At the end of this time, Ezekiel shaved his head and beard, and divided it into thirds. Each third represented the fate of Jerusalem’s inhabitants when the city fell.&lt;br /&gt;Ezekiel’s wife died suddenly (Ezek. 24). The prophet was called to do more than act out the fate of others. He was also called to experience the pain of judgment. Ezekiel was warned that his wife, “the desire of your eyes,” would die. God told His prophet, “you shall neither mourn nor weep, nor shall your tears run down. Sigh in silence, make no mourning for the dead; bind your turban on your head, and put your sandals on your feet; do not cover your lips, and do not eat man’s bread of sorrow” (Ezek. 24:16, 17).&lt;br /&gt;This strange behavior at the death of a loved one provoked the wonder of the Jewish community, and Ezekiel explained that this fate—a disaster so great that it was beyond mourning—awaited the Israelites as God’s judgment on His people for their sins.&lt;br /&gt;EZEKIEL: AN EXAMPLE FOR TODAY&lt;br /&gt;Ezekiel reminds us that believers who live in times of national disaster will not be protected from the suffering associated with divine judgment. We may, in fact, be called to speak to our generation out of the pain of personal loss.&lt;br /&gt;•     Ezekiel challenges us to be faithful to God when everything in our life seems to go wrong. God guarantees us an eternity of blessing but not a life of ease or pleasure in this world.&lt;br /&gt;•     Ezekiel reminds us that we are citizens of heaven and of earth. We will not escape suffering when our nation undergoes a purging judgment, but God can use us to speak to our contemporaries at such times.&lt;br /&gt;•     Ezekiel encourages us to keep our eyes fixed on the Lord. Only a clear vision of Him will give us the courage to face our own difficult times with peace and hope.&lt;br /&gt;DANIEL&lt;br /&gt;Scripture references:&lt;br /&gt;The Book of Daniel;&lt;br /&gt;Ezekiel 14:14, 20; 28:3; &lt;br /&gt;Matthew 24; 25; Mark 13:14&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;Date: About 600 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;Name: Daniel [DAN-yuhl; “God is my judge”] &lt;br /&gt;Greatest&lt;br /&gt;Accomplishment: Daniel rose high in the government of two world empires and had a personal impact on at least three of their rulers.&lt;br /&gt;————————❖————————&lt;br /&gt;DANIEL’S ROLE IN SCRIPTURE&lt;br /&gt;Daniel is perhaps best known to Bible students for the prophecies that compose the last half of the Book of Daniel. Fulfilled prophecies in this section outline the history of the East until the appearance of Jesus, and one stunning prophecy even relates Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem. Daniel’s prophecies concerning events associated with history’s end are yet to be fulfilled (Matt. 24 and Mark 13). &lt;br /&gt;Boys and girls in Sunday School are more familiar with Daniel the man whose adventures, such as being thrown in the lion’s den, have captured children’s imaginations for centuries. As a young teen, Daniel and three Jewish friends were taken from Judah to Babylon and enrolled in the school where future administrators of the Babylonian empire were trained. Daniel and his friends remained faithful to God’s law while in Babylon and excelled in their studies. After Daniel successfully interpreted King Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, Daniel became an influential advisor and administrator in his kingdom. Daniel also was influential when the Medo-Persians supplanted the Babylonians as rulers of the vast eastern empire.&lt;br /&gt;Throughout his long life, Daniel remained totally committed to God despite serving a secular state. He was mentioned by Ezekiel, a contemporary, as one of three men noted for their righteousness (Ezek. 14:14, 20), an unusual accolade for a still-living person. In a sarcastic remark addressed to the king of Tyre (Ezek. 28:3), Ezekiel also held up Daniel as the premier example of a truly wise man.&lt;br /&gt;EXPLORING DANIEL’S RELATIONSHIPS&lt;br /&gt;Daniel’s relationship with pagan rulers (Dan. 1–6). Daniel served three different rulers of what was initially the Babylonian Empire. &lt;br /&gt;Daniel and Nebuchadnezzar (Dan. 1; 2; 4). Nebuchadnezzar’s first recorded exposure to Daniel was when Daniel and his friends graduated from the king’s school. Graduation involved an interview with the great ruler himself, and Nebuchadnezzar found Daniel and his friends “ten times better” (Dan 1:10) than not only the other graduates but also his official advisers.&lt;br /&gt;In the second year of his reign, Nebuchadnezzar had a troubling dream. When he awoke, he had forgotten it. The king demanded that his wise men tell him both the dream and its meaning. When none could, the king determined to put all of his advisors to death. When Daniel heard of the king’s decree, he prayed and God revealed the dream and its meaning. Daniel gave full credit to the Lord, and Nebuchadnezzar was deeply impressed, affirming that “your God is the God of gods” (Dan. 2:47). Nebuchadnezzar then “promoted Daniel and gave him great gifts. He made Daniel ruler of the whole province of Babylon and chief administrator over all the wise men of Babylon” (2:48).&lt;br /&gt;Some time later Daniel interpreted another dream that warned Nebuchadnezzar against arrogantly giving himself credit for what God had done in exalting him. Nebuchadnezzar ignored the warning and God drove the ruler mad. For a time, he lived as a wild beast eating grass. When Nebuchadnezzar recovered he “blessed and honored the Most High and praised and honored Him who lives forever” (Dan. 4:34). Many see this response of Nebuchadnezzar as evidence of a true conversion to the Lord—a conversion in which Daniel’s faithful witness played the critical part.&lt;br /&gt;Daniel and Belshazzar (Dan. 5). After Nebuchadnezzar’s death, Daniel’s influenced waned. Belshazzar was regent in Babylon under his father Nabonidus when Medo-Persian forces attacked the city of Babylon. When writing miraculously appeared on a wall during a banquet, Belshazzar was urged to send for Daniel to interpret it. Daniel did interpret it, though it was a message of doom. That night the city fell to the invaders, who diverted a river that flowed through Babylon and entered it through the riverbed.&lt;br /&gt;Daniel and Darius (Dan. 6). Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon, but the Bible identifies a man named Darius subsequently governing the empire from Babylon city.&lt;br /&gt;Darius reorganized the administration of the empire into 120 districts and set Daniel over these high officials. The honest Daniel frustrated the governors, who traditionally relied on graft to enrich themselves, and they set out to rid themselves of Daniel. Through a clever trap they maneuvered Darius into ordering Daniel thrown in a den of lions. The deep concern Dari
